Assessment of Learners’ Motivation during Interactions with Serious Games: A Study of Some Motivational Strategies in Food-Force

Table 2

Results of Friedman’s ANOVA by ranks.

(a)  

Motivation	Mean	Median	SD	Chi-Square	Sig. P
Mission 1	55,14	55	10,347	4,657	.000*
Mission 2	54,66	55	11,321
Mission 3	52,00	50	11,206
Mission 4	58,93	62	10,535
Mission 5	56,45	54	10,377

*Significance at the .001 level.

(b)  

Attention	Mean	Median	SD	Chi-Square	Sig. P
Mission 1	14,334	15	3,351	19,512	.001*
Mission 2	16,310	18	3,883
Mission 3	16,000	17	3,595
Mission 4	16,862	17	3,090
Mission 5	17,620	19	3,121

*Significance at the .01 level.

(c)  

Relevance	Mean	Median	SD	Chi-Square	Sig. P
Mission 1	12,689	14	5,745	7,379	.117
Mission 2	11,000	9	5,855
Mission 3	9,482	7	5,369
Mission 4	12,620	12	5,747
Mission 5	10,758	10	4,852

*Significance at the .05 level.

(d)  

Confidence	Mean	Median	SD	Chi-Square	Sig. P
Mission 1	14,689	16	4,629	16,833	.002*
Mission 2	12,655	14	4,760
Mission 3	11,241	12	4,725
Mission 4	14,586	16	4,452
Mission 5	12,344	14	4,466

*Significance at the .01 level.

(e)  

Satisfaction	Mean	Median	SD	Chi-Square	Sig. P
Mission 1	13,413	14	2,872	10,852	.028*
Mission 2	14,689	15	3,495
Mission 3	15,275	16	3,463
Mission 4	14,862	15	2,812
Mission 5	15,724	15	2,986

*Significance at the .05 level.