Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 724315, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/724315
Research Article

Constraints on Heavy Neutrino and SUSY Parameters Derived from the Study of Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay

1Horia Hulubei Foundation, P.O. Box MG-12, Magurele, Bucharest 077125, Romania
2Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6, Magurele, Bucharest 077125, Romania

Received 4 April 2014; Accepted 26 May 2014; Published 16 June 2014

Academic Editor: Theocharis Kosmas

Copyright © 2014 Andrei Neacsu and Sabin Stoica. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. F. T. Avignone, S. R. Elliott, and J. Engel, “Double beta decay, Majorana neutrinos, and neutrino mass,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 481–516, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Ejiri, “Double beta decays and neutrino nuclear responses,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 249–257, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. D. Vergados, H. Ejiri, and F. Šimkovic, “Theory of neutrinoless double-beta decay,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 75, no. 10, Article ID 106301, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Rodejohann, “Neutrinoless double-beta decay and neutrino physics,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 39, no. 12, Article ID 124008, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Faessler, V. Rodin, and F. Simkovic, “Nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay and double-electron capture,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 39, no. 12, Article ID 124006, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Vogel, “Nuclear structure and double beta decay,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 39, no. 12, Article ID 124002, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, “Left-right gauge symmetry and an “isoconjugate & model of CP violation,” Physical Review D, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 566–571, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Doi, T. Kotani, H. Nishiura, and E. Takasugia, “Double beta decay,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 602–635, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Hirsch, H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, and S. G. Kovalenko, “Supersymmetry and neutrinoless double beta decay,” Physical Review D, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1329–1348, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. CMS Collaboration, “Search for new physics with same-sign isolated dilepton events with jets and missing transverse energy at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, article 77, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. ATLAS Collaboration, “Inclusive search for same-sign dilepton signatures in pp collisions at S=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, article 107, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. LHCb Collaboration, “Search for Lepton number violating decays B+π-μ+μ+ and B+K-μ+μ+,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, Article ID 101601, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. LHCb Collaboration, “Searches for Majorana neutrinos in B decays,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, p. 112004, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. F. Simkovic, A. Faessler, H. Muther, V. Rodin, and M. Stauf, “0νββ-decay nuclear matrix elements with self-consistent short-range correlations,” Physical Review C, vol. 79, Article ID 055501, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. V. A. Rodin, A. Faessler, F. Simkovic, and P. Vogel, “Uncertainty in the 0νββ decay nuclear matrix elements,” Physical Review C, vol. 68, Article ID 044302, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. V. A. Rodin, A. Faessler, F. Simkovic, and P. Vogel, “Assessment of uncertainties in QRPA 0νββ-decay nuclear matrix elements,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 766, pp. 107–131, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. V. A. Rodin, A. Faessler, F. Simkovic, and P. Vogel, “Erratum to: “Assessment of uncertainties in QRPA 0νββ-decay nuclear matrix elements” [Nucl. Phys. A 766 (2006) 107],” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 793, no. 1–4, pp. 213–215, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Kortelainen and J. Suhonen, “Nuclear matrix elements of 0νββ decay with improved short-range correlations,” Physical Review C, vol. 76, Article ID 024315, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. F. Šimkovic, A. Faessler, V. Rodin, P. Vogel, and J. Engel, “Anatomy of the 0νββ nuclear matrix elements,” Physical Review C, vol. 77, no. 4, Article ID 045503, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Stoica and H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, “Critical view on double-beta decay matrix elements within Quasi Random Phase Approximation-based methods,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 694, no. 1-2, pp. 269–294, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Horoi and S. Stoica, “Shell model analysis of the neutrinoless double-β decay of 48Ca,” Physical Review C, vol. 81, no. 2, Article ID 024321, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. Caurier, A. P. Zuker, A. Poves, and G. Martinez-Pinedo, “Full pf shell model study of A=48 nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 50, article 225, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Retamosa, E. Caurier, and F. Nowacki, “Neutrinoless double beta decay of 48Ca,” Physical Review C, vol. 51, article 371, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. E. Caurier, J. Menéndez, F. Nowacki, and A. Poves, “Influence of pairing on the nuclear matrix elements of the neutrinoless ββ decays,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 5, Article ID 052503, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Menéndez, A. Poves, E. Caurier, and F. Nowacki, “Disassembling the nuclear matrix elements of the neutrinoless ββ decay,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 818, no. 3-4, pp. 139–151, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Barea and F. Iachello, “Neutrinoless double-β decay in the microscopic interacting boson model,” Physical Review C, vol. 79, no. 4, Article ID 044301, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Barea, J. Kotila, and F. Iachello, “Limits on neutrino masses from neutrinoless double-β decay,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 4, Article ID 014315, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Barea, J. Kotila, and F. Iachello, “Nuclear matrix elements for double-β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, Article ID 014315, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  29. P. K. Rath, R. Chandra, K. Chaturvedi, P. K. Raina, and J. G. Hirsch, “Uncertainties in nuclear transition matrix elements for neutrinoless ββ decay within the projected-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov model,” Physical Review C, vol. 82, no. 6, Article ID 064310, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. R. Rodriguez and G. Martinez-Pinedo, “Energy density functional study of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless ββ Decay,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, Article ID 252503, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. F. Šimkovic, G. Pantis, J. D. Vergados, and A. Faessler, “Additional nucleon current contributions to neutrinoless double β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 60, no. 5, Article ID 055502, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Faessler, G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. M. Rotunno, and F. Åimkovic, “Multi-isotope degeneracy of neutrinoless double-β decay mechanisms in the quasiparticle random-phase approximation,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 11, Article ID 113015, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Lopez-Pavon, and J. Menendez, “Neutrinoless double beta decay in seesaw models,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, article 96, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. Horoi, “Shell model analysis of competing contributions to the double-β decay of 48Ca,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, Article ID 014320, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. A. Neacsu, S. Stoica, and M. Horoi, “Fast, efficient calculations of the two-body matrix elements of the transition operators for neutrinoless double-β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 86, no. 6, Article ID 067304, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Neacsu and S. Stoica, “Study of nuclear effects in the computation of the 0vββ decay matrix elements,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 41, no. 1, Article ID 015201, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. S. Stoica and A. Neacsu, “Constraints on light neutrino parameters derived from the study of neutrinoless double beta decay,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, Article ID 745082, 7 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. J. Kotila and F. Iachello, “Phase-space factors for double-β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 85, no. 3, Article ID 034316, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Stoica and M. Mirea, “New calculations for phase space factors involved in double-β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 88, Article ID 037303, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. H. Primakoff and S. P. Rosen, “Double beta decay,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 22, no. 1, article 305, pp. 121–166, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Weak-interaction and nuclear-structure aspects of nuclear double beta decay,” Physics Report, vol. 300, no. 3-4, pp. 123–214, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. E. Pahomi, A. Neacsu, M. Mirea, and S. Stoica, “Phase space calculations for beta- beta- decays to final excited 2+1 states,” Romanian Reports in Physics, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 370–375, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  43. A. Wodecki, W. A. Kaminski, and F. Simkovic, “Grand unified theory constrained supersymmetry and neutrinoless double β decay,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, Article ID 115007, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. T. Tomoda, “Double beta decay,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 53–126, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. Giusti, H. Müther, F. D. Pacati, and M. Stauf, “Short-range and tensor correlations in the 16O(e,e′pn) reaction,” Physical Review C, vol. 60, no. 5, Article ID 054608, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. H. Muther and A. Polls, “Correlations derived from modern nucleon-nucleon potentials,” Physical Review C, vol. 61, Article ID 014304, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. H. Muther, “Two-body correlations in nuclear systems,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 243–334, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. S. Umehara, T. Kishimoto, I. Ogawa et al., “Neutrino-less double-β decay of 48Ca studied by CaF2(Eu) scintillators,” Physical Review C, vol. 78, Article ID 058501, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. C. Macolino and GERDA Collaboration, “Results on neutrinoless double-beta decay from GERDA phase I,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 1430001, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  50. A. S. Barabash and V. B. Brudanin, “Investigation of double-beta decay with the NEMO-3 detector,” Physics of Atomic Nuclei, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 312–317, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Honma, T. Otsuka, B. A. Brown, and T. Mizusaki, “New effective interaction for pf nuclei and its implications for the stability of the N = Z = 28 closed core,” Physical Review C, vol. 69, no. 3, Article ID 034335, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. T. T. S. Kuo and G. E. Brown, “Reaction matrix elements for the 0f-1p shell nuclei,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 241–279, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. M. Honma, T. Otsuka, T. Mizusaki, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, “New effective interaction for f5pg9-shell nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 80, no. 6, Article ID 064323, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. Doi, T. Kotani, and E. Takasugi, “Double beta decay and majorana neutrino,” Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplements, vol. 83, pp. 1–175, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. M. Doi and T. Kotani, “Neutrino emitting modes of double beta decay,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 1207–1231, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. M. Doi and T. Kotani, “Neutrinoless modes of double beta decay,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 89, pp. 139–159, 1993. View at Google Scholar