Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013, Article ID 607807, 64 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/607807
Review Article

Precision Calculations in Supersymmetric Theories

Institute for Theoretical Particle Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany

Received 28 January 2013; Accepted 8 May 2013

Academic Editor: Hong-Jian He

Copyright © 2013 L. Mihaila. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. V. Avdeev and M. Y. Kalmykov, “Pole masses of quarks in dimensional reduction,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 502, no. 1-2, pp. 419–435, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Weinberg, “A model of leptons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 1264–1266, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Salam, “Weak and electromagnetic interactions,” in Proceedings of the 8th Nobel Symposium, pp. 367–377, Lerum, Sweden, May 1968.
  4. M. Gell-Mann, “Quarks,” Acta Physica Austriaca, Supplemet 9, pp. 733–761, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  5. H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann, and H. Leutwyler, “Advantages of the color octet gluon picture,” Physics Letters B, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 365–368, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Ultraviolet behavior of non-abelian gauge theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 30, no. 26, pp. 1343–1346, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Asymptotically free gauge theories. I,” Physical Review D, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 3633–3652, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. Coleman and J. Mandula, “All possible symmetries of the S matrix,” Physical Review, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 1251–1256, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Haag, J. T. Łopuszański, and M. Sohnius, “All possible generators of supersymmetries of the S-matrix,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 88, pp. 257–274, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman, “Extension of the algebra of poincare group generators and violation of P invariance,” JETP Letters, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 323, 1971, Translated from Pis'ma Zhurnal Eksperimental'noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, vol. 13 pp. 452, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov, “Possible universal neutrino interaction,” JETP Letters, vol. 16, p. 438, 1972, Translated from Pis'ma Zhurnal Eksperimental'noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, vol. 16 pp. 621, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Supergauge transformations in four dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 70, pp. 39–50, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. A. Salam and J. Strathdee, “Super-gauge transformations,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 477–482, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Zumino, “Supersymmetry and the vacuum,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 535–546, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. C. West, “The supersymmetric effective potential,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 106, pp. 219–227, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. T. Grisaru, W. Siegel, and M. Roček, “Improved methods for supergraphs,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 429–450, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. L. Girardello and M. T. Grisaru, “Soft breaking of supersymmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. V. Gladyshev and D. I. Kazakov, “Is (low energy) dusy still alive?” European School of High-Energy Physics. In presshttp://arxiv.org/abs/1212.2548.
  19. http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/LEPEWWG/.
  20. J. Ellis, S. Kelley, and D. V. Nanopoulos, “Probing the desert using gauge coupling unification,” Physics Letters B, vol. 260, no. 1-2, pp. 131–137, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, and H. Fürstenau, “Comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at LEP,” Physics Letters B, vol. 260, no. 3-4, pp. 447–455, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Langacker and M. X. Luo, “Implications of precision electroweak experiments for mt,ρ0, sin2θW, and grand unification,” Physical Review D, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 817–822, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Sofue and V. Rubin, “Rotation curves of spiral galaxies,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 39, pp. 137–174, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. N. Kaiser and G. Squires, “Mapping the dark matter with weak gravitational lensing,” Astrophysics Journal, vol. 404, no. 2, pp. 441–450, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  25. C. S. Kochanek, “Gravitational lensing limits on cold dark matter and its variants,” Astrophysics Journal, vol. 453, p. 545, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Eidelman, K. G. Hayes, K. A. Olive et al., “Review of particle physics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 592, pp. 1–5, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  27. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/SupersymmetryPublicResults.
  28. J. Angle, E. Aprile, F. Arneodo et al., “Search for light dark matter in XENON10 data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 5, Article ID 051301, 5 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/.
  30. G. W. Bennett, B. Bousquet, H. N. Brown et al., “Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 7, Article ID 072003, 41 pages, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  31. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/HiggsPublicResults.
  32. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResults.
  33. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, “Electroweak precision observables in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Physics Reports, vol. 425, no. 5-6, pp. 265–368, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. D. Stockinger, “The muon magnetic moment and supersymmetry,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 34, no. 2, article R45. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. F. del Aguila, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, B. C. Allanach et al., “Collider aspects of flavor physics at high Q,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 57, no. 1-2, pp. 183–307, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. S. Dittmaier, C. Mariotti, G. Passarinos et al., “Handbook of LHC higgs cross sections: 1. Inclusive observables,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.0593.
  37. M. A. Shifman and A. I. Vainshtein, “Solution of the anomaly puzzle in SUSY gauge theories and the Wilson operator expansion,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 277, pp. 456–486, 1986, translated from Soviet Physics—JETP, vol. 64, p. 428, 1986, Zhurnal Eksperimental'noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, vol. 91, pp. 723–744, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  38. N. Arkani-Hamed and H. Murayama, “Holomorphy, rescaling anomalies and exact functions in supersymmetric gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2000, no. 6, article 30, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  39. K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, “The renormalization group and the ε expansion,” Physics Reports, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 75–199, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Gell-Mann and F. E. Low, “Quantum electrodynamics at small distances,” Physical Review, vol. 95, pp. 1300–1312, 1954. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  41. C. G. Callan, “Broken scale invariance in scalar field theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1541–1547, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. Symanzik, “Small distance behaviour in field theory and power counting,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 227–246, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  43. M. T. Grisaru, B. Milewski, and D. Zanon, “The structure of UV divergences in SS YM theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 155, no. 5-6, pp. 357–363, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. Hisano and M. A. Shifman, “Exact results for soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters in supersymmetric gauge theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 5475–5482, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. N. Arkani-Hamed, G. F. Giudice, M. A. Luty, and R. Rattazzi, “Supersymmetry-breaking loops from analytic continuation into superspace,” Physical Review D, vol. 58, no. 11, Article ID 115005, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Y. Yamada, “Two-loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry-breaking scalar interactions: supergraph method,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 3537–3545, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. L. V. Avdeev, D. I. Kazakov, and I. N. Kondrashuk, “Renormalizations in softly broken SUSY gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 510, no. 1-2, pp. 289–312, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  48. D. I. Kazakov and V. N. Velizhanin, “Massive ghosts in softly broken SUSY gauge theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 485, no. 4, pp. 393–402, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. L. N. Mihaila, J. Salomon, and M. Steinhauser, “Gauge coupling β functions in the standard model to three loops,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 15, Article ID 151602, 4 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. A. Bauer, L. Mihaila, and J. Salomon, “Matching coefficients for αs and mb to O(αs2) in the MSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 2, article 37, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. W. Martens, L. Mihaila, J. Salomon, and M. Steinhauser, “Minimal supersymmetric SU(5) and gauge coupling unification at three loops,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 9, Article ID 095013, 11 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. J. Ellis, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, A. Hoecker, and A. Riotto, “The probable fate of the standard model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 679, no. 4, pp. 369–375, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Riotto, and A. Strumia, “Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum,” Physics Letters B, vol. 709, no. 3, pp. 222–228, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. A. Pak, M. Steinhauser, and N. Zerf, “Supersymmetric next-to-next-to-leading order corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 9, article 118, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LHCPhysics/CrossSections.
  56. V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “The β function in supersymmetric gauge theories. Instantons versus traditional approach,” Physics Letters B, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 329–333, 1986, translated from Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 43, p. 294, 1986, Yadernaya Fizika, vol. 43, p. 459, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. W. Siegel, “Supersymmetric dimensional regularization via dimensional reduction,” Physics Letters B, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 193–196, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  58. W. Siegel, “Inconsistency of supersymmetric dimensional regularization,” Physics Letters B, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 37–40, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  59. L. V. Avdeev, G. A. Chochia, and A. A. Vladimirov, “On the scope of supersymmetric dimensional regularization,” Physics Letters B, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 272–274, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. L. V. Avdeev and A. A. Vladimirov, “Dimensional regularization and supersymmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 262–276, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. I. Jack and D. R. T. Jones, “The gaugino β-function,” Physics Letters B, vol. 415, no. 4, pp. 383–389, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and A. Pickering, “The soft scalar mass β-function,” Physics Letters B, vol. 432, no. 1-2, pp. 114–119, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and C. G. North, “N=1 supersymmetry and the three-loop anomalous dimension for the chiral superfield,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 473, no. 1-2, pp. 308–322, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  64. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and C. G. North, “N=1 supersymmetry and the three-loop gauge β-function,” Physics Letters B, vol. 386, no. 1–4, pp. 138–140, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and C. G. North, “Scheme dependence and the NSVZ β-function,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 486, no. 1-2, pp. 479–499, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and K. L. Roberts, “Equivalence of dimensional reduction and dimensional regularisation,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 151–159, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. L. V. Avdeev and O. V. Tarasov, “The three-loop β-function in the N = 1, 2, 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 112, no. 4-5, pp. 356–358, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. G. Bollini and J. J. Giambiagi, “Razmyernaya pyeryenormirovka: Chislo izmyeryenii{cyrillic, short}, kak ryegulyarizatsionnyi{cyrillic, short} paramyetr,” Il Nuovo Cimento, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. G. 't Hooft and M. Veltman, “Regularization and renormalization of gauge fields,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 44, pp. 189–213, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  70. O. Piguet, K. Sibold, and M. Schweda, “General solution of the supersymmetry consistency conditions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 183–188, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. J. C. Ward, “An identity in quantum eletrodynamics,” Physical Review, vol. 78, no. 2, p. 182, 1950. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  72. Y. Takahashi, “On the generalized ward identity,” Il Nuovo Cimento, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 371–375, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. A. A. Slavnov, “Ward identities in gauge theories,” Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 99–104, 1972, Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 153–161, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. D. Stöckinger, “Regularization by dimensional reduction: consistency, quantum action principle, and supersymmetry,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2005, no. 3, article 76, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. J. C. Collins, Renormalization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  76. J. G. Korner and M. M. Tung, “Dimensional reduction methods in QCD,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 255–265, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. M. Misiak, “On dimensional methods in rare b decays,” Physics Letters B, vol. 321, no. 1-2, pp. 113–120, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. Z. Kunszt, A. Signer, and Z. Trocsanyi, “One-loop helicity amplitudes for all 2→2 processes in QCD and N=1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 411, no. 2-3, pp. 397–442, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. J. Smith and W. L. van Neerven, “The difference between n-dimensional regularization and n-dimensional reduction in QCD,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 199–203, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. G. Altarelli, G. Curci, G. Martinelli, and S. Petrarca, “QCD non-leading corrections to weak decays as an application of regularization by dimensional reduction,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 461–513, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. D. M. Capper, D. R. T. Jones, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Regularization by dimensional reduction of supersymmetric and non-supersymmetric gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 479–499, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. H. Nicolai and P. K. Townsend, “Anomalies and supersymmetric regularization by dimensio nal reduction,” Physics Letters B, vol. 93, no. 1-2, pp. 111–115, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. D. R. T. Jones and J. P. Leveille, “Dimensional regularization and the two-loop axial anomaly in abelian, non-abelian and supersymmetric gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 206, no. 3, pp. 473–495, 1982, Erratum in Nuclear Physics B, vol. 22, p. 517, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. S. L. Adler and W. A. Bardeen, “Absence of higher-order corrections in the anomalous axial-vector divergence equation,” Physical Review, vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 1517–1536, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. T. L. Trueman, “Spurious anomalies in dimensional renormalization,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 525–536, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. S. A. Larin, “The renormalization of the axial anomaly in dimensional regularization,” Physics Letters B, vol. 303, no. 1-2, pp. 113–118, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. K. G. Chetyrkin, B. A. Kniehl, M. Steinhauser, and W. A. Bardeen, “Effective QCD interactions of CP-odd higgs bosons at three loops,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 535, no. 1-2, pp. 3–18, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. S. L. Adler, “Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,” Physical Review, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 2426–2438, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, “A PCAC puzzle: πγγ in the α-model,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. W. A. Bardeen, “Anomalous ward identities in spinor field theories,” Physical Review, vol. 184, no. 5, pp. 1848–1859, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. W. A. Bardeen, R. Gastmans, and B. Lautrup, “Static quantities in Weinberg's model of weak and electromagnetic interactions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 319–331, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. M. S. Chanowitz, M. Furman, and I. Hinchliffe, “The axial current in dimensional regularization,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 159, no. 1-2, pp. 225–243, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. F. Jegerlehner, “Facts of life with γ5,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 673–679, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. J. Fleischer, O. V. Tarasov, and F. Jegerlehner, “Two-loop heavy top corrections to the ρ parameter. A simple formula valid for arbitrary Higgs mass,” Physics Letters B, vol. 319, no. 1–3, pp. 249–256, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. J. Fleischer, O. V. Tarasov, F. Jegerlehner, and P. Raczka, “Two-loop OαsGμmt2 corrections to the partial decay width of the Z0 into bb¯ final states in the large top-mass limit,” Physics Letters B, vol. 293, no. 3-4, pp. 437–444, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. A. Freitas, W. Hollik, W. Walter, and G. Weiglein, “Complete fermionic two-loop results for the MWMZ interdependence,” Physics Letters B, vol. 495, no. 3-4, pp. 338–346, 2000, Erratum in Physics Letters B, vol. 570, no. 3-4, p. 265, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. A. Freitas, W. Hollik, W. Walter, and G. Weiglein, “Electroweak two-loop corrections to the MWMZ mass correlation in the standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 632, no. 1–3, pp. 189–218, 2002, Erratum in Nuclear Physics B, vol. 666, no. 1-2, pp. 305–307, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. L. Avdeev, J. Fleischer, S. Mikhailov, and O. Tarasov, “O(ααs2) correction to the electroweak ϱ parameter,” Physics Letters B, vol. 336, no. 3-4, pp. 560–566, 1994, Erratum in Physics Letters B, vol. 349, pp. 597–589, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, “Corrections of order O(GFMt2αs2) to the ϱ parameter,” Physics Letters B, vol. 351, no. 1–3, pp. 331–338, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  100. S. Heinemeyer, D. Stockinger, and G. Weiglein, “Electroweak and supersymmetric two-loop corrections to μ(g2),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 699, pp. 103–123, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. A. G. M. Pickering, J. A. Gracey, and D. R. T. Jones, “Three loop gauge β-function for the most general single gauge-coupling theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 510, pp. 347–354, 2001, Erratum in Physics Letters B, vol. 535, pp. 377, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. A. G. M. Pickering, J. A. Gracey, and D. R. T. Jones, “Three loop gauge β-function for the most general single gauge-coupling theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 512, pp. 230–238, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. R. V. Harlander, L. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, “The SUSY-QCD β function to three loops,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 383–390, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. G. 't Hooft, “Dimensional regularization and the renormalization group,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 61, pp. 455–468, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. W. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, D. W. Duke, and T. Muta, “Deep-inelastic scattering beyond the leading order in asymptotically free gauge theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 3998–4017, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. J. C. Collins, “Structure of counterterms in dimensional regularization,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 341–348, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. J. C. Collins, “Normal products in dimensional regularization,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 477–506, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. K. G. Chetyrkin and V. A. Smirnov, “R*-operation corrected,” Physics Letters B, vol. 144, no. 5-6, pp. 419–424, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. A. A. Vladimirov, “Method of calculating renormalization-group functions in the scheme of dimensional regularization,” Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 417–422, 1980, Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 210–217, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. K. G. Chetyrkin, A. L. Kataev, and F. V. Tkachov, “New approach to evaluation of multiloop Feynman integrals: the Gegenbauer polynomial x-space technique,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 174, no. 2-3, pp. 345–377, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  111. O. V. Tarasov, A. A. Vladimirov, and A. Y. Zharkov, “The gell-mann-low function of QCD in the three-loop approximation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 429–432, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. S. A. Larin and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “The three-loop QCD β-function and anomalous dimensions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 303, no. 3-4, pp. 334–336, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. R. Harlander, P. Kant, L. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, “Dimensional reduction applied to QCD at three loops,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 9, article 53, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. K. G. Chetyrkin and M. F. Zoller, “Three-loop β-functions for top-Yukawa and the Higgs self-interaction in the standard model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 6, article 33, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. S. A. Larin, F. V. Tkachov, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “The FORM version of MINCER,” NIKHEF-H-91-18, 1991.
  116. J. A. M. Vermaseren, “New features of FORM,” http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0010025.
  117. K. G. Chetyrkin, M. Misiak, and M. Münz, “β functions and anomalous dimensions up to three loops,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 518, no. 1-2, pp. 473–494, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. K. G. Chetyrkin, “Quark mass anomalous dimension to O(αs4),” Physics Letters B, vol. 404, no. 1-2, pp. 161–165, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. T. van Ritbergen, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and S. A. Larin, “The four-loop β-function in quantum chromodynamics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 400, no. 3-4, pp. 379–384, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. J. A. M. Vermaseren, S. A. Larin, and T. van Ritbergen, “The 4-loop quark mass anomalous dimension and the invariant quark mass,” Physics Letters B, vol. 405, no. 34, pp. 327–333, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. M. Czakon, “The four-loop QCD β-function and anomalous dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 710, no. 1-2, pp. 485–498, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. T. Curtright, “Three-loop charge renormalization effects due to quartic scalar self-interactions,” Physical Review D, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1543–1549, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. D. R. T. Jones, “Comment on the charge-renormalization effects of quartic scalar self-interactions,” Physical Review D, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3140–3141, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. M. Steinhauser, “MATAD: a program package for the computation of MAssive TADpoles,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 335–364, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  125. K. G. Chetyrkin, “Corrections of order αs3 to Rhad in pQCD with light gluinos,” Physics Letters B, vol. 391, no. 3-4, pp. 402–412, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  126. K. G. Chetyrkin, “Correlator of the quark scalar currents and Γtot (H hadrons) at O(αs3) in pQCD,” Physics Letters B, vol. 390, no. 1–4, pp. 309–317, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  127. P. M. Ferreira, I. Jack, and D. R. T. Jones, “The three-loop SSM β-functions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 387, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  128. Z. Bern, A. de Freitas, L. Dixon, and H. L. Wong, “Supersymmetric regularization, two-loop QCD amplitudes, and coupling shifts,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 8, Article ID 085002, 25 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  129. A. Pak, M. Steinhauser, and N. Zerf, “Towards Higgs boson production in gluon fusion to NNLO in the MSSM,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 71, article 1602, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. P. Kant, Higgs-Masse im MSSM und Dimensionale Reduktion in hohen Ordnungen der Störungstheorie [Ph.D. thesis], University of Karlsruhe, 2008.
  131. W. Siegel, P. K. Townsend, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Supersymmetric dimensional regularization,” in Proceedings of the Cambridge Meeting on Supergravity, 1980, ITP-SB-80-65.
  132. R. van Damme and G. 't Hooft, “Breakdown of unitarity in the dimensional reduction scheme,” Physics Letters B, vol. 150, no. 1–3, pp. 133–138, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and K. L. Roberts, “Dimensional reduction in non-supersymmetric theories,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 161–166, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  134. M. Steinhauser, “Results and techniques of multi-loop calculations,” Physics Reports, vol. 364, no. 4, pp. 247–357, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, P. Kant, and L. Mihaila, “The four-loop DRED gauge β-function and fermion mass anomalous dimension for general gauge groups,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 9, article 58, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. P. Cvitanović, “Group theory for Feynman diagrams in non-Abelian gauge theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1536–1553, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  137. P. Dittner, “Invariant tensors in SU(3). II,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 27, pp. 44–52, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  138. A. J. Macfarlane, A. Sudbery, and P. H. Weisz, “On Gell-Mann's λ-matrices,d- and f-tensors, octets, and parametrizations of SU(3),” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 77–90, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  139. T. van Ritbergen, A. N. Schellekens, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “Group theory factors for Feynman diagrams,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41–96, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  140. T. P. Cheng, E. Eichten, and L. F. Li, “Higgs phenomena in asymptotically free gauge theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 2259–2273, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. P. Nogueira, “Automatic Feynman graph generation,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 279–289, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  142. T. Seidensticker, “Automatic application of successive asymptotic expansions of Feynman diagrams,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on New Computing Techniques in Physics Research (AIHENP '99), 1999, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9905298.
  143. R. Harlander, T. Seidensticker, and M. Steinhauser, “Corrections of script Oααs to the decay of the Z boson into bottom quarks,” Physics Letters B, vol. 426, no. 1-2, pp. 125–132, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. R. V. Harlander, D. R. T. Jones, P. Kant, L. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, “Four-loop β function and mass anomalous dimension in dimensional reduction,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 12, article 24, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  145. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kuhn, “Order αs4 QCD corrections to Z and t decays,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 1, Article ID 012002, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  146. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kuhn, “Adler function, DIS sum rules and Crewther relations,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 205-206, pp. 237–241, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  147. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and A. Pickering, “The connection between the DRED and NSVZ renormalisation schemes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 435, no. 1-2, pp. 61–66, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  148. D. R. T. Jones, “More on the axial anomaly in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 45–46, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  149. V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “Instanton effects in supersymmetric theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 229, no. 2, pp. 407–420, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. V. A. Smirnov, Applied Asymptotic Expansions in Momenta and Masses, vol. 177 of Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at MathSciNet
  151. P. Marquard, L. Mihaila, J. H. Piclum, and M. Steinhauser, “Relation between the pole and the minimally subtracted mass in dimensional regularization and dimensional reduction to three-loop order,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 773, no. 1-2, pp. 1–18, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. S. P. Martin, “Two-loop effective potential for a general renormalizable theory and softly broken supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 11, Article ID 116003, 20 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  153. http://www.fnal.gov/pub/science/experiments/energy/tevatron/.
  154. S. Heinemeyer, “MSSM Higgs physics at higher orders,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 2659–2772, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  155. G. Degrassi and P. Slavich, “On the radiative corrections to the neutral Higgs boson masses in the NMSSM,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 825, no. 1-2, pp. 119–150, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  156. P. Kant, R. V. Harlander, L. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, “Light MSSM Higgs boson mass to three-loop accuracy,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 8, article 104, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  157. V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “Exact Gell-Mann-low function of supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories from instanton calculus,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 229, no. 2, pp. 381–393, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and A. F. Kord, “Three loop soft running, benchmark points and semi-perturbative unification,” Physics Letters B, vol. 579, no. 1-2, pp. 180–188, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  159. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and A. F. Kord, “Snowmass benchmark points and three-loop running,” Annals of Physics, vol. 316, no. 1, pp. 213–233, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  160. L. N. Mihaila, J. Salomon, and M. Steinhauser, “Renormalization constants and β functions for the gauge couplings of the standard model to three-loop order,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 9, Article ID 096008, 27 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  161. T. Hermann, L. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, “Three-loop anomalous dimensions for squarks in supersymmetric QCD,” Physics Letters B, vol. 703, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  162. W. Hollik, E. Kraus, M. Roth, C. Rupp, K. Sibold, and D. Stöckinger, “Renormalization of the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 639, no. 1-2, pp. 3–65, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  163. W. Hollik, E. Kraus, and D. Stockinger, “Renormalization of supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories with soft supersymmetry breaking,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 735–747, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  164. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, S. P. Martin, M. T. Vaughn, and Y. Yamada, “Decoupling of the ε-scalar mass in softly broken supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. R5481–R5483, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  165. H. D. Politzer, “Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 30, no. 26, pp. 1346–1349, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  166. D. R. T. Jones, “Two-loop diagrams in Yang-Mills theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 531–538, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  167. O. V. Tarasov and A. A. Vladimirov, “Two loop renormalization of the Yang-Mills theory in an arbitrary gauge,” Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 25, p. 585, 1977, Translated from Yadernaya Fizika, vol. 25, pp. 1104–1106, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  168. W. E. Caswell, “Asymptotic behavior of non-abelian gauge theories to two-loop order,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 244–246, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. E. Egorian and O. V. Tarasov, “Two loop renormalization of the QCD in an arbitrary gaug,” Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, vol. 41, pp. 26–32, 1979, Translated from Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 41, pp. 863–867, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  170. D. R. T. Jones, “Two-loop function for a G1×G2 gauge theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 581–582, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  171. M. S. Fischler and C. T. Hill, “Effects of large mass fermions on MX and sin2θW,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  172. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, “Two-loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory: (I). Wave function renormalization,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 222, no. 1, pp. 83–103, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  173. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, “Two-loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory (II). Yukawa couplings,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 221–232, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  174. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, “Two-loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory: (III). Scalar quartic couplings,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 70–92, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  175. I. Jack and H. Osborn, “General background field calculations with fermion fields,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 472–506, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  176. M. Steinhauser, “Higgs boson decay into gluons up to o(αs3GFmt2),” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 5, Article ID 054005, 11 pages, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  177. A. V. Bednyakov, A. F. Pikelner, and V. N. Velizhanin, “Anomalous dimensions of gauge fields and gauge coupling β-functions in the standard model at three loops,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 1, article 17, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  178. K. Nakamura, K. Hagiwara, K. Hikasa et al., “Review of particle physics,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 37, no. 7, Article ID 075021, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  179. L. F. Abbott, “The background field method beyond one loop,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 189–203, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  180. A. Denner, G. Weiglein, and S. Dittmaier, “Application of the background-field method to the electroweak standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 440, no. 1-2, pp. 95–128, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  181. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1995. View at MathSciNet
  182. S. Bethke, “The 2009 world average of α,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 689–703, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  183. R. Harlander, L. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, “Two-loop matching coefficients for the strong coupling in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 9, Article ID 095009, 11 pages, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  184. T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, “Infrared singularities and massive fields,” Physical Review D, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2856–2861, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  185. K. G. Chetyrkin, B. A. Kniehl, and M. Steinhauser, “Decoupling relations to O(αs3) and their connection to low-energy theorems,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 510, no. 1-2, pp. 61–87, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  186. Y. Schröder and M. Steinhauser, “Four-loop decoupling relations for the strong coupling,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 1, article 51, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  187. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and C. Sturm, “QCD decoupling at four loops,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 744, no. 1-2, pp. 121–135, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  188. A. V. Bednyakov, “Running mass of the b-quark in QCD and SUSY QCD,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, no. 29, p. 5245, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  189. A. V. Bednyakov, “On the two-loop decoupling corrections to τ-lepton and b-quark running masses in the MSSM,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 25, no. 10, p. 2437, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  190. D. Noth and M. Spira, “Higgs boson couplings to bottom quarks: two-loop supersymmetry-QCD corrections,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 18, Article ID 181801, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  191. D. Noth and M. Spira, “Supersymmetric Higgs Yukawa couplings to bottom quarks at next-to-next-to-leading order,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 6, article 84, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  192. A. Kurz, M. Steinhauser, and N. Zerf, “Decoupling constant for αs and the effective gluon-Higgs coupling to three loops in supersymmetric QCD,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 7, article 138, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  193. I. Jack and D. R. T. Jones, “Soft supersymmetry breaking and finiteness,” Physics Letters B, vol. 333, no. 3-4, pp. 372–379, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  194. A. Bednyakov, A. Onishchenko, V. Velizhanin, and O. Veretin, “Two-loop O(αs2) MSSM corrections to the pole masses of heavy quarks,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 87–101, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  195. D. M. Pierce, J. A. Bagger, K. T. Matchev, and R. J. Zhang, “Precision corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 491, no. 1-2, pp. 3–67, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  196. R. V. Harlander and M. Steinhauser, “Supersymmetric Higgs production in gluon fusion at next-to-leading order,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 9, article 66, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  197. S. P. Martin and D. G. Robertson, “TSIL: a program for the calculation of two-loop self-energy integrals,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 133–151, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  198. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “Remarks on Higgs-boson interactions with nucleons,” Physics Letters B, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 443–446, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  199. M. Carena, D. Garcia, U. Nierste, and C. E. M. Wagner, “Effective Lagrangian for the t̅bH+ interaction in the MSSM and charged Higgs phenomenology,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 577, no. 1-2, pp. 88–120, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  200. R. V. Harlander, L. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, “Running of αs and mb in the MSSM,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 5, Article ID 055002, 9 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  201. L. Mihaila, “Two-loop parameter relations between dimensional regularization and dimensional reduction applied to SUSY-QCD,” Physics Letters B, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 52–59, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  202. D. Stockinger and P. Varso, “FeynArts model file for MSSM transition counterterms from DREG to DRED,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 422–430, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  203. S. Bethke, “Experimental tests of asymptotic freedom,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 351–386, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  204. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Ali, B. C. Allanach et al., “Supersymmetry parameter analysis: SPA convention and project,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 43–60, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  205. N. Ghodbane and H. U. Martyn, “Compilation of SUSY particle spectra from Snowmass 2001 benchmark models,” in Proceedings of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass '01), N. Graf, Ed., arXiv:hep-ph/0201233.
  206. S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, “Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 150–162, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  207. N. Sakai, “Naturalnes in supersymmetric GUTS,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 153–157, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  208. T. Goto and T. Nihei, “Effect of an RRRR dimension 5 operator on the proton decay in the minimal SU(5) SUGRA GUT model,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 11, Article ID 115009, 14 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  209. H. Murayama and A. Pierce, “Not even decoupling can save minimal supersymmetric SU(5),” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 5, Article ID 055009, 8 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  210. B. Bajc, P. Fileviez Perez, and G. Senjanovic, “Proton decay in minimal supersymmetric SU(5),” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 7, Article ID 075005, 8 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  211. D. Emmanuel-Costa and S. Wiesenfeldt, “Proton decay in a consistent supersymmetric SU(5) GUT model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 661, pp. 62–82, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  212. S. Wiesenfeldt, Proton decay in supersymmetric grand unified theories [Ph.D. thesis], University of Hamburg, 2004.
  213. B. Bajc, P. F. Perez, and G. Senjanovic, “Minimal supersymmetric SU(5) theory and proton decay: where do we stand?” in Proceedings of the Physics Beyond the Standard Model: Beyond the Desert Conference, p. 734, IOP, Bristol, UK, 2003, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0210374.
  214. Y. Yamada, “SUSY and GUT threshold effects in SUSYSU(5) models,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 60, pp. 83–93, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  215. L. Hall, “Grand unification of effective gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 75–124, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  216. S. Weinberg, “Effective gauge theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  217. M. B. Einhorn and D. R. T. Jones, “The weak mixing angle and unification mass in supersymmetric SU(5),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 475–488, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  218. K. Hagiwara and Y. Yamada, “Grand unification threshold effects in supersymmetric SU(5) models,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 709–712, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  219. A. Dedes, A. B. Lahanas, J. Rizos, and K. Tamvakis, “Threshold effects and radiative electroweak symmetry breaking in SU(5) extensions of the MSSM,” Physical Review D, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2955–2964, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  220. J. Hisano, H. Murayama, and T. Yanagida, “Nucleon decay in the minimal supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 402, no. 1-2, pp. 46–84, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  221. C. Amsler, M. Doser, M. Antonelli et al., “Review of particle physics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 667, no. 1–5, pp. 1–6, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  222. T. Teubner, K. Hagiwara, R. Liao, A. D. Martin, and D. Nomura, “Update of g—2 of the muon and Δα,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 34, article 728, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  223. M. Steinhauser, “Leptonic contribution to the effective electromagnetic coupling constant up to three loops,” Physics Letters B, vol. 429, no. 1-2, pp. 158–161, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  224. J. H. Kuhn and M. Steinhauser, “A perturbation theory driven analysis of the effective QED coupling at MZ,” Physics Letters B, vol. 437, no. 3-4, pp. 425–431, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  225. S. Fanchiotti, B. Kniehl, and A. Sirlin, “Incorporation of QCD effects in basic corrections of the electroweak theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 307–331, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  226. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, “RunDec: a mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 43–65, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  227. A. Dedes, A. B. Lahanas, and K. Tamvakis, “The effective weak mixing angle in the MSSM,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 1, Article ID 015019, 17 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  228. A. H. Chamseddine, R. Arnowitt, and P. Nath, “Locally supersymmetric grand unification,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, no. 14, pp. 970–974, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  229. B. C. Allanach, “SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 305–331, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  230. K. Kobayashi, M. Earl, Y. Ashie et al., “Search for nucleon decay via modes favored by supersymmetric grand unification models in Super-Kamiokande-I,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 5, Article ID 052007, 15 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  231. Y. Nambu, “Axial vector current conservation in weak interactions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 380–382, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  232. F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 13, pp. 321–323, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  233. P. W. Higgs, “Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields,” Physics Letters, vol. 12, pp. 132–133, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  234. P. W. Higgs, “Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 13, pp. 508–509, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  235. G. 't Hooft, “Renormalizable Lagrangians for massive Yang-Mills fields,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 167–188, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  236. ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL Collaboration, and The LEP Working Group for Higgs Boson Searches, “Search for the standard model higgs boson at LEP,” Physics Letters B, vol. 565, pp. 61–75, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  237. M. Baak, M. Goebel, J. Haller et al., “The electroweak fit of the standard model after the discovery of a new boson at the LHC,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, article 2205, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  238. TEVNPH Working Group, CDF, and D0 Collaborations, “Combined CDF and D0 search for standard model higgs boson production with up to 10.0 fb-1 of data,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.3774.
  239. F. Bezrukov, M. Y. Kalmykov, B. A. Kniehl, and M. Shaposhnikov, “Higgs boson mass and new physics,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 10, article 140, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  240. G. Degrassi, S. di Vita, J. Elias-Miro et al., “Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 8, article 98, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  241. J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi, and F. Z. Zwirner, “On radiative corrections to supersymmetric Higgs boson masses and their implications for LEP searches,” Physics Letters B, vol. 262, no. 4, pp. 477–484, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  242. Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yanagida, “Welcome,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 85, p. 1, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  243. H. E. Haber and R. Hempfling, “Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the minimal supersymmetric model be larger than mZ?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 66, no. 14, pp. 1815–1818, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  244. B. C. Allanach, M. Battaglia, G. A. Blair et al., “The snowmass points and slopes: benchmarks for SUSY searches,” in Proceedings of APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics, N. Graf, Ed., Snowmass, Colorado, June 2001.
  245. B. C. Allanach, M. Battaglia, G. A. Blair et al., “The snowmass points and slopes: benchmarks for SUSY searches,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 113–123, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  246. P. H. Chankowski, S. Pokorski, and J. Rosiek, “Charged and neutral supersymmetric Higgs boson masses. Complete one-loop analysis,” Physics Letters B, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 191–198, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  247. A. Brignole, “Radiative corrections to the supersymmetric neutral Higgs boson masses,” Physics Letters B, vol. 281, no. 3-4, pp. 284–294, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  248. A. Dabelstein, “The one-loop renormalization of the MSSM Higgs sector and its application to the neutral scalar Higgs masses,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 495–511, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  249. B. C. Allanach, A. Djouadi, J. L. Kneur, W. Porod, and P. Slavich, “Precise determination of the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 9, article 44, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  250. M. Frank, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, and G. Weiglein, “The Higgs boson masses and mixings of the complex MSSM in the Feynman-diagrammatic approach,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 2, article 47, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  251. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, and G. Weiglein, “The Higgs sector of the complex MSSM at two-loop order: QCD contributions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 652, no. 5-6, pp. 300–309, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  252. M. S. Carena, J. R. Ellis, A. Pilaftsis, and C. E. M. Wagner, “Renormalization-group-improved effective potential for the MSSM Higgs sector with explicit CP violation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 586, no. 1-2, pp. 92–140, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  253. S. P. Martin, “Complete two-loop effective potential approximation to the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 9, Article ID 095012, 5 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  254. S. P. Martin, “Three-loop corrections to the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 5, Article ID 055005, 9 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  255. R. V. Harlander, P. Kant, L. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, “Higgs boson mass in supersymmetry to three loops,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 19, Article ID 191602, 4 pages, 2008, Erratum in Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 3. Article ID 039901, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  256. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, “FeynHiggs: a program for the calculation of the masses of the neutral C-even Higgs bosons in the MSSM,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 76–89, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  257. G. Degrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, P. Slavich, and G. Weiglein, “Towards high-precision predictions for the MSSM Higgs sector,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 133–143, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  258. T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, and G. Weiglein, “FeynHiggs: a program for the calculation of MSSM Higgs-boson observables—version 2.6.5,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 180, no. 8, pp. 1426–1427, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  259. J. S. Lee, A. Pilaftsis, M. S. Carena et al., “CPsuperH: a computational tool for Higgs phenomenology in the minimal supersymmetric standard model with explicit CP violation,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 156, pp. 283–317, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  260. J. S. Lee, M. Carena, J. Ellis, A. Pilaftsis, and C. E. M. Wagner, “CPsuperH2.0: an improved computational tool for Higgs phenomenology in the MSSM with explicit CP violation,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 312–331, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  261. http://www-ttp.particle.uni-karlsruhe.de/Progdata/ttp10/ttp10-23/.
  262. http://www.feynhiggs.de/.
  263. Y. Schroder and M. Steinhauser, “Four-loop singlet contribution to the electroweak ρ parameter,” Physics Letters B, vol. 622, no. 1-2, p. 130, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  264. K. G. Chetyrkin, M. Faisst, J. H. Kuhn, P. Maierhofer, and C. Sturm, “Four-loop QCD corrections to the electroweak ρ parameter,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, no. 10, Article ID 102003, 3 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  265. R. Boughezal and M. Czakon, “Single scale tadpoles and OGFmt2αs3 corrections to the ρ parameter,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 755, no. 1–3, pp. 221–238, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  266. G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and F. Zwirner, “On the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM for arbitrary stop mixing,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 611, no. 1–3, pp. 403–422, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  267. K. G. Wilson, “Non-Lagrangian models of current algebra,” Physical Review, vol. 179, pp. 1499–1512, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  268. H. Kluberg-Stern and J. B. Zuber, “Renormalization of non-Abelian gauge theories in a background-field gauge. II. Gauge-invariant operators,” Physical Review D, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 3159–3180, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  269. N. K. Nielsen, “Gauge invariance and broken conformal symmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 527–540, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  270. V. P. Spiridonov, “Anomalous dimension of g**2 (Muon-neutrino) and beta function,” Report No. INR P-0378, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  271. K. G. Chetyrkin, B. A. Kniehl, and M. Steinhauser, “Three-loop script capital Oαs2GFMt2 corrections to hadronic Higgs decays,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 490, no. 1-2, pp. 19–39, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  272. G. Degrassi and P. Slavich, “NLO QCD bottom corrections to Higgs boson production in the MSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 11, article 44, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  273. R. V. Harlander, F. Hofmann, and H. Mantler, “Supersymmetric Higgs production in gluon fusion,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 2, article 55, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  274. A. I. Davydychev and J. B. Tausk, “Two-loop self-energy diagrams with different masses and the momentum expansion,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 397, no. 1-2, pp. 123–142, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  275. S. Dawson, “Radiative corrections to Higgs boson production,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 359, no. 2-3, pp. 283–300, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  276. A. Djouadi, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas, “Production of Higgs bosons in proton colliders. QCD corrections,” Physics Letters B, vol. 264, no. 3-4, pp. 440–446, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  277. T. Inami, T. Kubota, and Y. Okada, “Effective gauge theory and the effect of heavy quarks in Higgs boson decays,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  278. P. A. Baikov and K. G. Chetyrkin, “Top quark mediated Higgs boson decay into hadrons to order αs5,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, no. 6, Article ID 061803, 3 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  279. R. V. Harlander and M. Steinhauser, “Hadronic Higgs production and decay in supersymmetry at next-to-leading order,” Physics Letters B, vol. 574, no. 3-4, pp. 258–268, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  280. G. Degrassi and P. Slavich, “On the NLO QCD corrections to Higgs production and decay in the MSSM,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 805, no. 1-2, pp. 267–286, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  281. C. Anastasiou, S. Beerli, and A. Daleo, “Two-loop QCD Amplitude for ggh, H in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 24, Article ID 241806, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  282. M. Muhlleitner, H. Rzehak, and M. Spira, “MSSM Higgs boson production via gluon fusion: the large gluino mass limit,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 4, article 23, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  283. M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, “Higgs boson production via gluon fusion: squark loops at NLO QCD,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 790, no. 1-2, pp. 1–27, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  284. R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, and A. Vicini, “Scalar particle contribution to Higgs production via gluon fusion at NLO,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 11, article aritcle 95, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  285. L. Mihaila and C. Reisser, “O(α2s) corrections to fermionic Higgs decays in the MSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 8, article 21, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  286. R. V. Harlander and K. J. Ozeren, “Finite top mass effects for hadronic Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 11, article 88, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  287. A. Pak, M. Rogal, and M. Steinhauser, “Finite top quark mass effects in NNLO Higgs boson production at LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 2, article 25, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  288. J. R. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and D. V. Nanopoulos, “A phenomenological profile of the Higgs boson,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 106, pp. 292–340, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  289. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “Remarks on Higgs-boson interactions with nucleons,” Physics Letters B, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 443–446, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  290. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, M. B. Voloshin, and V. I. Zakharov, “Low-energy theorems for Higgs Boson couplings to photons,” Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 30, p. 711, 1979, Translated from Yadernaya Fizika, vol. 30, p. 1368, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  291. A. I. Vainshtein, V. I. Zakharov, and M. A. Shifman, “Higgs particles,” Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 23, no. 8, article 429, 1980, Translated from Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk, vol. 131, pp. 537–575, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  292. B. A. Kniehl and M. Spira, “Low-energy theorems in Higgs physics,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  293. M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P. M. Zerwas, “Higgs boson production at the LHC,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 453, no. 1-2, pp. 17–82, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  294. W. Kilian, “Renormalized soft-higgs theorems,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  295. E. Braaten and J. P. Leveille, “Higgs-boson decay and the running mass,” Physical Review D, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 715–721, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  296. S. G. Gorishnii, A. L. Kataev, S. A. Larin, and L. R. Surguladze, “Three-loop QCD correction to the correlator of the Quark scalar currents and Γtot (H∘→ hadrons),” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 5, no. 32, article 2703, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  297. K. G. Chetyrkin, B. A. Kniehl, and M. Steinhauser, “Strong coupling constant with flavor thresholds at four loops in the modified minimal-subtraction scheme,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 2184–2187, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  298. A. Kwiatkowski and M. Steinhauser, “Corrections of order OGFαsmt2 to the Higgs decay rate ΓHbb¯,” Physics Letters B, vol. 338, no. 1, pp. 66–70, 1994, Erratum in Physics Letters B, vol. 342, p. 455, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  299. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, A. Maier et al., “Charm and bottom quark masses: an update,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 7, Article ID 074010, 5 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  300. M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P. M. Zerwas, “Higgs boson production at the LHC,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 453, no. 1-2, pp. 17–82, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  301. M. Steinhauser, “Corrections of Oαs2 to the decay of an intermediate-mass Higgs boson into two photons,” in Proceedings of the Ringberg Workshop, pp. 177–185, Tegernsee, Germany, 1996, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9612395.
  302. U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, and A. Vicini, “Two-loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays,” Physics Letters B, vol. 595, no. 1–4, pp. 432–441, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  303. F. Fugel, B. A. Kniehl, and M. Steinhauser, “Two-loop electroweak correction of OGFMt2 to the Higgs-boson decay into photons,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 702, no. 1-2, pp. 333–345, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  304. G. Degrassi and F. Maltoni, “Two-loop electroweak corrections to the Higgs-boson decay Hγγ,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 724, no. 1-2, pp. 183–196, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  305. R. Harlander and P. Kant, “Higgs production and decay: analytic results at next-to-leading order QCD,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2005, no. 12, article 15, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  306. A. Kurz, Entkopplungseffekte zur Dreischleifenordnung in supersymmetrischer QCD [Diploma thesis], Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2010.
  307. J. Kleine, Dimensionale Regularisierung und Dimensionale Reduktion in der supersymmetrischen QCD [Diploma thesis], Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2010.
  308. A. Djouadi, “The anatomy of electroweak symmetry breaking: tome I: the Higgs boson in the standard model,” Physics Reports, vol. 457, no. 1–4, pp. 1–216, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  309. A. Djouadi, “The anatomy of electroweak symmetry breaking tome II: the Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model,” Physics Reports, vol. 459, no. 1–6, pp. 1–241, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  310. R. Harlander, “Higgs production at the large Hadron collider: theoretical status,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 35, no. 3, Article ID 033001, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  311. R. V. Harlander and K. J. Ozeren, “Top mass effects in Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD: virtual corrections,” Physics Letters B, vol. 679, no. 5, pp. 467–472, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  312. R. V. Harlander, H. Mantler, S. Marzani, and K. J. Ozeren, “Higgs production in gluon fusion at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD for finite top mass,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 66, no. 3-4, pp. 359–372, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  313. A. Pak, M. Rogal, and M. Steinhauser, “Virtual three-loop corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion for finite top quark mass,” Physics Letters B, vol. 679, no. 5, pp. 473–477, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  314. A. Pak, M. Rogal, and M. Steinhauser, “Production of scalar and pseudo-scalar Higgs bosons to next-to-next-to-leading order at hadron colliders,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 9, article 88, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  315. M. Carena, S. Heinemeyer, C. E. M. Wagner, and G. Weiglein, “Suggestions for benchmark scenarios for MSSM Higgs boson searches at hadron colliders,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 601–607, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus