Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013, Article ID 298616, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/298616
Research Article

Physical Quantities of Reissner-Nordström Spacetime with Arbitrary Function and Regularized Procedure

1Center for Theoretical Physics, British University in Egypt, Sherouk City 11837, P.O. Box 43, Cairo, Egypt
2Mathematics Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt

Received 9 October 2012; Revised 26 April 2013; Accepted 2 May 2013

Academic Editor: Chao-Qiang Geng

Copyright © 2013 Gamal G. L. Nashed. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Ortín, Gravity and Strings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
  2. C. Møller, “Tetrad fields and conservation laws in general relativity,” in Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, C. Mller, Ed., Academic Press, London, UK, 1962.
  3. C. Møller, “Conservation laws in the tetrad theory of gravitation,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Theory of Gravitation, Warszawa and Jablonna 1962, NORDITA Publications No. 136, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France; PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers, Warszawa, Poland, 1964.
  4. C. Pellegrini and J. Plebański, Matematisk-fysiske skrifter udgivet af Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, vol. 2, no. 4, 1963.
  5. F. W. Hehl, In ProceedIngs of the 6th School of Cosmology and Gravitation Course on spin, Torsion Rotation and Supergravity, Eric, Italy, Plenum, New York, NY, USA, 1979.
  6. F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Neeman, “Metric-affine gauge theory of gravity: field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance,” Physics Reports, vol. 258, no. 1-2, pp. 1–171, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. K. Hayashi, “The gauge theory of the translation group and underlying geometry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 441–444, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  8. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, “New general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3524–3553, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, “Addendum to ‘New general relativity’,” Physical Review D, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3312–3314, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  10. F. I. Mikhail, M. I. Wanas, E. I. Lashin, and A. Hindawi, “Spherically symmetric solutions in Møller's tetrad theory of gravitation,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 869–876, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. N. L. Youssef and A. M. Sid-Ahmed, “Linear connections and curvature tensors in the geometry of parallelizable manifolds,” Reports on Mathematical Physics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 39–53, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Blagojevic and M. Vasilic, “Asymptotic symmetry and conserved quantities in the Poincare gauge theory of gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 5, no. 9, p. 1241, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. T. Kawai, “Energy-momentum and angular momentum densities in gauge theories of gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, no. 10, p. 104014, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. T. Kawai, K. Shibata, and I. Tanaka, “Generalized equivalence principle in extended new general relativity,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 505–530, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. F. W. Hehl, J. Dermott McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Ne'eman, “Metric-affine gauge theory of gravity: field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance,” Physics Report, vol. 258, no. 1-2, pp. 1–171, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. N. Obukhov, “Poincaré gauge gravity: selected topics,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 95, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. T. G. Lucas, Y. N. Obukhov, and J. G. Pereira, “Regularizing role of teleparallelism,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 6, p. 064043, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Aldrovandi, L. C. T. Guillen, J. G. Pereira, and K. H. Vu, “Bringing together gravity and the quanta,” in Proceedings of the Albert Einstein Century International Conference, Paris, France, July 2005, [gr-qc/0603122].
  19. Y. N. Obukhov, J. G. Pereira, and G. F. Rubilar, “On the energy transported by exact plane gravitational-wave solutions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, no. 21, p. 215014, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. E. C. G. Sudarshan and N. Mukunda, Classical Dynamics: A Modern Perspective, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1974.
  21. C. Itzykson and J. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  22. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, Mass, USA, 1980.
  23. L. B. Szabados, “Quasi-local energy-momentum and angular momentum in GR: a review article,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 7, p. 1, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  24. J. M. Nester, “General pseudotensors and quasilocal quantities,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 3, p. S261, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. W. Maluf, “Hamiltonian formulation of the teleparallel description of general relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 335–343, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Schwinger, “Quantized gravitational field,” Physical Review, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 1253–1258, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. J. W. Maluf, “Localization of energy in general relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 4242–4247, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. W. Maluf, J. F. da Rocha-neto, T. M. L. Toribio, and K. H. Castello-Branco, “Energy and angular momentum of the gravitational field in the teleparallel geometry,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 12, p. 124001, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. G. W. Gibbons, M. J. Perry, and C. N. Pope, “The first law of thermodynamics for Kerr-anti-de Sitter black holes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 1503, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, “Asymptotically anti-de Sitter space-times,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 1, no. 4, p. L39, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. A. Ashtekar and S. Das, “Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes: conserved quantities,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 17, no. 2, p. L17, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity,” Annals of Physics, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 286–318, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  33. L. F. Abbott and S. Deser, “Charge definition in non-abelian gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics, vol. 88, p. 286, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  34. S. Deser, I. Kanik, and B. Tekin, “Conserved charges of higher D Kerr-AdS spacetimes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 17, pp. 3383–3389, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  35. S. Deser and B. Tekin, “New energy definition for higher-curvature gravities,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 8, Article ID 084032, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, G. T. Horowitz, and M. J. Perry, “Positive mass theorems for black holes,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 295–308, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. G. W. Gibbons, C. M. Hull, and N. P. Warner, “The stability of gauged supergravity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 173–190, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, “Some properties of the Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 846–864, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. R. Cai and L. Cao, “Conserved charges in even dimensional asymptotically locally anti-de Sitter space-times,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 603, no. 3, p. 83, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi, and D. Marolf, “Comparison between various notions of conserved charges in asymptotically AdS spacetimes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 14, p. 2881, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas, “General definition of “conserved quantities” in general relativity and other theories of gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 61, no. 8, Article ID 084027, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. I. M. Anderson and C. G. Torre, “Asymptotic conservation laws in classical field theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 20, pp. 4109–4113, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. G. Barnich and F. Brandt, “Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 633, no. 1-2, pp. 3–82, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. Katz, J. Bicak, and D. Lynden-Bell, “Relativistic conservation laws and integral constraints for large cosmological perturbations,” Physical Review D, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 5957–5969, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. N. Deruelle and J. Katz, “On the mass of a Kerr-anti-de Sitter spacetime in D dimensions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 421, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. A. N. Aliev, “Electromagnetic properties of Kerr-anti-de Sitter black holes,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 8, Article ID 084041, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. B. Julia and S. Silva, “Currents and superpotentials in classical gauge-invariant theories: I. Local results with applications to perfect fluids and general relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 2173, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. Y. Obukhov and G. F. Rubilar, “Scalar ΛN and ΛΛ interaction in a chiral unitary approach,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 6, Article ID 064002, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. S. Silva, “On superpotentials and charge algebras of gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 558, no. 1-2, pp. 391–415, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. B. Julia and S. Silva, “Currents and superpotentials in classical gauge theories: II. Global aspects and the example of affine gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 17, no. 22, p. 4733, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. R. Aros, M. Contreras, R. Olea, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, “Conserved charges for gravity with locally anti-de sitter asymptotics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 1647–1650, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. R. Aros, M. Contreras, R. Olea, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, “Conserved charges for even dimensional asymptotically AdS gravity theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, no. 4, Article ID 044002, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, “The holographic Weyl anomaly,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 9807, no. 7, p. 23, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, “A stress tensor for anti-de sitter gravity,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 413–428, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. G. Barnich and G. Compeere, “Generalized Smarr relation for Kerr-AdS black holes from improved surface integrals,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 4, Article ID 044016, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. M. Banados, R. Olea, and S. Theisen, “Counterterms and dual holographic anomalies in CS gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 510, p. 67, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. R. Olea, “Regularization of odd-dimensional AdS gravity: kounterterms,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 704, p. 73, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. G. G. L. Nashed, “Total conserved charges of Kerr-NUT spacetimes using Poincaré version of teleparallel equivalent of general relativity,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. P. Baekler and F. W. Hehl, “Rotating black holes in metric-affine gravity,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 635, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. J. M. Nester, F. H. Ho, and C. M. Chen, “Quasilocal center-of-mass for teleparallel gravity,” in Proceedings of the 10th Marcel Grossman Meeting, J. M. Nester, Ed., vol. 33, p. 910, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1992.
  61. R. S. Tung and J. M. Nester, “The quadratic spinor Lagrangian is equivalent to the teleparallel theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 2, Article ID 021501, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. V. C. de Andrade and J. G. Pereira, “Gravitational Lorentz force and the description of the gravitational interaction,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 4689–4695, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. Y. M. Cho, “Einstein Lagrangian as the translational Yang-Mills Lagrangian,” Physical Review D, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 2521–2525, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. F. Gronwald, “Metric-affine gauge theory of gravity: I. Fundamental structure and field equations,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 263, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. U. Muench, Über teleparallele Gravitationstheorien [M.S. thesis], University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 1997.
  66. D. K. Wise, “Symmetric space cartan connections and gravity in three and four dimensions,” Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry, vol. 5, p. 80, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. V. C. de Andrade and J. G. Pereira, “Gravitational Lorentz force and the description of the gravitational interaction,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 4689–4695, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. R. Tresguerres, “Translations and dynamics,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 905, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. Y. N. Obukhov and J. G. Pereira, “Metric-affine approach to teleparallel gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 4, Article ID 044016, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. Y. N. Obukhov, “Plane waves in metric-affine gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 2, Article ID 024025, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. Y. N. Obukhov, G. F. Rubilar, and J. G. Pereira, “Conserved currents in gravitational models with quasi-invariant Lagrangians: application to teleparallel gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 10, Article ID 104007, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. Y. N. Obukhov and J. G. Pereira, “Lessons of spin and torsion: reply to ‘Consistent coupling to Dirac fields in teleparallelism’,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 12, Article ID 128502, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. D. Puetzfeld, “An exact-plane fronted wave solution in metric-affine gravity,” in Exact Solutions and Scalar Field in Gravity: Recent Developments, A. Macias, J. Cervantes-Cota, and C. Lammerzahl, Eds., pp. 141–151, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  74. A. Garcia, A. Macias, D. Puetzfeld, and J. Socorro, “Plane-fronted waves in metric-affine gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, no. 4, Article ID 044021, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. A. D. King and D. Vassiliev, “Torsion waves in metric-affine field theory,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2317–2329, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  76. J. D. Brown and J. W. York, “Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action,” Physical Review D, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1407–1419, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. V. Pasic and D. Vassiliev, “Pp-waves with torsion and metric-affine gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 3961–3975, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  78. D. Vassiliev, “Pseudoinstantons in metric-affine field theory,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1239–1265, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. D. Vassiliev, “Quadratic metric-affine gravity,” Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 231–252, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  80. H. T. Nieh, “A torsional topological invariant,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, no. 29, p. 5237, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi, “Chern-Simons modification of general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 10, Article ID 104012, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. M. B. Cantcheff, “Einstein-Cartan formulation of Chern-Simons Lorentz-violating gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 2, Article ID 025002, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. E. W. Mielke, “Einsteinian gravity from a topological action,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1311–1325, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. E. W. Mielke, “Topologically modified teleparallelism, passing through the Nieh-Yan functional,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 6, Article ID 067502, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. Ph. Freud, “Uber die ausdrucke der gesamtenergie und des gesamtimpulses eines materiellen systems in der allgemeinen relativitatstheorie,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 417–419, 1939. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. J. M. Nester, “A new gravitational energy expression with a simple positivity proof,” Physics Letters A, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 241–242, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. J. Socorro, A. Macias, and F. W. Hehl, “Computer algebra in gravity: reduce-excalc programs for (non-) Riemannian space-times. I,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 115, no. 2-3, pp. 264–283, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. G. G. L. Nashed and T. Shirafuji, “Reissner-Nordström space-time in the tetrad theory of gravitation,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 65, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. G. G. L. Nashed, “Vacuum non singular black hole solutions in tetrad theory of gravitation,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1047–1058, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. T. Shirafuji, G. G. L. Nashed, and K. Hayashi, “Energy of general spherically symmetric solution in the tetrad theory of gravitation,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 665–678, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. G. G. L. Nashed, “General spherically symmetric nonsingular black hole solutions in a teleparallel theory of gravitation,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 6, Article ID 064015, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, “The dynamics of general relativity,” in Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research, L. Witten, Ed., Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  93. G. G. L. Nashed, “Reissner-Nordström solutions and energy in teleparallel theory,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 21, no. 29, p. 2241, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. G. G. L. Nashed, “Energy of spherically symmetric space-times on regularizing teleparallelism,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 25, no. 14, p. 2883, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2752–2756, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. S. W. Hawking, “Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse,” Physical Review D, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 2460–2473, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. S. W. Hawking, in General Relativity, S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1979.
  98. W. Kim, E. J. Son, and M. Yoon, “Thermodynamic similarity between the noncommutative Schwarzschild black hole and the Reissner-Nordström black hole,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 4, p. 42, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. M. M. Akbar, “Entropy corrections for Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström black holes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 6, p. 1383, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  100. M. Blagojević, “Hamiltonian structure and gauge symmetries of Poincaré gauge theory,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 367–391, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. E. W. Mielke and R. P. Wallner, “Mass and spin of double dual solutions in Poincaré gauge theory,” Nuovo Cimento B, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 607–624, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar