Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014, Article ID 483814, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/483814
Review Article

Gravity/Fluid Correspondence and Its Application on Bulk Gravity with Gauge Field

1INPAC, Department of Physics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2College of Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received 2 January 2014; Accepted 11 February 2014; Published 13 March 2014

Academic Editor: Piero Nicolini

Copyright © 2014 Ya-Peng Hu and Jian-Hui Zhang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 231–252, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 428, no. 1-2, pp. 105–114, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 253–291, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,” Physics Reports, vol. 323, no. 3-4, pp. 183–386, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. C. P. Herzog, “Lectures on holographic superfluidity and superconductivity,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 42, no. 34, Article ID 343001, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. J. Casalderrey-Solana, H. Liu, D. Mateos, K. Rajagopal, and U. A. Wiedemann, Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  7. G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 8, Article ID 081601, 4 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “Holography and hydrodynamics: diffusion on stretched horizons,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2003, no. 10, article 064, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. A. Buchel and J. T. Liu, “Universality of the shear viscosity from supergravity duals,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 9, Article ID 090602, 4 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 11, Article ID 111601, 4 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. Mas, “Shear viscosity from R-charged AdS black holes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 3, article 016, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Hydrodynamics of R-charged black holes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 3, article 052, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. O. Saremi, “The viscosity bound conjecture and hydrodynamics of M2-brane theory at finite chemical potential,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 10, article 083, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. K. Maeda, M. Natsuume, and T. Okamura, “Viscosity of gauge theory plasma with a chemical potential from AdS/CFT correspondence,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 6, Article ID 066013, 8 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. R.-G. Cai and Y.-W. Sun, “Shear viscosity from AdS Born-Infeld black holes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 115, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. R. Brustein and A. J. M. Medved, “Ratio of shear viscosity to entropy density in generalized theories of gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 2, Article ID 021901, 5 pages, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  17. N. Iqbal and H. Liu, “Universality of the hydrodynamic limit in AdS/CFT and the membrane paradigm,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 2, Article ID 025023, 15 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R.-G. Cai, Z.-Y. Nie, and Y.-W. Sun, “Shear viscosity from effective couplings of gravitons,” Physical Review, vol. 78, no. 12, Article ID 126007, 9 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  19. R. G. Cai, Z. Y. Nie, N. Ohta, and Y. W. Sun, “Shear viscosity from Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a dilaton coupling,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 6, Article ID 066004, 9 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. D. Astefanesei, N. Banerjee, and S. Dutta, “Moduli and electromagnetic black brane holography,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 2, article 021, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. A. Buchel, R. C. Myers, M. F. Paulos, and A. Sinha, “Universal holographic hydrodynamics at finite coupling,” Physical Review B, vol. 669, no. 5, pp. 364–370, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. R. C. Myers, M. F. Paulos, and A. Sinha, “Quantum corrections to η/s,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 4, Article ID 041901, 5 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “From AdS/CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, no. 9, article 043, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “From AdS/CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics. II. Sound waves,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, no. 12, article 054, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. A. Buchel, “On universality of stress-energy tensor correlation functions in supergravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 609, no. 3-4, pp. 392–401, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. T. D. Cohen, “Is there a “most perfect fluid” consistent with quantum field theory?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 2, Article ID 021602, 4 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Viscosity, black holes, and quantum field theory,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 57, pp. 95–118, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. A. Cherman, T. D. Cohen, and P. M. Hohler, “A sticky business: the status of the conjectured viscosity/entropy density bound,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 2, article 026, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. J. W. Chen, M. Huang, Y. H. Li, E. Nakano, and D. L. Yang, “Phase transitions and perfectness of fluids in weakly coupled real scalar field theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 670, no. 1, pp. 18–21, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. I. Fouxon, G. Betschart, and J. D. Bekenstein, “Bound on viscosity and the generalized second law of thermodynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 2, Article ID 024016, 11 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. A. Dobado, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, and J. M. T. Rincon, “The status of the KSS bound and its possible violations (how perfect can a fluid be?),” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1031, no. 1, pp. 221–231, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. K. Landsteiner and J. Mas, “The shear viscosity of the non-commutative plasma,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 7, article 088, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. M. Brigante, H. Liu, R. C. Myers, S. Shenker, and S. Yaida, “Viscosity bound violation in higher derivative gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 12, Article ID 126006, 17 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. Brigante, H. Liu, R. C. Myers, S. Shenker, and S. Yaida, “Viscosity bound and causality violation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 19, Article ID 191601, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. Y. Kats and P. Petrov, “Effect of curvature squared corrections in AdS on the viscosity of the dual gauge theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 1, article 044, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. J. de Boer, M. Kulaxizi, and A. Parnachev, “ AdS 7/ CFT 6, Gauss-Bonnet gravity, and viscosity bound,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 3, article 087, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. X. O. Camanho and J. D. Edelstein, “Causality constraints in AdS/CFT from conformal collider physics and Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 4, article 007, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  38. A. Buchel, J. Escobedo, R. C. Myers, M. F. Paulos, A. Sinha, and M. Smolkin, “Holographic GB gravity in arbitrary dimensions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 3, article 111, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  39. A. Adams, A. Maloney, A. Sinha, and S. E. Vazquez, “1/N effects in non-relativistic gauge-gravity duality,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 3, article 097, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  40. S. Cremonini, K. Hanaki, J. T. Liu, and P. Szepietowski, “Higher derivative effects on η/s at finite chemical potential,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 2, Article ID 025002, 7 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. X.-H. Ge, Y. Matsuo, F.-W. Shu, S.-J. Sin, and T. Tsukioka, “Viscosity bound, causality violation and instability with stringy correction and charge,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 009, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  42. J. de Boer, M. Kulaxizi, and A. Parnachev, “Holographic Lovelock gravities and black holes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 6, article 008, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. X. O. Camanho and J. D. Edelstein, “Causality in AdS/CFT and Lovelock theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 6, article 099, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani, “Nonlinear fluid dynamics from gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 2, article 045, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. M. Rangamani, “Gravity and hydrodynamics: lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, no. 22, Article ID 224003, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  46. J. Hur, K. K. Kim, and S.-J. Sin, “Hydrodynamics with conserved current from the gravity dual,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 3, article 036, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  47. J. Erdmenger, M. Haack, M. Kaminski, and A. Yarom, “Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 1, article 055, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  48. N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Dutta, R. Loganayagam, and P. Surowka, “Hydrodynamics from charged black branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 1, article 094, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  49. D. T. Son and P. Surowka, “Hydrodynamics with triangle anomalies,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 19, Article ID 191601, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  50. H. S. Tan, “First order Born-Infeld hydrodynamics via gauge/gravity duality,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 4, article 131, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. M. Torabian and H.-U. Yee, “Holographic nonlinear hydrodynamics from AdS/CFT with multiple/non-abelian symmetries,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 8, article 020, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  52. Y.-P. Hu, H.-F. Li, and Z.-Y. Nie, “The first order hydrodynamics via AdS/CFT correspondence in the Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 1, article 123, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  53. Y.-P. Hu, P. Sun, and J.-H. Zhang, “Hydrodynamics with conserved current via AdS/CFT correspondence in the Maxwell-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 12, Article ID 126003, 12 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. Y.-P. Hu and C. Y. Park, “Chern-Simons effect on the dual hydrodynamics in the Maxwell-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 714, no. 2–5, pp. 324–330, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  55. X. Bai, Y.-P. Hu, B.-H. Lee, and Y.-L. Zhang, “Holographic charged fluid with anomalous current at finite cutoff surface in Einstein-Maxwell gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 11, article 054, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. T. Kalaydzhyan and I. Kirsch, “Fluid-gravity model for the chiral magnetic effect,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 21, Article ID 211601, 4 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. I. Amado, K. Landsteiner, and F. Pena-Benitez, “Anomalous transport coefficients from Kubo formulas in Holography,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 5, article 081, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and S. Templeton, “Three-dimensional massive gauge theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 48, no. 15, pp. 975–978, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. G. Tallarita, “AdS phase transitions at finite κ,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 8, article 048, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  60. S. Nakamura, H. Ooguri, and C. S. Park, “Gravity dual of spatially modulated phase,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 4, Article ID 044018, 12 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  61. R. C. Myers, “Stress tensors and Casimir energies in the AdS-CFT correspondence,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 4, Article ID 046002, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  62. V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, “A stress tensor for anti-de Sitter gravity,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 413–428, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  63. S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin, and K. Skenderis, “Holographic reconstruction of spacetime and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 217, no. 3, pp. 595–622, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  64. R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson, and R. C. Myers, “Surface terms as counterterms in the AdS-CFT correspondence,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 10, Article ID 104001, 14 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  65. R. B. Mann, “Misner string entropy,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 10, Article ID 104047, 5 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  66. R.-G. Cai and K.-S. Soh, “Topological black holes in the dimensionally continued gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 4, Article ID 044013, 13 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  67. M. Cvetic, S. I. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, “Black hole thermodynamics and negative entropy in de Sitter and anti-de Sitter Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 628, no. 1-2, pp. 295–330, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  68. D. Anninos and G. Pastras, “Thermodynamics of the Maxwell-Gauss-Bonnet anti-de Sitter black hole with higher derivative gauge corrections,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 7, article 030, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. W. A. Bardeen and B. Zumino, “Consistent and covariant anomalies in gauge and gravitational theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 244, no. 2, pp. 421–453, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  70. O. Saremi and D. T. Son, “Hall viscosity from gauge/gravity duality,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 4, article 091, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  71. J.-W. Chen, N.-E. Lee, D. Maity, and W.-Y. Wen, “A holographic model for hall viscosity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 713, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. D.-C. Zou and B. Wang, “Holographic parity violating charged fluid dual to Chern-Simons modified gravity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5486.