Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 952597, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/952597
Research Article

Analytical Solution of the Schrödinger Equation with Spatially Varying Effective Mass for Generalised Hylleraas Potential

Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India

Received 30 May 2014; Revised 19 July 2014; Accepted 21 July 2014; Published 11 August 2014

Academic Editor: Shi-Hai Dong

Copyright © 2014 Sanjib Meyur et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Abstract

We have obtained exact solution of the effective mass Schrödinger equation for the generalised Hylleraas potential. The exact bound state energy eigenvalues and corresponding eigenfunctions are presented. The bound state eigenfunctions are obtained in terms of the hypergeometric functions. Results are also given for the special case of potential parameter.

1. Introduction

The study of quantum mechanical systems within the framework of effective position dependent mass has been the subject of much activity in recent years. The Schrödinger equation with position-dependent (nonconstant) mass provides an interesting and useful model for the description of many physical problems. The most extensive use of such an equation is in the physics of semiconductor nanostructures [1, 2], quantum dots [3], 3He clusters [4], quantum liquids [5], semiconductor heterostructures [6, 7], and so forth.

The solutions of nonrelativistic wave equations with constant mass have been extended to the position dependent mass in recent studies [811]. A general formalism for energy spectra and wave functions was found in nonrelativistic problems by using point canonical transformation [8]. Compared to the constant mass wave equation, the position-dependent mass Schrödinger equation is more complex. It is difficult to obtain its analytical solution as usual. Several authors have studied the effects of the position-dependent mass on the solutions of the Schrödinger equation. A position-dependent effective mass, , associated with a quantum mechanical particle constitutes a useful model for the study of various potentials such as Morse potential [1218], hard-core potential [18], Scarf potential [1921], Pöschl-Teller potential [22, 23], spherically ring-shaped potential [24], Hulthén potential [25], Kratzer potential [26], and Coulomb-like potential [27, 28]. Different techniques have been developed to obtain its exact solutions, such as factorization methods [29], Nikiforov-Uvarov (NU) methods [30], and supersymmetric quantum mechanics [31]. The position-dependent effective mass might have impact on high-energy physics [31].

The objective of this paper is to investigate the position-dependent effective mass Schrödinger equation for the generalised Hylleraas potential [32, 33] by using the Nikiforov-Uvarov (NU) method (Figure 1) [30]. Hylleraas potential is used to describe the interaction between two atoms in a diatomic molecule. We have also investigated the solutions of Hulthén potential and Woods-Saxon potential.

952597.fig.001
Figure 1: Hylleraas potential for , , , , and .

The plan of the present paper is as follows. In Section 2, the Nikiforov-Uvarov method is summarized. Section 3 is devoted to the solution of the position-dependent effective mass Schrödinger equation. In Sections 4 and 5, the Hulthén potential and Woods-Saxon potential are discussed, respectively. The paper is ended with a summary.

2. Nikiforov-Uvarov Method

The NU method is a useful technique to solve the second-order linear differential equations with special orthogonal functions [34]. In this method, after employing an appropriate coordinate transformation , the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation , can be written in the following form: where the prime denotes the differentiation with respect to , and are polynomials, at most of second degree, and is a polynomial, at most of first degree. In order to obtain a particular solution to (1), we set the following wave function as a multiple of two independent parts: Equation (2) transformed (1) to a hypergeometric-type equation: where first part of (2), , has a logarithmic derivative: and second part of (2), , is the hypergeometric-type function whose polynomial solution satisfies the Rodrigues relation: where is normalization constant and the weight function satisfies the relation as The function and the eigenvalue required in this method are defined as Hence, the determination of is the essential point in the calculation of , for which the discriminant of the square root in (7) is set to zero. Also, the eigenvalue equation defined in (8) takes the following new form: Since and , the derivative of should be negative [30], which helps to generate the essential condition for any choice of proper bound state solutions. In addition, the energy eigenvalues are obtained from (8) and (9).

3. Position-Dependent Effective Mass Schrödinger Equation

In general, working on position-dependent effective mass Hamiltonians is inspired by the von Roos Hamiltonian [35] proposal with : where and is the dimensionless form of the function . The ambiguity parameters are constrained by the relation and we have the following time-independent Schrödinger equation from (11): where the effective potential is where primes denote derivatives. Thus Schrödinger equation takes the form Using the transformation [36], in (14), we have where is the Hylleraas potential [29, 30] given by where , , and are the Hylleraas parameters, , are the potential depths, and .

Here, we consider the following mass distribution: The most extensive use of such kind of mass is in the physics of semiconductor quantum well structures [11]. The motion of electrons in them can often be described by the envelope function effective-mass Schrödinger equation, where is a constant mass (Figure 2).

952597.fig.002
Figure 2: Plot for mass function for and .

Obviously it has the exponential form. The above mass function is convergent (finite), when . In order to reduce the above equation (15) into Nikiforov-Uvarov equation, we make the transformation , : also Using (15)–(19), we have Comparing (20) with (1), we have Substituting these polynomials into (7), we have For physical solutions, it is necessary to choose The origin of the Nikiforov-Uvarov method is negative sign of derivative of because the condition helps to generate energy eigenvalues and corresponding eigenfunctions. Therefore becomes Therefore, from (8) and (9), we have Comparing (25), we have Using (26) and (18), we have Hence the energy becomes The last term of the square bracket must be positive for BenDaniel and Duke’s model [37] , (Figure 3).

952597.fig.003
Figure 3: Hylleraas energy for , , , , , , , and .

From (6), (21), and (24) we obtain the weight function and from (4), (21), and (23) we have Now we use the properties of Jacobi polynomial [35]: where (, ) is the Jacobi polynomial. The wave functions (Figure 4) are obtained from (2), (5), and ((29)–(31)): where is normalization constant to be determined from the normalization condition: For acceptable solution it is required that when , and when , .

952597.fig.004
Figure 4: Wave functions for , , , and .

4. Hulthén Potential

We set the conditions  , , and ; the potential in (16) reduces to Hulthén potential (Figure 5) [3841]: Then the energy becomes with . It is exactly the same result in the literature [38] for .

952597.fig.005
Figure 5: Hulthén potential for and .

5. Woods-Saxon Potential

For the conditions , , and , the potential given in (16) becomes Woods-Saxon potential (Figure 6) [4045], Then the energy becomes where .

952597.fig.006
Figure 6: Woods-Saxon potential for and .

6. Conclusion

We have applied the NU method derived for the exponential-type potentials to obtain the bound state solutions of the effective Schrödinger equation with position-dependent mass for the Hylleraas potential. Furthermore, a suitable choice of a position mass function of the exponential-like form has also been devised. Also we have shown that our results are consistent with ones obtained before.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to deliver their sincere gratitude to the referee for constructive suggestions and technical comments on the paper.

References

  1. G. Bastard, Wave Mechanics Applied to Semiconductor Hetero-Structures, EDP Sciences, Les Editions de Physique, Les Ulis, France, 1992.
  2. P. Harrison, Quantum Wells, Wires and Dots, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  3. L. Serra and E. Lipparini, “Spin response of unpolarized quantum dots,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 667–672, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Barranco, M. Pi, S. M. Gatica, E. S. Hernández, and J. Navarro, “Structure and energetics of mixed 4He-3He drops,” Physical Review B, vol. 56, no. 14, pp. 8997–9003, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Arias De Saavedra, J. Boronat, A. Polls, and A. Fabrocini, “Effective mass of one He4 atom in liquid He3,” Physical Review B, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 4248–4251, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. Galbraith and G. Duggan, “Envelope-function matching conditions for GaAs/(Al,Ga)As heterojunctions,” Physical Review B, vol. 38, no. 14, pp. 10057–10059, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Weisbuch and B. Vinter, Quantum Semiconductor Heterostructure, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
  8. L. Dekar, L. Chetouani, and T. F. Hammann, “Wave function for smooth potential and mass step,” Physical Review A, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 107–112, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. D. Alhaidari, “Solution of the Dirac equation with position-dependent mass in the Coulomb field,” Physics Letters A, vol. 322, no. 1-2, pp. 72–77, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. B. Roy and P. Roy, “A Lie algebraic approach to effective mass Schr\"odinger equations,” Journal of Physics. A. Mathematical and General, vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 3961–3969, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. B. Gönul, D. Tutcu, and O. Özer, “Supersymmetric approach to exactly solvable systems with position-dependent effective masses,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 17, no. 31, pp. 2057–2066, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. M. Ikhdair, “Rotation and vibration of diatomic molecule in the spatially-dependent mass Schrödinger equation with generalized q-deformed Morse potential,” Chemical Physics, vol. 361, no. 1-2, pp. 9–17, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Tezcan, R. Sever, and O. Yesiltas, “A new approach to the exact solutions of the effective mass Schrodinger equation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1713–1721, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Arda and R. Sever, “Bound state solutions of the Schrödinger for generalized Morse potential with position-dependent mass,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 51–54, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. G. Lévai and O. Özer, “An exactly solvable Schrödinger equation with finite positive position-dependent effective mass,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 51, no. 9, Article ID 092103, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. B. Bagchi, C. Quesne, and R. Roychoudhury, “Pseudo-Hermiticity and some consequences of a generalized quantum condition,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 38, no. 40, pp. L647–L652, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. J. Yu, S.-H. Dong, and G.-H. Sun, “Series solutions of the Schrödinger equation with position-dependent mass for the Morse potential,” Physics Letters A, vol. 322, no. 5-6, pp. 290–297, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. S.-H. Dong and M. Lozada-Cassou, “Exact solutions of the Schrödinger equation with the position-dependent mass for a hard-core potential,” Physics Letters A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, vol. 337, no. 4—6, pp. 313–320, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. O. Mustafa and S. H. Mazharimousavi, “First-order intertwining operators with position dependent mass and η-weak-pseudo-Hermiticity generators,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 446–454, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. H. Motavali, “Bound state solutions of the Dirac equation for the Scarf-type potential using Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 1227–1236, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. A. P. Zhang, P. Shi, Y. W. Ling, and Z. W. Hua, “Solutions of one-dimensional effective mass Schrödinger equation for PT-symmetric Scarf potential,” Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 987–991, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. G. Miranda, G. Sun, and S.-H. Dong, “The solution of the second Pöschl-Teller-like potential by Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 123–129, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  23. H. Hassanabadi, E. Maghsoodi, S. Zarrinkamar, and H. Rahimov, “Dirac equation for generalized Pöschl-Teller scalar and vector potentials and a Coulomb tensor interaction by Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 53, no. 2, Article ID 022104, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. M. C. Zhang, G. H. Sun, and S.-H. Dong, “Exactly complete solutions of the Schrödinger equation with a spherically harmonic oscillatory ring-shaped potential,” Physics Letters A, vol. 374, no. 5, pp. 704–708, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. F. Yasuk and M. K. Bahar, “Approximate solutions of the Dirac equation with position-dependent mass for the Hulthén potential by the asymptotic iteration method,” Physica Scripta, vol. 85, no. 4, Article ID 045004, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Exactly solvable effective mass D-dimensional Schrödinger equation for pseudoharmonic and modified Kratzer problems,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 361–372, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. R. Koç and M. Koca, “A systematic study on the exact solution of the position dependent mass Schrödinger equation,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 36, no. 29, pp. 8105–8112, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. S. Ortakaya, “Pseudospin symmetry in position-dependent mass dirac-coulomb problem by using laplace transform and convolution integral,” Few-Body Systems, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2073–2080, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S.-H. Dong, Factorization Method in Quantum Mechanics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2007. View at MathSciNet
  30. A. F. Nikiforov and V. B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, Birkhäauser, Basel, Switzerland, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. B. Midya, B. Roy, and T. Tanaka, “Effect of position-dependent mass on dynamical breaking of type B and type X2N-fold supersymmetry,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 45, no. 20, Article ID 205303, 22 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. E. A. Hylleraas, “Energy formula and potential distribution of diatomic molecules,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 3, article 595, no. 9, 1935. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. N. Ikot, “Solution of Dirac equation with generalized hylleraas potential,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 268–272, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Function with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1964.
  35. O. von Roos, “Position-dependent effective masses in semiconductor theory,” Physical Review B, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 7547–7552, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. Sever, C. Tezcan, Ö. Yeşiltaş, and M. Bucurgat, “Exact solution of effective mass Schrödinger equation for the Hulthen potential,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2243–2248, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. D. J. BenDaniel and C. B. Duke, “Space-charge effects on electron tunneling,” Physical Review, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 683–692, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. Hulthén, “Über die eigenlösungen der schrödinger-gleichung der deuterons,” Arkiv för Matematik A, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1–12, 1942. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  39. S. Meyur and S. Debnath, “Real spectrum of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians for hulthén potential,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 23, no. 25, pp. 2077–2084, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  40. O. Aydoğdu, A. Arda, and R. Sever, “Scattering of a spinless particle by an asymmetric Hulthén potential within the effective mass formalism,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 53, no. 10, Article ID 102111, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. D. S. Saxon and R. D. Woods, “Diffuse surface optical model for nucleon-nuclei scattering,” Physical Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 577–578, 1954. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Arda and R. Sever, “Bound states of the Klein-Gordon equation for Woods-Saxon potential with position dependent mass,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 763–773, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. Berkdemir, A. Berkdemir, and R. Sever, “Polynomial Solution of the Schrödinger equation for the generalized Woods-Saxon potential,” Physical Review C, vol. 74, no. 3, Article ID 039902, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. O. Aydoğdu, A. Arda, and R. Sever, “Effective-mass Dirac equation for Woods-Saxon potential: scattering, bound states, and resonances,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 53, Article ID 042106, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  45. O. Aydoǧdu and R. Sever, “Pseudospin and spin symmetry in the Dirac equation with Woods-Saxon potential and tensor potential,” European Physical Journal A, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus