Advances in Hematology

Advances in Hematology / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 604165 | 5 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/604165

A Preliminary Study of the Suitability of Archival Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Smears for Diagnosis of CML Using FISH

Academic Editor: Abdulkareem Almomen
Received14 Jun 2014
Accepted07 Sep 2014
Published22 Sep 2014

Abstract

Background. FISH is a molecular cytogenetic technique enabling rapid detection of genetic abnormalities. Facilities that can run fresh/wet samples for molecular diagnosis and monitoring of neoplastic disorders are not readily available in Ghana and other neighbouring countries. This study aims to demonstrate that interphase FISH can successfully be applied to archival methanol-fixed bone marrow and peripheral blood smear slides transported to a more equipped facility for molecular diagnosis of CML. Methods. Interphase FISH was performed on 22 archival methanol-fixed marrow (BM) and 3 peripheral blood (PB) smear slides obtained at diagnosis. The BM smears included 20 CML and 2 CMML cases diagnosed by morphology; the 3 PB smears were from 3 of the CML patients at the time of diagnosis. Six cases had known BCR-ABL fusion results at diagnosis by RQ-PCR. Full blood count reports at diagnosis were also retrieved. Result. 19 (95%) of the CML marrow smears demonstrated the BCR-ABL translocation. There was a significant correlation between the BCR-ABL transcript detected at diagnosis by RQ-PCR and that retrospectively detected by FISH from the aged BM smears at diagnosis (; ). Conclusion. Archival methanol-fixed marrow and peripheral blood smears can be used to detect the BCR-ABL transcript for CML diagnosis.

1. Background

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is a sensitive molecular cytogenetic technique that enables rapid detection of chromosomal abnormalities in pathological samples for accurate diagnosis, detection of submicroscopic deletions, risk stratification, detection of minimal residual disease, and assessment of response to therapy. Unlike conventional cytogenetic techniques which require metaphase nuclei (dividing cells), FISH can be applied to nondividing interphase nuclei; hence, uncultured cells can be used [1, 2]. This makes it a useful tool in most fields for studying neoplastic disorders such as chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). The various chromosomal abnormalities can be detected in interphase nuclei using the appropriate DNA FISH probe set [3].

A wide range of specimens such as peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate for metaphase cell preparation; uncultured interphase cells from archival bone marrow and blood smears, paraffin-embedded tissue sections or disaggregated cells from paraffin blocks, frozen tissue, cells from lymph node aspirates or solid tumours can all be used for the analysis [36]. Previous studies had proved interphase FISH as a valuable and reliable contemporary approach for retrospective studies especially when fresh samples are not available, more so when additional investigative information is required to determine an underlying molecular transformation for both diagnostic and research purposes [4].

Currently, medical laboratory practice in Ghana, like other West African countries, focuses more on the diagnosis of common infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis due to their overwhelming burden coupled with their associated social and economic challenges [7]. The underfunding of public laboratories in Ghana due to the social and economic constraints makes it difficult to develop and apply current molecular technologies for diagnosis; as a result, laboratory practitioners depend largely on morphology to diagnose malignancies using various stains. Molecular techniques such as FISH, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), and flow cytometry are generally not available for routine clinical use. However, recent WHO (World Health Organization) classification of tumours especially haemopoietic and lymphoid neoplasms requires the detection of chromosomal abnormalities for accurate diagnosis and management [8].

Chronic myeloid leukaemia is a haematologic malignancy associated with a balanced reciprocal translocation between the Abelson leukaemia virus gene (ABL) on chromosome 9 and the break-point cluster region gene (BCR) on chromosome 22 forming the BCR-ABL fusion gene. The product of the BCR-ABL gene (the bcr-abl protein) is a constitutively active tyrosine kinase, which is responsible for the pathogenesis of CML [9]. Detection and monitoring of the BCR-ABL transcripts are essential for CML diagnosis and evaluation of patient’s response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as Imatinib [10]. The t(9;22) chromosomal abnormality occurs in more than 95% of cases. Interphase FISH is useful in confirming the presence of the translocation [2]. In Ghana, CML accounts for 12.8% of all cases of adult leukaemia but there was no standardized method for molecular diagnosis and monitoring for minimal residual disease at the time of this study [11]. In resource-constrained countries, there is a diagnostic vacuum when it is not possible to carry out these diagnostic procedures due to lack of resources; fresh samples have to be transported to more resourced countries for analysis at great cost. This study therefore sought to determine the usefulness of transporting archival methanol fixed bone marrow and peripheral blood smears to a well-resourced country for molecular diagnosis of CML.

2. Methods

The study was retrospective. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee of the University of Ghana Medical School. Twenty-two (22) archival methanol-fixed bone marrow (BM) and 3 peripheral blood (PB) smear slides at diagnosis from the haematology laboratory of Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana, were retrieved. Completely air-dried and well labelled BM and PB smears with monolayers were fixed in absolute methanol by immersion for 1 minute and allowed to air dry. Each patient’s methanol-fixed smears (about 4–6 smears) were wrapped in “non-woven instrument wrap paper”, labelled with the patient’s unique identification number for easy retrieval. It was then packed into a box for storage in the laboratory at room temperature. The BM smears were made up of 20 CML and 2 CMML cases diagnosed between February 2007 and January 2011; the 3 PB smears were from 3 of the CML patients at the time of diagnosis; the slides had been stored for between 10 and 48 months. The corresponding full blood count (FBC) report at diagnosis was also retrieved. Initial diagnosis for these patients was made on the basis of clinical findings and morphological examination of Leishman stained peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate smears. Six of the CML cases had known BCR-ABL fusion results (using fresh peripheral blood) at diagnosis made by RQ-PCR outside Ghana. Fisher exact test was used to determine the correlation between the BCR-ABL transcript detected by RQ-PCR at diagnosis and that detected by FISH from the aged smears at diagnosis. The statistical significance was set at . Metaphase FISH was performed on control cells; in addition, direct blood smears were prepared from the peripheral blood control for interphase FISH analysis.

2.1. Tissue Culture on Control Cells

Commercially prepared BCR-ABL fusion positive cell line in blast crisis (BV173) and a peripheral blood from a single BCR-ABL transcript negative volunteer were used as control. Tissue culture was performed in RPMI 1640 medium [12].

2.2. Pretreatment of Smears and Dropped Cells

The direct smear slides were pretreated by immersion in methanol for 1 minute, incubated in 2x standard saline citrate (2x SSC) at room temperature (RT) for 5 minutes, and digested in 0.05 mg/mL pepsin/10 mmol/HCl at 37°C for 5–10 minutes. It was then incubated in 2x SSC for 5 minutes rinsed in double distilled water and observed under a phase contrast microscope to ensure adequate lysis of the red blood cells. If red blood cells remained, an additional pepsin treatment was repeated. At this point, the desired areas for hybridization with the least amount of cell clumps were selected as previously described [4]. Glacial acetic acid: methanol fixative (1 : 3 ratios) was used to lyse red cell for direct peripheral blood control smears aged less than 3 weeks as well as two BM and one of the PB smear. Smears were then fixed in 1% formaldehyde, rinsed in 1x phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and dehydrated in 70%, 80%, and absolute ethanol [4].

2.3. FISH

FISH was performed using Vysis LSI BCR/ABL Dual Color, Dual Fusion Translocation DNA Probe (Downers Grove, IL, USA). The probe was validated by standard procedure. Hybridization and posthybridization wash conditions followed the manufacturer’s protocol. Finally, the cells were counterstained with DAPI II.

Hybridized cells were examined through a Zeiss Axio fluorescence microscope using Vysis filter sets: DAPI/Spectrum Orange dual bandpass and DAPI/Spectrum Green dual bandpass, and images were captured using Axio Imager Z2 Vision 4.0 software. A total of one hundred (100) interphase nuclei were analysed per slide. The cut-off value for a positive signal was 1% [13]. Cells lacking BCR-ABL translocation displayed two red (R) signals, corresponding to the ABL probe, and two green (G) signals, corresponding to the BCR probe. Thus, a normal cell had 2R2G signal pattern. Cells with a balanced BCR-ABL translocation displayed two fusions (F) of red and green signals as well as one green and one red signal. Thus, a typical positive signal pattern for the BCR-ABL fusion showed 2F1R1G. The degree of positivity for BCR-ABL transcript was scored for each slide as percentages.

3. Results

3.1. Peripheral Blood Features at Diagnosis

The CML cases comprised of 5 females and 15 males, and the median age at diagnosis was 36 yrs (Range: 20–67 yrs). All the subjects showed marked leukocytosis in the range of 20.7–636.8 × 109/L and anaemia, shown in Table 1. Anaemia, defined as haemoglobin level less than 12 g/dL [14], was observed in all the subjects. The platelet count was normal (150–450 × 109/L) in 8 (40%) subjects, low (less than 150 × 109/L) in two (10%) subjects, and high (greater than 450 × 109/L) in 10 (50%) subjects.


Parameter Study subject, Ranges
Median

Leucocyte count (×109/L)253.120.7–636.8
Platelet count (×109/L)446.2
46.0–1051.0
Haemoglobin (g/dL)8.2
5.2–11.5
Neutrophils (%)**67.6
45.7–89.3
Eosinophils (%)**2.2
0.1–12.3
Basophils (%)**4.5
0.0–25.0

Table 1 shows the full blood count profile of the 20 subjects at diagnosis. NB: % = percentage. **Absolute values for the differential counts were not available for majority of subjects at diagnosis; hence, percentage differential count was used.
3.2. Interphase FISH

Interphase FISH analysis was carried out in 20 CML and 2 CMML patients. Nineteen (95%) out of the 20 CML bone marrow slides at diagnosis demonstrated the BCR-ABL translocation. The percentage means score ± SD for the BCR-ABL positive smears at diagnosis was (Range: 70.0–98.0%). The two CMML subjects were BCR-ABL negative. The major scoring signal patterns obtained for the BCR-ABL positive smears were categorized into 3 groups: 1 () showed the classical 2F1R1G (Figure 1(d)); group 2 () showed one fusion, one red, and two green (1F1R2G) indicating ABL deletion; group 3 () showed one fusion, two red, and one green 1F2R1G (Figure 1(e)) indicating BCR deletion. There was a significant correlation between the BCR-ABL transcript detected at diagnosis by RQ-PCR using fresh peripheral blood and that retrospectively detected by FISH from the aged bone marrow smears at diagnosis (; by fisher exact test). Two of the PB smears showed the BCR-ABL translocation, and the major scoring signal was the classical 2F1R1G, with 2F1R (Figure 1(f)) as a minor scoring signal in one of the PB smears, a similar signal was seen in its corresponding BM smear. The third PB smear was negative (Figure 1(c)) (it’s corresponding BM smear was also BCR-ABL negative).

4. Discussion

With the discovery of molecular markers for some neoplastic disorders, accurate assessment of the genetic characteristics of these malignancies is the hallmark for decisions on prognosis and clinical management especially with regard to targeted molecular therapies [4]. The need to identify and correlate these individual tumor features becomes a challenge when fresh pathological samples are not available or when it is not possible to carry out diagnostic procedure due to lack of resources. In resource-constrained countries, these samples may have to be transported to more resourced countries for analysis. Fresh peripheral blood samples or bone marrow aspirates that are normally relied on in the field of haematology often possess transportation challenges due to sample degradation.

Previous studies had revealed an excellent agreement in the detection and quantitation of the BCR-ABL translocation from results obtained from interphase cells of cultured bone marrow aspirate and peripheral blood [1]. This study was performed to determine the usefulness of interphase FISH as a reliable, reproducible, and quantitative molecular diagnostic technique on methanol fixed archival bone marrow and peripheral blood smears stored at room temperature which can be transported to a better equipped laboratory without fear of sample degradation.

The data obtained shows that the majority (89%) of the subjects showed the classical BCR-ABL dual fusion (2F1R1G) pattern at diagnosis. Approximately 11% demonstrated the unusual signal patterns 1F1R2G suggesting ABL deletion and 1F2R1G suggesting BCR deletion. Such deletions have been reported in 10–15% of patients and may confer a poor prognosis in CML patients in the advanced phase [15, 16]. There was a significant correlation between the BCR-ABL transcripts levels detected at diagnosis by RQ-PCR in six CML patients using fresh peripheral blood samples prior to commencement of treatment and their corresponding archival bone marrow smears at diagnosis using interphase FISH. This implies that aged methanol fixed bone marrow smear specimens are as reliable as fresh blood specimens, for quantification of the leukaemia burden at diagnosis. Hence, methanol fixed bone marrow and peripheral blood smears can conveniently be used for the diagnosis of CML using FISH technique. This study demonstrated that BCR-ABL transcript could be detected by FISH using aged bone marrow and peripheral blood smears.

Interphase FISH technique was applied directly without tissue culture to methanol fixed bone marrow and peripheral blood smears (stored at room temperature) retrieved from the haematology laboratory. This makes this technique rapid, simple, and less expensive since culture and other logistics will not be required.

However, thin films (smears) with monolayer sections treated with glacial acetic acid/methanol fixative for red cell lysis gave a better result, and although some red cells are not lysed, all the white cells remain intact. Also, the pepsin digestion step has to be monitored since overdigestion can lead to loss of all the cells on the slide.

5. Conclusions

The result confirms that archival bone marrow and peripheral blood smears can successfully be used to detect and quantify the BCR-ABL transcript to diagnose CML. The BCR-ABL fusion was reliably detected. This has significant implications for the setting-up of regional diagnostic centres of excellence in the main referral hospital, in Ghana as well as in the African continent. Since it may not be feasible in the near future to establish well-equipped medical laboratories in all regional hospitals, samples from the other regions in Ghana and even neighbouring countries can be collected, fixed, and sent to these centres, where molecular diagnosis will be made and the results relayed promptly via the internet. This will greatly improve the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of response to treatment of many malignant diseases on the continent. We recommend carrying further studies with a larger sample size to determine how long methanol fixed marrow and peripheral smears can be stored at room temperature before degradation set in.

Abbreviations

CML:Chronic myeloid leukaemia
CMML:Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia
FISH:Fluorescent in situ hybridization
RQ-PCR:Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction
BCR:Break-point cluster region gene
ABL:Abelson leukaemia virus gene.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Ivy Ekem, Edeghonghon E. Olayemi, Alice Charwudzi, and Olufunmilayo Olopade planned the study. Alice Charwudzi, Mariann M. Coyle, Amma Anima Benneh, and Emmanuel Allote Allotey conducted the pilot study and the initial literature review. Alice Charwudzi, Olufunmilayo Olopade, and Mariann M. Coyle implemented the study. Olufunmilayo Olopade and Alice Charwudzi provided financial support. All authors commented on the paper. All authors read and approved the final paper. All authors contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors are extremely grateful to the Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva, for providing a training grant, staff of Professor Olopade’s laboratory for financial support and training, the late Professor Janet Rowley’s laboratory for providing BV173 cell line, and the Cytogenetics laboratory for their support, all of the University of Chicago. Special thanks are due to Mr. Ekow Aidoo who stored the smear slides used and Mr. Christopher Nyimba for assisting in the retrieval of the smear slides, all of the Haematology Department of Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital.

References

  1. S. Le Gouill, P. Talmant, N. Milpied et al., “Fluorescence in situ hybridization on peripheral-blood specimens is a reliable method to evaluate cytogenetic response in chronic myeloid leukemia,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1533–1538, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  2. G. W. Dewald, “Interphase FISH studies of chronic myeloid leukemia,” in Molecular Cytogenetic, Y. S. Fan, Ed., pp. 311–342, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  3. D. J. Wolff, A. Bagg, L. D. Cooley et al., “Guidance for fluorescence in situ hybridization testing in hematologic disorders,” Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 134–143, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. V. Bedell, S. J. Forman, K. Gaal, V. Pullarkat, L. M. Weiss, and M. L. Slovak, “Successful application of a direct detection slide-based sequential phenotype/genotype assay using archived bone marrow smears and paraffin embedded tissue sections,” Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 589–597, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. L. Nguyen, D. C. Arthur, C. E. Litz, and R. D. Brunning, “Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detection of trisomy 8 in myeloid cells in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): a study of archival blood and bone marrow smears,” Leukemia, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1654–1662, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S. F. Paternoster, S. R. Brockman, R. F. McClure, E. D. Remstein, P. J. Kurtin, and G. W. Dewald, “A new method to extract nuclei from paraffin-embedded tissue to study lymphomas using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 160, no. 6, pp. 1967–1972, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. O. A. Adeyi, “Pathology services in developing countriesthe West African experience,” Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 183–186, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. W. Vardiman, J. Thiele, D. A. Arber et al., “The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 937–951, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. W. Deininger, J. M. Goldman, and J. V. Melo, “The molecular biology of chronic myeloid leukemia,” Blood, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 3343–3356, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  10. H. Kantarjian, C. Schiffer, D. Jones, and J. Cortes, “Monitoring the response and course of chronic myeloid leukemia in the modern era of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors: practical advice on the use and interpretation of monitoring methods,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 1774–1780, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. I. Ekem, “Haematological malignancies in Korle Bu teaching hospital,” Turkish Journal of Hematology, supplement 22, p. 330, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  12. A. D. White, B. M. Jones, R. E. Clark, and A. Jacobs, “Chromosome aberrations following cytotoxic therapy in patients in complete remission from lymphoma,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1095–1099, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. Testoni, G. Marzocchi, S. Luatti et al., “Chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective comparison of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome banding analysis for the definition of complete cytogenetic response: a study of the GIMEMA CML WP,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 24, pp. 4939–4943, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. F. S. Asobayire, P. Adou, L. Davidsson, J. D. Cook, and R. F. Hurrell, “Prevalence of iron deficiency with and without concurrent anemia in population groups with high prevalences of malaria and other infections: a study in Côte d'lvoire1-3,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 776–782, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  15. P. B. Sinclair, E. P. Nacheva, M. Leversha et al., “Large deletions at the t(9;22) breakpoint are common and may identify a poor-prognosis subgroup of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia,” Blood, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 738–744, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. Quintás-Cardama, H. Kantarjian, J. Shan et al., “Prognostic impact of deletions of derivative chromosome 9 in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with nilotinib or dasatinib,” Cancer, vol. 117, no. 22, pp. 5085–5093, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Alice Charwudzi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1843 Views | 527 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.