Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 319218, 6 pages
Research Article

Black Component of Dark Matter

Particle Physics Department, National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”, Moscow 115409, Russia

Received 30 November 2013; Accepted 20 January 2014; Published 30 March 2014

Academic Editor: Konstantin Belotsky

Copyright © 2014 A. V. Grobov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.


A mechanism of primordial black hole formation with specific mass spectrum is discussed. It is shown that these black holes could contribute to the energy density of dark matter. Our approach is elaborated in the framework of universal extra dimensions.

1. Introduction

After discovery of the Higgs boson, dark matter remains the most challenging unsolved problem. A nature of this dominant component of matter density is so far unknown. Extensions of standard model propose a number of possible candidates for the dark matter particle, so-called WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles). Most popular candidates—neutralino, sneutrino, or gravitino—come from the SUSY models. Axions represent another way to describe the dark matter phenomenon by means of particle physics [1, 2]. The third widely discussed method is various extra dimensional models producing different sorts of Kaluza-Klein particles that can be considered as the dark matter particles [3].

There are many experiments aimed to clarifying the essence of dark matter. One of the most known Fermi LAT experiments is searching for the dark matter footprints in gamma rays since 2008. According to the recent Fermi LAT data [4] there is some signature of a gamma-ray line at the energy about 130 GeV in the direction of the Galactic Center. Unfortunately, in spite of continual efforts it is not clear yet if this is a real line. Up to now, there are no signatures of dark matter in the existing spectra of cosmic rays. The successor of Fermi LAT, Russian-Italian satellite GAMMA-400, was announced to have an unprecedented energy and angular resolution and believed to be more effective.

Another explanation for dark matter content is the existence of massive compact halo objects (MACHOs) [57]. Brown dwarfs, interstellar gas, comets, cosmic dust, neutron stars, and black holes of stellar origin may be considered as MACHOs. All of these constituents are made from baryons which drastically reduces their possible contribution to the energy density of dark matter [8].

Primordial black holes (PBH) with a wide range of masses provide additional contribution to an invisible part of the average energy density of the universe. There are several models describing PBH formation soon after the end of inflation. Starting from the first articles [57], various models of such kind have appeared during last decades; see substantial review [9]. In contrast to the black holes originating from stars for PBHs there is no lower mass limit (actually [10] there is black hole minimum ).

Mechanism of PBH formation as a result of phase transitions during the inflationary stage was developed in [1113]. The basic of this mechanism is quantum fluctuations of scalar field with a potential possessing at least two minima. Constraints on a PBH abundance associated with cosmological nucleosynthesis are not applicable because the formation of PBHs is a result of first order phase transitions of some scalar field.

The origin of the scalar field remains uncertain in this model. Meantime, extra dimensions provide a wide range of such potentials which can influence the evolution of the universe; see also [14, 15].

In this paper we elaborate the model of PBH formation based on universal extra dimensions. Mass distribution and number of PBH do not contradict observational limits and could contribute substantially to dark matter content.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we describe the mechanism of primordial black holes formation. In Section 3 we discuss initial conditions and modern limits on PBHs. In Section 4 we conclude.

2. Primordial Black Holes Formation and Extra Space

As was mentioned above our study is based on the mechanism of PBH formation revealed in [11]. Its necessary ingredient is a potential of scalar field with two minima which is postulated from the beginning. In the framework of multidimensional gravity, metric components of extra space are perceived as scalar fields acting in 4-dim space. In this connection we shortly remind some effective way to reduce a D-dim theory to 4-dim low energy effective theory [16].

Consider a dimensional manifold with the metric where and the extra dimensional metric components are independent of , the observable space-time coordinates. In the framework of this metric let us consider the curvature-nonlinear theory of gravity with the action which has various nontrivial consequences: where is a -dimensional analogue of the Planck mass. For example, action (2) was used [17] to develop the model describing both primary and secondary inflations. Action (2) contains an arbitrary smooth function , and are arbitrary constants, and are Ricci tensor and Kretschmann scalar, and .

Let us express all quantities in terms of 4-dimensional variables and ; notice that now here we introduce scalar field

We suppose that all quantities are slowly varying; that is, consider each derivative (including those in the definition of (Ricci scalar corresponding to )) as an expression containing a small parameter , and neglect all quantities of orders higher than . Then we have the following decompositions: where . For detailed analysis we refer to [16, 18, 19].

We implement the conformal mapping leading to the Einstein frame:

After reduction to 4 dimensions the dynamics of the model is defined by the following action: where is the volume of a compact hyperbolic -dimensional extra space of a unit curvature. The volume of such a space could be arbitrary large without contradiction to observations [2022].

The Lagrangian in the Einstein frame has the form is the function introduced in (2), are initial parameters of the model, is a dimension of extra space, and is the Ricci scalar constructed from the conformal metric of the Einstein frame.

The action acquires the standard form after the renormalization of the kinetic and potential terms where the Planck mass is expressed in terms of the initial parameters as follows: In what follows we will use Hubble units (), where is the value of Hubble parameter at the inflationary stage (we assume ).

The potential (10) possesses one maximum; see Figure 2 with some parameter values represented in captions of Figure 3. The observable cosmological constant is small comparing to the energy density at early stages and corresponding conditions give two constraints to parameters of our model.

To simplify the further analysis we will consider the kinetic term in the form (see Figure 1) valid at small (see Figure 2).

Figure 1: Right panel: Solid line: lg  function; dotted line: approximation of lg ; see (15). One can see that this approximation is valid for the small values of where a dynamic is developed; see Left panel: Potential . Numerical values of the parameters are listed in the caption of Figure 3.
Figure 2: Potential possesses one maximum at and one minimum at . When the field in some region reaches the value some part of causally independent domains can flip to the other side of the potential with the field value .
Figure 3: Solid line: mass spectrum of primordial BHs for the parameter values: , , , , , , , , , , and . The spectrum of the PBHs is very sensitive to the initial conditions, so that slight change of (in order of ) drastically changes the picture (dashed and dot-dashed lines).

In terms of a new field the Lagrangian takes the standard form:

Quantum fluctuations during inflation lead to the appearance of lots of causally independent space regions. Due to quantum fluctuations, each of these regions is characterized by specific value of the field. Eventually field value reaches the maximum at (see Figure 2) in some region and some part of causally independent domains can flip to the other side of the potential with the field value . In the following the field in such domains moves classically from the maximum to . After the end of inflation the universe is filled with the phase except some set of regions filled with the phase .

As was established [11] domain walls are formed between the regions characterized by different phase. These walls are expanding along with the rest of the space. When the inflationary period is over and the universe stops expanding exponentially, domain walls begin to collapse. In the case when domain wall collapses down to its Schwarzschild radius, the black hole forms.

The detailed description of quantum fluctuations during the inflationary stage can be found in [23, 24]. The corresponding mathematical tool was developed in [25, 26]. An amplitude of quantum fluctuations obeys the Gauss distribution with the average value equal to the classical component of the field at the e-fold number : Here is the average value of the amplitude of the field fluctuation and is a duration of the inflationary period.

Number of regions filled with the phase that appear during one e-fold and e-folds before the end of inflation and that lead to the formation of BHs is defined by the probability (17). The volume filled with the false vacuum can be calculated using the iterative procedure. Let be a volume with new phase. This volume is expanding in times during one e-fold. Besides, new volume will be filled with the new phase due to quantum transitions. Finally we obtain the connection here we substitute , where is a number of e-folds before the end of inflation and is the volume of the universe. We also put followed from observations. Number of closed walls is estimated as

After the end of the inflationary period these regions are surrounded by closed domain walls. Due to the collapse of such a domain wall its energy is concentrated in a small volume inside the Schwarzschild radius—fulfilling the necessary condition for the formation of PBH. To calculate the amount of energy concentrated during the collapse of a domain wall we should estimate the surface energy density of the wall that depends on the parameters of the potential (10).

To simplify the analysis let us approximate the potential term of our model in the vicinity of its maximum by Higgs-like potential; see Figure 2. In this case the soliton solution is well known [27] together with its width and surface energy density .

The radius of the region that is formed e-folds before the end of inflation was found in [11]

Thereby we get the total amount of energy of the black hole as . Masses of the forming BHs depend on the typical size of the closed wall. This size is the bigger; the earlier space region surrounded by the domain wall starts to form.

3. Primordial Black Holes as MACHO Objects

Discrete spectrum of specific masses of PBH can be easily obtained by iterative procedure (18). It will be used later (see (25)) for an estimation of PBH density. Much more informative is the differential spectrum of the PBHs presented in Figure 3. It is obtained approximately on the basis of numerical solution .

We presented three different spectra, to show the dependence of spectra on the initial conditions and parameters of the Lagrangian. Since PBHs are forming during the phase transitions when the domain wall collapses inside the Schwarzschild radius there exists a natural requirement that cuts off PBHs of smaller masses. If the width of the domain wall is bigger than then PBHs of that mass cannot form.

There exist strong constraints on the PBHs of the mass about  g, so the fact that PBHs with masses <1016 g do not appear under certain choice of the parameters allows us to avoid the constraints related to the evaporations of PBHs during Big Bang nucleosynthesis.

According to [9] the current PBHs density is limited from above by parameter for PBHs which have not been evaporated yet. Here is the PBHs mass, is their concentration, is the critical density, and indicates an epoch of PBH formation, is the Hubble parameter, is a numerical factor of order unity related to the gravitational collapse details, and is the number of relativistic degrees of freedom.

It is convenient to define a new parameter : so that (22) gives

Contribution of PBH into the average energy density may be estimated as follows: where uniform space distribution of PBH is supposed. Here is the number of PBHs of mass discussed in the beginning of this section, and is the volume of the universe with  Mpc.

To satisfy the constraints (see [9]), we should have

They are true for the solid and dashed lines while the dot-dashed line does not satisfy these conditions. According to the chaotic inflation, a lot of universes with different initial conditions are formed due to quantum fluctuations. In our context it means that there are a lot of universes filled be various number of PBH and we live in one of them. Comparison of solid and dashed distribution reveals strong dependence on initial conditions.

The differential spectrum represented by solid line in Figure 3 gives total mass of all PBHs , what could explain most of the hidden mass of the universe.

The mass of the particles corresponding to the field is about  KeV that is small enough for them to remain unseen. Axions and gravitino in GMSB model are other examples of very light particles that have not been detected yet [2830].

4. Conclusion

In this paper, we propose a way to explain the hidden mass of the universe. Our approach is based on the scalar fields that appear in frame of the multidimensional gravity. Components of extra space metric are perceived as scalar fields. Appropriate Lagrangian in low energy limit is obtained from the initial pure gravitational Lagrangian in dimensions.

Closed domain walls formed during the inflationary phase of the universe begin to collapse immediately after the end of inflation. If due to the collapse of domain wall its energy is concentrated within the gravitational radius, one can expect the formation of a primordial black hole.

Primordial black holes with wide range of masses are uniformly dispersed in the early universe. Their mass spectrum satisfies the observational constraints on the density of primordial black holes. Their total mass is large enough to explain substantial of the dark matter in the universe. This approach is an alternative to the WIMP-explanation of dark matter. Nevertheless, there is a room for particles beyond the standard model.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors are grateful to K. Belotsky, A. Kirillov, and I. Svadkovsky for their interest and helpful remarks.


  1. J. E. Kim and G. Carosi, “Axions and the strong CP problem,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 557–601, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Yu. Khlopov, A. S. Sakharov, and D. D. Sokoloff, “The nonlinear modulation of the density distribution in standard axionic CDM and its cosmological impact,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 72, no. 1–3, pp. 105–109, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H.-C. Cheng, J. L. Feng, and K. T. Matchev, “Kaluza-Klein dark matter,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, no. 21, Article ID 211301, 4 pages, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Weniger, “A tentative gamma-ray line from dark matter annihilation at the Fermi large area telescope,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 1208, article 007, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Y. Khlopov and A. G. Polnarev, “Primordial black holes as a cosmological test of grand unification,” Physics Letters B, vol. 97, no. 3-4, pp. 383–387, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. D. Novikov, A. G. Polnarev, A. A. Starobinsky, and B. Ya. Zeldovich, “Primordial black holes,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 80, pp. 104–109, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. G. Polnarev and M. Y. Khlopov, “Cosmology, primordial black holes, and supermassive particles,” Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 213–232, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. W. Sutherland, “Gravitational microlensing—a report on the MACHO project,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 421–434, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, “New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 10, Article ID 104019, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Harada, “Is there a black hole minimum mass?” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 8, Article ID 084004, 4 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. S. G. Rubin, M. Yu. Khlopov, and A. S. Sakharov, “Primordial black holes from nonequilibrium second order phase transition,” Gravitation and Cosmology, supplement 6, pp. 51–58, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  12. A. V. Grobov, S. G. Rubin, D. A. Samarchenko, and E. D. Zhizhin, “A mechanism of supermassive primordial black hole formation,” Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 181–184, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. G. Rubin, A. S. Sakharov, and M. Y. Khlopov, “The formation of primary galactic nuclei during phase transitions in the early Universe,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 921–929, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. V. Chervon, V. M. Zhuravlev, and V. K. Shchigolev, “New exact solutions in standard inflationary models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 398, no. 3-4, pp. 269–273, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. M. A. Skugoreva, S. V. Sushkov, and A. V. Toporensky, “Cosmology with nonminimal kinetic coupling and a power-law potential,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 8, Article ID 083539, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. K. A. Bronnikov and S. G. Rubin, “Self-stabilization of extra dimensions,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 12, Article ID 124019, 10 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. K. A. Bronnikov, S. G. Rubin, and I. V. Svadkovsky, “Multidimensional world, inflation, and modern acceleration,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 8, Article ID 084010, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. A. Bronnikov and S. G. Rubin, “Abilities of multidimensional gravity,” Gravitation & Cosmology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 253–258, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. K. A. Bronnikov, R. V. Konoplich, and S. G. Rubin, “The diversity of universes created by pure gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1261–1278, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. M. Trodden, “Diluting gravity with compact hyperboloids,” in proceedings of the COSMO-2000 Fourth International Workshop on Particle Physics and the Early Universe, Cheju Island, Republic of Korea, September 2000.
  21. Y. Kim and S. C. Park, “Hyperbolic inflation,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 6, Article ID 066009, 5 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. D. Orlando and S. C. Park, “Compact hyperbolic extra dimension: a M-theory solution and its implications for the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 8, article 006, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. K. A. Bronnikov and S. G. Rubin, Black Holes, Cosmology and Extra Dimensions, World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ, USA, 2012.
  24. V. I. Dokuchaev, Yu. N. Eroshenko, S. G. Rubin, and D. A. Samarchenko, “Mechanism for the suppression of intermediate-mass black holes,” Astronomy Letters, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 773–779, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. A. Starobinsky, “Stochastic de sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe,” in Field Theory, Quantum Gravity and Strings: Proceedings of a Seminar Series Held at DAPHE, H. J. de Vega and N. Sanchez, Eds., vol. 246 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pp. 107–126, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  26. S.-J. Rey, “Dynamics of inflationary phase transition,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 284, pp. 706–728, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons, North-Holland, New York, NY, USA, 1982. View at MathSciNet
  28. J. Kandaswamy, P. Salomonson, and J. Schechter, “Mass of the axion,” Physical Review D, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3051–3054, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. G. Raffelt, J. Redondo, and N. V. Maira, “The meV mass frontier of axion physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 10, Article ID 103008, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Particle Data Group, C. Amsler, M. Doser et al., “Review of particle physics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 667, no. 1–5, pp. 1–6, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar