Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014, Article ID 791367, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/791367
Review Article

Testing General Relativistic Predictions with the LAGEOS Satellites

1Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali (IAPS-INAF), Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Roma, Italy
2Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Roma, Italy

Received 8 December 2013; Accepted 12 March 2014; Published 22 May 2014

Academic Editor: Douglas Singleton

Copyright © 2014 Roberto Peron. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. S. C. Cohen, R. W. King, R. Kolenkiewicz, R. D. Rosen, and B. E. Schutz, “LAGEOS scientific results,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 90, pp. 9215–9438, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. I. Ciufolini, A. Paolozzi, E. Pavlis et al., “Testing General Relativity and gravitational physics using the LARES satellite,” European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 127, article 133, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Xu, Sciences of Geodesy—I: Advances and Future Directions, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
  4. G. Xu, Sciences of Geodesy—II: Innovations and Future Developments, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013.
  5. I. Ciufolini and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation and Inertia, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1995. View at MathSciNet
  6. C. Huang, J. C. Ries, B. D. Tapley, and M. M. Watkins, “Relativistic effects for near-earth satellite orbit determination,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 167–185, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Einstein, “Die grundlage der allgemeinen relativitätstheorie,” Annals of Physics, vol. 354, pp. 769–822, 1916. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. W. de Sitter, “On Einstein's theory of gravitation and its astronomical consequences. Second paper,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 77, no. 155, 184 pages, 1916. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Lense and H. Thirring, “Über den Einfluss der Eigenrotation der Zentralkörper auf die Bewegung der Planeten und Monde nach der Einsteinschen GravitationstheoriePhysikalische Zeitschrift,” vol. 19, pp. 156–163, 1918. View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Mashhoon, F. W. Hehl, and D. S. Theiss, “On the gravitational effects of rotating masses: the Thirring-Lense papers,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 711–750, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. M. H. Soffel, Relativity in Astrometry, Celestial Mechanics and Geodesy, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. T. Damour, F. Piazza, and G. Veneziano, “Violations of the equivalence principle in a dilaton-runaway scenario,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 4, Article ID 046007, 15 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. E. Fischbach, D. Sudarsky, A. Szafer, C. Talmadge, and S. H. Aronson, “Reanalysis of the Eoumltvös experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–6, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Fischbach, G. T. Gillies, D. E. Krause, J. G. Schwan, and C. Talmadge, “Non-Newtonian gravity and new weak forces: an index of measurements and theory,” Metrologia, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 213–260, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. S. Goldhaber and M. M. Nieto, “Photon and graviton mass limits,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 939–979, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. H. Gundlach, S. Schlamminger, and T. Wagner, “Laboratory tests of the equivalence principle at the university of washington,” Space Science Reviews, vol. 148, no. 1–4, pp. 201–216, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. M. Lucchesi, “LAGEOS II perigee shift and Schwarzschild gravitoelectric field,” Physics Letters A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, vol. 318, no. 3, pp. 234–240, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. R. Pearlman, J. J. Degnan, and J. M. Bosworth, “The International Laser Ranging Service,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. J. Degnan, “Satellite laser ranging: current status and future prospects,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 398–413, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Milani, A. M. Nobili, and P. Farinella, Non-Gravitational Perturbations and Satellite Geodesy, Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK, 1987.
  21. A. Milani and G. F. Gronchi, Theory of Orbit Determination, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010. View at MathSciNet
  22. D. M. Lucchesi and G. Balmino, “The LAGEOS satellites orbital residuals determination and the Lense-Thirring effect measurement,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 581–593, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. E. Pavlis et al., GEODYN II Operations Manual. NASA GSFC, 1998.
  24. B. Putney, R. Kolenkiewicz, D. Smith, P. Dunn, and M. H. Torrence, “Precision orbit determination at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 197–203, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. I. Ciufolini, D. Lucchesi, F. Vespe, and A. Mandiello, “Measurement of dragging of inertial frames and gravitomagnetic field using laser-ranged satellites,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 575–590, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. I. Ciufolini, D. Lucchesi, F. Vespe, and F. Chieppa, “Measurement of gravitomagnetism,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 359–364, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. Ciufolini, E. Pavlis, F. Chieppa, E. Fernandes-Vieira, and J. Pérez-Mercader, “Test of general relativity and measurement of the lense-thirring effect with two earth satellites,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5359, pp. 2100–2103, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. Ciufolini and E. C. Pavlis, “A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lens-Thirring effect,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7011, pp. 958–960, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. Ciufolini, E. C. Pavlis, and R. Peron, “Determination of frame-dragging using Earth gravity models from CHAMP and GRACE,” New Astronomy, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 527–550, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. M. Lucchesi and R. Peron, “Accurate measurement in the field of the earth of the general-relativistic precession of the LAGEOS II pericenter and new constraints on non-newtonian gravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, no. 23, Article ID 231103, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. Peron, “Einstein is still right: New tests of gravitational dynamics in the field of the Earth,” Nuovo Cimento C, vol. 36, pp. 125–134, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. I. Ciufolini, A. Paolozzi, R. Koenig et al., “Fundamental physics and general relativity with the LARES and LAGEOS satellites,” Nuclear Physics B—Proceedings Supplements, vol. 243-244, pp. 180–193, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. M. Lucchesi and R. Peron, “LAGEOS II pericenter general relativistic precession (1993–2005): error budget and constraints in gravitational physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 8, Article ID 082002, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. D. M. Lucchesi, “The LAGEOS satellites orbital residuals determination and the way to extract gravitational and non-gravitational unmodeled perturbing effects,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1559–1575, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. T. Sinclair, Data Screening and Normal Point Formation—Re—Statement of Herstmonceux Normal Point Recommendation, 1997, http://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/products_formats_procedures/normal_point/np_algo.html.
  36. O. Montenbruck and E. Gill, Satellite Orbits. Models, Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000.
  37. K. Nordtvedt, “Equivalence principle for massive bodies. II. Theory,” Physical Review, vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 1017–1025, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. M. Will, “Theoretical frameworks for testing relativistic gravity. II. Parametrized post-Newtonian hydrodynamics, and the Nordtvedt effect,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 163, pp. 611–628, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  39. C. M. Will and K. Nordtvedt, Jr., “Conservation laws and preferred frames in relativistic gravity. I. Preferred-frame theories and an extended PPN formalism,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 177, pp. 757–774, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  40. K. Nordtvedt, Jr. and C. M. Will, “Conservation laws and preferred frames in relativistic gravity. II. Experimental evidence to rule out preferred-frame theories of gravity,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 177, pp. 775–792, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. D. D. McCarthy and G. Petit, “IERS Conventions (2003),” IERS Technical Note 32, IERS, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  42. B. Bertotti, P. Farinella, and D. Vokrouhlický, “Physics of the Solar System. Dynamics and Evolution, Space Physics, and Spacetime Structure,” in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol. 293, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  43. B. Hofmann-Wellenhof and H. Moritz, Physical Geodesy, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
  44. P. Melchior, The Tides of the Planet Earth, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  45. K. Lambeck, “Tidal dissipation in the oceans: astronomical, geophysical and oceanographic consequences,” Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, vol. 287, pp. 545–594, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. Schwiderski, E. W. : Ocean tides, and part i:, “Global ocean tidal equations,” Marine Geodesy, vol. 3, no. 1–4, pp. 161–217, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. E. W. Schwiderski, “Ocean tides, part ii: a hydrodynamical interpolation model,” Marine Geodesy, vol. 3, no. 1–4, pp. 219–255, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. J. M. Wahr, “A normal mode expansion for the forced response of a rotating Earth,” Geophysical Journal, Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 651–675, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. M. Wahr, “Body tides on an elliptical, rotating, elastic and oceanless earth,” Geophysical Journal, Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 64, pp. 677–703, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. K. Cheng, C. K. Shum, and B. D. Tapley, “Determination of long-term changes in the Earth's gravity field from satellite laser ranging observations,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 102, no. 10, pp. 22377–22390, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. B. Wu, P. Bibo, Y. Zhu, and H. Hsu, “Determination of love numbers using satellite laser ranging,” The Geodetic Society of Japan, vol. 47, pp. 174–180, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  52. E. M. Standish, X. X. Newhall, J. G. Williams, and W. M. Folkner, “JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides, DE403/LE403,” Tech. Rep. 314. 10–127, JPL IOM, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  53. D. M. Lucchesi, “Reassessment of the error modelling of non-gravitational perturbations on LAGEOS II and their impact in the Lense-Thirring determination. Part I,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 447–463, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. D. M. Lucchesi, “Reassessment of the error modelling of non-gravitational perturbations on LAGEOS II and their impact in the Lense-Thirring derivation. Part II,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 50, no. 10-11, pp. 1067–1100, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. I. Andrés de la Fuente, [Ph.D. thesis], Delft University, 2007.
  56. D. M. Lucchesi, I. Ciufolini, J. I. Andrés et al., “LAGEOS II perigee rate and eccentricity vector excitations residuals and the Yarkovsky-Schach effect,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 699–710, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. D. P. Rubincam, “LAGEOS orbit decay due to infrared radiation from earth,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 92, pp. 1287–1294, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. D. P. Rubincam, “Yarkovsky thermal drag on LAGEOS,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 93, no. 11, p. 13810, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. D. P. Rubincam, “Drag on the LAGEOS satellite,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 95, pp. 4881–4886, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. B. Bertotti and L. Iess, “The rotation of LAGEOS,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 2431–2440, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. Habib, D. E. Holz, A. Kheyfets, R. A. Matzner, W. A. Miller, and B. W. Tolman, “Spin dynamics of the LAGEOS satellite in support of a measurement of the Earths gravitomagnetism,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 6068–6079, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. E. Williams, The Lageos satellite: a comprehensive spin model and analysis [Ph.D. thesis], North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2002.
  63. J. Ries, R. Eanes, and M. M. Watkins M, “Spin vector influence on LAGEOS ephemeris,” presented at the Second Meeting of IAG Special Study Group 2. 130, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1993.
  64. W. M. Kaula, Theory of Satellite Geodesy. Applications of Satellites to Geodesy, Blaisdell, Waltham, Mass, USA, 1966.
  65. L. Iorio, “The impact of the static part of the earth's gravity field on some tests of general relativity with satellite laser ranging,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 277–294, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. I. Ciufolini, “On a new method to measure the gravitomagnetic field using two orbiting satellites,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 109, no. 12, pp. 1709–1720, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. R. Peron, “On the use of combinations of laser-ranged satellites orbital residuals to test relativistic effects around Earth,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 432, pp. 2591–2595, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. C. M. Will, “The confrontation between general relativity and experiment,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 4, article 4, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  69. C. M. Cox and B. F. Chao, “Detection of a large-scale mass redistribution in the terrestrial system since 1998,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5582, pp. 831–833, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. D. P. Rubincam, “General relativity and satellite orbits: the motion of a test particle in the Schwarzschild metric,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 21–33, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. L. Cugusi and E. Proverbio, “Relativistic effects on the motion of earth's artificial satellites,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 69, pp. 321–325, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  72. I. Ciufolini, “Measurement of the Lense-Thirring drag on high-altitude, laser-ranged artificial satellites,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 278–281, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. C. Reigber, R. Schmidt, F. Flechtner et al., “An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S,” Journal of Geodynamics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. F. G. Lemoine, S. C. Kenyon, J. K. Factor et al., “The development of the joint nasa gsfc and the national imagery and mapping agency (nima) geopotential model egm96,” Technical Paper NASA/TP-1998-206861, NASA GSFC, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  75. R. D. Ray, “A Global Ocean Tide Model From TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimetry: GOT99. 2,” Technical Paper NASA/TM-1999-209478, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  76. D. P. Rubincam, P. Knocke, V. R. Taylor, and S. Blackwell, “Earth anisotropic reflection and the orbit of LAGEOS,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 92, pp. 11662–11668, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. Z. Altamimi, P. Sillard, and C. Boucher, “ITRF2000: new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications,” Journal of Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth, vol. 107, no. 10, pp. 2–19, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. C. Boucher, Z. Altamimi, P. Sillard, and M. Feissel-Vernier, “The ITRF2000,” IERS Technical Note 31, IERS, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  79. “International Earth Rotation Service: EOP Combined Series EOP,” Tech. Rep. C04, IERS.