Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 612390, 30 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/612390
Review Article

Charged Particle, Photon Multiplicity, and Transverse Energy Production in High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions

1Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore 452017, India
2Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400067, India

Received 24 August 2014; Revised 17 January 2015; Accepted 24 January 2015

Academic Editor: Andrey Leonidov

Copyright © 2015 Raghunath Sahoo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. J. C. Collins and M. J. Perry, “Superdense matter: neutrons or asymptotically free quarks?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 34, no. 21, pp. 1353–1356, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. D. Bjorken, “Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: the central rapidity region,” Physical Review D, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 140–151, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. F. Karsch, “Lattice results on QCD thermodynamics,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 698, no. 1–4, pp. 199–208, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Kataja, P. V. Ruuskanen, L. D. McLerran, and H. von Gersdorff, “Studies of the hydrodynamic evolution of matter produced in fluctuations in p¯p collisions and in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions. II. Transverse-momentum distributions,” Physical Review D, vol. 34, p. 2755, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. L. van Hove, “Multiplicity dependence of pt spectrum as a possible signal for a phase transition in hadronic collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 118, no. 1–3, pp. 138–140, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Sarkar, D. K. Srivastava, and B. Sinha, “Rapidity distribution of photons emitted from a hadronizing quark-gluon plasma,” Physical Review C, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 318–327, 1995, Erratum in Physical Review C, vol. 51, p. 2845, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Dumitru, U. Katscher, J. A. Maruhn, H. Stöcker, W. Greiner, and D. H. Rischke, “Thermal photons as a measure for the rapidity dependence of the temperature,” Zeitschrift für Physik A, vol. 353, no. 2, pp. 187–190, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. Kharzeev and M. Nardi, “Hadron production in nuclear collisions at RHIC and high-density QCD,” Physics Letters B, vol. 507, no. 1–4, pp. 121–128, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. B. B. Back, M. D. Baker, M. Ballintijn et al., “Charged-particle pseudorapidity distributions in Au+Au collisions at sNN=62.4 GeV,” Physical Review C, vol. 74, Article ID 021901, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. C. Abreu, B. Alessandro, C. Alexa et al., “Scaling of charged particle multiplicity in Pb-Pb collisions at SPS energies,” Physics Letters B, vol. 530, pp. 43–55, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. E. Abbas, B. Abelev, J. Adam et al., “Centrality dependence of the pseudorapidity density distribution for charged particles in Pb–Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 726, no. 4-5, pp. 610–622, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. B. B. Back, M. D. Baker, M. Ballintijn et al., “Collision geometry scaling of Au + Au pseudorapidity density from sNN=19.6 to 200 GeV,” Physical Review C, vol. 70, Article ID 021902(R), 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. B. Alver, B. B. Back, M. D. Baker et al., “Charged-particle multiplicity and pseudorapidity distributions measured with the PHOBOS detector in Au+Au, Cu+Cu, d+Au, and p+p collisions at ultrarelativistic energies,” Physical Review C, vol. 83, no. 2, Article ID 024913, 24 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Measurement of the centrality dependence of the charged particle pseudorapidity distribution in lead-lead collisions at sNN=2.76 Tev with the ATLAS detector,” Physics Letters B, vol. 710, pp. 363–382, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Dependence on pseudorapidity and on centrality of charged hadron production in PbPb collisions at SNN = 2.76 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, p. 141, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  16. B. Abelev, J. Adam, D. Adamová et al., “Centrality determination of Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV with ALICE,” Physical Review C, vol. 88, Article ID 044909, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. B. Abelev, J. Adam, D. Adamová et al., “Measurement of the cross section for electromagnetic dissociation with neutron emission in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, Article ID 252302, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. W. Kittel and E. A. De Wolf, Soft Multihadron Dynamics, World Scientific, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  19. I. M. Dremin and J. W. Gary, “Hadron multiplicities,” Physics Report, vol. 349, no. 4, pp. 301–393, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. F. Grosse-Oetringhaus and K. Reygers, “Charged-particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 37, no. 8, Article ID 083001, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Aamodt, A. Abrahantes Quintana, D. Adamová et al., “Centrality dependence of the charged-particle multiplicity density at midrapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, Article ID 032301, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. B. Alver, B. B. Back, M. D. Baker et al., “System size, energy, and centrality dependence of pseudorapidity distributions of charged particles in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, Article ID 142301, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. B. B. Back, M. D. Baker, D. S. Barton et al., “Significance of the fragmentation region in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, Article ID 052303, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. P. Carruthers and M. Duong-van, “Rapidity and angular distributions of charged secondaries according to the hydrodynamical model of particle production,” Physical Review D, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 859–874, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. F.-H. Liu, Y.-H. Chen, Y.-Q. Gao, and E.-Q. Wang, “On current conversion between particle rapidity and pseudorapidity distributions in high energy collisions,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, Article ID 710534, 4 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. C. Y. Wong, Introduction to High Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA, 1994.
  27. K. Adcox, S. S. Adler, N. N. Ajitanand et al., “Measurement of the midrapidity transverse energy distribution from sNN=130 GeV Au + Au collisions at RHIC,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, Article ID 052301, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Measurement of the pseudorapidity and centrality dependence of the transverse energy density in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, Article ID 152303, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. G. Wolschin, “Particle production sources at LHC energies,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 40, no. 4, Article ID 045104, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. L. D. Landau, “On the multiparticle production in high-energy collisions,” Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSR, Seriya Fizicheskaya, vol. 17, pp. 51–64, 1953. View at Google Scholar
  31. C. Alt, T. Anticic, B. Baatar et al., “Pion and kaon production in central Pb + Pb collisions at 20A and 30A GeV: evidence for the onset of deconfinement,” Physical Review C, vol. 77, Article ID 024903, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. H. Petersen and M. Bleicher, “Longitudinal flow and onset of deconfinement,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop The Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement, Firenze, Italy, 2006.
  33. B. Mohanty and J. Alam, “Velocity of sound in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 68, Article ID 064903, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. J. Benecke, T. T. Chou, C. N. Yang, and E. Yen, “Hypothesis of limiting fragmentation in high-energy collisions,” Physical Review, vol. 188, no. 5, pp. 2159–2169, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. J. Alner, R. E. Ansorge, B. Åsman et al., “Scaling of pseudorapidity distributions at c.m. energies up to 0.9 TeV,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. B. B. Back, M. D. Baker, M. Ballintijn et al., “Scaling of charged particle production in d + Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV,” Physical Review C, vol. 72, Article ID 031901, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. B. B. Back, M. D. Baker, D. S. Barton et al., “Centrality and energy dependence of charged-particle multiplicities in heavy ion collisions in the context of elementary reactions,” Physical Review C, vol. 74, no. 2, Article ID 021902, 4 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. G. Antchev, P. Aspell, I. Atanassov et al., “Luminosity-independent measurements of total, elastic and inelastic cross-sections at s = 7 TeV,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 101, no. 2, Article ID 21004, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. J. Jalilian-Marian, “Limiting fragmentation from the color glass condensate,” Physical Review C, vol. 70, no. 2, Article ID 027902, 3 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. F. Gelis, A. M. Staśto, and R. Venugopalan, “Limiting fragmentation in hadron–hadron collisions at high energies,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 489–500, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. J. Cleymans, J. Strümpfer, and L. Turko, “Extended longitudinal scaling and the thermal model,” Physical Review C, vol. 78, no. 1, Article ID 017901, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. P. Brogueira, J. D. D. Deus, and C. Pajares, “Limiting fragmentation in heavy-ion collisions and percolation of strings,” Physical Review C, vol. 75, no. 5, Article ID 054908, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. Sahoo and A. N. Mishra, “Transverse energy and charged particle production in heavy-ion collisions: from RHIC to LHC,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 23, no. 4, Article ID 1450024, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. A. Biallas, M. Bleszynski, and W. Czyz, “Multiplicity distributions in nucleus-nucleus collisions at high energies,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 111, pp. 461–476, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  45. X.-N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, “Energy and centrality dependence of rapidity densities at RHIC energies,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 16, article 3496, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. P. Steinberg, “Entropy production at high energy and μB,” Proceedings of Science CPOD, vol. 2006, article 036, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  47. E. K. G. Sarkisyan and A. S. Sakharov, “Multihadron production features in different reactions,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 828, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  48. C. Y. Wong, “Landau hydrodynamics reexamined,” Physical Review C, vol. 78, Article ID 054902, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. P. K. Netrakanti and B. Mohanty, “Width of the rapidity distribution in heavy-ion collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 71, Article ID 047901, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. P. Carruthers and M. Doung-van, “New scaling law based on the hydrodynamical model of particle production,” Physics Letters B, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 597–601, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. G. Wolschin, “Relativistic diffusion model,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 85–90, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. P. Tribedy and R. Venugopalan, “QCD saturation at the LHC: comparisons of models to p + p and A + A data and predictions for p + Pb collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 710, no. 1, pp. 125–133, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. A. N. Mishra, R. Sahoo, E. K. G. Sarkisyan, and A. S. Sakharov, “Effective-energy budget in multiparticle production in nuclear collisions,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 3147, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. S. Eremin and S. Voloshin, “Nucleon participants or quark participants?” Physical Review C, vol. 67, Article ID 064905, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. P. K. Netrakanti and B. Mohanty, “Quark participants and global observables,” Physical Review C, vol. 70, Article ID 027901, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. B. De and S. Bhattacharyya, “Rapidity spectra of the secondaries produced in heavy ion collisions and the constituent picture of the particles,” Physical Review C, vol. 71, Article ID 024903, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. R. Nouicer, “Similarity of initial states in A+A and p+p collisions in constituent quarks framework,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 828, p. 11, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. R. Nouicer and PHOBOS Collaboration, “Systematics of global observables in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at RHIC energies,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 842, p. 86, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. R. Nouicer, “Charged particle multiplicities in A+A and p+p collisions in the constituent quarks framework,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 281–286, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. E. K. G. Sarkisyan and A. S. Sakharov, “Relating multihadron production in hadronic and nuclear collisions,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 533–541, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. D. Bjorken, “A full-acceptance detector for SSC physics at low and intermediate mass scales: an expression of interest to the SSC,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 7, no. 18, p. 4189, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. J. D. Bjorken, K. L. Kowalski, and C. C. Taylor, “Baked Alaska,” Tech. Rep. SLAC-PUB-6109, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  63. K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, “Static and dynamic critical phenomena at a second order QCD phase transition,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 399, no. 2-3, pp. 395–425, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. J. Adams, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed et al., “Measurements of transverse energy distributions in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV,” Physical Review C, vol. 70, Article ID 054907, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  65. B. I. Abelev, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed et al., “Center of mass energy and system-size dependence of photon production at forward rapidity at RHIC,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 832, no. 1-2, pp. 134–147, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. J. Adams, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed et al., “Multiplicity and pseudorapidity distributions of photons in Au+Au collisions at sNN=62.4 GeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, Article ID 062301, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. M. M. Aggarwal, A. L. S. Angelis, V. Antonenko et al., “Multiplicity and pseudorapidity distribution of photons in S + Au reaction at 200A GeV,” Physical Review C, vol. 58, pp. 1146–1154, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  68. M. M. Aggarwal, A. Agnihotri, Z. Ahammed et al., “Systematics of inclusive photon production in 158-A-GeV Pb induced reactions on Ni, Nb, and Pb targets,” Physics Letters B, vol. 458, pp. 422–430, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  69. M. Jacob and P. V. Landshoff, “Minijets: origin and usefulness,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 1, no. 12, article 657, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. X. N. Wang, “A pQCD-based approach to parton production and equilibration in high-energy nuclear collisions,” Physics Reports, vol. 280, no. 5-6, pp. 287–371, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. M. Gyulassy and T. Matsui, “Quark-gluon-plasma evolution in scaling hydrodynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 419–425, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. K. J. Eskola, K. Kajantie, P. V. Ruuskanen, and K. Tuominen, “Scaling of transverse energies and multiplicities with atomic number and energy in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 570, no. 1-2, pp. 379–389, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. P. F. Kolb, U. Heinz, P. Huovinen, K. J. Eskola, and K. Tuominen, “Centrality dependence of multiplicity, transverse energy, and elliptic flow from hydrodynamics,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 696, no. 1-2, pp. 197–215, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. Dumitru and M. Gyulassy, “The effective pressure of a saturated gluon plasma,” Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, vol. 494, no. 3-4, pp. 215–220, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. T. Abbott, L. Ahle, Y. Akiba et al., “Systematics of midrapidity transverse energy distributions in limited apertures from p+Be to Au+Au,” Physical Review C, vol. 63, Article ID 064602, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  76. K. Adcox, S. S. Adler, S. Afanasiev et al., “Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus–nucleus collisions at RHIC: experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 757, no. 1-2, pp. 184–283, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. E. A. de Wolf, “Intermittency, negative binomials and two particle correlations,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 611–626, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  78. T. Abbott, Y. Akiba, D. Alburger et al., “Multiplicity distributions from central collisions of O16+Cu at 14.6A GeV/c and intermittency,” Physical Review C, vol. 52, article 2663, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. P. Ghosh, “Negative binomial multiplicity distribution in proton-proton collisions in limited pseudorapidity intervals at LHC up to s=7 TeV and the clan model,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 054017, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. L. Ahle, Y. Akiba, K. Ashktorab et al., “Simultaneous multiplicity and forward energy characterization of particle spectra in Au + Au collisions at 11.6A GeV/c,” Physical Review C, vol. 59, no. 4, p. 2173, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. F. Karsch, “Lattice results on QCD at high temperature and non-zero baryon number density,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 62, pp. 503–511, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. Z. Fodor and S. D. Katz, “Critical point of QCD at finite T and μ, lattice results for physical quark masses,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 4, article 050, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. S. S. Adler, S. Afanasiev, C. Aidala et al., “Systematic studies of the centrality and sNN dependence of the dET/dη and dNch/dη,” Physical Review C, vol. 71, Article ID 034908, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  84. B. Hahn, D. G. Ravenhall, and R. Hofstadter, “High-energy electron scattering and the charge distributions of selected nuclei,” Physical Review, vol. 101, pp. 1131–1142, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. C. W. de Jager, H. de Vries, and C. de Vries, “Nuclear charge and magnetization density distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 14, no. 5-6, pp. 479–508, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. T. Alber, H. Appelshäuser, J. Bächler et al., “Transverse energy production in 208Pb + Pb collisions at 158 GeV per nucleon,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, no. 21, pp. 3814–3817, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. T. S. Ullrich, “Experimental summary on global observables, hadron spectra and ratios,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 715, pp. 399c–411c, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. J. Adams, C. Adler, M. M. Aggarwal et al., “Particle-type dependence of azimuthal anisotropy and nuclear modification of particle production in Au + Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, Article ID 052302, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. P. F. Kolb and U. Heinz, “Hydrodynamic description of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0305084.
  90. W. Reisdorf, “Central collisions of Au on Au at 150, 250 and 400 A·MeV,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 612, no. 3-4, pp. 493–556, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. M. van Leeuwen, S. V. Afanasiev, T. Anticic et al., “Recent results on spectra and yields from NA49,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 715, pp. 161c–170c, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. S. V. Afanasiev, T. Anticic, D. Barna et al., “Energy dependence of pion and kaon production in central Pb + Pb collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 66, Article ID 054902, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. F. Siklér, J. Bächler, D. Barna et al., “Hadron production in nuclear collisions from the NA49 experiment at 158 GeV/c·A,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 661, no. 1–4, pp. 45–54, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. R. Sahoo, Transverse energy measurement and fluctuation studies in ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions [Ph.D. thesis], Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, India, 2007.
  95. R. Sahoo and STAR Collaboration, “Transverse energy measurement in Au+Au collisions by the STAR experiment,” Indian Journal of Physics, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 897–901, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. B. Abelev, J. Adamal, D. Adamová et al., “Multiplicity dependence of the average transverse momentum in pp, p-Pb, and Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 727, no. 4-5, pp. 371–380, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. C. Markert, R. Bellwied, and I. Vitev, “Formation and decay of hadronic resonances in the QGP,” Physics Letters B, vol. 669, no. 1, pp. 92–97, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. A. Krasnitz, Y. Nara, and R. Venugopalan, “Gluon production in the Color Glass Condensate model of collisions of ultrarelavistic finite nuclei,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 717, no. 3-4, pp. 268–290, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. J. Cleymans, R. Sahoo, D. P. Mahapatra, D. K. Srivastava, and S. Wheaton, “Transverse energy per charged particle and freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions,” Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, vol. 660, no. 3, pp. 172–175, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. J. Cleymans, R. Sahoo, D. P. Mahapatra, D. K. Srivastava, and S. Wheaton, “Saturation of ET/Nch and freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 35, no. 10, Article ID 104147, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. D. Prorok, “The transverse energy per charged particle estimates in the framework of a statistical model,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 749, pp. 194–197, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. D. Prorok, “The centrality dependence of transverse-energy and charged-particle multiplicity at RHIC: statistical model analysis,” The European Physical Journal A—Hadrons and Nuclei, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 277–284, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. D. Prorok, “Centrality dependence of global variables in relativistic heavy ion collisions: final pT data analysis in the framework of a statistical model,” Physical Review C, vol. 73, Article ID 064901, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. D. Prorok, “Statistical hadronization model approach to sNN=200 GeV Au-Au collisions: pT-spectra fits and global variable predictions,” Physical Review C, vol. 75, Article ID 014903, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. J. Cleymans and K. Redlich, “Unified description of freeze-out parameters in relativistic heavy ion collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, no. 24, pp. 5284–5286, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, “Particle ratios, equilibration and the QCD phase boundary,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1971–1976, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. A. Tawfik, “Influence of strange quarks on the QCD phase diagram and chemical freeze-out,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 31, no. 6, Article ID S1105, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, and S. Wheaton, “Transition from baryonic to mesonic freeze-out,” Physics Letters B, vol. 615, no. 1-2, pp. 50–54, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. A. Adronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, and H. Stocker, “Production of light nuclei, hypernuclei and their antiparticles in relativistic nuclear collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 697, no. 3, pp. 203–207, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. B. Abelev, J. Adam, D. Adamová et al., “Pion, kaon, and proton production in central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, Article ID 252301, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. A. Baran, W. Broniowski, and W. Florkowski, “Description of the particle ratios and transverse-momentum spectra for various centralities at RHIC in a single-freeze-out model,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 35, pp. 779–798, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  112. A. Bialas and R. Peschanski, “Random cascading models and the link between long-range and short-range interactions in multiparticle production,” Physics Letters B, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. A. Stuart and K. Ord, Kendall's Advances Theory of Statistics, vol. 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 6th edition, 1994.
  114. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability: Theory and Its Applications, vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2008.
  115. M. J. Tannenbaum, “ET and other event-by-event distributions from AGS to RHIC energies,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 239–252, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. J. Rak and M. J. Tannenbaum, High pT Physics in the Heavy Ion Era, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1st edition, 2013.