Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 915897, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/915897
Review Article

Heavy Chiral Fermions and Dark Matter

1Department of Physics and Center for Theoretical Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
2Department of Physics and Center for Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, National Central University, Chungli 32001, Taiwan

Received 22 June 2012; Accepted 4 November 2012

Academic Editor: Tao Han

Copyright © 2013 Johan Alwall and Jusak Tandean. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Beringer, J. F. Arguin, R. M. Barnett et al., “Review of particle physic,” Physical Review, vol. 86, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, “Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints,” Physics Reports, vol. 405, no. 5-6, pp. 279–390, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Hooper and E. A. Baltz, “Strategies for determining the nature of dark matter,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 58, pp. 293–314, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. L. Feng, “Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 48, pp. 495–545, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. L. M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, “Discrete gauge symmetry in continuum theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1221–1223, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Batell, “Dark discrete gauge symmetries,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 3, 12 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, “Supersymmetric dark matter,” Physics Report, vol. 267, no. 5-6, pp. 195–373, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W. Y. Keung and P. Schwaller, “Long lived fourth generation and the Higgs,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 54, 19 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. D. Borah, “Abelian extension of standard model with four generations,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 1, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. Y. F. Zhou, “Probing the fourth generation Majorana neutrino dark matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 5, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. H. S. Lee, Z. Liu, and A. Soni, “Neutrino dark matter candidate in fourth generation scenarios,” Physics Letters B, vol. 704, no. 1-2, pp. 30–35, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Belotsky, D. Fargion, M. Y. Khlopov et al., “May Heavy hadrons of the 4th generation be hidden in our Universe while close to detection?” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0411271.
  13. M. Y. Khlopov, “Composite dark matter from 4th generation,” Pis'ma v Zhurnal Eksperimental'noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, vol. 83, p. 3, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Y. Khlopov, “Physics of dark matter in the light of dark atoms,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 26, no. 38, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. L. Feng and J. Kumar, “Dark-matter particles without weak-scale masses or weak interactions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 23, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Fukushima, J. Kumar, and P. Sandick, “Detection prospects for Majorana fermion WIMPless dark matter,” Physical Review, vol. 84, no. 1, 9 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. L. Feng and Y. Shadmi, “WIMPless dark matter from non-Abelian hidden sectors with anomaly-mediated supersymmetry breaking,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 9, Article ID 095011, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. L. Feng, V. Rentala, and Z. Surujon, “WIMPless dark matter in anomaly-mediated supersymmetry breaking with Hidden QED,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 9, Article ID 095033, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. J. L. Feng, V. Rentala, and Z. Surujon, “WIMPless dark matter from an anomaly-mediated supersymmetry breaking hidden sector with no new mass parameters,” Physical Review, vol. 85, no. 5, Article ID 055003, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. X. G. He, S. Y. Ho, J. Tandean, and H. C. Tsai, “Scalar dark matter and standard model with four generations,” Physical Review, vol. 82, 3, Article ID 035016, 11 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. L. M. Carpenter, “Fourth generation lepton sectors with stable majorana neutrinos: from LEP to LHC,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.5502. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. G. D. Kribs, T. Plehn, M. Spannowsky, and T. M. P. Tait, “Four generations and Higgs physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 7, Article ID 075016, 11 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. O. Eberhardt, A. Lenz, and J. Rohrwild, “Less space for a new family of fermions,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 9, Article ID 095006, 20 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. The ATLAS collaboration, “Update of the combination of Higgs Boson searches in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC,” ATLAS-CONF 2011-135, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  25. CMS Collaboration, “SM Higgs combination,” CMS-PAS-HIG 11-011, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  26. D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, “Observational evidence for self-interacting cold dark matter,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 17, p. 3760, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. R. Dave, D. N. Spergel, P. J. Steinhardt, and B. D. Wandelt, “Halo properties in cosmological simulations of self-interacting cold dark matter,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 547, no. 2, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. C. Kouvaris, “Limits on self-interacting dark matter from neutron stars,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 19, Article ID 191301, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. J.L. Feng, J. Kumar, and L.E. Strigari, “Explaining the DAMA signal with WIMPless dark matter,” Physics Letters B, vol. 670, no. 1, pp. 37–40, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. R. Bernabei, P. Belli, F. Cappella et al., “New results from DAMA/LIBRA,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 67, no. 1-2, pp. 39–49, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. C. E. Aalseth, P. S. Barbeau, N. S. Bowden et al., “Results from a search for light-mass dark matter with a p-type point contact germanium detector,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, Article ID 131301, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. B. Dutta and J. Kumar, “Asymmetric dark matter from hidden sector baryogenesis,” Physics Letters B, vol. 699, no. 5, pp. 364–367, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. H. C. Cheng and I. Low, “Little hierarchy, little higgses, and a little symmetry,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 408, Article ID 061, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. G. Servant and T. M. P. Tait, “Is the lightest kaluza-klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 650, no. 1-2, pp. 391–419, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. H. C. Cheng, J. L. Feng, and K. T. Matchev, “Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, no. 21, Article ID 211301, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. J. Alwall, J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, and S. Su, “Dark matter-motivated searches for exotic fourth-generation mirror quarks in tevatron and early LHC data,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 11, Article ID 114027, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. Alwall, J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, and S. Su, “B's with direct decays: Tevatron and LHC discovery prospects in the bb+E/T channel,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 074010, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  38. V. Silveira and A. Zee, “Scalar Phantoms,” Physics Letters B, vol. 161, no. 1–3, pp. 136–140, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. J. McDonald, “Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 3637–3649, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. H. Davoudiasl, R. Kitano, T. Li, and H. Murayama, “The new minimal standard model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 609, no. 1-2, pp. 117–123, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. X. G. He, T. Li, X. Q. Li, and H. C. Tsai, “Scalar dark matter effects in Higgs and top quark decays,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 22, pp. 2121–2129, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and G. Shaughnessy, “CERN LHC phenomenology of an extended standard model with a real scalar singlet,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 3, Article ID 035005, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. S. Andreas, T. Hambye, and M. H. G. Tytgat, “WIMP dark matter, Higgs exchange and DAMA,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 0810, Article ID 034, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. X. G. He, T. Li, X. Q. Li, J. Tandean, and H. C. Tsai, “Constraints on scalar dark matter from direct experimental searches,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 2, Article ID 023521, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. X. G. He, T. Li, X. Q. Li, J. Tandean, and H.-C. Tsai, “The simplest dark-matter model, CDMS II results, and Higgs detection at LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 688, no. 4-5, pp. 332–336, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. S. Andreas, C. Arina, T. Hambye, F. S. Ling, and M. H. G. Tytgat, “Light scalar WIMP through the Higgs portal and CoGeNT,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 4, Article ID 043522, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. W. L. Guo and Y. L. Wu, “The real singlet scalar dark matter model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, Article ID 083, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. K. Ghosh, B. Mukhopadhyaya, and U. Sarkar, “Signals of an invisibly decaying Higgs in a scalar dark matter scenario: a study for the large hadron collider,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 1, Article ID 015017, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. Y. Mambrini, “Higgs searches and singlet scalar dark matter: combined constraints from XENON 100 and the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 11, Article ID 115017, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. M. Raidal and A. Strumia, “Hints for a non-standard Higgs boson from the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 7, Article ID 077701, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. O. Lebedev, H. M. Lee, and Y. Mambrini, “Vector Higgs portal dark matter and the invisible Higgs,” Physics Letters B, vol. 707, no. 5, pp. 570–576, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. A. Djouadi, O. Lebedev, Y. Mambrini, and J. Quevillon, “Implications of LHC searches for Higgs-portal dark matter,” Physics Letters B, vol. 709, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi, and M. Raidal, “Implications of the 125 GeV Higgs boson for scalar dark matter and for the CMSSM phenomenology,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1205, Article ID 061, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. X. G. He, B. Ren, and J. Tandean, “Hints of standard model Higgs boson at the LHC and light dark matter searches,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 9, Article ID 093019, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. C. P. Burgess, M. Pospelov, and T. ter Veldhuis, “The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: a singlet scalar,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 619, no. 1–3, pp. 709–728, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. X. G. He and J. Tandean, “Hidden Higgs boson at the LHC and light dark matter searches,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 7, Article ID 075018, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. E. Komatsu, K. M. Smith, J. Dunkley et al., “Seven-yearwilkinson microwave anisotropy probe(wmap*) observations: cosmological interpretation,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 192, no. 2, p. 18, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. D. Hooper, J. I. Collar, J. Hall, D. McKinsey, and C. Kelso, “Consistent dark matter interpretation for CoGeNT and DAMA/LIBRA,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 12, Article ID 123509, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. J. I. Collar, “A comparison between the low-energy spectra from CoGeNT and CDMS,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.3481.
  60. J. I. Collar, “A realistic assessment of the sensitivity of XENON10 and XENON100 to light-mass WIMPs,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0653.
  61. J. I. Collar, “Comments on ‘final analysis and results of the phase II SIMPLE dark matter search’,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3559.
  62. G. B. Gelmini, “Direct dark matter searches: Fits to WIMP candidates,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3559.
  63. E. Aprile, M. Alfonsi, K. Arisaka et al., “Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 18, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait, and H. B. Yu, “Constraints on light Majorana dark matter from colliders,” Physics Letters B, vol. 695, no. 1–4, pp. 185–188, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. K. M. Belostky, M. Y. Khlopov, and K. I. Shibaev, “Accelerator probes for new stable quarks,” arxiv.org/abs/1111.3578.
  66. A. C. Kraan, “Interactions of heavy stable hadronizing particles,” The European Physical Journal, vol. 37, pp. 91–104, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  67. R. Mackeprang and A. Rizzi, “Interactions of coloured heavy stable particles in matter,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 353–362, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. R. Mackeprang and D. Milstead, “An updated description of heavy-hadron interactions in Geant-4,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 66, no. 3-4, pp. 493–501, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott, M. Abolins et al., “Search for long-lived charged massive particles with the D0 detector,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 16, Article ID 161802, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. T. Aaltonen, J. Adelman, T. Akimoto et al., “Search for long-lived massive charged particles in 1.96 TeV pp¯ collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 2, Article ID 021802, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. C. M. S. Collaboration, “Search for heavy stable charged particles in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 3, p. 24, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  72. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Search for stable hadronising squarks and gluinos with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 701, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. J. Alwall, P. Demin, S. de Visscher et al., “MadGraph/MadEvent v4: the new web generation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, Article ID 028, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, “PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0605, Article ID 026, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. PGS—Pretty Good Simulator, http://www.physics.ucdavis.edu/~conway/research/software/pgs/pgs4-general.htm.
  76. T. Aaltonen, B. A. Gonzalez, S. Amerio et al., “Search for new T′ particles in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse energy in ppbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, Article ID 191803, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. T. Aaltonen, B. Á. Gonzalez, S. Amerio et al., “Search for production of heavy particles decaying to top quarks and invisible particles in pp¯ collisions at s=1.96 TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 19, Article ID 191801, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Search for new phenomena in ttbar events with large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 4, Article ID 041805, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. G. Eilam, J. L. Hewett, and A. Soni, “Rare decays of the top quark in the standard and two Higgs doublet models,” Physical Review D, vol. 44, no. 5, Article ID 1473, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. G. Eilam, J. L. Hewett, and A. Soni, “Erratum: rare decays of the top quark in the standard and two-Higgs-doublet models,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 3, Article ID 039901, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  81. J. L. Hewett, T. Takeuchi, and S. D. Thomas, “Indirect probes of new physics,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9603391.
  82. B. Mele, S. Petrarca, and A. Soddu, “A new evaluation of the t→cH decay width in the standard model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 435, no. 3-4, pp. 401–406, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and G. C. Branco, “Probing top flavour-changing neutral scalar couplings at the CERN LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 495, no. 3-4, pp. 347–356, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “Top flavour-changing neutral interactions: theoretical expectations and experimental detection,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 35, pp. 2695–2710, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  85. G. Eilam, B. Melic, and J. Trampetic, “CP violation and the 4th generation,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 116003, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  86. A. Arhrib and W. S. Hou, “Flavor changing neutral currents involving heavy quarks with four generations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0607, Article ID 009, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. K. Belotsky, D. Fargion, M. Khlopov, R. Konoplich, and K. Shibaev, “Invisible Higgs boson decay into massive neutrinos of fourth generation,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 5, Article ID 054027, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. A. N. Rozanov and M. I. Vysotsky, “Tevatron constraints on the Higgs boson mass in the fourth-generation fermion models revisited,” Physics Letters B, vol. 700, no. 5, pp. 313–315, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. S. A. Cetin, T. Cuhadar-Donszelmann, M. Sahin, S. Sultansoy, and G. Unel, “Impact of the relatively light fourth family neutrino on the Higgs boson search,” Physics Letters B, vol. 710, no. 2, pp. 328–331, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. N. Chen and H. J. He, “LHC signatures of two-Higgs-doublets with fourth family,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1204, Article ID 062, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. Q. Li, M. Spira, J. Gao, and C. S. Li, “Higgs boson production via gluon fusion in the standard model with four generations,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 9, Article ID 094018, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. G. Aad, T. Abajyan, and B. Abbott, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, and A. Tumasyan, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 30–61, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. T. Aaltonen, V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott et al., “Evidence for a particle produced in association with weak bosons and decaying to a bottom-antibottom quark pair in Higgs boson searches at the Tevatron,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 7, 12 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. A. Djouadi and A. Lenz, “Sealing the fate of a fourth generation of fermions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.1252.
  96. E. Kuflik, Y. Nir, and T. Volansky, “Implications of Higgs searches on the four generation standard model,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.1975.
  97. M. Buchkremer, J.M. Gerard, and F. Maltoni, “Closing in on a perturbative fourth generation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1206, Article ID 135, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. O. Eberhardt, A. Lenz, A. Menzel, U. Nierste, and M. Wiebusch, “Status of the fourth fermion generation before ICHEP2012: higgs data and electroweak precision observables,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 7, 5 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. I. Low, J. Lykken, and G. Shaughnessy, “Have we observed the Higgs (imposter)?” http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1093.
  100. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal, and A. Strumia, “Is the resonance at 125 GeV the Higgs boson?” http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1347.
  101. D. Elander and M. Piai, “The decay constant of the holographic techni-dilaton and the 125 GeV boson,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0546.
  102. X. G. He and G. Valencia, “An extended scalar sector to address the tension between a fourth generation and Higgs searches at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 707, no. 3-4, pp. 381–384, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. M. Geller, S. Bar-Shalom, and G. Eilam, “The need for new search strategies for fourth generation quarks at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 715, no. 1–3, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. K. Kumar, R. Vega-Morales, and F. Yu, “Effects from new colored states and the Higgs portal on gluon fusion and Higgs boson decays,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4244.
  105. L. Bellantoni, J. Erler, J. J. Heckman, and E. Ramirez-Homs, “Masses of a fourth generation with two Higgs doublets,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 3, Article ID 034022, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. H. S. Lee and A. Soni, “Fourth generation parity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6110.
  107. E. Osoba, “Fourth generations with an inert doublet Higgs,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6912.
  108. S. Bar-Shalom, M. Geller, S. Nandi, and A. Soni, “Two Higgs doublets, a 4th generation and a 125 GeV Higgs: a review,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3195.
  109. Z. Ahmed, D. S. Akerib, A. Arrenberg et al., “The CDMS II Collaboration. Dark matter search results from the CDMS II experiment,” Science, vol. 327, pp. 1619–1621, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. E. Aprile, K. Arisaka, F. Arneodo et al., “Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 13, Article ID 131302, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. H. S. Lee, H. C. Bhang, J. H. Choi et al., “Limits on interactions between weakly interacting massive particles and nucleons obtained with CsI(Tl) crystal detectors,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 9, Article ID 091301, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. D. S. Akerib, M. S. Armel-Funkhouser, M. J. Attisha et al., “Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon interactions from the cryogenic dark matter search,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 1, Article ID 011102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. J. Angle, E. Aprile, F. Arneodo et al., “Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections from the XENON10 experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 9, Article ID 091301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. D. S. Akerib, M. J. Attisha, and L. Baudis, “Low-threshold analysis of CDMS shallow-site data,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 12, Article ID 122004, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. Z. Ahmed, D. S. Akerib, S. Arrenberg et al., “Results from a low-energy analysis of the CDMS II germanium data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 13, Article ID 131302, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. J. Angle, E. Aprile, F. Arneodo et al., “Search for light dark matter in XENON10 data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 5, Article ID 051301, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  117. C. Savage, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, and K. Freese, “Compatibility of DAMA/LIBRA dark matter detection with other searches,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 0904, Article ID 010, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. G. Angloher, M. Bauer, I. Bavykina et al., “Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II Dark Matter search,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, no. 1971, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. E. Aprile, “The XENON1T dark matter search experiment,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6288.