Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 953987, 22 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/953987
Research Article

On the Pulsating Strings in

1Department of Physics, Sofia University, 5 J. Bourchier Boule vard, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria
2Institute for Theoretical Physics, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstr. 8-10, 1040 Vienna, Austria

Received 25 August 2009; Accepted 19 October 2009

Academic Editor: Kadayam S. Viswanathan

Copyright © 2009 H. Dimov and R. C. Rashkov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We study the class of pulsating strings on . Using a generalized ansatz for pulsating string configurations we find new solutions of this class. Further we quasiclassically quantize the theory and obtain the first corrections to the energy. The latter, due to AdS/CFT correspondence, is supposed to give the anomalous dimensions of operators of the gauge theory dual Chern-Simons theory.

1. Introduction

The attempts to establish a correspondence between the large limit of gauge theories and string theory have more than 30 years history and over the years they showed different faces. Recently an explicit realization of this correspondence was provided by the Maldacena conjecture about AdS/CFT correspondence [1]. The convincing results from the duality between type IIB string theory on and super Yang-Mills theory [13] made this subject a major research area and many fascinating new features have been established.

An important part of the current understanding of the duality between gauge theories and strings (M-theory) is the world-volume dynamics of the branes. Recently there has been a number of works focused on the understanding of the world-volume dynamics of multiple M2-branes—an interest inspired by Bagger, Lambert, and Gustavsson [47] investigations based on the structure of Lie 3-algebra.

Recently, motivated by the possible description of the world-volume dynamics of coincident membranes in M-theory, a new class of conformal invariant, maximally supersymmetric field theories in 2 + 1 dimensions has been found [8, 9]. The main feature of these theories is that they contain gauge fields with Chern-Simons-like kinetic terms. Based on this development, Aharony, Bergman, Jafferis, and Maldacena proposed a new gauge/string duality between an superconformal Chern-Simons theory (ABJM theory) coupled with bi-fundamental matter, describing membrane on . This model, which was first proposed by Aharony, Bergman, Jafferis, and Maldacena [9], is believed to be dual to M-theory on .

The ABJM theory actually consists of two Chern-Simons theories of level and correspondingly and each with gauge group . The two pairs of chiral superfields transform in the bi-fundamental representations of and the R-symmetry is as it should be for supersymmetry of the theory. It was observed in [9] that there exists a natural definition of a 't Hooft coupling . It was observed that in the 't Hooft limit with held fixed, one has a continuous coupling and the ABJM theory is weakly coupled for . The ABJM theory is conjectured to be dual to M-theory on with units of four-form flux. In the scaling limit with the theory can be compactified to type IIA string theory on . Thus, the AdS/CFT correspondence, which has led to many exciting developments in the duality between type IIB string theory on and super Yang-Mills theory, is now being extended to the and is expected to constitute a new example of exact gauge/string theory duality.

The semiclassical strings have played, and still play, an important role in studying various aspects of correspondence [1031]. The development in this subject gives a strong hint about how the new emergent duality can be investigated. An important role in these studies plays the integrability. The superstrings on as a coset were first studied in [32] (see also [33]) which opens the door for investigation of the integrable structures in the theory. To pursue these issues it is necessary to have the complete superstring action. It was noticed that the string supercoset model does not describe the entire dynamics of type IIA superstring in , but only its subsector. The complete string dual of the ABJM model, that is, the complete type-IIA Green-Schwarz string action in superspace has been constructed in [34].

Various properties on gauge theory side and tests on string theory side as rigid rotating strings, pp-wave limit, relation to spin chains, and certain limiting cases as well as pure spinor formulation have been considered [3266].

In these intensive studies many properties were uncovered and impressive results obtained, but still the understanding of this duality is far from completeness.

Another class of string solutions which proved its importance in the case of duality is the class of pulsating strings introduced first in [67] and studied and generalized further in [6870]. In the case of background the pulsating strings are also expected to play an essential role. The simplest such solutions were mentioned in [57], but thorough analysis and quasiclassical quantization are still missing. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and quasiclassically quantize the class of pulsating strings on part of the background. The first corrections to the energy, which according to the AdS/CFT conjecture give the anomlaous dimensions of gauge theory operators, will be the main subject of these considerations.

The paper is organized as follows. In the Introduction we briefly present the basic facts about ABJM theory. To explain the method and fix the procedure, in the next section we give short review of the pulsating strings and their quasi-classical quantization for the case of background. Next, we proceed with the pulsating strings on background restricting the string dynamics to part of the spacetime. The next section is devoted to the derivation of the correction to the energy. We find the wave function associated with the Laplace-Beltrami operator of first and then compute the first correction to the energy. The latter is supposed to give the anomalous dimension of operator of the dual theory. We conclude with a brief discussion on the results.

1.1. ABJM and Strings on

To find the ABJM theory one starts with analysis M2-brane dynamics governed by 11d supergravity action [9]

where . Solving for the equations of motions

one can find the M2-brane solutions whose near horizon limit becomes

In addition we have units four-form flux

Next we consider the quotient acting as . It is convenient first to write the metric on as

where

and then to perform the quotient identifying with ( is proportional to the Kahler form on ). The resulting metric becomes

One can observe that the first volume factor on the right-hand side is divided by factor of compared to the initial one. In order to have consistent quantized flux one must impose where is the number of quanta of the flux on the quotient. We note that the spectrum of the supergravity fields of the final theory is just the projection of the initial onto the invariant states. In this setup there is a natural definition of 't Hooft coupling . Decoupling limit should be taken as , while is kept fixed.

One can follow now [9] to make reduction to type IIA with the following final result:

We end up then with compactification of type IIA string theory with units of flux on and units of flux on the 2-cycle.

The radius of curvature in string units is . It is important to note that the type IIA approximation is valid in the regime where .

In order to fix the notations, we write down the explicit form of the metric on in spherical coordinates. The metric on can be written as [71]

Here is the radius of the , and are left-invariant 1-forms on an , parameterized by ,

The range of the coordinates is

2. A Brief Review of Pulsating Strings on

In this section we give a brief review of the pulsating string solutions obtained first by Minahan [67] and generalized later in [6870]. We will concentrate only on the case of pulsating string on part of , that is, a circular string which pulsates expanding and contracting on is considered. To fix the notations, we start with the metric of and relevant part of

where . In order to obtain the simplest solution, we identify the target space time with the worldsheet one, , and use the ansatz , that is, the string is stretched along direction, and keep the dependence on for a while. The reduced Nambu-Goto action in this case is

For our considerations it is useful to pass to Hamiltonian formulation. For this purpose we find the canonical momenta and find the Hamiltonian in the form (for more details see [67])

Fixing the string to be at the origin of space (), we see that the squared Hamiltonian have a form very similar to a point particle. The last term in (2.3) can be considered as a perturbation, so first we find the wave function for a free particle in the above geometry

The solution to the above equation is

where are spherical harmonics on and the energy is given by

Since we consider highly excited states (large energies), one should take large , so we can approximate the spherical harmonics as

The correction to the energy can be obtained by using perturbation theory, which to first order is

Up to the first order in we find for the anomalous dimension of the corresponding YM operators (see [67] for more details)

It should be noted that in this case the -charge is zero. In order to include it, we consider pulsating string on which has a center of mass that is moving on the subspace of [6870]. While in the previous example part of the metric was assumed trivial, now we consider all the angles to depend on (only). The corresponding Nambu-Goto action now is

where are angles and is the corresponding metric. The Hamiltonian in this case is [6870]

Again, we see that the squared Hamiltonian looks like the point particle one, however, now the potential has angular dependence. Denoting the quantum number of and by and correspondingly, one can write the Schrodinger equation

where we set . The solution to the Schrodinger equation is

The first-order correction to the energy is

or, up to first order in

The anomalous dimension then is given by

where .

We conclude this section referring for more details to [6770].

3. Pulsating Strings on

In this section we consider a circular pulsating string expanding and contracting only on part of . We will consider the string dynamics confined in the part of the spacetime with no extension of the string in the remaining spatial coordinates. Then the relevant metric we will work with is given by

Having in mind the explicit form of the metric (1.9), one can write it as

where the part is defined as

while is the remaining part of metric associated with coordinates, denoted here as , , , . The residual worldsheet symmetry allows us to identify with and to obtain a classical pulsating string solution. To do that we use the following ansatz:

We are interested in the induced worldsheet metric which in our case has the form

The Nambu-Goto action is

in this ansatz then reduces to expression

where , and we set for simplicity . To follow the procedure described in the previous section, we need a Hamiltonian formulation of the problem. For this purpose, we have to find first the canonical momenta of our dynamical system. Straightforward calculations give for the momenta

Solving for the derivatives in terms of the canonical momenta and substituting back into the Legendre transform of the Lagrangian, we find the Hamiltonian

The interpretation of this relation is as in the case of , namely, the first term in the brackets is the kinetic term while the second one is considered as a potential , which in our case has the form

The approximation where our considerations are valid assumes high energies, which suggests that one can think of this potential term as a perturbation. For latter use we write down the explicit form of the potential

The above perturbation to the free action will produce the corrections to the energy and therefore to the anomalous dimension. In order to calculate the corrections to the energy as a perturbation due to the above potential however, we need the normalized wave function associated with space and all these issues are subject to the next section.

4. Semiclassical Correction to the Energy

In this section we will compute the quasi-classical correction to the energy of the pulsating string on . As we discussed in the previous section, the Hamiltonian of the pulsating string is interpreted as a dynamical system with high energy described by free theory Schrödinger equation and perturbed by a potential (3.11).

First of all, we have to find the wave function associated with the Laplace-Beltrami operator on and then to obtain the correction to the energy due to the induced potential.

4.1. The Metric and the Associated Laplace-Beltrami Operator

We start with the Laplace-Beltrami operator in coordinates parameterizing as follows. First we define coordinates

The line element of in these coordinates is explicitly given by

4.1.1. The Laplace-Beltrami Operator on

Using the standard definition of the Laplace-Beltrami operator in global coordinates we find

Since we are going to separate the variables, it is useful to arrange the terms as follows:

Then the operator can be written as

where

The full measure on is

4.1.2. The Wave Function

The Schrödinger equation for the wave function is

To separate the variables, we define as , where

With this choice we can solve for the eigenfunctions replacing the derivatives along Killing directions () by () correspondingly. The equation for then separates from the rest and has the form

It is convenient to define a new variable in which the equation can be written as

The solution to this equation is

Our wave function must be square integrable with respect to the measure on (4.7). In separated variables this means that must be square integrable with respect to the measure on . This condition imposes the following restriction on the parameters:

Introducing new parameters and the solution can be written in the form

The equation for can be treated analogously and has the form With the help of the new variable , the above equation can be written as

Recognizing the hypergeometric equation mentioned previously we find the solution as

In addition we have to ensure that the solution is square integrable with respect to the measure in . This requirement imposes the following restriction on the parameters:

It is useful to introduce new parameters and , in terms of which the solution can be written in the form

Then, the equation for we have to solve becomes

We change the variable defining

It is convenient to define new parameters , , and , , and then the solution can be written in the terms of Legendre polynomials

In terms of the new variables the measure (4.7) becomes

The normalized wave functions of (4.14), (4.19), (4.22) have a form

4.2. Corrections to the Energy

There is potential (3.11) in terms

There is correction to the energy

The explicit form of the previous formula using the explicit form of the various wave functions is

In short notations, it looks as

where the integrals are explicitly calculated in the appendix. The expression for the correction to the energy looks very complicated. Therefore, to make conclusions we use the fact that the approximation we work in is for large quantum numbers, say , and . Within this approximation the integrals behave like

Ignoring the terms of high order (, , , , ) we obtain

We see that the corrections to the energy have complicated form even at this level. Nevertheless, one can recognize some structures of the quantum numbers that appear in the energy corrections. In order to make comparison with the much well-known case of pulsating strings, we present in what follows the case of pulsating strings on .

4.2.1. Pulsating in

The case of pulsating on subspace of the spacetime can be defined as follows. The metric can be written as

where

and as before are left-invariant 1-form on an . Since and it follows that and

The potential in this case becomes

The correction to the energy can be computed using the same technology as before and it gives the expression

To obtain an explicit expression; we have to calculate the following integral:

In (4.35) and therefore we end up with

On other hand we need the limit of large

which gives the following approximation of the integral :

Substituting into the expression for the correction to that energy, we find

We note that in the limit of large we reproduce the of [68].

5. Conclusions

In this section we summarize the results of our study. The purpose of this paper was to look for pulsating string solutions in background. The class of pulsating strings have been used to study AdS/CFT correspondence in the case of [67, 69, 70] and the corrections to the string energy has been associated with anomalous dimensions of certain type operators.

The recently suggested duality between string theory in attracted much attention promising to be exact and with number of applications. Here we consider a generalized string ansatz for pulsating string in the part of the geometry. Next we considered the corrections to the classical energy. From AdS/CFT point of view the corrections to the classical energy give the anomalous dimensions of the operators in SYM theory and therefore they are of primary interest.

For this purpose, we consider the Nambu-Goto actions and find the Hamiltonian. After that we quantize the resulting theory semiclassically and obtain the corrections to the energy. Since we consider highly excited system, the kinetic term is dominating and the effective potential term serves for a small perturbation. Note that this semiclassical treatement of the problem can be interpreted as an effective summation over all classical solutions.

The obtained corrections to the classical energy look complicated, but in certain limit one can find relatively simple expressions. To identify the contribution of the different terms, it is instructive to look at the solutions for the case. At the end of the last section we present these solutions thus providing a basis for comparison. Since they correspond to a subsector of the well known from considerations one can identify the origin of the various contributions. One can see that the corrections to the energy have analogous structure to the case of pulsating, say in . The mixing between quantum numbers of the different isometry directions shows up in analogous, but slightly more complicated way. This can be seen using the result from subsector and its embedding in .

As a final comment, we note that in order to complete the analysis from AdS/CFT point of view, it is of great interest to perform an analysis comparing our result to that in SYM side. We leave this important question for future research.

Appendix

Some Integrals Appearing in the Main Text

The integrals appeared in (4.28) are defined as follows:

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the Austrian Research Fund FWF I192, NSFB VU-F-201/06, and DO 02-257.

References

  1. J. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 231–252, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 428, no. 1-2, pp. 105–114, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 253–291, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Modeling multiple M2-branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 4, Article ID 045020, 7 pages, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. A. Gustavsson, “Algebraic structures on parallel M2 branes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 811, no. 1-2, pp. 66–76, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Gauge symmetry and supersymmetry of multiple M2-branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 6, Article ID 065008, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Comments on multiple M2-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 2, article 105, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. H. Schwarz, “Superconformal Chern-Simons theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1865–1877, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, “𝒩=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. I. Bena, J. Polchinski, and R. Roiban, “Hidden symmetries of the AdS5×S5 superstring,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 4, Article ID 046002, 7 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Integrable hamiltonian for classical strings on AdS5×S5,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 2, article 059, pp. 1–29, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. S. Frolov, J. Plefka, and M. Zamaklar, “The AdS5×S5 superstring in light-cone gauge and its Bethe equations,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 39, no. 41, pp. 13037–13081, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. N. Beisert, “The su(2|2) dynamic s-matrix,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 945–979, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  14. G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, J. Plefka, and M. Zamaklar, “The off-shell symmetry algebra of the light-cone AdS5×S5 superstring,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 3583–3605, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. V. A. Kazakov, A. Marshakov, J. A. Minahan, and K. Zarembo, “Classical/quantum integrability in AdS/CFT,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 5, article 024, pp. 1–55, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. N. Beisert, V. A. Kazakov, K. Sakai, and K. Zarembo, “The algebraic curve of classical superstrings on AdS5×S5,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 263, no. 3, pp. 659–710, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, and M. Staudacher, “Bethe ansatz for quantum strings,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 10, article 016, pp. 1–21, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. R. A. Janik, “The AdS5×S5 superstring worldsheet S matrix and crossing symmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 8, Article ID 086006, 10 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. N. Beisert, R. Hernández, and E. López, “A crossing-symmetric phase for AdS5×S5 strings,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 11, article 070, pp. 1–34, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. N. Beisert, B. Eden, and M. Staudacher, “Transcendentality and crossing,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, no. 1, article P01021, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Das, A. Melikyan, M. Sato, and J. Maharana, “The algebra of transition matrices for the AdS5×S5 superstring,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1295–1315, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Das, A. Melikyan, and M. Sato, “The algebra of flat currents for the string on AdS5×S5 in the light-cone gauge,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 11, article 015, pp. 1–26, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. L. F. Alday, G. Arutyunov, and A. A. Tseytlin, “On integrability of classical superstrings in AdS5×S5,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 7, article 002, pp. 23–52, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. M. Kruczenski, “Spiky strings and single trace operators in gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 8, article 014, pp. 403–423, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. M. Kruczenski, J. G. Russo, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Spiky strings and giant magnons on S5,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 10, article 002, pp. 1–32, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. J. Klusoň, R. R. Nayak, and K. L. Panigrahi, “Giant magnon in NS5-brane background,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 4, article 099, pp. 1–18, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. N. P. Bobev and R. C. Rashkov, “Spiky strings, giant magnons, and β deformations,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 4, Article ID 046008, 9 pages, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. N. P. Bobev and R. C. Rashkov, “Multispin giant magnons,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 4, Article ID 046011, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Dimov and R. C. Rashkov, “On the anatomy of multi-spin magnon and single spike string solutions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 799, no. 3, pp. 255–290, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. P. Bozhilov and R. C. Rashkov, “On the multi-spin magnon and spike solutions from membranes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 794, no. 3, pp. 429–441, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. B.-H. Lee, R. R. Nayak, K. L. Panigrahi, and C. Park, “On the giant magnon and spike solutions for strings on AdS5×S5,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 6, article 065, pp. 1–18, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Superstrings on AdS4×3 as a coset sigma-model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. B. Stefański Jr., “Green-Schwarz action for type IIA strings on AdS4×3,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 808, no. 1-2, pp. 80–87, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Gomis, D. Sorokin, and L. Wulff, “The complete AdS4×3 superspace for the type IIA superstring and D-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 3, article 015, pp. 1–41, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  35. T. McLoughlin and R. Roiban, “Spinning strings at one-loop in AdS4×3,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 12, article 101, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. L. F. Alday, G. Arutyunov, and D. Bykov, “Semiclassical quantization of spinning strings in AdS4×3,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 11, article 089, pp. 1–21, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. M. Benna, I. Klebanov, T. Klose, and M. Smedbäck, “Superconformal Chern-Simons theories and AdS4/CFT3 correspondence,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Mauri and A. C. Petkou, “An 𝒩=1 superfield action for M2 branes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 666, no. 5, pp. 527–532, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Bhattacharya and S. Minwalla, “Superconformal indices for 𝒩=6 Chern Simons theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 1, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. Nishioka and T. Takayanagi, “On type IIA Penrose limit and 𝒩=6 Chern-Simons theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 8, article 001, pp. 1–18, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. C. Caviezel, P. Koerber, S. Körs, D. Lüst, D. Tsimpis, and M. Zagermann, “The effective theory of type IIA AdS4 compactifications on nilmanifolds and cosets,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, no. 2, Article ID 025014, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo, “The Bethe ansatz for superconformal Chern-Simons,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. Gaiotto and X. Yin, “Notes on superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 8, article 056, pp. 1–40, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. A. Armoni and A. Naqvi, “A non-supersymmetric large-N 3D CFT and its gravity dual,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. Gaiotto, S. Giombi, and X. Yin, “Spin chains in 𝒩=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-Matter theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 4, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Ahn and R. I. Nepomechie, “𝒩=6 super Chern-Simons theory S-matrix and all-loop Bethe ansatz equations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. N. Gromov and P. Vieira, “The all loop AdS4/CFT3 Bethe ansatz,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 1, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. G. Grignani, T. Harmark, and M. Orselli, “The SU(2)×SU(2) sector in the string dual of 𝒩=6 superconformal Chern-Simons theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 810, no. 1-2, pp. 115–134, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. K. Hosomichi, K.-M. Lee, S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “𝒩=5, 6 superconformal Chern-Simons theories and M2-branes on orbifolds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. N. Beisert, “The su(2|3) undynamic spin chain,” Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, no. 177, pp. 1–11, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. Terashima, “On M5-branes in 𝒩=6 membrane action,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 8, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. Gomis, D. Rodríguez-Gómez, M. Van Raamsdonk, and H. Verlinde, “A massive study of M2-brane proposals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. K. Hanaki and H. Lin, “M2-M5 systems in 𝒩=6 Chern-Simons theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. T. Harmark, G. Grignani, M. Orselli, and G. W. Semenoff, “Finite size giant magnons in the string dual of 𝒩=6 superconformal Chern-Simons theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 12, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. C. Ahn and P. Bozhilov, “Finite-size effects for single spike,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 7, article 105, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. C. Ahn, P. Bozhilov, and R. C. Rashkov, “Neumann-Rosochatius integrable system for strings on AdS4×3,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. Chen and J.-B. Wu, “Semi-classical strings in AdS4×3,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. A. Bandres, A. E. Lipstein, and J. H. Schwarz, “Studies of the ABJM theory in a formulation with manifest SU(4) R-symmetry,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. Schnabl and Y. Tachikawa, “Classification of 𝒩=6 superconformal theories of ABJM type,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1102.
  60. A. Hashimoto and P. Ouyang, “Supergravity dual of Chern-Simons Yang-Mills theory with 𝒩=6,8 superconformal IR fixed point,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. D. Astolfi, V. G. M. Puletti, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, and M. Orselli, “Finite-size corrections in the SU(2)×SU(2) sector of type IIA string theory on AdS4×3,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 810, no. 1-2, pp. 150–173, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. A. Ghodsi, M. R. Garousi, and M. Khosravi, “On thermodynamics of 𝒩=6 superconformal Chern-Simons theories at strong coupling,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 8, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. G. Bonelli, P. A. Grassi, and H. Safaai, “Exploring pure spinor string theory on AdS4×3,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. R. D'Auria, P. Fré, P. A. Grassi, and M. Trigiante, “Superstrings on AdS4×3 from supergravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 8, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. Kreuzer, R. C. Rashkov, and M. Schimpf, “Near-flat space limit of strings on AdS4×3,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 471–480, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  66. P. Sundin, “The AdS4×3 string and its Bethe equations in the near plane wave limit,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 2, article 046, pp. 1–24, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  67. J. A. Minahan, “Circular semiclassical string solutions on AdS5×S5,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 648, no. 1-2, pp. 203–214, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  68. J. Engquist, J. A. Minahan, and K. Zarembo, “Yang-Mills duals for semiclassical strings on AdS5×S5,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1455–1476, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  69. H. Dimov and R. C. Rashkov, “Generalized pulsating strings,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1595–1609, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  70. M. Smedbäck, “Pulsating strings on AdS5×S5,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 61–72, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  71. C. N. Pope and N. P. Warner, “An SU(4) invariant compactification of d=11 supergravity on a stretched seven-sphere,” Physics Letters B, vol. 150, no. 5, pp. 352–356, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet