Research Article  Open Access
ChernSimons: Fano and CalabiYau
Abstract
We present the complete classification of smooth toric Fano threefolds, known to the algebraic geometry literature, and perform some preliminary analyses in the context of brane tilings and ChernSimons theory on M2branes probing CalabiYau fourfold singularities. We emphasise that these 18 spaces should be as intensely studied as their wellknown counterparts: the del Pezzo surfaces.
1. Introduction
A flurry of activity has, since the initial work of Bagger and Lambert [1–3] and Gustavsson [4], rather excited the community for the past two years upon the subject of supersymmetric ChernSimons theories. It is by now widely believed that the worldvolume theory of M2branes on various backgrounds is given by a dimensional quiver ChernSimons (QCS) theory [5–26], most conveniently described by a brane tiling.
Even though analogies with the case of D3branes in Type IIB, whose worldvolume theory is a dimensional supersymmetric quiver gauge theory, are very reassuring, the story is much less understood for the M2 case. Much work has been devoted to the understanding of issues such as orbifolding, phases of duality, brane tilings, and dimer/crystal models and so forth. Nevertheless, the role played by the correspondence between the worldvolume theory and the underlying CalabiYau geometry is of indubitable importance. Indeed, there is a bijection: the vacuum moduli space of the former is, tautologically, the latter, while the geometrical engineering on the latter gives, by construction, the former. This bijection, called, respectively, the “forward” and “inverse” algorithms [27, 28], persists in any dimension and can be succinctly summarised in Table 1.

A crucial feature for all the brane embeddings in Table 1 is that in the toric case they are all described by brane tilings. The first case, with CY2, is described by onedimensional tilings, that is, brane intervals and thus brane constructions following the work in [29]. The second case is the wellestablished twodimensional brane tilings which use dimer techniques to study supersymmetric gauge theories [30–32]. The third case is the newly proposed construction [13] of ChernSimon theories.
It is perhaps naïvely natural to propose threedimensional tilings for the case of M2branes probing CY4, but in fact, it turns out not to be as useful as it may initially seem. These threedimensional tilings have been nicely advocated in the crystal model [33, 34]. The main issue perhaps is the current shortcoming of this model to identify the gauge groups with a simplex as it is done for the tilings in dimensions one and two. In the onedimensional case for toric CY2, the gauge group is identified with an edge of the tiling, and the matter content with nodes. For the twodimensional case for toric CY3, the gauge fields, matter fields, and interactions are, respectively, identified with faces, edges, and nodes of the tiling. But for the proposed crystal model, there is no such simple interpretation yet known.
We are thus led, for now, to keep on the path of twodimensional tilings, while bearing in mind that the data needed to specify a QCS theory is given by gauge groups, matter fields, and interactions, as well as the additional data of the CS levels for the gauge groups. These nicely map, respectively, to tiles, edges, and nodes, while the corresponding CS levels are given by fluxes on the tiles. It would be interesting to check if this correspondence between tilings in one and two dimensions, that is, for toric CalabiYau folds with , can be extended to possibly higherdimensional tilings and perhaps higherdimensional CalabiYau spaces.
The cases for CalabiYau two and threefolds are well established over the past decade. These are affine complex cones over base complex curves and surfaces, or real cones over real, compact, SasakiEinstein three and five manifolds. Perhaps the most extensively studied are, inspired by phenomenological concerns, D3branes and CalabiYau threefolds and the widest class studied therein is toric CalabiYau cones. A rather complete picture for both the forward and inverse algorithms, as well as the unifying perspective of brane tilings and dimer models, has emerged over the last decade. Ricciflat metrics have even been found for infinite families within the class of these noncompact spaces.
Another crucial family of CalabiYau threefold cones affords a clear construction, and the worldvolume physics has been intensely investigated (cf., e.g., [35–37]). The base surfaces here are socalled del Pezzo surfaces which afford positive curvature, so that the appropriate cones over them have just the right behaviour to make the affine threefold have zero Ricci curvature. More precisely, these surfaces are , which is blowup at equal to zero up to eight generic points, or the zeroth Hirzebruch surface . In fact, the cones over and are toric, whereby making these five del Pezzo members of particular interest. The dimensional gauge theories for these were first constructed in [27, 28], giving rise to such interesting phenomena as toric duality and tilings.
Indeed, all toric gauge theories in dimensions obey a remarkable topological formula: take the number of nodes in the quiver, the number of fields, and the number of terms in the superpotential; their alternating sum vanishes. This is a key for the powerful brane tiling (dimer model) description (cf. review in [32]) of these theories. Interestingly, this relation is still obeyed for the myriad of all known dimensional QCS theories to date and suggests that a planar brane tiling may still be the underlying principle behind theories living on M2branes probing affine CalabiYau fourfolds. The richness of the dimensional theories beckons for their analogous and extensions to the dimensional case.
It is therefore a natural and important question to ask what are the corresponding geometries for CalabiYau fourfolds and physically what are the associated dimensional QCS theories on the M2brane world volume, that is, what are the (smooth) toric complex threefolds which admit positive curvature? Based on the ample experience with and the wealth of physics engendered by the aforementioned five del Pezzo cases for threefolds, these fourfolds could hold a key toward understanding QCS and M2 theories.
It is the purpose of the current short note, a prologue to [38], to present the dramatis personae onto the stage and to introduce some rudiments of their properties as well as to initiate the first constructions of the QCS physics associated thereto. Indeed, complex manifolds admitting positive curvature are in general called Fano varieties of which the del Pezzo surfaces are merely the twodimensional examples. We will see that a complete and convenient classification exists for the smooth toric Fano threefolds over which CalabiYau fourfold cones can be established; we will take advantage of the existing data and use the forward algorithm to explicitly construct the quivers, superpotentials, and ChernSimons levels for some cases. A companion paper, of substantially more length and indepth analysis [38], will ensue in the near future. It is our hope that the 18 characters to which we draw your attention will, in due course, become as familiar as the del Pezzo family to the community.
2. Fano Varieties
Fano varieties are of obvious importance; these are varieties which admit an ample anticanonical sheaf; thus, whereas CalabiYau varieties are of zero curvature, they are of positive curvature. (Recently, lower bounds on the Ricci curvature of Fano manifolds have been found [39].) Therefore, not only could Fano varieties constitute cycles of positive volume that can shrink inside a CalabiYau, but also, could they provide local models of CalabiYau of a higher dimension. This second case is perhaps of more interest in the braneprobe scenario where the transverse directions to the branes are affine, noncompact CalabiYau spaces. In particular, one could construct an affine complex cone over a Fano fold, so as to construct a CalabiYau fold, and the branes then reside at the tip of the cone. This situation has become well known to the AdS/CFT correspondence.
What are explicit examples of Fano varieties? In complex dimension one, there is only , the sphere, which obviously has positive curvature. In dimension two, they are called del Pezzo surfaces. In particular, they are , as well its blowup at up to generic points thereon, and the zeroth Hirzebruch surface . Of these 10, , , and for admit a toric description. These have been used extensively in constructing gauge theories on the D3brane world volume [27–40], and the moduli spaces of these theories are correspondingly local CalabiYau threefolds.
We point out that, of course, the aforementioned are smooth Fano varieties. Indeed, we can readily construct affine CalabiYau spaces which are singular cones. For example, for complex dimension one, we indeed have the smooth , leading to the affine CalabiYau 2fold , with the corresponding quiver gauge theory in dimensions, but we also have any of the famous ADE singularities given by quotient by a discrete subgroup of which give rise to wellknown gauge theories. In complex dimension 2, we have , corresponding to the affine CalabiYau 3fold ; however, any is just as good with a singular base Fano 2fold in a weighted projected space.
Our chief interest lies in the situation of dimension three. These Fano threefolds can give rise to CalabiYau fourfolds which can then be probed by M2branes in order to arrive at quiver ChernSimons (QCS) theories on their world volume. A classification of the Fano vareities was achieved in the 80s [41–43]; there is a wealth thereof. Our particular interest will once more be on the toric Fano threefolds where such techniques as tilings and dimers will be conducive. Toric Fano threefolds have been studied in [44, 45]. In dimension , an obvious general class of toric Fano folds is where is a partition of , that is, .
With the rapid advance of computer algebra and algorithmic algebraic geometry, especially in applications to physics (cf. [46–48]), even nonsmooth Fano varieties can be classified [50]. (Indeed, in any dimension , it is known that there are a finite number of smooth Fano varieties [49].) A convenient database has been established whereby one could readily search within an online depository [51]. (We are grateful to Richard Thomas for revealing this treasure trove to us.)
2.1. Smooth Toric Fano Threefolds
Given the enormity of the number, we were to allow singularities—against which, physically, there need be no prejudice—and being inspired by the 2fold case of the del Pezzo surfaces all being smooth, we will henceforth restrict our attention to the smooth toric Fano threefolds. In the parlance of toric geometry, the corresponding cone is called regular. There is a total of 18 such threefolds, a reasonable set indeed. We will adhere to the standard notation of [45] wherein the family is tabulated and also to the identifier with the database [51] for the sake of canonical reference. This is presented in Table 2.

2.1.1. Toric Data
Some detailed explanation of the nomenclature in Table 2 is in order. The toric data is such that the columns are vectors which generate the cone of the variety; in the Dbrane context, this has become known as the matrix. Note that each is a 3vector, signifying that we are dealing with threefolds. Moreover, the point is always an internal point. This property is equivalent to the Fano condition. Indeed, as we recall from [27, 28], the del Pezzo surfaces all have a single internal point. The explicit topology of each space is also given, following [45].
Indeed, our interest in (compact) Fano threefolds is that the complex cone thereupon is an (noncompact) affine CalabiYau fourfold which M2branes may probe. Going form the data in the table to the fourfold is simple; we only need to add one more dimension, say, a row of 1s to each of the matrices. In such cases, the geometry will be cones over what is reported in the third column. In the physics literature, there have been several cases which have been studied in considerable depth and detail: the cone over is the orbifold , the SasakiEinstein 7fold (a homogeneous space which is a circle fibration over the ), which is a real cone over , is dubbed (see [13]), and the real SasakiEinstein cone over is called (cf., e.g., [19, 24, 25]).
2.1.2. Fibrations and Bundles
We, of course, recognise (succeeding the sequence of in dimension 1 and in dimension 2) and the natural generalisation of . Indeed, in complex dimensions, and are always smooth, toric, and Fano. The toric del Pezzo surfaces also appear in Table 2, either in direct product or as various fibers. The notation means projectivisation so as to manufacture a compact project threefold. Indeed, we are primarily interested in the affine CalabiYau fourfold cone over these Fano threefolds, so the spaces in which we have interest do not need this projectivisation; we have included them for consistency of notation in that we are discussing the Fano threefolds in this section.
Therefore, the cone in a sense undoes the said projectivisation, and the fourfold is simply the total space of the fibration. For example, is ; here, is a line bundle of degree over , hence the fiber of is of dimension , which together with the base dictates the total space as being of dimension . (Of course, in line with standard notation is the structure sheaf, or the line bundle of degree 0.) Subsequently, the projectivisation is of dimension , as required. The actual affine CalabiYau fourfold is simply the total space .
2.1.3. Symmetries
One piece of information, obviously of great importance, is the symmetry of the variety, which is encoded in the worldvolume physics, either manifestly or as hidden global symmetries [52–55]. Inspecting the toric diagrams, we readily see that our list of Fano threefolds affords the following symmetries. The most symmetric case is, of course, , the cone over it has a full , acting as unitary transformations on the four coordinates. Next, both and have , with acting on the base and for each fiber. Similarly, has symmetry , with for the base , another for the 2 identical line bundles , and one more for . Likewise, has , with the and for the and , respectively, and for the cone which gives the affine CalabiYau 4fold. Proceeding along the same vein, , , and share the symmetry , has , and has . All remaining cases, namely, the ’s, ’s, and ’s, are of symmetry .
Note that the rank of the group of symmetries must total to 4 because we are dealing with a toric (affine) CalabiYau 4fold. Indeed, one factor of the symmetry is the Rsymmetry and the remaining rank 3 symmetry, a global mesonic symmetry (cf. [52, 53]), and there could be possible additional baryonic symmetries. We have summarised these mesonic symmetries in the last column of Table 2, under the entry . Unless explicitly written, we have used the shorthand notation that
We note that the three cases of there being only a single symmetry, namely, (for which contains the ), , and , are products of projective spaces corresponding to the three partitions of 3. The corresponding QCS theories for these have been already constructed in the literature. This is perhaps unsurprising given the high degree of symmetry for these spaces.
2.1.4. Some Geometrical Data
We have also listed, to the rightmost of the table, some geometrical data, such as topological invariants. In particular, we tabulate the second Betti number and the genus . Indeed, , where is the number of external points in the toric diagram, or since there is always a single internal point as discussed above, is the number of columns of minus 1. Now, recall that in the D3brane probes on CalabiYau threefold case, the external vertices count the conserved anomalyfree global charges of the dimensional gauge theory. Each external vertex in the toric diagram is a divisor, and its corresponding charge gives rise to a basis for the set of mesonic, and baryonic charges: one of which is the Rsymmetry, three of which are mesonic and the remaining charges are baryonic.
However, in our present case of M2branes probing the CalabiYau fourfold, the worldvolume ChernSimons theory in dimensions has no notion of anomaly, and hence there is no distinction between anomalous and anomalyfree baryonic charges. (An exception to this is the parity anomaly where one starts with a theory that has no CS terms, and oneloop perturbation theory generates a nonzero CS term. Since the CS term is odd under parity, one says that parity is conserved in the classical level but broken by a oneloop effect, hence anomalous. This is the only instance in which one can have anomalies in dimensions. Nevertheless, all the theories we deal with are protected by supersymmetry and, as long as the ranks are equal, the CS levels do not get quantum corrections (cf. [56]).) Thus, seems to be counting the number of baryonic charges if we extend the analogy from the dimensional situation.
On the other hand, a conserved baryonic charge corresponds to a gauge field in AdS. This is counted by the number of 2cycles in the SasakiEinstein 7fold (SE7), given by the 3form on each 2cycle. The number of 2cycles in the SE7 is equal to the number of 5cycles by Poincaré duality, which is in turn equal to the number of external points in the toric diagram subtracted by 4. That is, the baryonic symmetries also afford a nice geometrical interpretation here: the number of columns of is , then the number of baryonic symmetries is , signifying (cf. of [25, Section 2] and also [23]). Then, since the second Betti number is , we have the number of baryonic symmetries as the topological quantity .
Next, let us discuss the genus . Note that a polarisation can be chosen as the ample anticanonical sheaf , which, due to its ampleness, can be used to embed into a projective space. It turns out that this embedding is of degree into such that . Of physical importance is that the homogeneous coordinates of the ambient constitute gauge invariant chiral operators which parameterise the supersymmetric vacuum moduli space, with the relations satisfied amongst them providing the explicit equation thereof. In short, the number of generators of the moduli space is .
2.1.5. Hilbert Series
Now, it was first pointed out in [57, 58] that the Hilbert series of an algebraic variety is central toward understanding the gauge invariant operators of the gauge theory living on the branes probing the variety. For our purposes, this is a rational function which is the generating function for counting the spectrum of operators; it could be multivariate, having a number of “chemical potentials,” which we call the refined Hilbert series, or it could depend on a single grading, which we call the unrefined Hilbert series. In particular, cones over the Fano twofolds, that is, the del Pezzo surfaces, have an elegant expression for their unrefined Hilbert series. We recall, [57, Section 3.3.1], that for the th del Pezzo, of degree , it is ; Note that has the same unrefined Hilbert series as that of though the refined, multivariate Hilbert series does differentiate the two.
The unrefined Hilbert series, computed for the canonical embedding stated above, is also presented in [51], though perhaps not of immediate use since they are given as series expansions. We have recomputed these as rational functions. By inspection, a succinct equation, similar to the del Pezzo case, exists where is the genus of .
In the special cases where the Fano threefold is the product of with , the genus turns out to be . Whence, the number of generators of the moduli space is ; the 3 corresponds to the factor, and the refers to the factor.
3. Reconstructing the Vacuum Moduli Space
With a current want of an inverse algorithm, with or without the aid of dimer technology, it is difficult to systematically find the requisite quiver ChernSimons theories whose moduli spaces are CalabiYau cones over the Fano threefolds listed above, a question certainly of considerable interest. Nevertheless, because the forward algorithm is now well established [20], one could explicitly check whether a certain ansatz theory indeed gives the correct moduli space. Therefore, with a combination of inspired guesses and systematic computer scans, one could hope to find some theories.
Nomenclature
In accordance with the notation of [14, 19], and emphasising the intimate relation between the dimensional gauge theory and the dimensional QCS, we denote the latter as follows: let the superpotential and matter content be that of the D3brane worldvolume theory for the CalabiYau threefold , then we keep the same superpotential and quiver, but impose ChernSimons levels , ordered according to a fixed choice for the nodes, while obeying the constraint [19, 20]
We subsequently run the forward algorithm, the resulting vacuum moduli space is now a CalabiYau fourfold and the QCS theory we will denote as . Note, of course, that the actual 4fold may be seemingly quite unrelated to .
Furthermore, as always, we let denote the th bifundamental field between nodes and , and let signify the th adjoint field for the th node.
3.1. Various Candidates
and
The quiver and superpotential can be readily recalled from, for example, [27, 28] (cf. also this theory as a QCS from [13]); next, we can assign the ChernSimons levels as , which indeed satisfies the constraint (3.1)
(3.2)
Running through the forward algorithm gives us the following charge matrix and toric diagram :
Now, take , or number 24, of the Fano list from Table 2, and consider the affine CY4 cone thereupon, by adding a row of 1s. One can readily check that upto reordering the columns, the two matrices are explicitly related by a transformation. This means that the moduli spaces, as affine toric varieties, are isomorphic.
Phases of
Next, we recall the wellknown two phases of the dimensional theories for the CY3 over the zeroth Hirzebruch surface
(3.4)
There are two toric phases, the first having 8 fields, and the second 12.
From these progenitors, we can obtain quite a few CalabiYau fourfold cones with judicious choices of CS levels. We list these in Table 3, running, in each case, the forward algorithm to the theory. The input is the superpotential and quiver of the indicated phase of , together with the chosen ChernSimons levels, and the output, the charge matrix and toric diagram .
In this table, we have used the notation to mean that it is isomorphic, by an explicit transformation of the toric diagrams (upto repetition and permutation of the vertices) to the CalabiYau fourfold cone over the Fano threefold . Note that the last row of is always 1, this is a consequence of the CalabiYau condition. Furthermore, note that the second 2 rows for phase I, corresponding to the Fterms, decouple into diagonal form; this reflects the fact that the master space [52, 53] is the direct product of two conifolds. Moreover, the first row of the table, for the theory corresponding to , has been obtained in [25].
and
The theory for the cone over the surface is again well known. We present it below (note that only two of the three bifundamental fields group into an multiplet and the third is a singlet). Now, if we took the ChernSimons levels as , and combining with the standard theory
(3.5)
then we find the charge and toric matrices to be
and resulting moduli space to be .
4. Outlook
In this short note, a prelude to [38], we have initiated the study of Fano threefolds in the context of M2branes. In particular, we have presented the classification of all smooth toric Fano threefolds, the cones over which are CalabiYau fourfold singularities which the M2branes could probe. We have computed some preliminary geometrical data, including such quantities as Hilbert series and global symmetries which have recently turned out to be important for the physics of these models.
These 18 spaces are direct analogues of the toric del Pezzo surfaces, which have been the subject of much investigation in the past decade in association with the construction of dimensional worldvolume quiver gauge theories for D3branes. It is selfevident that these spaces should be central to the study of dimensional quiver ChernSimons theories.
For some of these we have identified, using the forward algorithm, the quiver theories whose mesonic moduli spaces are precisely as desired. Such a prima facie scan has produced 6 as moduli spaces of vacua, and they, as with all theories so far produced in the toric M2brane scenario, obey the planar brane tiling/dimer model condition. It is our hope that systematically all gauge theories for the 18 spaces can be soon geometrically engineered and the corresponding tiling descriptions prescribed. These and many further details will appear in the companion work of [38].
Acknowledgments
.בהקדשה, לואלריואֵלָהשמאירותאתחײתמיד
Scientiae et Technologiae Concilio Anglicae, et Ricardo Fitzjames, Episcopo Londiniensis, ceterisque omnibus benefactoribus Collegii Mertonensis Oxoniensis, sed super omnes, pro amore Catharinae Sanctae Alexandriae, lacrimarum Mariae semper Virginis, et ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam hoc opusculum Y.H. He dedicat. The authors are indebted to John Davey, Kentaro Hori, Noppadol Mekareeya, Richard Thomas, Giuseppe Torri, and Alberto Zaffaroni for enlightening discussions. A. Hanany would like to thank the kind hospitality, during the initiation of this project, of IPMU in Tokyo and is further grateful to the University of Richmond, the Perimeter Institute as well as the KITP in Santa Barbara, during the completion. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant no. PHY0551164.
References
 J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Modeling multiple M2branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 4, Article ID 045020, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Gauge symmetry and supersymmetry of multiple M2branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 6, Article ID 065008, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Comments on multiple M2branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 2, article 105, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Gustavsson, “Algebraic structures on parallel M2 branes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 811, no. 12, pp. 66–76, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Van Raamsdonk, “Comments on the BaggerLambert theory and multiple M2branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 5, article 105, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Mukhi and C. Papageorgakis, “M2 to D2,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 5, article 085, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, “N = 6 superconformal ChernSimonsmatter theories, M2branes and their gravity duals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 091, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Benna, I. Klebanov, T. Klose, and M. Smedbäck, “Superconformal ChernSimons theories and AdS/CFT correspondence,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 072, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Kim, S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “M2brane probe dynamics and toric duality,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 797, no. 12, pp. 340–370, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Hosomichi, K. M. Lee, S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “N = 5, 6 superconformal ChernSimons theories and M2branes on orbifolds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 002, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Schnabl and Y. Tachikawa, “Classification of N = 6 superconformal theories of ABJM type,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 9, article 103, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “Moduli spaces of ChernSimons quiver gauge theories and AdS_{4}/CFT_{3},” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 12, Article ID 126005, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, “Tilings, ChernSimons theories and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 111, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Hanany, D. Vegh, and A. Zaffaroni, “Brane tilings and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 3, article 012, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Imamura and K. Kimura, “On the moduli space of elliptic MaxwellChernSimons theories,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 509–523, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Imamura and K. Kimura, “N = 4 ChernSimons theories with auxiliary vector multiplets,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 040, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Imamura and K. Kimura, “Quiver ChernSimons theories and crystals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 114, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Ueda and M. Yamazaki, “Toric CalabiYau fourfolds dual to ChernSimonsmatter theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 12, article 045, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Franco, A. Hanany, J. Park, and D. RodriguezGomez, “Towards M2brane theories for generic toric singularities,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 12, article 110, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Hanany and Y. H. He, “M2branes and quiver ChernSimons: a taxonomic study,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.4044. View at: Google Scholar
 O. Aharony, O. Bergman, and D. L. Jafferis, “Fractional M2branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 11, article 043, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Krishnan, C. MacCaferri, and H. Singh, “M2brane flows and the ChernSimons level,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 5, article 114, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Imamura, “Charges and homologies in AdS_{4}/CFT_{3},” http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.3095. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Franco, I. R. Klebanov, and D. RodríguezGómez, “M2branes on orbifolds of the cone over Q^{1,1,1},” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 8, article 033, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Davey, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, and G. Torri, “Phases of M2brane theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 6, article 025, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Amariti, D. Forcella, L. Girardello, and A. Mariotti, “3D Seiberglike dualities and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 5, article 025, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 BO. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, “Dbrane gauge theories from toric singularities and toric duality,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 595, no. 12, pp. 165–200, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, “Phase structure of Dbrane gauge theories and toric duality,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, no. 8, article 040, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Hanany and E. Witten, “Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and threedimensional gauge dynamics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 492, no. 12, pp. 152–190, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Hanany and K. D. Kennaway, “Dimer models and toric diagrams,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hepth/0503149. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Vegh, B. Wecht, and K. D. Kennaway, “Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 1, pp. 2401–2448, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. D. Kennaway, “Brane tilings,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 2977–3038, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Lee, “Superconformal field theories from Mtheory crystal lattices,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 10, Article ID 101901, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “Toric AdS_{4}/CFT_{3} duals and Mtheory crystals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 5, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Feng, A. Hanany, Y. H. He, and A. Iqbal, “Quiver theories, soliton spectra and PicardLefschetz transformations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1265–1297, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Feng, S. Franco, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, “Unhiggsing the del Pezzo,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1385–1420, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Wijnholt, “Large volume perspective on branes at singularities,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1117–1153, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Davey et al., “M2 theories from Fano threefolds,” to appear. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Székelyhidi, “Greatest lower bounds on the Ricci curvature of Fano manifolds,” Compositio Mathematica, vol. 147, pp. 319–331, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Feng, A. Hanany, Y. H. He, and A. M. Uranga, “Toric duality as Seiberg duality and brane diamonds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, no. 12, article 28, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Mori and S. Mukai, “Classification of Fano 3folds with B_{2}≥2, I,” in Algebraic and Topological Theories, M. Nagata et al., Ed., pp. 496–545, Kinokuniya Company, Tokyo, Japan, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 J.P. Murre, “Classification of Fano threefolds according to Fano and Iskovskih,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (C.I.M.E.), vol. 947 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 35–92, Varenna, Italy, June 1981. View at: Google Scholar
 S. D. Cutkosky, “On Fano 3folds,” Manuscripta Mathematica, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 189–204, 1989. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. V. Batyrev, “Toroidal Fano 3folds,” Mathematics of the USSRIzvestiya, vol. 19, pp. 13–25, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
 V. V. Batyrev, “On the classification of toric Fano 4folds,” Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 1021–1050, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 L. B. Anderson, Y.H. He, and A. Lukas, “Heterotic compactification, an algorithmic approach,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 7, article 049, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Gray, Y. H. He, A. Ilderton, and A. Lukas, “STRINGVACUA. A Mathematica package for studying vacuum configurations in string phenomenology,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 107–119, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Gray, “A simple introduction to Grobner basis methods in string phenomenology,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1662. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Kollar, Y. Miyaoka, and S. Mori, “Rational connectedness and boundedness of Fano manifolds,” Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 765–779, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
 A. M. Kasprzyk, M. Kreuzer, and B. Nill, “On the combinatorial classification of toriclog del Pezzo surfaces,” LMS Journal of Computation and Mathematics, vol. 13, pp. 33–46, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 http://grdb.lboro.ac.uk/.
 D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y.H. He, and A. Zaffaroni, “The master space of N = 1 gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 8, article 012, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y. H. he, and A. Zaffaroni, “Mastering the master space,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 85, no. 23, pp. 163–171, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Feng, S. Franco, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, “Symmetries of toric duality,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1769–1798, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Franco, A. Hanany, and P. Kazakopoulos, “Hidden exceptional global symmetries in 4d CFTs,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1475–1530, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K. Intriligator, N. Seiberg, and M. J. Strassler, “Aspects of N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 499, no. 12, pp. 67–99, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y.H. He, “Counting BPS operators in gauge theories: quivers, syzygies and plethystics,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 11, article 050, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y.H. He, “Counting gauge invariants: the plethystic program,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 3, article 090, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Amihay Hanany and YangHui He. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.