Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2013, Article ID 180192, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/180192
Research Article

Designing Interactive Applications to Support Novel Activities

1Singapore University of Technology and Design, 20 Dover Drive, Singapore 138682
2Institute of Visual Informatics (IVI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
3Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI) and University of Amsterdam, Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 18 February 2013; Revised 19 May 2013; Accepted 22 May 2013

Academic Editor: Kerstin S. Eklundh

Copyright © 2013 Hyowon Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. G. M. Snoek, M. Worring, O. D. Rooij, K. E. A. van de Sande, R. Yan, and A. G. Hauptmann, “VideOlympics: real-time evaluation of multimedia retrieval systems,” IEEE Multimedia, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 86–91, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. A. Sadlier, H. Lee, C. Gurrin, A. F. Smeaton, and N. E. O'Connor, “User-feedback on a feature-rich photo organiser,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services (WIAMIS '08), pp. 215–218, City University, May 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. G. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Blighe, S. Sav, H. Lee, and N. O'Connor, “Mo Músaem Fíorúil: a web-based search and information service for museum visitors,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR '08), pp. 25–27, Povoa de Varzim, Portugal, June 2008.
  5. H. Lee, A. F. Smeaton, N. E. O'Connor et al., “Constructing a SenseCam visual diary as a media process,” Multimedia Systems, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 341–349, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Boreczky, A. Girgensohn, G. Golovchinsky, and S. Uchihashi, “Interactive comic book presentation for exploring video,” in Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00), pp. 185–192, ACM Press, April 2000. View at Scopus
  7. N. Caprani, A. R. Doherty, H. Lee, A. F. Smeaton, N. E. O'Connor, and C. Gurrin, “Designing a touch-screen SenseCam browser to support an aging population,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10), pp. 4291–4296, ACM Press, April 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Norman and R. Verganti, Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research Versus Technology and Meaning Change, Nielsen Norman Group, 2012, http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/incremental_and_radi.html.
  9. P. Hekkert, D. Snelders, and P. C. W. van Wieringen, “'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design,” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 111–124, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. K. Hung and L. L. Chen, “Effects of novelty and its dimensions on aesthetic preference in product design,” International Journal of Design, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 81–90, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Fallman, “The interaction design research triangle of design practice, design studies, and design exploration,” Design Issues, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 4–18, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Ljungblad and L. E. Holmquist, “Transfer scenarios: grounding innovation with marginal practices,” in Proceedings of the 25th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), pp. 737–746, ACM, May 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. E. Holmquist, Grounded Innovation: Strategies for Creating Digital Products, Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, Mass, USA, 2012.
  14. S. Bly and E. Churchill, “Design through matchmaking: technology in search of users,” Interactions, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 23–31, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  15. Y. Rogers and V. Bellotti, “Grounding blue-sky research: how can ethnography help?” Interactions, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 58–63, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  16. Y. Rogers, M. Scaife, E. Harris et al., “Things aren't what they seem to be: Innovation through technology inspiration,” in Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '02), pp. 373–378, ACM, June 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Davidoff, M. K. Lee, A. Dey, and J. Zimmerman, “Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '07), J. Krumm et al., Ed., vol. 4717 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 429–446, Springer.
  18. H. Hutchinson, W. Mackay, B. Westerlund et al., “Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), pp. 17–24, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla, USA, April 2003. View at Scopus
  19. G. Iacucci, K. Kuutti, and M. Ranta, “On the move with a magic thing: Role playing in concept design of mobile services and devices,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 193–202, Brooklyn, NY, USA, August 2000. View at Scopus
  20. W. Odom, J. Zimmerman, S. Davidoff, J. Forlizzi, A. Dey, and M. K. Lee, “A fieldwork of the future with user enactments,” in Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 338–347, ACM, Newcastle, UK, June 2012.
  21. W. Gaver, J. Bowers, A. Boucher, A. Law, S. Pennington, and N. Villar, “The history tablecloth: Illuminating domestic activity,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '06), pp. 199–208, ACM, June 2006. View at Scopus
  22. H. Lee, “Issues in designing novel applications for emerging multimedia technologies,” in Proceeding of the 6th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering (USAB '10), vol. 6389 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 411–426, Klagenfurt, Austria, November 2010.
  23. H. Lee and A. F. Smeaton, “Establishing design knowledge for emerging interaction platforms,” in Proceeding of the 4th World Conference on Design Research (IASDR '11), pp. 1–11, Delft, The Netherlands, October-November 2011.
  24. P. Sengere and B. Gaver, “Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '06), pp. 99–108, ACM Press, University Park, Pa, USA, June 2006. View at Scopus
  25. J. Zimmerman, E. Stolterman, and J. Forlizzi, “An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '10), pp. 310–319, Aarhus, Denmark, August 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. I. Koskinen, J. Zimmerman, T. Binder, J. Redstrom, and S. Wensveen, Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom, Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, Mass, USA, 2011.
  27. D. Schon, Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  28. N. Cross, “Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science,” Design Issues, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 49–55, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  29. B. Lawson, How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, Architectural Press, Burlington, Mass, USA, 4th edition, 2006.
  30. B. Lawson and K. Dorst, Design Expertise, Architectural Press, Oxford, UK, 2009.
  31. D. Norman, The Design of Future Things, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
  32. J. Gothelf and J. Seiden, Lean UX: Applying Lean Principles to Improve User Experience, O'Reilly Media, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2013.
  33. S. Greenberg and B. Buxton, “Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time),” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), pp. 111–120, ACM Press, April 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. R. Olsen Jr., “Evaluating user interface systems research,” in Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '07), pp. 251–258, ACM Press, Newport, RI, USA, October 2007.