Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2010, Article ID 427891, 30 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/427891
Review Article

The Master Space of Supersymmetric Gauge Theories

1Theoretical Physics Group, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK
2Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy
3INFN, Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy

Received 10 May 2010; Accepted 14 June 2010

Academic Editor: Carlos Nunez

Copyright © 2010 Amihay Hanany and Alberto Zaffaroni. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Pouliot, “Molien function for duality,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 3, no. 1, article 021, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Römelsberger, “Counting chiral primaries in N=1, d=4 superconformal field theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 747, no. 3, pp. 329–353, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Hanany and N. Mekareeya, “Counting gauge invariant operators in SQCD with classical gauge groups,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 012, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Gray, Y.-H. He, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, and V. Jejjala, “SQCD: a geometric aperçu,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 5, aricle 099, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Kinney, J. Maldacena, S. Minwalla, and S. Raju, “An index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 275, no. 1, pp. 209–254, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “Dual giant gravitons in Sasaki-Einstein backgrounds,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 759, no. 1-2, pp. 292–319, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y.-H. He, “Counting BPS operators in gauge theories: quivers, syzygies and plethystics,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 11, article 050, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Butti, D. Forcella, and A. Zaffaroni, “Counting BPS baryonic operators in CFTs with Sasaki-Einstein duals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 6, article 069, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y. He, “Counting gauge invariants: the plethystic program,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 3, article 090, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Hanany and C. Römelsberger, “Counting BPS operators in the chiral ring of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories or N=2 braine surgery,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1091–1112, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Forcella, A. Hanany, and A. Zaffaroni, “Baryonic generating functions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 12, article 022, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Butti, D. Forcella, A. Hanany, D. Vegh, and A. Zaffaroni, “Counting chiral operators in quiver gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 11, article 092, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Forcella, “BPS partition functions for Quiver Gauge theories: counting fermionic operators,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.2989.
  14. D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He, and A. Zaffaroni, “The master space of N=1 gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 8, article 012, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, “Superconformal field theory on threebranes at a Calabi-Yau singularity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 536, no. 1-2, pp. 199–218, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. S. Acharya, J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, C. M. Hull, and B. J. Spence, “Branes at conical singularities and holography,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, pp. 1249–1286, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  17. D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser, “Non-spherical horizons. I,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 3, pp. 1–81, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Hanany and K. D. Kennaway, “Dimer models and toric diagrams,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503149.
  19. S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Vegh, B. Wecht, and K. D. Kennaway, “Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 1, article 096, pp. 2401–2448, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, “N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Benna, I. Klebanov, T. Klose, and M. Smedbäck, “Superconformal Chern-Simons theories and AdS4/CFT3 correspondence,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 072, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Hosomichi, K.-M. Lee, S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “N=5, 6 superconformal Chern-Simons theories and M2-branes on orbifolds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 002, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. O. Aharony, O. Bergman, and D. L. Jafferis, “Fractional M2-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 11, article 043, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. L. Jafferis and A. Tomasiello, “A simple class of N=3 gauge/gravity duals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 101, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “Moduli spaces of Chern-Simons quiver gauge theories and AdS4/CFT3,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 12, Article ID 126005, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, “Tilings, Chern-Simons theories and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 111, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Hanany, D. Vegh, and A. Zaffaroni, “Brane tilings and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 3, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He, and A. Zaffaroni, “Mastering the master space,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 85, no. 2-3, pp. 163–171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Amati, K. Konishi, Y. Meurice, G. C. Rossi, and G. Veneziano, “Non-perturbative aspects in supersymmetric gauge theories,” Physics Reports, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 169–248, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. Cachazo, M. R. Douglas, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, “Chiral rings and anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 6, no. 12, article 071, pp. 1611–1666, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Grayson and M. Stillman, “Macaulay 2, a software system for research in algebraic geometry,” http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2.
  32. A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, and G. Torri, “The Hilbert series of adjoint SQCD,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 825, no. 1-2, pp. 52–97, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. P. Stanley, “Hilbert functions of graded algebras,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 57–83, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. I. Biswas, D. Gaiotto, S. Lahiri, and S. Minwalla, “Supersymmetric states of N=4 Yang-Mills from giant gravitons,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 12, article 006, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. E. Beasley, “BPS branes from baryons,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 6, no. 11, article 015, pp. 297–319, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and S.-T. Yau, “Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and volume minimisation,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 280, no. 3, pp. 611–673, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Distler, S. Mukhi, C. Papageorgakis, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “M2-branes on Mfolds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 5, article 038, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. N. Lambert and D. Tong, “Membranes on an orbifold,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 4, Article ID 041602, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. K. Ueda and M. Yamazaki, “Toric Calabi-Yau four-folds dual to Chern-Simons-matter theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 12, article 045, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y. Imamura and K. Kimura, “Quiver Chern-Simons theories and crystals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 114, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Franco, A. Hanany, J. Park, and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, “Towards M2-brane theories for generic toric singularities,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 12, article 110, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Hanany and Y. H. He, “M2-branes and quiver Chern-Simons: a taxonomic study,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.4044.
  43. J. Davey, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, and G. Torri, “Phases of M2-brane theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 6, article 025, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Amariti, D. Forcella, L. Girardello, and A. Mariotti, “3D Seiberg-like dualities and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 5, pp. 1–33, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. S. Franco, I. R. Klebanov, and D. Rodríguez-Gómez, “M2-branes on orbifolds of the cone over Q1,1,1,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 8, article 033, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Hanany and Y. H. He, “Chern-Simons: Fano and Calabi-Yau,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.1847.
  47. J. Davey, A. Hanany, and J. Pasukonis, “On the classification of brane tilings,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.2868.
  48. J. Davey, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, and G. Torri, “Higgsing M2-brane theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 11, article 028, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “AdS4/CFT3 duals from M2-branes at hypersurface singularities and their deformations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 12, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Davey, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, and G. Torri, “Brane tilings, M2-branes and Chern-Simons theories,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 639–655, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Davey, A. Hanany, and R. K. Seong, “Counting orbifolds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 6, pp. 1–59, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, and A. Zaffaroni, “Partition functions for membrane theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 090, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. B. E. W. Nilsson and C. N. Pope, “Hopf fibration of eleven-dimensional supergravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 499–515, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “Notes on toric Sasaki-Einstein seven-manifolds and AdS4/CFT3,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 11, article 016, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. Fabbri, P. Fré, L. Gualtieri et al., “3D superconformal theories from Sasakian seven-manifolds: new non-trivial evidences for AdS4/CFT3,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 577, no. 3, pp. 547–608, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus