Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014, Article ID 619498, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/619498
Research Article

Some Implications of Two Forms of the Generalized Uncertainty Principle

Department of Electrical Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 12544, Egypt

Received 26 November 2013; Revised 30 January 2014; Accepted 30 January 2014; Published 10 March 2014

Academic Editor: Elias C. Vagenas

Copyright © 2014 Mohammed M. Khalil. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. S. Hossenfelder, “Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 16, no. 2, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. Y. J. Ng, “Selected topics in planck-scale physics,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 1073–1097, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 304, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimum length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 145–165, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Phenomenological implications of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Discreteness of space from the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 678, no. 5, pp. 497–499, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Proposal for testing quantum gravity in the lab,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 4, Article ID 044013, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Universality of quantum gravity corrections,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 22, Article ID 221301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Kempf, “Non-pointlike particles in harmonic oscillators,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2093–2101, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  11. I. Pikovski, M. R. Vanner, M. Aspelmeyer, M. S. Kim, and Č. Brukner, “Probing planck-scale physics with quantum optics,” Nature Physics, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 393–397, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, and T. Takeuchi, “Exact solution of the harmonic oscillator in arbitrary dimensions with minimal length uncertainty relations,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 12, Article ID 125027, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Pearson Education, 2nd edition, 2005.
  14. K. Blaum, “High-accuracy mass spectrometry with stored ions,” Physics Reports, vol. 425, no. 1, pp. 1–78, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Brau, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and the hydrogen atom,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 32, no. 44, pp. 7691–7696, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  16. C. G. Parthey, A. Matveev, J. Alnis et al., “Improved measurement of the hydrogen 1S–2S transition frequency,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 20, Article ID 203001, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. F. Ali, “Minimal length in quantum gravity, equivalence principle and holographic entropy bound,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 6, Article ID 065013, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  18. L. C. Tu and J. Luo, “Experimental tests of Coulomb's Law and the photon rest mass,” Metrologia, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. S136–S146, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Das and R. B. Mann, “Planck scale effects on some low energy quantum phenomena,” Physics Letters B, vol. 704, no. 5, pp. 596–599, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Padmanabhan, “Limitations on the operational definition of spacetime events and quantum gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. L107–L113, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Griffiths, Introduction to Elementary Particles, Wiley-Vch, 2008.
  22. Particle Data Group, Particle Physics Booklet, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2012.
  23. S. Basilakos, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Quantum gravity corrections and entropy at the planck time,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2010, no. 9, article 027, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus