Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 310264, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/310264
Research Article

Hermitian -Freudenthal-Kantor Triple Systems and Certain Applications of *-Generalized Jordan Triple Systems to Field Theory

1Department of Mathematics, University of Aizu, Aizuwakamatsu 965-8580, Japan
2Department of Natural Science, Faculty of Education, Hirosaki University, Bunkyo-cho 1, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8560, Japan

Received 15 August 2013; Revised 5 January 2014; Accepted 3 March 2014; Published 3 April 2014

Academic Editor: Anastasios Petkou

Copyright © 2014 Noriaki Kamiya and Matsuo Sato. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. N. Kamiya, “A structure theory of Freudenthal-Kantor triple systems,” Journal of Algebra, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 108–123, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. N. Kamiya, “A structure theory of Freudenthal-Kantor triple systems II,” Commentarii Mathematici Universitatis Sancti Pauli, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 41–60, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. N. Kamiya, “A structure theory of Freudenthal-Kantor triple systems III,” Memoirs of the Faculty of Science and Engineering. Shimane University, vol. 23, pp. 33–51, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. N. Kamiya, “The construction of all simple Lie algebras over C from balanced Freudenthal-Kantor triple systems,” in Contributions to General Algebra, vol. 7, pp. 205–213, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien, Austria; Veralg G. Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. N. Kamiya, “On Freudenthal-Kantor triple systems and generalized structurable algebras,” in Non-Associative Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 303 of Mathematics and Its Applications, pp. 198–203, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. N. Kamiya, “On the Peirce decompositions for Freudenthal-Kantor triple systems,” Communications in Algebra, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1833–1844, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. N. Kamiya, “Examples of Peirce decomposition of generalized Jordan triple system of second order—balanced cases,” in Noncommutative Geometry and Representation Theory in Mathematical Physics, J. Fuchs, Ed., vol. 391 of Contemporary Mathematics, pp. 157–165, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. N. Kamiya and S. Okubo, “On δ-Lie supertriple systems associated with (ϵ,δ)-Freudenthal-Kantor supertriple systems,” Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 243–260, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. I. L. Kantor and N. Kamiya, “A Peirce decomposition for generalized Jordan triple systems of second order,” Communications in Algebra, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 5875–5913, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. I. L. Kantor, “Models of the exceptional Lie algebras,” Soviet Mathematics—Doklady, vol. 14, pp. 254–258, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. I. L. Kantor, “Some generalizations of Jordan algebras,” Trudy Seminara po Vektornomu i Tenzornomu Analizu s ikh Prilozheniyami k Geometrii, Mekhanike i Fizike, vol. 16, pp. 407–499, 1972 (Russian). View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. W. Kaup, “Algebraic characterization of symmetric complex Banach manifolds,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 228, no. 1, pp. 39–64, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. I. Loos, Bounded Symmetric Domains and Jordan Pairs, Mathematical Lectures, University of California, Irvine, Calif, USA, 1977.
  14. K. Meyberg, Lectures on Algebras and Triple Systems, Lecture Notes, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, USA, 1972. View at MathSciNet
  15. E. Neher, “On the radical of J*-triples,” Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 211, no. 1, pp. 323–332, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. N. Kamiya and M. Sato, “'Hermitian generalised Jordan triple systems and certain applications to field theory,” In press.
  17. S. Palmer and C. Sämann, “M-brane models from non-abelian gerbes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 7, article 10, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. S. Palmer and C. Sämann, “Six-dimensional (1,0) superconformal models and higher gauge theory,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 54, no. 11, Article ID 113509, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. S. Palmer and C. Sämann, “The ABJM model is a higher gauge theory,” http://xxx.tau.ac.il/abs/1311.1997.
  20. Y. Nambu, “Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 2405–2412, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. V. T. Filippov, “n-Lie algebras,” Sibirskiĭ Matematicheskiĭ Zhurnal, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 126–140, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin, and P. K. Townsend, “Supermembranes and eleven-dimensional supergravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 189, no. 1-2, pp. 75–78, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. B. de Wit, J. Hoppe, and H. Nicolai, “On the quantum mechanics of supermembranes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 305, no. 4, pp. 545–581, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. H. Awata, M. Li, D. Minic, and T. Yoneya, “On the quantization of Nambu brackets,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2001, no. 2, article 13, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. D. Minic, “M-theory and deformation quantization,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9909022.
  26. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Modeling multiple M2-branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 4, Article ID 045020, 7 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. A. Gustavsson, “Algebraic structures on parallel M2 branes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 811, no. 1-2, pp. 66–76, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  28. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Gauge symmetry and supersymmetry of multiple M2-branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 6, Article ID 065008, 6 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  29. O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, “N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 91, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  30. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Three-algebras and N=6 Chern-Simons gauge theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 2, Article ID 025002, 8 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. J. Figueroa-O'Farrill and G. Papadopoulos, “Plücker-type relations for orthogonal planes,” Journal of Geometry and Physics, vol. 49, no. 3-4, pp. 294–331, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  32. G. Papadopoulos, “M2-branes, 3-Lie algebras and Plücker relations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 5, article 54, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. J. P. Gauntlett and J. B. Gutowski, “Constraining maximally supersymmetric membrane actions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 6, article 53, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “Janus configurations, Chern-Simons couplings, and the θ-angle in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 6, article 97, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  35. Y. Honma, S. Iso, Y. Sumitomo, and S. Zhang, “Janus field theories from multiple M2 branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 2, Article ID 025027, 7 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  36. K. Hosomichi, K.-M. Lee, S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “N=5,6 superconformal Chern-Simons theories and M2-branes on orbifolds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 2, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  37. M. Schnabl and Y. Tachikawa, “Classification of N=6 superconformal theories of ABJM type,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 9, article 103, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. S. Mukhi and C. Papageorgakis, “M2 to D2,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 5, article 85, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  39. J. Gomis, G. Milanesi, and J. G. Russo, “Bagger-Lambert theory for general Lie algebras,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 6, article 75, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  40. S. Benvenuti, D. Rodríguez-Gómez, E. Tonni, and H. Verlinde, “N=8 superconformal gauge theories and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 1, article 78, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  41. P.-M. Ho, Y. Imamura, and Y. Matsuo, “M2 to D2 revisited,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 7, article 3, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. M. A. Bandres, A. E. Lipstein, and J. H. Schwarz, “Ghost-free superconformal action for multiple M2-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 7, article 117, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. P. de Medeiros, J. Figueroa-O'Farrill, E. Méndez-Escobar, and P. Ritter, “On the Lie-algebraic origin of metric 3-algebras,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 290, no. 3, pp. 871–902, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  44. S. A. Cherkis, V. Dotsenko, and C. Sämann, “Superspace actions for multiple M2-branes, metric 3-algebras, and their classification,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 8, Article ID 086002, 11 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. P.-M. Ho, Y. Matsuo, and S. Shiba, “Lorentzian Lie (3-)algebra and toroidal compactification of M/string theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 3, article 45, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  46. P. de Medeiros, J. Figueroa-O'Farrill, E. Méndez-Escobar, and P. Ritter, “Metric 3-Lie algebras for unitary Bagger-Lambert theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 4, article 37, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  47. H. Nishino and S. Rajpoot, “Triality and Bagger-Lambert theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 671, no. 3, pp. 415–421, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  48. A. Gustavsson and S. -J. Rey, “Enhanced N=8 supersymmetry of ABJM theory on R(8) and R(8)/Z(2),” http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.3568.
  49. O. Aharony, O. Bergman, and D. L. Jafferis, “Fractional M2-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 11, article 43, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  50. M. Hanada, L. Mannelli, and Y. Matsuo, “Large-N reduced models of supersymmetric quiver, Chern-Simons gauge theories and ABJM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 11, article 87, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  51. G. Ishiki, S. Shimasaki, and A. Tsuchiya, “Large N reduction for Chern-Simons theory on S3,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 8, Article ID 086004, 5 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  52. H. Kawai, S. Shimasaki, and A. Tsuchiya, “Large N reduction on group manifolds,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3389–3406, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  53. G. Ishiki, S. Shimasaki, and A. Tsuchiya, “A novel large-N reduction on S3: demonstration in Chern-Simons theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 834, no. 3, pp. 423–452, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. Y. Pang and T. Wang, “N M2-branes to N D2-branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 12, Article ID 125007, 6 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  55. J. deBellis, C. Sämann, and R. J. Szabo, “Quantized Nambu-Poisson manifolds in a 3-Lie algebra reduced model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 4, article 75, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  56. M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Tiny graviton matrix theory: DLCQ of IIB plane-wave string theory, a conjecture,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 9, article 17, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  57. J. Gomis, A. J. Salim, and F. Passerini, “Matrix theory of type IIB plane wave from membranes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 8, article 2, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  58. K. Hosomichi, K.-M. Lee, and S. Lee, “Mass-deformed Bagger-Lambert theory and its BPS objects,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 6, Article ID 066015, 6 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  59. L. Smolin, “M theory as a matrix extension of Chern-Simons theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 591, no. 1-2, pp. 227–242, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  60. L. Smolin, “The cubic matrix model and a duality between strings and loops,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0006137.
  61. T. Azuma, S. Iso, H. Kawai, and Y. Ohwashi, “Supermatrix models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 610, no. 1-2, pp. 251–279, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  62. J. Palmkvist, “Unifying N=5 and N=6,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 5, article 88, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  63. M. Sato, “Covariant formulation of M-theory,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 24, no. 27, pp. 5019–5024, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  64. M. Sato, “Model of M-theory with eleven matrices,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 7, article 26, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  65. M. Sato, “Supersymmetry and the discrete light-cone quantization limit of the Lie 3-algebra model of M-theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 4, Article ID 046003, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. M. Sato, “Zariski quantization as second quantization,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 12, Article ID 126012, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. M. Sato, “3-algebras in string theory,” in Linear Algebra—Theorems and Applications, H. A. Yasser, Ed., InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  68. B. N. Allison, “A class of nonassociative algebras with involution containing the class of Jordan algebras,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 237, no. 2, pp. 133–156, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  69. N. Jacobson, Structure and Representations of Jordan Algebras, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, 1968. View at MathSciNet
  70. S. Okubo, Introduction to Octonion and Other Non-Associative Algebras in Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995. View at MathSciNet
  71. I. Satake, Algebraic Structure of Symmetric Domains, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1980.
  72. R. D. Shafer, An Introduction to Non-Associative Algebras, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1966.
  73. N. Kamiya and D. Mondoc, “A new class of nonassociative algebras with involution,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy A, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 68–72, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  74. N. Kamiya and S. Okubo, “A construction of simple Lie subalgebras of certain types from triple systems,” Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 113–123, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  75. N. Kamiya and S. Okubo, “Construction of Lie superalgebras D(2,1;α),G(3) and F(4) from some triple systems,” Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet