Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2010, Article ID 768054, 22 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/768054
Research Article

Superconductivity due to Condensation of Monopoles around RCD Strings in SU(2) Gauge Theory

1Department of Physics, Kumaon University, Nainital, India
2Department of Physics, D. S. College, Aligarh (U.P), India

Received 17 September 2010; Revised 24 November 2010; Accepted 1 December 2010

Academic Editor: George Siopsis

Copyright © 2010 B. S. Rajput and Sandeep Kumar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. S. Rajput, “Relationship between restricted chromodynamics and the dual superconductivity,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 528–533, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. S. Rajput, “Superconductivity at Higher temperature as restoration of supersymmetry,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, vol. 33, pp. 166–168, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Kumar, R. Swarup, B. S. Rajput, and B. Singh, “Dual superconductivity in restricted chromo-dynamics (RCD),” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1766–1780, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Kumar, “Superconductivity in restricted chromo-dynamics (RCD) in SU(2) and SU(3) gauge theories,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 512–525, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. Y. Nambu, “Strings, monopoles, and gauge fields,” Physical Review D, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 4262–4268, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Nambu, “Hydrodynamic boundary conditions and mode-mode coupling theory,” Physics Reports, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 250–253, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  7. G. 't Hooft, “On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  8. B. S. Rajput, J. M. S. Rana, and H. C. Chandola, “Quark confinement through dyonic condensation,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 82, no. 1, p. 153, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  9. B. S. Rajput, J. M. S. Rana, and H. C. Chandola, “The Quark confinement in extended gauge theory,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 69, p. 1441, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  10. G. 't. Hooft, “Magnetic charge quantization and fractionally charged quarks,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 538–547, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  11. G. 't. Hooft, “Topology of the gauge condition and new confinement phases in non-abelian gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 455–478, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Mandelstam, “II. Vortices and quark confinement in non-Abelian gauge theories,” Physics Reports, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 245–249, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Mandelstam, “Charge monopole duality and the phases of non-Abelian Gauge theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2391–2409, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Mandelstam, “Approximation scheme for quantum chromodynamics,” Physical Review C, vol. 35, p. 269, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  15. Z. F. Ezawa and A. Iwazaki, “ZN topology and charge confinement in SU(N) Higgs models,” Physical Review D, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 3036–3045, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. Z. F. Ezawa and A. Iwazaki, “ZN topology and charge confinement in SU(N) Higgs models. II,” Physical Review D, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2264–2273, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. Z. F. Ezawa and A. Iwazaki, “Abelian dominance and quark confinement in Yang-Mills theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2681–2689, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. F. Ezawa and A. Iwazaki, “Abelian dominance and quark confinement in Yang-Mills theories. II. Oblique confinement and η mass,” Physical Review D, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 631–647, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. V. P. Nair and C. Rosenzweig, “QCD vacuum as a chromomagnetic superconductor: microscopic physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 401–410, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. Y. Simonov, “The confinement,” Physics-Uspekhi, vol. 39, no. 4, p. 313, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. D'Alessandro, M. D'Elia, and L. Tagliacozzo, “Dual superconductivity and vacuum properties in Yang-Mills theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 774, no. 1-3, pp. 168–181, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. P. YU. Boyko, V. G. Bornyakov, E. M. Ilgenfritz et al., “Once more on the interrelation between Abelian monopoles and P-vortices in SU (2) LGT,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 756, no. 1-2, pp. 71–85, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. S. Bali, V. Bornyakov, M. Müller-Preussker, and K. Schilling, “Dual superconductor scenario of confinement: a systematic study of Gribov copy effects,” Physical Review D, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 2863–2875, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  24. T. Suzuki and I. Yotsuyanagi, “Possible evidence for Abelian dominance in quark confinement,” Physical Review D, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 4257–4260, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Suzuki, “Monopoles and confinement,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 30, no. C, pp. 176–183, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  26. Y. Koma, M. Koma, E. M. Ilgenfritz, and T. Suzuki, “Detailed study of the Abelian-projected SU(2) flux tube and its dual Ginzburg-Landau analysis,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 11, Article ID 094018, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. S. Rajput, J.M.S. Rana, and H. C. Chandola, “Dyon dynamics in nonAbelian restricted gauge theory,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, vol. 26, p. 587, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  28. B. S. Rajput, S. Sah, and H. C. Chandola, “Confinement parameters in restricted chromodynamics,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 509–524, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  29. J. M. S. Rana, H. C. Chandola, and B. S. Rajput, “Supersymmetric dyons,” Physical Review D, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 3550–3556, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. S. Rajput, R. Bist, and H.C. Chandola, “Angular-momentum operators of non-Abelian dyons,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 697–705, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. B. S. Rajput, J. M. S. Rana, and H.C. Chandola, “Quark confinement through dyonic condensation,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 82, pp. 153–161, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. B. S. Rajput, J. M. S. Rana, and H.C. Chandola, “Charge spectra of dyonic quarks,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 357–371, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. M. Cho, “Extended gauge theory and its mass spectrum,” Physical Review D, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2415–2426, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. Y. M. Cho, “Glueball spectrum in extended quantum chromodynamics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 302–306, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. Y. M. Cho, “Restricted gauge theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1080–1088, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. B. S. Rajput, O. P. S. Negi, and J. M. S. Rana, “Magnetic symmetry and dyons,” Pramana, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 469–478, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. T. Suzuki, K. Ishiguro, Y. Mori, and T. Sekido, “Dual Meissner effect and magnetic displacement currents,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 13, Article ID 132001, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Achucarro and T. Vachaspati, “Semilocal and electroweak strings,” Physics Report, vol. 327, no. 6, p. 427, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  39. P. Forgács, S. Reuillon, and M. S. Volkov, “Twisted superconducting semilocal strings,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 751, no. 3, pp. 390–418, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y. M. Cho and P. G. O. Freund, “Non-abelian gauge fields as Nambu-Goldstone fields,” Physical Review D, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1711–1720, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Y. M. Cho and P. S. Jang, Physical Review D, vol. 12, p. 3189, 1975.
  42. M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield, “Exact classical solution for the 't Hooft monopole and the Julia-Zee dyon,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 760–762, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. Forgács and N. S. Manton, “Space-time symmetries in gauge theories,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 15–35, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. N. Chernodub, K. Ishiguro, Y. Mori et al., “Vacuum type of SU(2) gluodynamics in maximally Abelian and Landau gauges,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 7, Article ID 074505, pp. 1–14, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. V. G. Bornyakov, H. Ichie, Y. Koma et al., “Dynamics of monopoles and flux tubes in two-flavor dynamical QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 7, Article ID 074511, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. V. G. Bornyakov, M. N. Chernodub, F. V. Gubarev et al., “Anatomy of the lattice magnetic monopoles,” Physics Letters, vol. 537, no. 3-4, pp. 291–296, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus