Research Article
Prognostic Impact of Lymphoid Enhancer Factor 1 Expression and Serum Galectin.3 in Egyptian AML Patients
Table 1
Baseline patients characteristic.
| Characteristic | Value |
| Age (Mean ± SD, range) | 45.74 + 15.98 (18–81) |
| Male, (%) | 36 (52.2%) |
| WBC × 109/L (Mean ± SD, range) | 73.19 ± 72.95 (0.6–300) |
| HB g/L (Mean ± SD, range) | 8.01 ± 1.95 (3.8–14.2) |
| Plt × 109/L (Mean ± SD, range) | 54.27 ± 50.18 (3–320) |
| BM blast% (Mean ± SD, range) | 69.52 ± 22.58 (25–100) |
| FAB subtypes, (%) | M0 | 1 (1.4%) | M1 | 7 (10.1%) | M2 | 27 (39.1%) | M4 | 13 (18.8%) | M5 | 19 (27.5%) | M6 | 2 (2.9%) |
| FLT3.ITD mutation status, (%) | Unmutated | 40 (58%) | Mutated | 19 (27.5%) | Missing data | 10 (14.5%) |
| NPM1 mutation status, (%) | Unmutated | 39 (56.5%) | Mutated | 20 (29%) | Missing data | 10 (14.5%) |
| Risk, (%) | Favorable risk | 17 (24.6%) | Intermediate risk | 23 (33.3%) | Poor risk | 19 (27.5%) | Missing data | 10 (14.5%) |
| Response (%) | Achieve 1st complete response (CR) | 57 (82.6%) |
| Relapse/refractory disease, (%) | Relapse/refractory | 38 (55.1%) |
|
|