Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 7219098, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7219098
Research Article

An Integrated Support to Collaborative Semantic Annotation

Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Torino, C. Svizzera 185, 10149 Torino, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Annamaria Goy

Received 24 September 2016; Revised 14 December 2016; Accepted 30 January 2017; Published 21 February 2017

Academic Editor: Thomas Mandl

Copyright © 2017 Annamaria Goy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Indratmo and J. Vassileva, “A review of organizational structures of personal information management,” Journal of Digital Information, vol. 9, no. 26, pp. 1–19, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. Jones, Keeping Found Things Found, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007.
  3. P. Ravasio and V. Tscherter, “Users' theories of the desktop metaphor, or why we should seek metaphor-free interfaces,” in Beyond the Desktop Metaphor, V. Kaptelinin and M. Czerwinski, Eds., pp. 265–294, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. Boardman, R. Spence, and M. A. Sasse, “Too many hierarchies? The daily struggle for control of the workspace,” in Human-Computer Interaction: Theory and Practice, J. A. Jacko and C. Stephanidis, Eds., pp. 616–620, Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Goy, D. Magro, G. Petrone, and M. Segnan, “Semantic representation of information objects for digital resources management,” Intelligenza Artificiale, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 145–161, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Goy, D. Magro, G. Petrone, C. Picardi, and M. Segnan, “Shared and personal views on collaborative semantic tables,” in Semantic Web Collaborative Spaces, P. Molli, J. Breslin, and M. E. Vidal, Eds., vol. 9507 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 13–32, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. V. Kaptelinin and M. Czerwinski, Eds., Beyond the Desktop Metaphor, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2007.
  8. A. Adler, J. C. Nash, and S. Noël, “Evaluating and implementing a collaborative office document system,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 665–682, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. R. Karger, “Haystack: per-user information environments based on semistructured data,” in Beyond the Desktop Metaphor, V. Kaptelinin and M. Czerwinski, Eds., pp. 49–100, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. E. Bardram, “Activity-based computing: support for mobility and collaboration in ubiquitous computing,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 312–322, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Voida, E. D. Mynatt, and B. Macintyre, “Supporting activity in desktop and ubiquitous computing,” in Beyond the Desktop Metaphor, V. Kaptelinin and M. Czerwinski, Eds., pp. 195–222, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Houben, J. Vermeulen, K. Luyten, and K. Coninx, “Co-activity manager: integrating activity-based collaboration into the desktop interface,” in Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '12), pp. 398–401, ACM, Capri Island, Italy, May 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P.-L. P. Rau, S.-H. Chen, and Y.-T. Chin, “Developing web annotation tools for learners and instructors,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 163–181, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Pearson, G. Buchanan, H. Thimbleby, and M. Jones, “The digital reading desk: a lightweight approach to digital note-taking,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 327–338, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J.-C. Jan, C.-M. Chen, and P.-H. Huang, “Enhancement of digital reading performance by using a novel web-based collaborative reading annotation system with two quality annotation filtering mechanisms,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 86, pp. 81–93, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Sauermann, A. Bernardi, and A. Dengel, “Overview and outlook on the semantic desktop,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Semantic Desktop at ISWC 2005, vol. 175, CEUR-WS, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  17. L. Drăgan, R. Delbru, T. Groza, S. Handschuh, and S. Decker, “Linking semantic desktop data to the web of data,” in The Semantic Web—ISWC 2011, L. Aroyo, C. Welty, H. Alani et al., Eds., vol. 7032 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 33–48, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Koning, P. Grosso, and C. de Laat, “Using ontologies for resource description in the CineGrid Exchange,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 960–965, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Uflacker and A. Zeier, “A semantic network approach to analyzing virtual team interactions in the early stages of conceptual design,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 88–99, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. K. Barreau and B. Nardi, “Finding and reminding: file organization from the desktop,” ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 39–43, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Teevan, C. Alvarado, M. S. Ackerman, and D. R. Karger, “The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings (CHI '04), pp. 415–422, Vienna, Austria, April 2004. View at Scopus
  22. F. Abel, N. Henze, D. Krause, and M. Kriesell, “Semantic enhancement of social tagging systems,” in Web 2.0 & Semantic Web, V. Devedžić and D. Gašević, Eds., vol. 6 of Annals of Information Systems, pp. 25–54, Springer, Boston, Mass, USA, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Pak, S. Pautz, and R. Iden, “Information organization and retrieval: an assessment of taxonomical and tagging systems,” Cognitive Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 31–44, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  24. P. Dourish, W. K. Edwards, A. LaMarca et al., “Extending document management systems with user-specific active properties,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 140–170, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Civan, W. Jones, P. Klasnja, and H. Bruce, Better to Organize Personal Information by Folders or by Tags? The Devil is in the Details, vol. 45, American Society for Information Science and Technology, Silver Spring, Md, USA, 2009.
  26. H. L. Kim, S. Scerri, J. G. Breslin, S. Decker, and H. G. Kim, “The state of the art in tag ontologies: a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies,” in Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications (DC '08), pp. 128–137, Berlin, Germany, September 2008. View at Scopus
  27. S. Lohmann, P. Díaz, and I. Aedo, “MUTO: the modular unified tagging ontology,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-SEMANTICS '11), pp. 95–104, Graz, Austria, September 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Angeletou, “Semantic enrichment of folksonomy tagspaces,” in The Semantic Web—ISWC 2008, A. Sheth, S. Staab, M. Dean et al., Eds., vol. 5318 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 889–894, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. A. Passant and P. Laublet, “Meaning of a tag: a collaborative approach to bridge the gap between tagging and linked data,” in Proceedings of the WWW 2008 Workshop Linked Data on the Web (LDOW '08), C. Bizer, T. Heath, K. Idehen, and T. Berners-Lee, Eds., vol. 369, CEUR-WS, Beijing, China, April 2008.
  30. A. Marchetti, M. Tesconi, F. Ronzano, M. Rosella, and S. Minutoli, “SemKey: a semantic collaborative tagging system,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Tagging and Metadata for Social Information Organization at WWW2007, pp. 8–12, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  31. S. A. Golder and B. A. Huberman, “Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems,” Journal of Information Science, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 198–208, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Cunningham, D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva et al., Text Processing with GATE (Version 6), 2011, https://gate.ac.uk/.
  33. M. Erdmann, A. Maedche, H. P. Schnurr, and S. Staab, “From manual to semi-automatic semantic annotation: about ontology-based text annotation tools,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Annotation and Intelligent Content (COLING '00), pp. 79–85, ACL Press, Stroudsburg, Pa, USA, 2000.
  34. P. Fragkou, G. Petasis, A. Theodorakos, V. Karkaletsis, and C. Spyropoulos, “Boemie ontology-based text annotation tool,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC '08), N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard et al., Eds., pp. 1273–1279, ELRA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  35. K. Bontcheva, H. Cunningham, I. Roberts et al., “GATE Teamware: a web-based, collaborative text annotation framework,” Language Resources & Evaluation, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1007–1029, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Petasis, “The SYNC3 collaborative annotation tool,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC '12), pp. 363–370, ELRA, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  37. V. Uren, P. Cimiano, J. Iria et al., “Semantic annotation for knowledge management: requirements and a survey of the state of the art,” Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–28, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. O. Corcho, “Ontology based document annotation: trends and open research problems,” International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Borgo and C. Masolo, “Foundational choices in DOLCE,” in Handbook on Ontologies, S. Staab and R. Studer, Eds., pp. 361–381, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2nd edition, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. A. Gangemi, S. Borgo, C. Catenacci, and J. Lehmann, Task Taxonomies for Knowledge Content, Metokis Deliverable D07, 2005.
  41. D. Magro and A. Goy, “A core reference ontology for the customer relationship domain,” Applied Ontology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Goy, G. Petrone, and M. Segnan, “A cloud-based environment for collaborative resources management,” International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 7–31, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  43. A. Goy, D. Magro, G. Petrone, C. Picardi, and M. Segnan, “Ontology-driven collaborative annotation in shared workspaces,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 54, pp. 435–449, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. G. Guest, A. Bunce, and L. Johnson, “How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability,” Field Methods, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 24, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  45. M. Crouch and H. McKenzie, “The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research,” Social Science Information, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 483–499, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Goy, D. Magro, G. Petrone, M. Rovera, and M. Segnan, “A semantic framework to enrich collaborative tables with domain knowledge,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Vol. 3: KMIS, pp. 371–381, SciTePress, Setúbal, Portugal, 2015. View at Google Scholar