Review Article

The Role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Table 4

Rituximab-based salvage therapy in rituximab-naïve relapsing/refractory DLBCLs.

AuthorYear Pathological phenotypeDLCL (%)TherapyConditioning regimenPFS/EFS (%) OS (%)

Kewalramani [36] 200436
147
WHO 100R-ICE
ICE
* 2y: 54
2y: 43
N.S.2y: 67
2y: 56
N.S.

Sienawski [37] 200719
19
WHO 80R-DHAP1
DHAP1
BEAM2y: 57
2y: 18
0.00512y: 77
2y: 37
0.0051

Vallenga [38] 2008113
112
WHO80.5
78.6
R-DHAP-VIM-DHAP 1
DHAP-VIM-DHAP 1
BEAM2y: 52
2y: 31
0.0022y: 59
2y: 52
N.S.

Mounier [39] 2011 470 WHO 100 N.R. BEAM and others# 5y: 480.001** 5y: 63 N.R.

1Plus radiotherapy at bulky disease.
*The choice of conditioning regimen depended on the patient’s age, the extent of previous therapy and the clinical trials active at the time of transplantation (see [30]).
#See [39].
**Each patient was assessed as his or her own control.
WHO: World Health Organization classification of NHL; R: rituximab; ICE: ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide; DHAP: cisplatin, cytarabine, and dexamethasone; VIM: etoposide, ifosfamide, and methotrexate; BEAM: carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan; N.R.: not reported; N.S.: not significant.