Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013, Article ID 672972, 28 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/672972
Review Article

Two Higgs Doublets, a 4th Generation and a 125 GeV Higgs: A Review

1Physics Department, Technion-Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel
2Theoretische Elementarteilchenphysik, Naturwissenschaftlich Technische Fakultät, Universität Siegen, 57068 Siegen, Germany
3Indian Institute of Technology, North Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, Assam, India
4Theory Group, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA

Received 24 June 2012; Accepted 20 November 2012

Academic Editor: George Wei-Shu Hou

Copyright © 2013 Shaouly Bar-Shalom et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. H. Frampton, P. Q. Hung, and M. Sher, “Quarks and leptons beyond the third generation,” Physics Reports, vol. 330, pp. 263–348, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  2. B. Holdom, W. S. Hou, T. Hurth, M. L. Mangano, S. Sultansoy, and G. Ünel, “Four statements about the fourth generation,” PMC Physics A, vol. 3, no. 4, 2009, talk presented at Beyond the 3rd SM Generation at the LHC Era Workshop, Geneva, Switzerland, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Cline and A. Soni, “Preface,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 578, p. ix, 1989, Proceedings of the First (February 1987) and the Second (February 1989) International Symposiums on the Fourth Family of Quarks and Leptons, Santa Monica, Calif, USA. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. W. A. Bardeen, C. T. Hill, and M. Lindner, “Minimal dynamical symmetry breaking of the standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 41, pp. 1647–1660, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. B. Holdom, “Heavy quarks and electroweak symmetry breaking,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 57, pp. 2496–2499, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Holdom, “Heavy quarks and electroweak symmetry breaking,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 58, p. 177, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. S. F. King, “Is electroweak symmetry broken by a fourth family of quarks?” Physical Review B, vol. 234, no. 1-2, pp. 108–112, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. C. Hill, M. Luty, and E. A. Paschos, “Electroweak symmetry breaking by fourth-generation condensates and the neutrino spectrum,” Physical Review D, vol. 43, pp. 3011–3025, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Q. Hung and G. Isidori, “Anatomy of the Higgs mass spectrum,” Physical Review B, vol. 402, pp. 122–129, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Holdom, “The discovery of the fourth family at the LHC: what if?” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0608, p. 76, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  11. P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, “Dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking with a heavy fourth generation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 848, pp. 288–302, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. W. S. Hou, “Source of CP violation for baryon asymmetry of the universe,” Chinese Journal of Physics, vol. 47, p. 134, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  13. W. S. Hou, “Source of CP violation for baryon asymmetry of the universe,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP '08), Philadelphia, Pa, USA, July 2008.
  14. S. W. Ham, S. K. Oh, and D. Son, “Electroweak phase transition in the minimal supersymmetric standard model with four generations,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 015001, 6 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. G. W. S. Hou, “Source of CP violation for the baryon asymmetry of the universe,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 20, p. 1521, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Fok and G. D. Kribs, “Four generations, the electroweak phase transition, and supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 075023, 9 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Soni, A. K. Alok, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and S. Nandi, “The fourth family: a simple explanation for the observed pattern of anomalies in B-CP asymmetries,” Physical Review B, vol. 683, no. 4-5, pp. 302–305, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Soni, A. K. Alok, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and S. Nandi, “Standard model with four generations: selected implications for rare B and K decays,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 3, Article ID 033009, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. J. Buras, B. Duling, T. Feldmann, T. Heidsieck, C. Promberger, and S. Recksiegel, “Patterns of flavour violation in the presence of a fourth generation of quarks and leptons,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 9, p. 106, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. J. Buras, B. Duling, T. Feldmann, T. Heidsieck, C. Promberger, and S. Recksiegel, “The impact of a 4th generation on mixing and CP violation in the charm system,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 1007, p. 094, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. W.-S. Hou, M. Nagashima, and A. Soddu, “Large time-dependent CP violation in the BS system and finite D0D¯0 mass difference in a four generation standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, Article ID 016004, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Bobrowski, A. Lenz, J. Riedl, and J. Rohrwild, “How much space is left for a new family of fermions?” Physical Review D, vol. 79, Article ID 113006, 15 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. V. Bashiry, N. Shirkhanghah, and K. Zeynali, “CP violation, single lepton polarization asymmetry, and polarized CP asymmetry in BK+ decay in the four-generation standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 015016, 8 pages, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  24. W. S. Hou and C. Y. Ma, “Flavor and CP violation with fourth generations revisited,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, Article ID 036002, 9 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. O. Eberhardt, A. Lenz, and J. Rohrwild, “Less space for a new family of fermions,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, Article ID 095006, 20 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Nandi and A. Soni, “Constraining the mixing matrix for the standard model with four generations: time-dependent and semileptonic CP asymmetries in Bd0, Bs, and D0,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 114510, 13 pages, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  27. A. K. Alok, A. Ighe, and D. London, “Constraints on the four-generation quark mixing matrix from a fit to flavor-physics data,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 073008, 12 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. D. Choudhury and D. K. Ghosh, “A fourth generation, anomalous like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry and the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1102, no. 033, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. R. Mohanta and A. K. Giri, “Study of some rare decays of Bs meson in the fourth generation model,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 014008, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Ahmed, I. Ahmed, M. J. Aslam, M. Junaid, M. A. Paracha, and A. Rehman, “Fourth-generation standard model imprints in BK+ decays with polarized K,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 034018, 12 pages, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  31. M. M. H. Luk, “Search for fourth generation quarks at CMS,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3246.
  32. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for heavy, top-like quark pair production in the dilepton final state in pp collisions at s=7 TeV,” Physical Review B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 103–121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Search for down-type fourth generation quarks with the ATLAS detector in events with one lepton and hadronically decaying W bosons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, Article ID 032001, 19 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Suppression of non-prompt J/ψ, prompt J/ψ, and ϒ (1S) in PbPb collisions at sNN =2.76 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1205, p. 123, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  35. M. S. Chanowitz, M. A. Furman, and I. Hinchliffe, “Weak interactions of ultraheavy fermions,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, pp. 285–289, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. M. S. Chanowitz, M. A. Furman, and I. Hinchliffe, “Weak interactions of ultra heavy fermions (II),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 153, pp. 402–430, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. W. Marciano, G. Valencia, and S. Willenbrock, “Renormalization-group-improved unitarity bounds on the Higgs-boson and top-quark masses,” Physical Review D, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1725–1729, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Physical Review B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 30–61, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  39. J. Incandela, “Observation of a narrow resonance near 125 GeV in CMS,” in Proceedings of International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP '12), pp. 4–11, Melbourne, Australia, July 2012.
  40. G. Aad, T. Abajyan, B. Abbott et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Physical Review B, vol. 716, pp. 1–29, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  41. R. Hawkings, “ATLAS Higgs searches and experiment overview,” in Proceedings of International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP '12), pp. 4–11, Melbourne, Australia, July 2012.
  42. The TEVNPH Working Group, for the CDF, D0 Collaborations, “Combined CDF and D0 Search for Standard Model Higgs Boson Production with up to 10.0 fb1 of Data,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.3774.
  43. The ATLAS Collaboration, “Update of the Combination of Higgs Boson Searches in 1.0 to 2.3 fb1 of pp Collisions Data Taken at s=7 TeV with the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC,” ATLAS NOTE: ATLAS Conference 2011-135, http://atlas.ch/news/2011/Higgs-note.pdf.
  44. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at root s=7 TeV,” Physical Review B, vol. 710, no. 1, pp. 26–48, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  45. A. Djouadi and A. Lenz, “Sealing the fate of a fourth generation of fermions,” Physical Review B, vol. 715, pp. 310–314, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. E. Kuflik, Y. Nir, and T. Volanski, “Implications of Higgs searches on the four generation standard model,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.1975.
  47. O. Eberhardt, G. Herbert, H. Lacker et al., “Impact of a Higgs boson at a mass of 126 GeV on the standard model with three and four fermion generations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 24, Article ID 241802, 5 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. M. Hashimoto, “Constraints on the mass spectrum of fourth generation fermions and Higgs bosons,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 7, Article ID 075023, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam, and A. Soni, “Collider signals of a composite Higgs in the Standard Model with four generations,” Physical Review B, vol. 688, pp. 195–201, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. A. Dighe, D. Ghosh, R. M. Godbole, and A. Prasath, “Large mass splittings for fourth generation fermions allowed by LHC Higgs boson exclusion,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 114035, 12 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. M. Buchkremer, J.-M. Gérard, and F. Maltoni, “Closing in on a perturbative fourth generation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1206, p. 135, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. M. Baak, M. Goebel, J. Haller et al., “Updated status of the global electroweak fit and constraints on new physics,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, p. 2003, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, “Renormalization group fixed point with a fourth generation: Higgs-induced bound states and condensates,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 847, pp. 160–178, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  54. P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, “Implication of a quasi fixed point with a heavy fourth generation: the emergence of a TeV-scale physical cutoff,” Physical Review B, vol. 694, pp. 430–434, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  55. K. Ishiwata and M. B. Wise, “Fourth generation bound states,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 074015, 8 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  56. A. E. C. Hernández, C. O. Dib, H. N. Neill, and A. R. Zerwekh, “Quark masses and mixings in the RS1 model with a condensing 4th generation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1202, p. 132, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  57. G. Burdman and L. Da Rold, “Electroweak symmetry breaking from a holographic fourth generation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0712, p. 86, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. G. Burdman, L. Da Rold, O. Eboli, and R. D. Matheus, “Strongly coupled fourth generation at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, Article ID 075026, 11 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. G. Burdman, L. de Lima, and R. D. Matheus, “New strongly coupled sector at the Tevatron and the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 035012, 8 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. M. Hashimoto and V. A. Miransky, “Dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking with superheavy quarks and 2+1 composite Higgs model,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, Article ID 055014, 12 pages, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  61. S. Bar-Shalom, S. Nandi, and A. Soni, “Two Higgs doublets with fourth-generation fermions: models for TeV-scale compositeness,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 053009, 24 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  62. M. A. Luty, “Dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking with two composite Higgs doublets,” Physical Review D, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2893–2902, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. E. De Pree, G. Marshall, and M. Sher, “Fourth generation t quark in extensions of the standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 037301, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. M. Sher, “Fourth generation b decays into b+Higgs boson,” Physical Review D, vol. 61, Article ID 057303, 3 pages, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  65. W. Bernreuther, P. Gonzales, and M. Wiebusch, “Seudoscalar Higgs bosons at the LHC: production and decays into electroweak gauge bosons revisited,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 69, pp. 31–43, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  66. J. F. Gunion, “Ruling out a 4th generation using limits on hadron collider Higgs signals,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3965.
  67. X.-G. He and G. Valencia, “An extended scalar sector to address the tension between a fourth generation and Higgs searches at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 707, pp. 381–384, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. N. Chen and H. He, “LHC signatures of two-Higgs-doublets with fourth family,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1204, p. 062, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  69. H.-S. Lee and A. Soni, “Fourth generation parity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, no. 2, Article ID 021802, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. S. Litsey and M. Sher, “Higgs masses in the four generation minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 057701, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. S. Dawson and P. Jaiswal, “Four generations, Higgs physics, and the MSSMPhysical Review D,” vol. 82, Article ID 073017, 10 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. R. C. Cotta, J. L. Hewett, A. Ismail, M.-P. Le, and T. G. Rizzo, “Higgs properties in the fourth-generation MSSM: boosted signals over the three-generation plan,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 075019, 11 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. A. Das and C. Kao, “A two Higgs doublet model for the top quark,” Physical Review B, vol. 372, p. 106, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  74. K. Nakamura et al., “Review of particle physics,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 37, Article ID 075021, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  75. H.-J. He, N. Polonsky, and S. Su, “Extra families, Higgs spectrum, and oblique corrections,” Physical Review D, vol. 64, Article ID 053004, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  76. V. A. Novikov, L. B. Okun, A. N. Rozanov, and M. I. Vysotsky, “Extra generations and discrepancies of electroweak precision data,” Physical Review B, vol. 529, pp. 111–116, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. G. D. Kribs, T. Plehn, M. Spannowsky, and T. M. P. Tait, “Four generations and Higgs physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 7, Article ID 075016, 11 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. J. Erler and P. Langacker, “Precision constraints on extra fermion generations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, Article ID 031801, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  79. M. S. Chanowitz, “Bounding CKM mixing with a fourth family,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, 8 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. M. S. Chanowitz, “Higgs mass constraints on a fourth family: upper and lower limits on CKM mixing,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, Article ID 035018, 9 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, “New constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 65, pp. 964–967, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, “Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections,” Physical Review D, vol. 46, pp. 381–409, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. L. Bellantoni, J. Erler, and J. J. Heckman, “Masses of a fourth generation with two Higgs doublets,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 3, Article ID 034022, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. T. Yanir, “Phenomenological constraints on extended quark sectors,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0206, p. 044, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, J.-M. Gérard et al., “Is Vtb1?” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 49, pp. 791–801, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. E. Gamiz, C. T. H. Davies, G. P. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu, and M. Wingate, “Neutral B meson mixing in unquenched lattice QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 014503, 12 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. E. Gamiz, private communication.
  88. A. J. Buras, M. Jamin, and P. H. Weisz, “Leading and next-to-leading QCD corrections to ɛ-parameter and B0B¯0 source mixing in the presence of a heavy top quark,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 347, no. 3, pp. 491–536, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. M. Misiak, H. M. Asatrian, K. Bieri et al., “Estimate of (B¯Xsγ) at O(αS2),” Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, Article ID 022002, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  90. U. Haisch and A. Weiler, “Bound on minimal universal extra dimensions from B¯Xsγ,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, Article ID 034014, 4 pages, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  91. F. Borzumati, C. Greub, T. Hurth, and D. Wyler, “Gluino contribution to radiative B decays: organization of QCD corrections and leading order results,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, Article ID 075005, 20 pages, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. M. S. Carena, D. Garcia, U. Nierste, and C. E. M. Wagner, “bsγ and supersymmetry with large tanβ,” Physics Letters B, vol. 499, p. 141, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  93. T. Besmer, C. Greub, and T. Hurth, “Bounds on supersymmetric flavour violating parameters from B→Xsγ,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 609, no. 3, pp. 359–386, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, A. Masiero, and L. Silvestrini, “bs transitions transitions: a new frontier for indirect supersymmetry searches,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, Article ID 075016, 12 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, A. Masiero, and L. Silvestrini, “Erratum: bs transitions transitions: a new frontier for indirect supersymmetry searches,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, Article ID 079901, 8 pages, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  96. M. Ciuchini, A. Masiero, L. Silvestrini, S. K. Vempati, and O. Vives, “Grand unification of quark and lepton flavor changing neutral currents,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, no. 7, Article ID 071801, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, and P. Slavich, “QCD corrections to radiative B decays in the MSSM with minimal flavor violation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 635, pp. 335–342, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. M. Ciuchini, A. Masiero, P. Paradisi, L. Silvestrini, S. K. Vempati, and O. Vives, “Soft SUSY breaking grand unification: leptons vs quarks on the flavor playground,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 783, pp. 112–142, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. F. Borzumati and C. Greub, “Two Higgs doublet model predictions for B¯Xsγ in NLO QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 58, Article ID 074004, 20 pages, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  100. M. Ciuchini, G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, and G. F. Giudice, “Next-to-leading QCD corrections to BXsγ: standard model and two-Higgs doublet model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 527, pp. 21–43, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. M. Ciuchini, G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, and G. F. Giudice, “Next-to-leading QCD corrections to BXsγ in supersymmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 534, pp. 3–20, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, and G. F. Giudice, “BXsγ in supersymmetry: large contributions beyond the leading order,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0012, p. 009, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. A. Ali, E. Lunghi, C. Greub, and G. Hiller, “Improved model-independent analysis of semileptonic and radiative rare B decays,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, Article ID 034002, 19 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. T. Hurth, G. Isidori, J. F. Kamenik, and F. Mescia, “Constraints on new physics in MFV models: a model-independent analysis of ΔF=1 processes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 808, pp. 326–346, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. C. Greub, T. Hurth, and D. Wyler, “Virtual O(αS) corrections to the inclusive decay bsγ,” Physical Review D, vol. 54, pp. 3350–3364, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. A. J. Buras, A. Czarnecki, M. Misiak, and J. Urban, “Two-loop matrix element of the current—current operator in the decay BXsγ,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 611, pp. 488–502, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. K. G. Chetyrkin, M. Misiak, and M. Munz, “Weak radiative B-meson decay beyond leading logarithms,” Physics Letters B, vol. 400, pp. 206–219, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. K. G. Chetyrkin, M. Misiak, and M. Munz, “Weak radiative B-meson decay beyond leading logarithms,” Physics Letters B, vol. 425, p. 414, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. A. Ali and C. Greub, “Photon energy spectrum in BXs+γ and comparison with data,” Physics Letters B, vol. 361, p. 146, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. N. Pott, “Bremsstrahlung corrections to the decay bsγ,” Physical Review D, vol. 54, p. 938, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. M. Misiak and M. Münz, “Two-loop mixing of dimension-five flavor-changing operators,” Physics Letters B, vol. 344, p. 308, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. K. Adel and Y. P. Yao, “O(αS) calculation of the decays bs+γ and bs+g,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, pp. 4945–4948, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. C. Greub and T. Hurth, “Two-loop matching of the dipole operators for bsγ and bsg,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, pp. 2934–2949, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. A. J. Buras, A. Kwiatkowski, and N. Pott, “Next-to-leading-order matching for the magnetic photon-penguin operator in the BXs decay,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 517, pp. 353–373, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. M. Czakon, U. Haisch, and M. Misiak, “Four-loop anomalous dimensions for radiative flavour-changing decays,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0703, p. 008, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. C. Bobeth, M. Misiak, and J. Urban, “Photonic penguins at two loops and mt-dependence of BR[BXsI+I],” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 574, pp. 291–330, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  117. M. Misiak, “QCD calculations of radiative B decays,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.3134.
  118. D. Asner, Sw. Banerjee, R. Bernhard et al., “Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and tau-lepton properties,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1589.
  119. A. Lenz and U. Nierste, “Numerical updates of lifetimes and mixing parameters of B mesons,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.4274.
  120. T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, “mproved α4 term of the muon anomalous magnetic moment,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, Article ID 113001, 27 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  121. T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, “Improved α4 term of the electron anomalous magnetic moment,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, Article ID 013003, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  122. T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, “Tenth-order QED contribution to the lepton g-2: evaluation of dominant α5 terms of muon g-2,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, Article ID 053007, 21 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  123. G. Gabrielse, D. Hanneke, T. Kinoshita, M. Nio, and B. Odom, “Erratum: New determination of the fine structure constant from the electron g value and QED,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 3, Article ID 039902, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, “Revised value of the eighth-order contribution to the electron g-2,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 11, Article ID 110406, 4 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  125. D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell, and G. Gabrielse, “New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, Article ID 120801, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  126. G. Degrassi and G. F. Giudice, “QED logarithms in the electroweak corrections to the muon anomalous magnetic moment,” Physical Review D, vol. 58, Article ID 053007, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  127. A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and A. Vainshtein, “Refinements in electroweak contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, Article ID 073006, 20 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  128. S. Heinemeyer, D. Stockinger, and G. Weiglein, “Electroweak and supersymmetric two-loop corrections to μ(g2),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 699, pp. 103–123, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  129. T. Gribouk and A. Czarnecki, “Electroweak interactions and the muon g-2: bosonic two-loop effects,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, Article ID 053016, 10 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. J. Prades, E. de Rafael, and A. Vainshtein, “Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment,” in Lepton Dipole Moments, vol. 20 of Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics, pp. 303–318, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  131. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, G. Lopez Castro et al., “The discrepancy between τ and e+e spectral functions revisited and the consequences for the muon magnetic anomaly,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 66, pp. 127–136, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  132. J. Prades, “Standard model prediction of the muon anomalous magnetic moment,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 3, pp. 75–86, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  133. F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, “The muon g-2,” Physics Reports, vol. 477, pp. 1–110, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  134. A. Nyffeler, “Hadronic light-by-light scattering in the muon g-2: a new short-distance constraint on pion exchange,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, Article ID 073012, 13 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. S. Bar-Shalom, S. Nandi, and A. Soni, “Muon g-2 and lepton flavor violation in a two Higgs doublets model for the fourth generation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 709, no. 3, pp. 207–217, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. J. P. Leveille, “The second-order weak correction to (g2) of the muon in arbitrary gauge models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 137, pp. 63–76, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  137. J. Adam, X. Bai, A. M. Baldini et al., “New limit on the lepton-flavor-violating decay μ+e+γ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 17, Article ID 171801, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  138. A. Dedes, H. K. Dreiner, and U. Nierste, “Correlation of Bsμ+μ and (g2)μ in minimal supergravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, Article ID 251804, 4 pages, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  139. C. Bobeth, T. Ewerth, F. Kruger, and J. Urban, “Enhancement of B(Bdμ+μ)/B(Bsμ+μ) in the MSSM with modified minimal flavor violation and large tanβ,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, Article ID 074021, 10 pages, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  140. A. G. Akeroyd, F. Mahmoudi, and D. M. Santos, “The decay Bsμ+μ: updated SUSY constraints and prospects,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1112, p. 088, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  141. R. Aaij, C. Abellan Beteta, A. Adametz et al., “Strong constraints on the rare decays Bs0μ+μ and B0μ+μ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, Article ID 231801.
  142. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for microscopic black holes in pp collisions at s=7 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1204, p. 033, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  143. H. E. Logan and U. Nierste, “Bs,d+ in a two-Higgs-doublet model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 586, pp. 39–55, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  144. UTfit collaboartion, http://www.utfit.org/UTfit/.
  145. M. Antonelli, D. M. Asner, D. Bauer et al., “Flavor physics in the quark sector,” Physics Reports, vol. 494, pp. 197–414, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  146. K. Kiers and A. Soni, “Improving constraints on tanβ/mH using BDτν¯,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, pp. 5786–5793, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  147. J. P. Lees, V. Poireau, V. Tisserand et al., “Evidence for an excess of B¯D()τν¯τ decays,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, Article ID 101802, 10 pages. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  148. G. W.-S. Hou, “Theory summary (a Perspective,” in Presented at Flavor Physics and CP Violation (FPCP '12), Hefei, China, May 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7275.
  149. M. Geller, S. Bar-Shalom, and G. Eilam, “The need for new search strategies for fourth generation quarks at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 715, pp. 121–128, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  150. K. Rao and D. Whiteson, “Triangulating an exotic T quark,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 015008, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  151. K. Rao and D. Whiteson, “Reinterpretion of experimental results with basis templates,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.6642.
  152. G. Passarino, C. Sturm, and S. Uccirati, “Complete electroweak corrections to Higgs production in a Standard Model with four generations at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 706, pp. 195–199, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  153. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, A. Mück et al., “Higgs production and decay with a fourth Standard-Model-like fermion generation,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, p. 1992, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  154. G. Guo, B. Ren, and X.-G. He, “LHC evidence of a 126 GeV Higgs boson from Hγγ with three and four generations,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.3188.
  155. O. Eberhardt, G. Herbert, H. Lacker et al., “Joint analysis of Higgs boson decays and electroweak precision observables in the standard model with a sequential fourth generation,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 013011, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  156. A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, and M. Spira, “HDECAY: a program for Higgs boson decays in the Standard Model and its supersymmetric extension,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 108, pp. 56–74, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  157. M. Geller, S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam, and A. Soni, “125 GeV Higgs state in the context of four generations with two Higgs doublets,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 11, Article ID 115008, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar