Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014, Article ID 195157, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/195157
Research Article

Minimal Length and the Existence of Some Infinitesimal Quantities in Quantum Theory and Gravity

National Centre of Particles and High Energy Physics, Pervomayskaya Street 18, 220088 Minsk, Belarus

Received 23 September 2014; Accepted 25 November 2014; Published 10 December 2014

Academic Editor: George Siopsis

Copyright © 2014 A. E. Shalyt-Margolin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1995. View at MathSciNet
  2. R. M. Wald, General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. G. Veneziano, “A stringy nature needs just two constants,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 199, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Can spacetime be probed below the string size?” Physics Letters B, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 41–47, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Witten, “Reflections on the fate of spacetime,” Physics Today, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 24–30, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. J. Polchinski, String Theory, vol. 1 & 2, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  7. C. Rovelli, “Loop quantum gravity: the first 25 years,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 15, Article ID 153002, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Quantum spacetime phenomenology,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 16, p. 5, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  9. L. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimum length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145–165, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. G. Amelino-Camelia and L. Smolin, “Prospects for constraining quantum gravity dispersion with near term observations,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 8, Article ID 084017, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Gubitosi, L. Pagano, G. Amelino-Camelia, A. Melchiorri, and A. Cooray, “A constraint on Planck-scale modifications to electrodynamics with CMB polarization data,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2009, no. 8, article 21, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Building a case for a PLANCK-scale-deformed boost action: the Planck-scale particle-localization limit,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2167–2180, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Hossenfelder, M. Bleicher, S. Hofmann, J. Ruppert, S. Scherer, and H. Stöcker, “Signatures in the Planck regime,” Physics Letters B, vol. 575, no. 1-2, pp. 85–99, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Hossenfelder, “Running coupling with minimal length,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 70, no. 10, Article ID 105003, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Hossenfelder, “A note on theories with a minimal length,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1815–1821, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. S. Hossenfelder, “Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 16, p. 2, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. R. J. Adler and D. I. Santiago, “On gravity and the uncertainty principle,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 14, p. 1371, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. D. V. Ahluwalia, “Wave-particle duality at the Planck scale: freezing of neutrino oscillations,” Physics Letters A, vol. 275, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  19. D. V. Ahluwalia, “Interface of gravitational and quantum realms,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 17, no. 15–17, p. 1135, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Maggiore, “The algebraic structure of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 319, no. 1–3, pp. 83–86, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. K. Nozari and A. Etemadi, “Minimal length, maximal momentum, and Hilbert space representation of quantum mechanics,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 104029, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Penrose, “Quantum theory and space-time,” in The Nature of Space and Time, S. Hawking and R. Penrose, Eds., Fourth Lecture, Prinseton University Press, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  24. W. Heisenberg, “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 43, pp. 172–198, 1927, English translation: J. A. Wheeler and H. Zurek, Quantum Theory and Measurement Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 62–84, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. A. Wheeler, Geometrodynamics, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1962.
  26. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1973. View at MathSciNet
  27. R. Garattini, “A spacetime foam approach to the cosmological constant and entropy,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 635–651, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. R. Garattini, “A spacetime foam approach to the Schwarzschild-de Sitter entropy,” Entropy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–38, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Garattini, “Entropy and the cosmological constant: a spacetime-foam approach,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 88, pp. 297–300, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. R. Garattini, “Entropy from the foam,” Physics Letters B, vol. 459, no. 4, pp. 461–467, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. F. Scardigli, “Black hole entropy: a spacetime foam approach,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1781–1793, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. F. Scardigli, “Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole gedanken experiment,” Physics Letters B, vol. 452, no. 1-2, pp. 39–44, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. F. Scardigli, “Gravity coupling from micro-black holes,” Nuclear Physics B—Proceedings Supplements, vol. 88, pp. 291–294, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. L. J. Garay, “Thermal properties of spacetime foam,” Physical Review D, vol. 58, Article ID 124015, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. L. J. Garay, “Spacetime foam as a quantum thermal bath,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 2508–2511, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. Y. J. Ng and H. van Dam, “Measuring the foaminess of space-time with gravity-wave interferometers,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 795–805, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. Y. J. Ng, “Spacetime foam,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 11, p. 1585, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. Y. J. Ng, “Selected topics in planck-scale physics,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 18, no. 16, p. 1073, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. Y. J. Ng, “Quantum foam,” in Proceedings of the 10th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, pp. 2150–2164, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003.
  40. Y. J. Ng and H. van Dam, “Spacetime foam, holographic principle, and black hole quantum computers,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1328–1335, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. W. A. Christiansen, Y. J. Ng, and H. van Dam, “Probing spacetime foam with extragalactic sources,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 5, Article ID 051301, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. Y. J. Ng, “Holographic foam, dark energy and infinite statistics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 657, no. 1–3, pp. 10–14, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. Y. Jack Ng, “Spacetime foam and dark energy,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1115, p. 74, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  44. W. A. Christiansen, Y. J. Ng, D. J. E. Floyd, and E. S. Perlman, “Limits on spacetime foam,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 83, no. 8, Article ID 084003, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Gravity-wave interferometers as quantum-gravity detectors,” Nature, vol. 398, no. 6724, pp. 216–218, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. L. Diosi and B. Lukács, “On the minimum uncertainty of space-time geodesics,” Physics Letters A, vol. 142, no. 6-7, pp. 331–334, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin and J. G. Suarez, “Quantum mechanics of the early universe and its limiting transition,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0302119.
  48. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin and J. G. Suarez, “Quantum mechanics at Planck’s scale and density matrix,” International Journal of Modern Physics. Part D: Gravitation, Astrophysics, Cosmology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1265–1278, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin and A. Y. Tregubovich, “Deformed density matrix and generalized uncertainty relation in thermodynamics,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 71–81, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  50. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin, “Non-unitary and unitary transitions in generalized quantum mechanics, new small parameter and information problem solving,” Modern Physics Letters A: Particles and Fields, Gravitation, Cosmology, Nuclear Physics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 391–403, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  51. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin, “Pure states, mixed states and Hawking problem in generalized quantum mechanics,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 27, pp. 2037–2045, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  52. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin, “The universe as a nonuniform lattice in finite-volume hypercube: I. Fundamental definitions and particular features,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 853–863, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin, “The Universe as a nonuniform lattice in the finite-dimensional hypercube. II. Simple cases of symmetry breakdown and restoration,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 20, no. 20-21, pp. 4951–4964, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  54. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin and V. I. Strazhev, “The density matrix deformation in quantum and statistical mechanics of the early universe,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium-Frontiers of Fundamental and Computational Physics, B. G. Sidharth, Ed., pp. 131–134, 2006.
  55. A. Shalyt-Margolin, “Entropy in the present and early universe: new small parameters and dark energy problem,” Entropy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 932–952, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin, Quantum Cosmology Research Trends, vol. 246 of Horizons in World Physics, Nova Science, Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2005.
  57. E. P. Wigner, “Relativistic invariance and quantum phenomena,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 29, pp. 255–268, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  58. H. Salecker and E. P. Wigner, “Quantum limitations of the measurement of space-time distances,” vol. 109, pp. 571–577, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  59. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin, “Space-time fluctuations, quantum field theory with UV-cutoff and einstein equations,” Nonlinear Phenomena in Complex Systems, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 138–146, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  60. G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,” Essay dedicated to Abdus Salam, http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9310026.
  61. G. Hooft, “The holographic principle,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0003004.
  62. L. Susskind, “The world as a hologram,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 6377–6396, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  63. R. Bousso, “The holographic principle,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 825–874, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  64. L. D. Faddeev, “A mathematical view of the evolution of physics,” Priroda, no. 5, pp. 11–16, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  65. J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Physical Review D, vol. 7, pp. 2333–2345, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  66. S. W. Hawking, “Black holes and thermodynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 191–204, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  67. T. Padmanabhan, “Classical and quantum thermodynamics of horizons in spherically symmetric spacetimes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 5387–5408, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  68. T. Padmanabhan, “A new perspective on gravity and dynamics of space-time,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 2263, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. T. Padmanabhan, “The holography of gravity encoded in a relation between entropy, horizon area, and action for gravity,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2029–2035, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  70. T. Padmanabhan, “Holographic gravity and the surface term in the Einstein-Hilbert action,” Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 35, no. 2, p. 362, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. T. Padmanabhan, “Gravity: a new holographic perspective,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 15, p. 1659, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. G. A. Mukhopadhyay and T. Padmanabhan, “Holography of gravitational action functionals,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 12, Article ID 124023, 15 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. T. Padmanabhan, “Dark energy and gravity,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 40, no. 2-3, pp. 529–564, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  74. T. Padmanabhan and A. Paranjape, “Entropy of null surfaces and dynamics of spacetime,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 75, no. 6, Article ID 064004, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  75. T. Padmanabhan, “Gravity as an emergent phenomenon: a conceptual description,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 939, p. 114, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  76. T. Padmanabhan, “Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons,” Physics Reports, vol. 406, no. 2, pp. 49–125, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  77. A. Paranjape, S. Sarkar, and T. Padmanabhan, “Thermodynamic route to field equations in Lanczos-LOVelock gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 10, Article ID 104015, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  78. T. Padmanabhan, “Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: new insights,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 73, no. 4, Article ID 046901, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. T. Padmanabhan, “Equipartition of energy in the horizon degrees of freedom and the emergence of gravity,” Modern Physics Letters A: Particles and Fields, Gravitation, Cosmology, Nuclear Physics, vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 1129–1136, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  80. A. E. Shalyt-Margolin, “Quantum theory at planck scale, limiting values, deformed gravity and dark energy problem,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 21, no. 2, Article ID 1250013, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. S. Kobayashi and K. Nomozu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, V.II, Interscience Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 1969.
  82. E. Verlinde, “On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 4, article 29, 2011. View at Google Scholar