Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 349659, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/349659
Research Article

Field Equations and Radial Solutions in a Noncommutative Spherically Symmetric Geometry

Department of Physics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Mazandaran, P.O. Box 47416-95447, Babolsar, Iran

Received 10 June 2014; Revised 6 October 2014; Accepted 19 October 2014; Published 11 November 2014

Academic Editor: Luis A. Anchordoqui

Copyright © 2014 Aref Yazdani. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, “Noncommutative field theory,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 977–1029, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. W. Kalau and M. Walze, “Gravity, non-commutative geometry and the Wodzicki residue,” Journal of Geometry and Physics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 327–344, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. P. Nicolini, “Noncommutative black holes, the final appeal to quantum gravity: a review,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1229–1308, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. R. J. Szabo, “Quantum field theory on noncommutative spaces,” Physics Reports, vol. 378, no. 4, pp. 207–299, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. E. Langmann and R. J. Szabo, “Teleparallel gravity and dimensional reductions of noncommutative gauge theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 64, no. 10, Article ID 104019, 15 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. X. Calmet and A. Kobakhidze, “Noncommutative general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 4, Article ID 045010, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. X. Calmet and A. Kobakhidze, “Second order noncommutative corrections to gravity,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 74, no. 4, Article ID 047702, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. H. Chamseddine, “Deforming Einstein's gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 504, no. 1-2, pp. 33–37, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Aschieri, C. Blohmann, M. Dimitrijević, F. Meyer, P. Schupp, and J. Wess, “A gravity theory on noncommutative spaces,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 17, p. 3511, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Smailagic and E. Spallucci, “Feynman path integral on the noncommutative plane,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 36, p. L467, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Smailagic and E. Spallucci, “UV divergence-free QFT on noncommutative plane,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 36, no. 39, pp. L517–L521, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. A. Smailagic and E. Spallucci, “Lorentz invariance, unitarity and UV-finiteness of QFT on noncommutative spacetime,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 37, no. 28, pp. 7169–7178, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. P. Nicolini, A. Smailagic, and E. Spallucci, “Noncommutative geometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole,” Physics Letters. B, vol. 632, no. 4, pp. 547–551, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. C.-S. Chu and P.-M. Ho, “Non-commutative open string and D-brane,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 550, no. 1-2, pp. 151–168, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “String theory and noncommutative geometry,” The Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 9, article 32, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. F. Ardalan, H. Arfaei, and M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Noncommutative geometry from strings and branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2, p. 16, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. F. Ardalan, H. Arfaei, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Dirac quantization of open strings and noncommutativity in branes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 576, no. 1–3, pp. 578–596, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. C. Sochichiu, “M[any] vacua of IIB,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2000, no. 5, article 026, 12 pages, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  19. R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn, “Nonassociative gravity in string theory?” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 44, no. 1, Article ID 015401, 19 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. D. Lust, “T-duality and closed string non-commutative (doubled) geometry,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, article 84, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. C. Condeescu, I. Florakis, and D. Lüst, “Asymmetric orbifolds, non-geometric fluxes and non-commutativity in closed string theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 4, p. 121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. C. S{\"a}mann and R. J. Szabo, “Groupoids, loop spaces and quantization of 2-plectic manifolds,” Reviews in Mathematical Physics, vol. 25, no. 3, Article ID 1330005, 72 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. A. Konechny and A. Schwarz, “Introduction to M(atrix) theory and noncommutative geometry,” Physics Reports, vol. 360, no. 5-6, pp. 353–465, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. D. Mylonas, P. Schupp, and R. J. Szabo, “Membrane sigma-models and quantization of non-geometric flux backgrounds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 12, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Chatzistavrakidis and L. Jonke, “Matrix theory origins of non-geometric fluxes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 2, article 040, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. P. Nicolini, “Vacuum energy momentum tensor in (2+1) NC scalar field theory,” In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0401204.
  27. A. Gruppuso, “Newton's law in an effective non-commutative space-time,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 2039–2042, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. S. Ansoldi, P. Nicolini, A. Smailagic, and E. Spallucci, “Non-commutative geometry inspired charged black holes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 645, no. 2-3, pp. 261–266, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. D. McMahon, Relativity Demystified, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2006.
  30. Ø. Grøn and S. Hervik, Einstein's General Theory of Relativity: With Modern Applications in Cosmology, Springer, 2007.
  31. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 126, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1972.
  32. V. C. de Andrade, L. C. T. Guillen, and J. G. Pereira, “Teleparallel gravity: an overview,” in Proceedings of the 9th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, pp. 1022–1023, July 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. I. Olive, Lectures on Gauge Theories and Lie Algebras, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, USA, 1982, notes taken by G. Bhattacharya and N. Turok.
  34. J. W. Maluf, M. V. Veiga, and J. F. da Rocha-Neto, “Regularized expression for the gravitational energy-momentum in teleparallel gravity and the principle of equivalence,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 227–240, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. J. W. Maluf, “The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 525, no. 5, pp. 339–357, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  36. J. G. Pereira, “Teleparallelism: a new insight into gravity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6983.
  37. M. Sharif and M. J. Amir, “Teleparallel Killing vectors of the Einstein universe,” Modern Physics Letters A: Particles and Fields, Gravitation, Cosmology, Nuclear Physics, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 963–969, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. J. G. Pereira, T. Vargas, and C. M. Zhang, “Axial-vector torsion and the teleparallel Kerr spacetime,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 833–841, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. K. Nozari and A. Yazdani, “The energy distribution of a noncommutative Reissner—Nordström black hole,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 30, no. 9, Article ID 090401, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. Aldrovandi and J. G. Pereira, Teleparallel Gravity: An Introduction, vol. 173, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. V. C. de Andrade and J. G. Pereira, “Gravitational Lorentz force and the description of the gravitational interaction,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 4689–4695, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. Goss, “The adjoint of the Carlitz module and Fermat's last theorem,” Finite Fields and Their Applications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 165–188, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  43. D. S. Thakur, “Hypergeometric functions for function fields,” Finite Fields and Their Applications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 219–231, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  44. D. Goss, Basic Structures of Function Field Arithmetic, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1997. View at MathSciNet
  45. K. S. Kedlaya, “The algebraic closure of the power series field in positive characteristic,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 129, no. 12, pp. 3461–3470, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  46. H. Hironaka, “Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic zero: II,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 79, pp. 205–326, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  47. B. Poonen, “Fractional power series and pairings on Drinfeld modules,” Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 783–812, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  48. G. Zet, “Schwarzschild solution on a space-time with torsion,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0308078.
  49. H. I. Arcos and J. G. Pereira, “Torsion gravity: a reappraisal,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2193–2240, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  50. N. Ishibashi, S. Iso, H. Kawai, and Y. Kitazawa, “String scale in noncommutative Yang-Mills,” Nuclear Physics: B, vol. 583, no. 1-2, pp. 159–181, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  51. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation.
  52. G. J. Olmo, “Violation of the equivalence principle in modified theories of gravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, no. 6, Article ID 061101, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. Aldrovandi, J. G. Pereira, and K. H. Vu, “Gravitation without the equivalence principle,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 101–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  54. C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, “Mach's principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation,” Physical Review, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 925–935, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  55. A. Trautman, “Einstein-Cartan theory,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0606062.