Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2007, Article ID 90731, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/90731
Research Article

Astronomical Constraints on Some Long-Range Models of Modified Gravity

Viale Unità di Italia 68, Bari 70125, Italy

Received 18 September 2007; Accepted 5 October 2007

Academic Editor: Sandip Pakvasa

Copyright © 2007 Lorenzo Iorio. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. S. Adkins and J. McDonnell, “Orbital precession due to central-force perturbations,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 8, Article ID 082001, 7 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. G. S. Adkins, J. McDonnell, and R. N. Fell, “Cosmological perturbations on local systems,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 6, Article ID 064011, 9 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Allemandi, M. Francaviglia, M. L. Ruggiero, and A. Tartaglia, “Postnewtonian parameters from alternative theories of gravity,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1891–1904, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. S. Apostolopoulos and N. Tetradis, “Late acceleration and w=1 crossing in induced gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 6, Article ID 064021, 8 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone, and M. Francaviglia, “f(R) theories of gravity in the Palatini approach matched with observations,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 711–734, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. S. Capozziello, “Dark energy models toward observational tests and data,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–78, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. S. M. Carroll, A. de Felice, V. Duvvuri, D. A. Easson, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, “Cosmology of generalized modified gravity models,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 6, Article ID 063513, 11 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, “4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space,” Physics Letters B, vol. 485, no. 1–3, pp. 208–214, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. S. Fay, S. Nesseris, and L. Perivolaropoulos, “Can f(R) modified gravity theories mimic a ΛCDM cosmology?” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 6, Article ID 063504, 10 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J.-M. Frére, F.-S. Ling, and G. Vertongen, “Bound on the dark matter density in the solar system from planetary motions,” preprint, 2007, http://arxiv.org/abs/astroph/0701542v1.
  11. R. Gannouji, D. Polarski, A. Ranquet, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Scalar-tensor models of normal and phantom dark energy,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, no. 9, p. 16, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. L. Iorio, “On the effects of Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati braneworld gravity on the orbital motion of a test particle,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 24, pp. 5271–5281, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. L. Iorio, “Can solar system observations tell us something about the cosmological constant?” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 473–475, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Iorio, “Solar system planetary orbital motions and dark matter,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, no. 5, p. 2, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. L. Iorio, “On the perspectives of testing the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati gravity model with the outer planets of the solar System,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 8, no. 7, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  16. L. Iorio, “First preliminary tests of the general relativistic gravitomagnetic field of the Sun and new constraints on a Yukawa-like fifth force from planetary data,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1290–1298, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. L. Iorio, “Constraints on the range λ of Yukawa-like modifications to the Newtonian inverse-square law of gravitation from solar system planetary motions,” 2007, to appear in Journal of High Energy Physics. View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Iorio, “Dynamical determination of the mass of the Kuiper Belt from motions of the inner planets of the solar system,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 375, no. 4, pp. 1311–1314, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. I. B. Khriplovich and E. V. Pitjeva, “Upper limits on density of dark matter in solar system,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 615–618, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  20. I. B. Khriplovich, “Density of dark matter in solar system and perihelion precession of planets,” preprint, 2007, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0702260v2.
  21. J. Lense and H. Thirring, “Über den einfluss der eigenrotation der zentralk örper auf die bewegung der planeten und monde nach der einsteinschen gravitationstheorie,” Physikalische Zeitschrift, vol. 19, pp. 156–163, 1918. View at Google Scholar
  22. B. Mashhoon, F. W. Hehl, and D. S. Theiss, “On the gravitational effects of rotating masses: the thirring-lense papers,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 711–750, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. R. J. Ruffini and C. Sigismondi, Eds., Nonlinear Gravitodynamics, World Scientific, Singapore, 2003.
  24. A. Lue and G. Starkman, “Gravitational leakage into extra dimensions: probing dark energy using local gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 6, Article ID 064002, 9 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. O. Mena, J. Santiago, and J. Weller, “Constraining inverse-curvature gravity with supernovae,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 4, Article ID 041103, 4 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. M. Milgrom, “A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 270, pp. 365–370, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  27. I. Navarro and K. van Acoleyen, “On the Newtonian limit of generalized modified gravity models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 622, no. 1-2, pp. 1–5, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. I. Navarro and K. van Acoleyen, “Consistent long distance modification of gravity from inverse powers of the curvature,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, no. 3, pp. 127–148, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  29. I. Navarro and K. van Acoleyen, “Modified gravity, dark energy and modified Newtonian dynamics,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, no. 9, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, “Crossing the phantom divide: theoretical implications and observational status,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, no. 1, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, “Limits of extended quintessence,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 2, Article ID 023517, 9 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Introduction to modified gravity and gravitational alternative for dark energy,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 115–145, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. E. V. Pitjeva, “Relativistic effects and solar oblateness from radar observations of planets and spacecraft,” Astronomy Letters, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 340–349, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. E. V. Pitjeva, “High-precision ephemerides of planets-EPM and determination of some astronomical constants,” Solar System Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 176–186, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. M. L. Ruggiero and L. Iorio, “Solar System planetary orbital motions and f(R) theories of gravity,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, no. 1, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. R. H. Sanders and S. S. McGaugh, “Modified Newtonian dynamics as an alternative to dark matter,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 40, pp. 263–317, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. R. H. Sanders, “Solar system constraints on multifield theories of modified dynamics,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 370, no. 3, pp. 1519–1528, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Sereno and P. Jetzer, “Dark matter versus modifications of the gravitational inverse-square law: results from planetary motion in the solar system,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 371, no. 2, pp. 626–632, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. P. Jetzer and M. Sereno, “Two-body problem with the cosmological constant and observational constraints,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 4, Article ID 044015, 6 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. M. Sereno and P. Jetzer, “Evolution of gravitational orbits in the expanding universe,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 6, Article ID 064031, 8 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. C. M. Will, “The confrontation between general relativity and experiment,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 9, pp. 1–100, 2006. View at Google Scholar