Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2014, Article ID 946239, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/946239
Research Article

The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion

1Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Seminarstraße 20, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany
2Social and Media Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Straße 2, 50931 Cologne, Germany

Received 28 May 2014; Revised 22 October 2014; Accepted 8 November 2014; Published 25 November 2014

Academic Editor: Francesco Bellotti

Copyright © 2014 Kai-Christoph Hamborg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, AP Professional, Boston, Mass, USA, 1993.
  2. J. A. Bargas-Avila and K. Hornbæk, “Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges? A critical analysis of empirical studies of User Experience,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), pp. 2689–2698, ACM, New York, NY, USA, May 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Rogers, H. Sharp, and J. Preece, Interaction Design, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 3rd edition, 2011.
  4. M. Hassenzahl and A. Monk, “The inference of perceived usability from beauty,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 235–260, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky, “User experience—a research agenda,” Behaviour and Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 91–97, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. ISO 9241-210, Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction—Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems, ISO, Geneve, Switzerland, 2010.
  7. T. Lavie and N. Tractinsky, “Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 269–298, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Tractinsky, A. S. Katz, and D. Ikar, “What is beautiful is usable,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 127–145, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Diefenbach and M. Hassenzahl, “The “beauty dilemma”: beauty is valued but discounted in product choice,” in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), pp. 1419–1426, Boston, Mass, USA, April 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. N. Tuch, S. P. Roth, K. Hornbæk, K. Opwis, and J. A. Bargas-Avila, “Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1596–1607, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Hassenzahl, “The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 319–349, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. van Schaik and J. Ling, “Modelling user experience with web sites: usability, hedonic value, beauty and goodness,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 419–432, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. van Schaik, M. Hassenzahl, and J. Ling, “User-experience from an inference perspective,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 19, no. 2, article 11, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Ben-Bassat, J. Meyer, and N. Tractinsky, “Economic and subjective measures of the perceived value of aesthetics and usability,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 210–234, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Lee and R. J. Koubek, “Understanding user preferences based on usability and aesthetics before and after actual use,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 530–543, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Sonderegger and J. Sauer, “The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effects on user performance and perceived usability,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Sonderegger, G. Zbinden, A. Uebelbacher, and J. Sauer, “The influence of product aesthetics and usability over the course of time: a longitudinal field experiment,” Ergonomics, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 713–730, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Thüring and S. Mahlke, “Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human-technology interaction,” International Journal of Psychology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 253–264, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Hassenzahl, M. Burmester, and F. Koller, “Attrak Diff: ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommerner hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität,” in Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, J. Ziegler and G. Szwillus, Eds., pp. 187–196, Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. McCurdy, C. Connors, G. Pyrzak, B. Kanefsky, and A. Vera, “Breaking the fidelity barrier: an examination of our current characterization of prototypes and an example of a mixed-fidelity success,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), pp. 1233–1242, Montreal, Canada, April 2006. View at Scopus
  21. M. Hassenzahl, “The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 481–499, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Gilovich, D. Keltner, and R. E. Nisbett, Social Psychology, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  23. R. R. Hall, “Prototyping for usability of new technology,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 485–501, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. P. Archer and Y. Yuan, “Comparing telephone-computer interface designs: are software simulations as good as hardware prototypes?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 169–184, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. O. Götz and K. Götz, “Color preferences of art students: surface colors: II,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 271–278, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Wandmacher, Software Ergonomie, De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, 1993.
  27. ISO 9241-11, Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) Part 11: Guidance on Usability, ISO, Geneve, Switzerland, 1998.
  28. T. Tullis and B. Albert, Measuring the User Experience, Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008.
  29. S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland, “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research,” in Human Mental Workload, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds., pp. 139–183, North Holland Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  30. C. Pfendler, “Zur Messung der mentalen Beanspruchung mit dem NASA-Task Load Index,” Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, vol. 44, pp. 158–163, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  31. G. V. Glass and J. C. Stanley, Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1970.
  32. B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics, Pearson, Boston, Mass, USA, 2007.
  33. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 1988.
  34. J. T. E. Richardson, “Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research,” Educational Research Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 135–147, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. McNeil, I. Newman, and F. J. Kelly, Testing Research Hypotheses with the General Linear Model, SIU Press, Illinois, Ill, USA, 1996.
  36. R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1173–1182, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. O. Hansson, “Aesthetic functionalism,” Contemporary Aesthetics, vol. 3, 2005, http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.7523862.0003.008. View at Google Scholar
  38. E. Alvarado, “Form and function in the social perception and appreciation of web sites,” Florida Atlantic Comparative Studies Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 151–170, 2007-2008. View at Google Scholar
  39. A. de Angeli, J. Hartmann, and A. Sutcliffe, “The effect of brand on the evaluation of websites,” in Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part II, pp. 638–651, Springer, Uppsala, Sweden, 2009.
  40. J. Sauer and A. Sonderegger, “The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 670–677, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Y.-K. Lim, A. Pangam, S. Periyasami, and S. Aneja, “Comparative analysis of high- and low-fidelity prototypes for more valid usability evaluations of mobile devices,” in Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, pp. 291–300, Oslo, Norway, October 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus