Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 121494, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/121494
Research Article

Cognitive Load in eCommerce Applications—Measurement and Effects on User Satisfaction

1Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62a, 4055 Basel, Switzerland
2IV-Stelle Basel-Stadt, Lange Gasse 7, 4052 Basel, Switzerland

Received 15 October 2008; Accepted 24 February 2009

Academic Editor: Richard Kline

Copyright © 2009 Peter Schmutz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Baddeley and G. Hitch, “Working memory,” in Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation, G. Bower, Ed., pp. 47–90, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Nielsen, “Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94), pp. 152–158, Boston, Mass, USA, April 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. B. Shneiderman and C. Plaisant, Designing the User Interface, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 2004.
  4. S. Leuthold, J. A. Bargas-Avila, and K. Opwis, “Beyond web content accessibility guidelines: design of enhanced text user interfaces for blind internet users,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 257–270, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. T. Stewart and D. Travis, “Guidelines, standards, and style guides,” in The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, J. Jacko and A. Sears, Eds., pp. 991–1005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, UK, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Shneiderman, Designing the User Interface, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass, USA, 1998.
  7. T. Mandel, The Elements of User Interface Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  8. G. A. Miller, “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information,” Psychological Review, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 81–97, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Sweller, “Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning,” Cognitive Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 257–285, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Larkin, J. McDermott, D. P. Simon, and H. A. Simon, “Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems,” Science, vol. 208, no. 4450, pp. 1335–1342, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. W. Chase and H. Simon, “The mind's eye in chess,” in Visual Information Processing, pp. 215–281, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Bruner, “The art of discovery,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Baddeley, Working Memory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1986.
  14. J. Sweller, R. F. Mawer, and M. R. Ward, “Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 639–661, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. E. Owen and J. Sweller, “What do students learn while solving mathematics problems?,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 272–284, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. N. Cowan, Working Memory Capacity, Essays in Cognitive Psychology, Psychology Press, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  17. F. Paas, A. Renkl, and J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Sweller and P. Chandler, “Why some material is difficult to learn,” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 185–233, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. J. Conklin, “Hypertext: an introduction and survey,” Computer, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 17–41, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. W. P. Eveland, Jr. and S. Dunwoody, “User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load?,” Communication Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 48–78, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. A. Katz and M. D. Byrne, “Effects of scent and breadth on use of site-specific search on e-commerce web sites,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 198–220, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. Y. Métrailler, J. Bargas-Avila, P. Schmutz, and K. Opwis, “Search or browse: how do people behave while navigating on e-commerce websites?,” in Proceedings of the German Cognitive Science Conference (KogWis '05), K. Opwis and I.-K. Penner, Eds., pp. 137–140, Schwabe, Basel, Switzerland, September 2005.
  23. A. Chevalier and M. Kicka, “Web designers and web users: influence of the ergonomic quality of the web site on the information search,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1031–1048, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Brünken, J. L. Plass, and D. Leutner, “Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. F. Paas, J. E. Tuovinen, H. Tabbers, and P. W. M. Van Gerven, “Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. S. G. Hart and L. Staveland, “Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research,” in Human Mental Workload, P. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds., pp. 239–250, North-Holland Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  27. N. Stanton, P. Salmon, G. Walker, C. Baber, and D. Jenkins, Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design, Ashgate, Hampshire, UK, 2005.
  28. R. Brünken, S. Steinbacher, W. Schnotz, and D. Leutner, “Mentale Modelle und Effekte der Präsentations- und Abrufkodalität beim Lernen mit Multimedia,” Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. E. Awh, J. Jonides, E. E. Smith, E. H. Schumacher, R. A. Koeppe, and S. Katz, “Dissociation of storage and rehearsal in verbal working memory: evidence from positron emission tomography,” Psychological Science, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. M. A. Just, P. A. Carpenter, and A. Miyake, “Neuroindices of cognitive workload: neuroimaging, pupillometric and event-related potential studies of brain work,” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol. 4, no. 1-2, pp. 56–88, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. R. R. Whelan, “Neuroimaging of cognitive load in instructional multimedia,” Educational Research Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. C. D. Wickens, “Processing resources in attention,” in Varieties of Attention, R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davies, Eds., pp. 63–102, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  33. D. T. Gilbert, B. W. Pelham, and D. S. Krull, “On cognitive busyness: when person perceivers meet persons perceived,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 733–740, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. B. Shiv and A. Fedorikhin, “Spontaneous versus controlled influences of stimulus-based affect on choice behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 342–370, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. R. Brünken, S. Steinbacher, J. L. Plass, and D. Leutner, “Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology,” Experimental Psychology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 109–119, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. P. Chandler and J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction,” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 293–332, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. S. Dennis, R. McArthur, and P. Bruza, “Searching the world wide web made easy? The cognitive load imposed by query refinement mechanisms,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Document Computing Symposium (ADCS '98), pp. 65–71, Sydney, Australia, August 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. Joseph, J. Yukawa, D. Suthers, and V. Harada, “Searching emergent vocabularies: exploring methods to reduce cognitive load during web navigation and resource contribution,” in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '06), vol. 7, p. 154a, Kauai, Hawaii, USA, January 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. J. Kjeldskov and J. Stage, “New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 60, no. 5-6, pp. 599–620, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. Y. L. Theng, M. Jones, and H. W. Thimbleby, “Reducing information overload: a comparative study of hypertext systems,” in Proceedings of the IEE Colloquium on Information Overload, pp. 1–4, London, UK, November 1995.
  41. K. Hornbæk, “Current practice in measuring usability: challenges to usability studies and research,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 79–102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. S. Chaiken, A. Liberman, and A. H. Eagly, “Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context,” in Unintended Thought, J. Uleman and J. Bargh, Eds., pp. 212–252, Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  43. G. Gigerenzer, “Fast and frugal heuristics: the tools of bounded rationality,” in Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, D. J. Koehler and N. Harvey, Eds., pp. 62–88, Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. P. Pirolli and S. Card, “Information foraging,” Psychological Review, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 643–675, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. M. Pagendarm and H. Schaumburg, “Why are users banner-blind? The impact of navigation style on the perception of web banners,” Journal of Digital Information, vol. 2, no. 1, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  46. K. Hornbæk and E. L.-C. Law, “Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures,” in Proceedings of the 25th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), pp. 617–626, San Jose, Calif, USA, April 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar