Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014, Article ID 629148, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/629148
Research Article

Towards Thermodynamics with Generalized Uncertainty Principle

1Center for Fundamental Physics, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza 12588, Egypt
2Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Benha University, Benha 13518, Egypt

Received 9 December 2013; Revised 12 January 2014; Accepted 13 January 2014; Published 25 February 2014

Academic Editor: Elias C. Vagenas

Copyright © 2014 Ahmed Farag Ali and Mohamed Moussa. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Can spacetime be probed below the string size?” Physics Letters B, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 41–47, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 304, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Maggiore, “Quantum groups, gravity, and the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 5182–5187, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Maggiore, “The algebraic structure of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 319, no. 1–, pp. 83–86, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimum length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, p. 145, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Hossenfelder, M. Bleicher, S. Hofmann, J. Ruppert, S. Scherer, and H. Stöcker, “Signatures in the Planck regime,” Physics Letters B, vol. 575, no. 1-2, pp. 85–99, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Bambi and F. R. Urban, “Natural extension of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, no. 9, Article ID 095006, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Scardigli, “Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole gedanken experiment,” Physics Letters B, vol. 452, no. 1-2, pp. 39–44, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. F. Mende, “String theory at short distance and the principle of equivalence,” Erice Theoretical Physics, pp. 286–299, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Kempf, “Non-pointlike particles in harmonic oscillators,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2093–2101, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. Brau, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and the hydrogen atom,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 32, no. 44, pp. 7691–7696, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Discreteness of space from the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 678, no. 5, pp. 497–499, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Das, E. C. Vagenas, and A. F. Ali, “Discreteness of space from GUP II: relativistic wave equations,” Physics Letters B, vol. 690, no. 4, pp. 407–412, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. L. Cortes and J. Gamboa, “Quantum uncertainty in doubly special relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 065015, 4 pages, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Proposal for testing quantum gravity in the lab,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 4, Article ID 044013, 10 pages, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Tawfik, H. Magdy, and A. F. Ali, “Lorentz invariance violation and generalized uncertainty principle,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5998/.
  18. B. R. Majhi and E. C. Vagenas, “Modified dispersion relation, photonʼs velocity, and Unruh effect,” Physics Letters B, vol. 725, no. 4–6, pp. 477–480, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Universality of quantum gravity corrections,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 22, Article ID 221301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Phenomenological implications of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. Chemissany, S. Das, A. F. Ali, and E. C. Vagenas, “Effect of the generalized uncertainty principle on post-inflation preheating,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 12, Article ID 017, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Sprenger, M. Bleicher, and P. Nicolini, “Neutrino oscillations as a novel probe for a minimal length,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 23, Article ID 235019, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. F. Ali, “No existence of black holes at LHC due to minimal length in quantum gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 67, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. A. F. Ali, H. Nafie, and M. Shalaby, “Minimal length, maximal energy and black-hole remnant,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 100, no. 2, article 20004, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. F. Ali, “Minimal length in quantum gravity, equivalence principle and holographic entropy bound,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 6, Article ID 065013, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. B. Majumder and S. Sen, “Do the modified uncertainty principle and polymer quantization predict same physics?” Physics Letters B, vol. 717, no. 4-5, pp. 291–294, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. K. Nozari and S. Saghafi, “Natural cutoffs and quantum tunneling from black hole horizon,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 5, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  28. B. Majumder, “Effects of the modified uncertainty principle on the inflation parameters,” Physics Letters B, vol. 709, no. 3, pp. 133–136, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. Nozari and A. Etemadi, “Minimal length, maximal momentum, and Hilbert space representation of quantum mechanics,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 10, Article ID 104029, 12 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. I. Pikovski, M. R. Vanner, M. Aspelmeyer, M. S. Kim, and Č. Brukner, “Probing planck-scale physics with quantum optics,” Nature Physics, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 393–397, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. F. Marin, F. Marino, M. Bonaldi et al., “Gravitational bar detectors set limits to Planck-scale physics on macroscopic variables,” Nature Physics, vol. 9, pp. 71–73, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. J. D. Bekenstein, “Is a tabletop search for Planck scale signals feasible?” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 12, Article ID 124040, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. D. Bekenstein, “Can quantum gravity be exposed in the laboratory?: a tabletop experiment to reveal the quantum foam,” in Proceedings of the Keynote Lecture at the International Workshop on Horizon of Quantum Physics: From Foundations to Quantum Enabled Technologies, Taipei, Taiwan, October 2012.
  34. A. Camacho and A. Macías, “Thermodynamics of a photon gas and deformed dispersion relations,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1175–1183, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. O. Bertolami and C. A. D. Zarro, “Towards a noncommutative astrophysics,” Physical Review Ds, vol. 81, no. 2, Article ID 025005, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Proposal of a second generation of quantum-gravity-motivated lorentz-symmetry tests: Sensitivity to effects suppressed quadratically by the planck scale,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1633–1639, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Gregg and S. A. Major, “On modified dispersion relations and the chandrasekhar mass limit,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 971–982, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Das, S. Ghosh, and D. Roychowdhury, “Relativistic thermodynamics with an invariant energy scale,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 12, Article ID 125036, 6 pages, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  39. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Special treatment,” Nature, vol. 418, no. 6893, pp. 34–35, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Testable scenario for relativity with minimum length,” Physics Letters B, vol. 510, no. 1–4, pp. 255–263, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Relativity in spacetimes with short-distance structure governed by an observer-independent (Planckian) length scale,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–59, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 19, pp. 1904031–1904034, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “String theories with deformed energy-momentum relations, and a possible nontachyonic bosonic string,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 2, Article ID 026010, 6 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. S. Das and D. Roychowdhury, “Thermodynamics of a photon gas with an invariant energy scale,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 8, Article ID 085039, 7 pages, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  45. N. Chandra and S. Chatterjee, “Thermodynamics of ideal gas in doubly special relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 4, Article ID 045012, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. K. Nozari and S. H. Mehdipour, “Implications of minimal length scale on the statistical mechanics of ideal gas,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1637–1644, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. K. Nozari and B. Fazlpour, “Generalized uncertainty principle, modified dispersion relations and the early universe thermodynamics,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1661–1679, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. R. K. Pathria, Statistical Mechanics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1996.
  49. W. Greiner, L. Neise, and H. Stoecker, Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics.
  50. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Elsevier Academic Press, 7th edition, 2007.
  51. S. Chandrasekhar, An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure, Dover, Mineola, NY, USA, 1967.
  52. J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, “On massive neutron cores,” Physical Review, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 374–381, 1939. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. O. Bertolami and C. A. D. Zarro, “Towards a noncommutative astrophysics,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 2, Article ID 025005, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus