Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 196484, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/196484
Research Article

Study of Baryon Spectroscopy Using a New Potential Form

Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Benha University, Benha, Egypt

Received 23 May 2014; Revised 1 August 2014; Accepted 17 August 2014; Published 10 September 2014

Academic Editor: Elias C. Vagenas

Copyright © 2014 L. I. Abou-Salem. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Abstract

In the present work, the nonrelativistic quark model is applied to study baryon systems, where the constituent quarks are bound by a suitable hyper central potential. We proposed a new phenomenological form of the interaction potential, digamma-type potential. Using the Jacobi coordinates, the three-body wave equation is solved numerically to calculate the resonance states of the , and baryon systems. The present model contains only two adjustable parameters in addition to the quark masses. Our theoretical calculations are compared to the available experimental data and Cornell potential results. The description of the spectrum shows that the ground states of the considered light and strange baryon spectra are in general well reproduced.

1. Introduction

Hadron spectroscopy is very important to study its structures and the nature of the interaction forces between its constituents. In the previous works [15], the heavy meson spectroscopy is studied by using different potential models. Many authors have been studying the baryon spectroscopy. An analytical solution was provided in case of harmonic and anharmonic potentials for a system consists of three identical particles [6, 7]. Some authors have used the Cornell potential (Coulomb-type plus linear term) to study the resonance states of and baryons [814]. The harmonic oscillator potential has been used to study the interaction between three identical particles [15]. In the present work, the digamma-function is used as the interaction potential between constituent quarks of baryon systems. The three-body wave equation is solved, numerically, by using the Jacobi method to calculate the resonance state masses of , , , and baryons. These baryons consist of identical or nonidentical quarks. Our theoretical results will be investigated in Section 3.

2. The Used Model

The nonrelativistic Schroedinger equation for a system consists of three particles is given as where , , and are the three-quark masses and is the relative separation vector.

In the quark model, a baryon is a three-body bound state made of quarks. The mathematical description of a three-body system is more complicated than that of a two-body system. Several methods have been used by different authors to solve three-body problems [11, 15]. In order to describe the baryon as a bound state of three constituent quarks, we define the configuration of three particles by the center of mass, , and two Jacobi coordinates and as where ; ;   and are constants.

Using natural units and letting the coefficients of and be equal to , therefore, (1) can be separated into the following two equations: where where The wave function can be expressed as [8, 16, 17] where and are the hyper radial part of the wave function and the hyper spherical harmonic function, respectively. The symbol is called the grand angular quantum number and is given by where and are the angular momenta associated with the and variables and is a nonnegative integer number.

The hyperradius is given as The potential can be assumed to depend on the hyperradius and space wave function is factored similar to the central potential [8].

Equation (4) can be rewritten as where represents the dimension of the and is the angular momentum operator whose eigenfunctions are [6, 9, 11] In the present work, the interaction potential is assumed as digamma-type as follows: where is an adjustable parameter and is the gamma-function.

Now, applying the following transformation (10) can be rewritten as With the new boundary conditions, Using

Equation (12) can be rewritten as

To transform the range of from to , I introduce the dimensionless variables, , , and assume that where  GeV−1.

Equation (18) can be rewritten as The new boundary conditions are given as To transform (20) into a matrix form, one can divide the range of from into points with equal interval, , labeled by subscript .

The new form of the boundary conditions is given as Using the finite difference approximation [19], the second derivative term in (20) is given as where the term represents the expected error.

Using the symmetry properties of the radial wave function, one can assume that [15] Using (21), (22), and (23) in (18) and taking , one gets This equation is rewritten in the following matrix form: where is symmetric matrix and is unitary diagonal matrix. Using the Jacobi method [20, 21], (26) can be solved numerically and the eigenvalues, , are determined. The nonrelativistic resonance mass, , for each state is given by

3. Results and Discussions

In the present work, the spin-spin interaction is not considered and we deal with the spin averaged stats. The predicted values of the , , , and resonance masses are calculated through solving (26) numerically using the Jacobi method. The present potential form is proposed as the analytical form of the digamma-function; see (12) and (13). The -test is used to determine the parameter values where is the total number of states, is the resonance mass, and is the experimental error in the th State. The parameter values which are used in the present calculations are given in Table 1. The uncertainties in these parameters may be due to relativistic effects and ignoring the spin interaction terms.

tab1
Table 1: The values of the parameters which are taken in our calculations.

The behavior of the digamma-type and Cornell potentials versus the hyperradius, , is shown in Figure 1. From this figure one notices that the suggested potential behaves nearly like Cornell potential at small (one gluon exchange part) and the Cornell potential is more confined than the digamma-type potential at large .

196484.fig.001
Figure 1: The digamma-type and Cornell potentials versus the hyperradius .

Table 2 contains the present calculations of resonance states using both digamma-function potential and a Coulomb like hyper central potential plus the linear term (Cornell Model [10]) in comparison to the experimental values [18]. From this table, one notices that the observed seven experimental states are calculated using the suggested potential form while the results of Cornell potential are 4 states only and the present calculations give more satisfied agreement with the experimental data.

tab2
Table 2: The present calculations of baryon states in comparison to the Cornell potential results [10] and the experimental data [18] in (MeV).

Table 3 contains the present calculations of baryon states and Cornell potential results [10] in comparison to the available experimental data [18]. From this figure one notices that the observed 5 states are calculated using the present potential form while the calculated states in [10] are three states only. In case of and baryons, one can notice that the calculated resonance masses using the digamma-type potential agree more with the experiment than the Cornell potential model results [10].

tab3
Table 3: The present calculations of baryon states in comparison with the Cornell potential results [10] and the experimental data [18] in (MeV).

The present calculations of and baryon states compared with the experimental values [21] are given in Tables 4 and 5. One notices that the suggested potential model can reproduce the experimental results of the ground states of and baryon systems.

tab4
Table 4: The present calculations of baryon states in comparison to the experimental data [18] in (MeV).
tab5
Table 5: The present calculations of baryon states in comparison to the experimental data [18] in (MeV).

4. Conclusions

A nonrelativistic quark model is used to study the spectra of the considered baryon systems (, , , and baryons). Using the hyper central approach, we have simplified the three-body problem and solved the Schrodinger equation numerically to obtain the ground-state energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. In the present work, we proposed a new phenomenological form of the interaction potential, digamma-type potential, between the quark constituents to study baryon systems. The behavior of this analytical function may be the same as the quark-antiquark interaction inside quarkonium systems. The description of the spectrum shows that the light and strange baryon ground states are in general well reproduced. The suggested potential model may be used to describe the energies of the higher excited states and negative-parity resonances through introducing the spin interaction terms as perturbed terms. Finally, this approach is useful because it allows for predictions of baryon states without extended lattice calculations and provides useful information about the short-distance one gluon exchange and the long-distance confinement interactions that can be useful in understanding the nature of the quark-quark force generated by QCD.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. L. I. Abou-Salem, “Mass spectra and leptonic decay widths of heavy quarkonia by using psi function,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1391–1399, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. L. I. Abou-Salem, “A systematic study on nonrelativistic quark-antiquark interactions,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 20, no. 17, p. 4113, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. L. I. Abou-Salem, M. S. M. Nour El-Din, and M. M. Moussa, “A study on breit interaction through heavy mesons spectra,” Turkish Journal of Physics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 69–77, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Amsler, T. DeGrand, and B. Krusche, “Review of particle physics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 667, no. 1–5, pp. 1–6, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. B. Metsch, “Quark model description of hadrons,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 717, no. 1, pp. 646–655, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. A. Rajabi, “A three-body force model for the harmonic and anharmonic oscillator,” Iranian Journal of Physics Research, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 37, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. A. Rajabi, “Exact analytical solution of the schrödinger equation for an N-identical body-force system,” Few-Body Systems, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 197–213, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Santopinto, F. Iachello, and M. M. Giannini, “Exactly solvable models of baryon spectroscopy,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 623, no. 1-2, pp. 100–109, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Ferraris, M. M. Giannini, M. Pizzo, E. Santopinto, and L. Tiator, “A three-body force model for the baryon spectrum,” Physics Letters B, vol. 364, no. 4, pp. 231–238, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. M. Giannini, E. Santopinto, and A. Vassallo, “Hypercentral constituent quark model and isospin dependence,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 12, p. 447, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. I. M. Narodetskii and M. A. Trusov, “The doubly heavy baryons,” Nuclear Physics B: Proceedings Supplements, vol. 115, pp. 20–23, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Santopinto, F. Iachello, and M. M. Giannini, “Nucleon form factors in a simple three-body quark model,” European Physical Journal A, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 307–315, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. M. Giannini, E. Santopinto, and A. Vassallo, “An overview of the hypercentral constituent quark model,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 263–272, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Bijker, F. Iachello, and E. Santopinto, “Algebraic treatment of the hyper-Coulomb problem,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 31, no. 45, pp. 9041–9054, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Cuervo-Reyes, M. Rigol, and J. Rubayo-Soneira, “Hadron spectra from a non-relativistic model with confining harmonic potential,” Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 18, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. S. Avery, “Harmonic polynomials, hyperspherical harmonics, and atomic spectra,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 233, no. 6, pp. 1366–1379, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. J. L. Ballot and M. Fabre de la Ripelle, “Application of the hyperspherical formalism to the trinucleon bound state problems,” Annals of Physics, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 62–125, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Nakamura, “Review of particle physics,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 37, no. 7, Article ID 075021, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Abramomwitiz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, National Bureau of Standards U.S. Gpo, Washington, DC, USA, 1972.
  20. J. H. Mathews and K. K. Fink, Numerical Methods Using Matlab, 4th edition, 2004.
  21. A. R. Goulary and G. A. Watson, Computational Methods for Matrix Eigen Problems, John Wiley & Sons, 1973.