Advances in High Energy Physics

Advances in High Energy Physics / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 697514 | 16 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/697514

Mesons in Asymmetric Hot and Dense Hadronic Matter

Academic Editor: Juan José Sanz-Cillero
Received08 Jun 2015
Revised09 Aug 2015
Accepted18 Aug 2015
Published15 Oct 2015

Abstract

The in-medium properties of mesons are investigated within the framework of an effective hadronic model, which is a generalization of a chiral model, to , in order to study the interactions of the charmed hadrons. In the present work, the mesons are observed to experience net attractive interactions in a dense hadronic medium, hence reducing the masses of the and mesons from the vacuum values. While this conclusion holds in both nuclear and hyperonic media, the magnitude of the mass drop is observed to intensify with the inclusion of strangeness in the medium. Additionally, in hyperonic medium, the mass degeneracy of the mesons is observed to be broken, due to opposite signs of the Weinberg-Tomozawa interaction term in the Lagrangian density. Along with the magnitude of the mass drops, the mass splitting between and mesons is also observed to grow with an increase in baryonic density and strangeness content of the medium. However, all medium effects analyzed are found to be weakly dependent on isospin asymmetry and temperature. We discuss the possible implications emanating from this analysis, which are all expected to make a significant difference to observables in heavy ion collision experiments, especially the upcoming Compressed Baryonic Matter (CBM) experiment at the future Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR), GSI, where matter at high baryonic densities is planned to be produced.

1. Introduction

An effective description of hadronic matter is fairly common in low-energy QCD [13]. Realizing that baryons and mesons constitute the effective degrees of freedom in this regime, it is quite sensible to treat QCD at low-energies as an effective theory of these quark bound states [1]. This approach has been vigorously pursued in various incarnations over the years, with the different adopted strategies representing merely different manifestations of the same underlying philosophy. The actual manifestations range from the quark-meson coupling model [4, 5], phenomenological, relativistic mean-field theories based on the Walecka model [6], along with their subsequent extensions, the method of QCD sum rules [79], as well as the coupled channel approach [10, 11] for treating dynamically generated resonances, which has further evolved into more specialized forms, namely, the local hidden gauge theory [12, 13], and formalisms based on incorporating heavy-quark spin symmetry (HQSS) [14, 15] into the coupled channel framework [1620]. Additionally, the method of chiral-invariant Lagrangians [1] (which will also be embraced in this work) has developed over the years into a very successful strategy. This method uses an effective field theoretical model in which the specific form of hadronic interactions is dictated by symmetry principles and the physics governed predominantly by the dynamics of chiral symmetry—its spontaneous breakdown implying a nonvanishing scalar condensate in vacuum. One naturally expects then that the hadrons composed of these quarks would also be modified in accordance with these condensates [2, 3]. But while all hadrons would be subject to medium modifications from this perspective, pseudoscalar mesons have a special role in this context. In accordance with Goldstone’s theorem [1], spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry leads to the occurrence of massless pseudoscalar modes, the so-called Goldstone bosons, which are generally identified with the spectrum of light pseudoscalar mesons, like the pions or kaons and antikaons [2, 3]. In a strict sense, however, none of these physical mesons is a true Goldstone mode, since they are all massive, while Goldstone modes are supposed to be massless [21]. The origin of the masses of these mesons is related to the nonzero masses of light quarks, as can be easily discerned from the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner (GOR) relations and, hence, from explicit symmetry breaking terms (or explicit mass terms) in the chiral effective framework [1]. In fact, if one considers the limiting situation of vanishing quark masses , the masses of these pseudoscalar mesons would also vanish, so that the perfect Goldstone modes are indeed recovered. For this reason, the physically observed light pseudoscalar mesons are dubbed pseudo-Goldstone bosons [21]. In purely this sense, therefore, there is an inherent similarity between all these classes of pseudoscalar mesons; masses are acquired through explicit quark mass terms, and only the magnitude of these mass terms differs between these cases, being small for the pions (since ,  MeV), comparatively larger for the kaons and antikaons (since  MeV), and appreciably larger for the charmed pseudoscalar mesons. Thus, as we advance from the pions to the strange pseudoscalar mesons, with increasing mass, these mesons depart more from the ideal Goldstone mode character pertaining to the theorem and there is considerable departure of the charmed pseudoscalar mesons from Goldstone mode behaviour due to the explicit chiral symmetry breaking arising from the large charm quark mass ( GeV). An understanding of the in-medium properties of the pseudoscalar mesons has been an important topic of research, both theoretically and experimentally. Within the chiral effective approach, the pseudoscalar mesons are modified in the medium due to the modifications of the quark condensates in the hadronic medium. For pions, it is observed, however, that medium effects for them are weakened by the smallness of explicit symmetry breaking terms [2, 3]. Considerably detailed analysis of medium effects has been performed over the years, particularly in a chiral approach, for strange pseudoscalar mesons (kaons and antikaons) [2225]. For studying the charmed mesons, one needs to generalize the model to , in order to incorporate the interactions of the charmed mesons to the light hadrons. Such a generalization from to was initially done in [26], where the interaction Lagrangian was constructed for the pseudoscalar mesons for from a generalization of the lowest order chiral Lagrangian. Since the chiral symmetry is explicitly broken for the case due to the large mass of the charm quark ( GeV), which is much larger than the masses of the light quarks, for the study of the charmed () pseudoscalar mesons [2729], we adopt the philosophy of generalizing the chiral model to to derive the interactions of these mesons with the light hadrons but use the observed masses of these heavy hadrons as well as empirical/observed values of their decay constants [30]. With all these studies proving to be informative, the most natural direction of extension of this approach would be to analyze these medium effects for a strange-charmed system (the mesons). Apart from pure theoretical interest, an understanding of the medium modifications of mesons is important, since these can make a considerable difference to experimental observables in the (ongoing and future) relativistic heavy ion collision experiments, besides being significant in questions concerning their production and transport in such experimental situations. For instance, in a recent work, He et al. [31] have shown that the modifications of the meson spectrum can serve as a useful probe for understanding key issues regarding hadronization in heavy ion collisions. It is suggested that, by comparing observables for and mesons, it is possible to constrain the hadronic transport coefficient. This comparison is useful since it allows for a clear distinction between hadronic and quark-gluon plasma behavior.

However, as far as the existing literature on this strange-charmed system of mesons is concerned, we observe that only the excited states of mesons have received considerable attention, predominantly as dynamically generated resonances in various coupled channel frameworks [32, 33]. One must bear in mind that, in certain situations, a molecular interpretation of these excited states (resonances) is more appropriate [34] for an explanation of their observed, larger than expected lifetimes. From this perspective, a whole plethora of possibilities have been entertained for the excited states, the standard quark-antiquark picture aside. These include their description as molecular states, borne out of two mesons, four-quark states, or the still further exotic possibilities—as two-diquark states and as a mixture of quark-antiquark and tetraquark states [32]. Prominent among these is a treatment of as a bound state [35, 36], as a dynamically generated resonance [37], and being treated within the hidden local gauge formalism in coupled channel unitary approach [38, 39], as well as the vector states and the resonance treated in a multichannel approach [40]. The former three have also been covered consistently under the four-quark picture [41]. So, while considerable attention has been paid towards dynamically generating the higher excited states of the mesons, there is a conspicuous dearth [42] of available information about the medium modifications of the lightest pseudoscalar mesons, , the one that we know surely is well described within the quark-antiquark picture. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, the entire existing literature about the mesons in a hadronic medium is limited to the assessment of their spectral distributions and medium effects on the dynamically generated resonances borne out of the interaction of these mesons with other hadron species, in the coupled channel analyses of [4245]. This situation is quite unlike their open-charm, non-strange counterparts, the mesons, which boast of a sizeable amount of literature having been extensively investigated using a multitude of approaches over the years. In stark contrast, the available literature concerning the in-medium behavior of pseudoscalar mesons can at best be described as scanty, and there is need for more work on this subject. If one considers this problem from the point of view of the (extended) chiral effective approach, this scantiness is most of all because of the lack of a proper framework where the relevant form of the interactions for the mesons with the light hadrons (or in more generic terms, of meson-baryon interactions with the charm sector covered), based on arguments of symmetry and invariance, could be written down. Clearly, such interactions would have to be based on symmetry and bear all these pseudoscalar mesons and baryons in 15-plet and 20-plet representations, respectively, with meson-baryon interaction terms still in accordance with the general framework for writing chiral-invariant structures, as well as bearing appropriate symmetry breaking terms obeying the requisite transformation behavior under chiral transformations [1], which is quite a nontrivial problem. Of late, such formalisms have been proposed in [43, 46], as an extension of the frameworks based on chiral Lagrangians, where symmetry forms the basis for writing down the relevant interaction terms. However, since the mass of the charm quark is approximately 1.3 GeV [47], which is considerably larger than that of the up, down, and strange quarks, the symmetry is explicitly broken by this large charm quark mass. Hence, this formalism only uses the symmetry to derive the form of the interactions, whereas an explicit symmetry breaking term accounts for the large quark mass through the introduction of mass terms of the relevant ( or ) mesons. Also, symmetry being badly broken implies that any symmetry and order in the masses and decay constants, as predicted on the basis of symmetry, would not hold in reality. The same is acknowledged in this approach [46] and, as has been already mentioned, one does not use the masses and decay constants as expected on the basis of symmetry but rather their observed Particle Data Group (PDG) [47] values. Overall, therefore, symmetry is treated (appropriately) as being broken in this approach. Also, it is quite well-known, through both model-independent [48] and model-dependent [29] calculations, that the light quark condensates are modified significantly in a hadronic medium with medium parameters like density and temperature; the strange quark condensate is comparatively stolid and its variation is significantly more subdued, while upon advancing to the charm sector the variation in the charmed quark condensate is altogether negligible in the entire hadronic phase [48]. These observations form the basis for treating the charm degrees of freedom of open-charm pseudoscalar mesons as frozen in the medium, as was the case in the treatments of [28, 29, 46]. Thus, as we advance from pions and kaons to the charmed pseudoscalar mesons, the generalization is perfectly natural but with the aforementioned caveats. Provided all these aspects are taken into account, a generalization of this chiral effective framework to open-charm pseudoscalar mesons is quite reasonable and sane, and the predictions from such an extended chiral effective approach bode very well [28] with alternative calculations based on the QCD sum rule approach, quark-meson coupling model, coupled channel approach, and studies of quarkonium dissociation using heavy-quark potentials from lattice QCD at finite temperatures. Additionally, it is interesting to note that this approach, followed in [28, 29, 46] for the charmed pseudoscalar mesons, has recently been extended to the bottom sector and used to study the medium behavior of the open bottom pseudoscalar , , and mesons [49, 50]. The inherent philosophy beneath this extension continues to be the same; the dynamics of the heavy quark/antiquark is treated as frozen, and the interactions of the light quark (or antiquark) of the meson, with the particles constituting the medium, are responsible for the medium modifications. With this subsequent generalization as well, the physics of the medium behavior that follows from this approach is in agreement [49] with works based on alternative, independent approaches, like the heavy meson effective theory, quark-meson coupling model, and the QCD sum rule approach. Thus, these aforementioned, prior works based on the generalization of the original chiral effective approach to include heavy flavored mesons, are totally concordant with results from alternative approaches followed in the literature, which lends an aura of credibility to this strategy. Given this backdrop, it is clear that these formalisms wipe out the reason why such an investigation for the mesons within the effective hadronic model, obtained by generalizing the chiral model to , has not been undertaken till date and permit this attempt to fill the void.

We organize this paper as follows. In Section 2, we outline the chiral model (and its generalization to the case) used in this investigation. In Section 3, the Lagrangian density for the mesons, within this extended framework, is explicitly written down and is used to derive their in-medium dispersion relations. In Section 4, we describe and discuss our results for the in-medium properties of mesons, first in the nuclear matter case and then in the hyperonic matter situation, following which we briefly discuss the possible implications of these medium modifications. Finally, we summarize the entire investigation in Section 5.

2. The Effective Hadronic Model

As mentioned previously, this study is based on a generalization of the chiral model [51], to . We summarize briefly the rudiments of the model, while referring the reader to [51, 52] for the details. This is an effective hadronic model of interacting baryons and mesons, based on a nonlinear realization of chiral symmetry [53, 54], where chiral invariance is used as a guiding principle, in deciding the form of the interactions [5557]. Additionally, the model incorporates a scalar dilaton field, , to mimic the broken scale invariance of QCD [52]. Once these invariance arguments determine the form of the interaction terms, one resorts to a phenomenological fitting of the free parameters of the model, to arrive at the desired effective Lagrangian density for these hadron-hadron interactions. The general expression for the chiral model Lagrangian density reads In (1), is the kinetic energy term, while denotes the baryon-meson interaction term. Here, baryon-pseudoscalar meson interactions generate the baryon masses. treats the dynamical mass generation of the vector mesons through couplings with scalar mesons. The self-interaction terms of these mesons are also included in this term. contains the meson-meson interaction terms, which induce spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry. introduces scale invariance breaking, via a logarithmic potential term in the scalar dilaton field, . Finally, refers to the explicit symmetry breaking term. This approach has been employed extensively to study the in-medium properties of hadrons, particularly pseudoscalar mesons [2225]. As was observed in Section 1 as well, this would be most naturally extended to the charmed (nonstrange and strange) pseudoscalar mesons. However, that calls for this chiral formalism to be generalized to , which has been addressed in [43, 46]. For studying the in-medium behavior of pseudoscalar mesons, the following contributions need to be analyzed [28, 29, 46]: In (2), denotes the Weinberg-Tomozawa term, given by the expression [46] with repeated indices summed over. Baryons are represented by the tensor , which is antisymmetric in its first two indices [43]. The indices , , and run from 1 to 4, and one can directly read the quark content of a baryon state, with the following identification: , , , . However, the heavier, charmed baryons are discounted from this analysis. In (3), is defined as where the unitary transformation operator, , is defined in terms of the matrix of pseudoscalar mesons, , representing the generalized Gell-Mann matrices. Further, is the scalar meson exchange term, which is obtained from the explicit symmetry breaking term where and refers to the scalar meson multiplet [28]. Also, the first range term is obtained from the kinetic energy term of the pseudoscalar mesons and is given by the expression where . Lastly, the and range terms are Adopting the mean-field approximation [6, 52], the effective Lagrangian density for scalar and vector mesons simplifies; the same is used subsequently to derive the equations of motion for the nonstrange scalar-isoscalar meson , scalar-isovector meson , and strange scalar meson and for the vector-isovector meson , nonstrange vector meson , and strange vector meson , within this model.

The meson interaction Lagrangian density and in-medium dispersion relations, as they follow from the above general formulation, are described next.

3. Mesons in Hadronic Matter

The Lagrangian density for the mesons in isospin-asymmetric, strange, hadronic medium is given as This is the free Lagrangian density for a complex scalar field (which corresponds to the mesons in this case) and reads On the other hand, is determined to be In this expression, the first term (with coefficient ) is the Weinberg-Tomozawa term, obtained from (3), the second term (with coefficient ) is the scalar meson exchange term, obtained from the explicit symmetry breaking term of the Lagrangian (see (5)), the third term (with coefficient ) is the first range term (see (6)), and the fourth and fifth terms (with coefficients and , resp.) are the and terms, calculated from (7) and (8), respectively. Also, is the fluctuation of the strange scalar field from its vacuum value. The mean-field approximation, mentioned earlier, is a useful, simplifying measure in this context, since it permits us to have the following replacements: Thus, the interaction Lagrangian density can be recast in terms of the baryonic number densities and scalar densities, given by the following expressions: In the above, and are the effective mass and effective chemical potential of the th baryon, given as , , , and is the spin degeneracy factor. One can find the equations of motion for the and mesons, by the use of Euler-Lagrange equations on this Lagrangian density. The linearity of these equations follows from (11), which allows us to assume plane wave solutions (~), and hence, “Fourier transform” these equations, to arrive at the in-medium dispersion relations for the mesons. These have the general form where is the vacuum mass of the mesons and is the self-energy of the mesons in the medium. Explicitly, the latter reads where the + and − signs in the coefficient of refer to and , respectively, and we have used (12) to simplify the bilinears. In the rest frame of these mesons (i.e., setting ), these dispersion relations reduce towhich is a quadratic equation in , that is, of the form , where the coefficients , , and depend on various interaction terms in (15) and read As before, the “+” and “−” signs in correspond to and , respectively. In writing the above summations, we have used the following notation: denotes the set of all hyperons, is the set of nucleons, represents the Xi hyperons , and denotes all hyperons other than Xi hyperons, that is, the set of baryons which all carry one strange quark. This form is particularly convenient for later analysis. Also, the optical potential of mesons is defined as where (=) refers to the momentum of the respective meson, and represents its momentum-dependent in-medium energy.

In the next section, we study the sensitivity of the meson effective mass on various characteristic parameters of hadronic matter, namely, baryonic density (), temperature (), isospin asymmetry parameter , and the strangeness fraction , where and denote the strangeness quantum number and the third component of isospin of the th baryon, respectively.

4. Results and Discussion

Before describing the results of our analysis of mesons in a hadronic medium, we first discuss our parameter choice and the various simplifying approximations employed in this investigation. The parameters of the effective hadronic model are fitted to the vacuum masses of baryons, nuclear saturation properties, and other vacuum characteristics in the mean-field approximation [51, 52]. In this investigation, we have used the same parameter set that has earlier been used to study charmed () mesons within this effective hadronic model [46]. In particular, we use the same values of the parameters and of the range terms ( and ), fitted to empirical values of kaon-nucleon scattering lengths for the and channels, as employed in earlier treatments [22, 23, 28, 46]. For an extension to the strange-charmed system, the only extra parameter that needs to be fitted is the meson decay constant, , which is treated as follows. By extrapolating the results of [57], we arrive at the following expression for in terms of the vacuum values of the strange and charmed scalar fields: For fitting the value of , we retain the same values of and as in the earlier treatments of this chiral effective model [23, 51] and determine from the expression for in terms of and [28], using the Particle Data Group (PDG) value of  MeV. Substituting these in (22), our fitted value of comes out to be 235 MeV, which is close to its PDG value of 260 MeV and, particularly, is of the same order as typical lattice QCD calculations for the same [47]. We therefore persist with this fitted value  MeV in this investigation. Also, we treat the charmed scalar field () as being arrested at its vacuum value () in this investigation, as has been considered in other treatments of charmed mesons in a hadronic context [28, 46]. This neglect of charm dynamics appears natural from a physical viewpoint, owing to the large mass of a charm quark ( GeV) [47]. The same was verified in an explicit calculation in [48], where the charm condensate was observed to vary very weakly in the temperature range of interest to us in this regime [5860]. As our last approximation, we point out that, in the current investigation, we work within the “frozen glueball limit” [52], where the scalar dilaton field () is regarded as being frozen at its vacuum value (). This approximation was relaxed in a preceding work [29] within this effective hadronic model, where the in-medium modifications of this dilaton field were found to be quite meager. We conclude, therefore, that this weak dependence only serves to justify the validity of this assumption.

We next describe our analysis for the in-medium behavior of mesons, beginning first with the nuclear matter situation and including the hyperonic degrees of freedom only later. This approach has the advantage that many features of the meson in-medium behavior, common between these regimes, are discussed in detail in a more simplified context, and the effect of strangeness becomes a lot clearer.

In nuclear matter, the Weinberg-Tomozawa term and the range term vanish, since they depend on the number densities and scalar densities of the hyperons, and have no contribution from the nucleons. It follows from the self-energy expression that only the Weinberg-Tomozawa term differs between and ; all other interaction terms are absolutely identical for them. Thus, a direct consequence of the vanishing of Weinberg-Tomozawa contribution is that and are degenerate in nuclear matter. As mentioned earlier, the meson dispersion relations, with , takes the quadratic equation form (), where the coefficients (given by (18)–(20)) reduce to the following expressions in nuclear matter: where the subscript emphasizes the nuclear matter context. For solving this quadratic equation, we require the values of , as well as the scalar densities of protons and neutrons, which are obtained from a simultaneous solution of coupled equations of motion for the scalar fields, subject to constraints of fixed values of and . The behavior of the scalar fields, thus obtained, has been discussed in detail in [29]. Here, we build upon these scalar fields and proceed to discuss the behavior of solutions of the in-medium dispersion relations of mesons, given by (23) to (25). The variation of the meson in-medium mass, , with baryonic density in nuclear matter, along with the individual contributions to this net variation, is shown in Figure 1 for both zero and finite temperature value ( MeV). It is observed that the in-medium mass of mesons decreases with density, while being weakly dependent on temperature and isospin asymmetry parameter. We can understand the observed behavior through the following analysis. From (23) to (25), we arrive at the following closed-form solution for the meson effective mass in nuclear matter: From this exact closed-form solution, several general conclusions regarding the in-medium behavior of mesons in nuclear matter can be drawn. On the basis of this expression, the range term appearing in the denominator will lead to a decrease in the medium mass with increase in density. The in-medium mass is, additionally, also modified by the medium dependence of (we assume the value of to be frozen at its vacuum value and hence ). However, the density dependence of is observed to be quite subdued in nuclear matter. The total change in the value of from its vacuum value is observed; that is,  MeV. This value is acquired at a baryonic density of and thereafter it appears to saturate. This behavior of the strange scalar field, though ubiquitous in this chiral model [29, 51], is not just limited to it. Even in calculations employing the relativistic Hartree approximation to determine the variation of these scalar fields [61, 62], a behavior similar to this mean-field treatment is observed. We also point out that the saturation of the scalar meson exchange and first range term follows as a direct consequence of the saturation of , as is implied by their proportionality in (11) and (25). At larger densities, while the terms having saturate, the contribution from the range term continues to rise. With saturating at a value of around 15 MeV and the value of chosen to be 235 MeV in the present investigation, the last term in the numerator as well as the denominator in (26) turns out to be much smaller as compared to unity. Moreover, the term in the denominator in the expression for the in-medium mass of given by (26) also turns out to be much smaller as compared to unity, with at a density of . Hence the smallness of this term as compared to unity is justified for the entire range of densities we are concerned with, in the present investigation. In order to read more into our solution, we expand the argument of the square root, in a binomial series (assuming and ), and retain up to only the first-order terms. This gives, as the approximate solution, Moreover, since at small densities, the range term contribution in the above equation approximately equals at low densities. The first of the terms in the approximate expression given by (27) is an increasing function while the second one is a decreasing function of density. Their interplay generates the observed curve shape, the repulsive contribution being responsible for the small hump in an otherwise linear fall, at small densities (). While the attractive term would have produced a linear decrease right away, the role of repulsive contribution is to impede this decrease, hence producing the hump. At moderately higher densities, however, the contribution from the second term outweighs the first, which is why we see a linear drop with density. This is observed to be the case, till around . At still larger densities, the approximation () breaks down, though our binomial expansion is still valid. Since scalar density falls slower than number density, the term will fall faster than . This is responsible for the change in slope of the curve at intermediate densities, where a linear fall with density is no longer obeyed. So, at intermediate and large densities, the manner of the variation is dictated by the scalar densities, in the range term. From (18) to (20), one would expect the mass modifications of mesons to be insensitive to isospin asymmetry, since, for example, in this nuclear matter case, the dispersion relation bears isospin symmetric terms like (). (This is in stark contrast with earlier treatments of kaons and antikaons [22, 23] as well as the mesons [28] within this effective model, where the dispersion relations had terms like () or (), which contributed to asymmetry.) However, the meson effective mass is observed to depend on asymmetry in Figure 1, though the dependence is weak. For example, the values of , for the isospin symmetric situation , are , , and  MeV, respectively, at , , and , while the corresponding numbers for the (completely) asymmetric situation are , , and  MeV, respectively, at . Since the -dependence of and contributions must be identical, one can reason from Figure 1 that this isospin dependence of meson effective mass is almost entirely due to the range term (~), which was expected to be isospin symmetric. This apparently counterintuitive behavior has been observed earlier in [29], in the context of mesons. This is because the value of () turns out to be different for symmetric and asymmetric situations, contrary to naive expectations. Since the scalar-isovector meson () is responsible for introducing isospin asymmetry in this effective hadronic model [51], owing to the equations of motion of the scalar fields being coupled, the values of the other scalar fields turn out to be different in the symmetric and asymmetric cases. The same is also reflected in the values of the scalar densities calculated from these scalar fields, which leads to the observed behavior.

Additionally, we observe from a comparison of Figures 1(a) and 1(b) that the magnitude of the meson mass drop decreases with an increase in temperature from to  MeV. For example, in the symmetric () situation, at , the meson mass values, at , , and , are 1913, 1865, and 1834 MeV, respectively, which grow to 1925, 1879, and 1848 MeV, respectively, at  MeV. Likewise, with , the corresponding values read 1917, 1875, and 1849 MeV at , while the same numbers, at  MeV, are 1925, 1883, and 1855 MeV. Thus, though small, there is a definite reduction in the magnitude of the mass drops, as we go from to  MeV, in each of these cases. This behavior can be understood, from the point of view of the temperature variation of scalar condensates, in the following manner. It is observed that the scalar fields decrease with an increase in temperature from to  MeV [27, 29]. In [27], the same effect was understood as an increase in the nucleon mass with temperature. The equity of the two arguments can be seen by invoking the expression relating the baryon mass to the scalar fields’ magnitude, [51]. The temperature dependence of the scalar fields (, , ) has been studied within the model in [29], which are observed to be different for the zero and finite baryon densities. At zero baryon density, the magnitudes of the scalar fields and are observed to remain almost constant up to a temperature of about 125 MeV, above which these are observed to decrease with temperature. This behaviour can be understood from the expression of given by (14) for the situation of zero density, that is, for , which decreases with increase in temperature. The temperature dependence of the scalar density in turn determines the behaviour of the scalar fields. The scalar fields which are solved from their equations of motion behave in a similar manner as the scalar density. At finite densities, that is, for nonzero values of the effective chemical potential, , however, the temperature dependence of the scalar density is quite different from the zero density situation. For finite baryon density, with increase in temperature, there are contributions also from higher momenta, thereby increasing the denominator of the integrand on the right-hand side of the baryon scalar density given by (14). This leads to a decrease in the scalar density. At finite baryon densities, the competing effects of the thermal distribution functions and the contributions from the higher momentum states give rise to the temperature dependence of the scalar density, which in turn determine the behaviour of the and fields with temperature. These scalar fields are observed to have an initial increase in their magnitudes up to a temperature of around 125–150 MeV, followed by a decrease as the temperature is further raised [29]. This kind of behavior of the scalar field on temperature at finite densities has also been observed in the Walecka model in [63]. In fact, we point out that a decrease in the scalar condensates with an increase in temperature, though small in the hadronic regime (<170 MeV), is well-known in general model-independent terms [64] and was also observed to be a consistent feature of all linear sigma models in the model-independent work of Röder et al. [48]. Since these scalar fields serve as an input in calculating the scalar densities [51], a decrease in the magnitude of the latter accompanies a decrease in the former, at larger temperatures. From the point of view of the dispersion relations, this results in a decrease in the coefficient and, owing to the inverse dependence of on , increases the value of in the finite temperature case, as compared to the situation. Or stating it differently, the difference of this , from the vacuum value, that is, the mass drop, decreases. Thus, from a physical viewpoint, since the origin of these mass drops is the attractive in-medium interactions, one can say that the reduction in the mass drop magnitudes is due to a weakening of the attractive strength of these in-medium interactions, represented in these models by a reduction in the quark condensates with increasing temperatures. Additionally, it is also observed from Figure 1 that isospin dependence of the meson mass, feeble anyways, weakens further with temperature. For example, as mentioned earlier, mass of the mesons at , for the and cases, is and  MeV, respectively (a difference of 15 MeV), when , which changes to 1848 and 1855 MeV at  MeV (a 7 MeV difference). This is, once again, due to a decrease in the magnitude of , with temperature, at any fixed value of the parameters and . In particular, the difference between the values of for the and cases is observed to decrease with temperature (as was shown explicitly in [29]). Since asymmetry is introduced through , a decrease in the difference of the values of , between symmetric and asymmetric situations, with temperature, follows naturally.

Next, we generalize our analysis by including hyperonic degrees of freedom as well, in the medium. However, as mentioned previously, in the ensuing discussion of mesons in hyperonic matter, we focus predominantly on the new physics arising via the introduction of strangeness in the medium, since, for example, the weak dependence on isospin asymmetry, or a weak reduction in the mass drop magnitudes at higher temperatures, has, in principle, the same explanation that stood in the nuclear matter context.

Figure 2 shows the variation of the in-medium mass of the mesons, along with the various individual contributions, in hyperonic medium as a function of baryonic density, for typical values of temperature, isospin asymmetry parameter, and strangeness fraction. The most drastic consequence of the inclusion of hyperons in the medium is that the mass degeneracy of and now stands broken. For example, the values of at , , , and are observed to be , , , and () MeV, respectively, as can be seen from the figure. Thus, except at vacuum (), mass difference of and is nonzero at finite , growing in magnitude with density. This mass degeneracy breaking is a direct consequence of nonzero contributions from the Weinberg-Tomozawa term, which follows from (11), (16), and (19). The same may be reconciled with Figure 2, from which it follows that, except for this Weinberg-Tomozawa term acquiring equal and opposite values for these mesons, all other terms are absolutely identical for them. Once again, on the basis of the following analysis of the meson dispersion relations at zero momentum, we insist that this observed behavior is perfectly consistent with expectations.

The general solution of the equivalent quadratic equation (17) is where we have disregarded the negative root and have performed a binomial expansion of , with . Upon feeding numerical values, we observe that the expansion parameter is much smaller than unity for our entire density variation, which justifies the validity of this expansion for our analysis. The same exercise also allows us to safely disregard higher-order terms and simply write Further, with the same justification as in the nuclear matter case, both and can also be expanded binomially. For example, for the second term, this gives where the contribution from these higher-order terms is smaller owing to the large denominator, prompting us to retain only the first-order terms. Here, we point out that since (+ sign for and − sign for ), this term, which represents the Weinberg-Tomozawa contribution to the dispersion relations, breaks the degeneracy of the mesons. On the other hand, the first term in (29) is common between and mesons. Thus, the general solution of the meson dispersion relations in the hyperonic matter context can be written as where

Thus, and (where is necessarily positive), which readily explains why the mass of drops more than that of , with density. Also, this formulation readily accounts for symmetric fall of the medium masses of and mesons, about in Figure 3. Trivially, it may also be deduced that is extinguished in nuclear matter, so that the mass degeneracy of and is recovered from these equations. However, we observe that though the curve corresponding to is exactly bisecting the masses of and at small densities, this bisection is no longer perfect at high densities. This can be understood in the following manner. In essence, we are comparing the density dependence of a function , with the functions . Since scalar densities fall sublinearly with the number density, it follows that the fall can not be absolutely symmetric at any arbitrary density. In fact, since a decreasing function of scalar density will fall faster than that of a number density, one expects to lean away from the curve for meson and towards the curve corresponding to , which is exactly what is observed in Figure 3.

Since this disparity between and originates from the Weinberg-Tomozawa term, whose magnitude is directly proportional to the hyperonic number densities, one expects this disparity to grow with an increase in the strangeness content of the medium. The same also follows from the above formulation, since the mass splitting between the two, , should grow with both at fixed (i.e., a larger proportion of hyperons) and at fixed (nonzero) (i.e., a larger hyperonic density), in accordance with (33). Naively, one expects this dependence to be shared by the two mesons; however, closer analysis reveals that this is not the case, as shown in Figure 4 where we consider the dependence of the meson medium mass. It is observed that while the dependence for meson is quite pronounced, the same for the is conspicuously subdued. Counterintuitive as it may apparently be, this observed behavior follows from the above formulation. Since , at any fixed density, the first of these is a decreasing function of , while the second increases with . These opposite tendencies are responsible for the weak dependence of meson. On the other hand, because , the two effects add up to produce a heightened overall decrease with for the meson, as we observe in the figure.

A comparison of these hyperonic matter solutions with the nuclear matter solutions is shown in Figure 5 for typical values of the parameters. It is observed from Figure 5(a) that, at small densities, the nuclear matter curve, which represents both and , bisects the mass degeneracy breaking curve, akin to in Figure 3. However, at larger densities, both of these curves drop further than the curve. From a casual comparison of expressions, it appears that the nuclear matter solution, given by (27), also enters the hyperonic matter solution, (32), albeit as a subset of . It is tempting to rearrange the latter then, such that this nuclear matter part is separated out, generating an expression of the type , which would also entail the segregation of the entire dependence. However, careful analysis reveals that it is impossible to achieve this kind of a relation, since, in spite of an identical expression, in hyperonic matter, the RHS of (27) does not give the nuclear matter solution. This is because the nuclear matter solution involves the scalar fields (and scalar densities computed using these scalar fields) obtained as a solution of coupled equations in the situation, which are radically different from the solutions obtained in the case. (This has been observed to be the case, in almost every treatment of hyperonic matter within this effective model but perhaps most explicitly in [46].) Thus, one can not retrieve the nuclear matter solution from the scalar fields obtained as solutions in the case; moreover, due to the complexity of the concerned equations, it is impossible to achieve a closed-form relation between the values of the scalar fields (and hence also the scalar densities) obtained in the two cases. In fact, the low-density similarity between Figures 3 and 5(a) might lead one to presume that reduces to at small densities. This expectation is fueled further by their comparison in Figure 5(b), which shows clearly that they coincide at small densities. However, in light of the above argument, it follows that they are absolutely unrelated. Their coincidence at small densities can be explained by invoking the relation in this regime, using which (32) reduces to with , with our choice of parameters, () , and with the difference term, . The contribution from this second term in (34) is significantly smaller than the first term at small densities, owing to the smaller coefficient, as well as the fact that this depends on the difference of densities rather than on their sum (like the first term). This first part of (34) can be likened to the approximate nuclear matter solution at small , as we concluded from (27). The marginal increase of above is compensated by a marginal increase in for the case, as compared to the situation, and hence the two curves look approximately the same at small densities in Figure 5(b). At larger densities, however, this simple picture breaks down, and the fact that they are unrelated becomes evident. Nevertheless, we may conclude in general from this comparison that the inclusion of hyperonic degrees of freedom in the hadronic medium makes it more attractive, regarding mesons’ in-medium interactions, especially at large . From the point of view of the meson dispersion relations, this is conclusively because of the contributions from the extra, hyperonic terms, which result in an overall increase of the coefficient significantly above , particularly at large .

Finally, we consider momentum-dependent effects by investigating the behavior of the in-medium optical potentials for the mesons. These are shown in Figure 6, where we consider them in the context of both asymmetric nuclear () and hyperonic matter (), as a function of momentum (=) at fixed values of the parameters , , and . As with the rest of the investigation, the dependence of the in-medium optical potentials on the parameters and is quite weak; hence, we neglect their variation in this context. In order to appreciate the observed behavior of these optical potentials, we observe that as per its definition, (21), at zero momentum, optical potential is just the negative of the mass drop of the respective meson (i.e., . It follows then that, at , the two mesons are degenerate in nuclear matter; moreover, it is observed that this degeneracy extends to the finite momentum regime. This is because, from (15) and (16), the finite momentum contribution is also common for and in nuclear matter. In hyperonic matter, however, nonzero contribution from these terms breaks the degeneracy in the limit (as was already discussed before), and finite momentum preserves this nondegeneracy. Consequently, at any fixed density, the curves for different values of differ in terms of their -intercept but otherwise appear to run parallel. Further, as we had reasoned earlier for the case, the effect of increasing on the mass drops of and is equal and opposite about the nuclear matter situation at small densities, which readily explains the behavior of optical potentials for these mesons at . At larger densities, for example, the case shown in Figure 6, the lower values of optical potentials for both and , as compared to the case, can be immediately reconciled with the behavior observed in Figure 5. In fact, the large difference between the optical potentials for the and cases, as compared to that for , is a by-product of their zero-momentum behavior, preserved at nonzero momenta as a consequence of (15) and (16).

We next discuss the possible implications of these medium effects. In the present investigation, we have observed a reduction in the mass of the mesons, with an increase in baryonic density. This decrease in meson mass can result in the opening up of extra reaction channels of the type in the hadronic medium. In fact, a comparison with the spectrum of known charmonium states [47, 65] sheds light on the possible decay channels, as shown in Figure 7. As a starting approximation, we have neglected the variation of energy levels of these charmonia with density, since we intuitively expect medium effects to be larger for (or ) system, as compared to system. However, this approximation can be conveniently relaxed, for example, as was done in [46, 66] for charmonia and bottomonia states, respectively. It follows from Figure 7 that above certain threshold density, which is given by the intersection of the meson curve with the respective energy level, the mass of the pair is smaller than that of the excited charmonium state. Hence, this decay channel opens up above this threshold density. The most immediate experimental consequence of this effect would be a decrease in the production yields for these excited charmonia in collision experiments. Additionally, since an extra decay mode will lower the lifetime of the state, one expects the decay widths of these excited charmonia to be modified as a result of these extra channels. Though it can be reasoned right away that reduction in lifetime would cause a broadening of the resonance curve, more exotic effects can also result from these level crossings. For example, it has been suggested in [67] that if the internal structure of the hadrons is also accounted for, there is even a possibility for these in-medium widths to become narrow. This counterintuitive result originates from the node structure of the charmonium wavefunction, which can even create a possibility for the decay widths to vanish completely at certain momenta of the daughter particles. Also, if the medium modifications of the charmonium states are accounted for, the decay widths will be modified accordingly (as was observed in the context of the mesons, in [46]).

Apart from this, one expects signatures of these medium effects to be reflected in the particle ratio (). A production asymmetry between and mesons might be anticipated owing to their unequal medium masses, as observed in the current investigation. Also, due to the semileptonic and leptonic decay modes of the mesons [47], one also expects that, accompanying an increased production of mesons due to a lowered mass, there would be an enhancement in dilepton production as well. Further, we expect these medium modifications of the mesons to be reflected in the observed dilepton spectra, due to the well-known fact that dileptons, with their small interaction cross section in hadronic matter, can serve as probes of medium effects in collision experiments [68, 69]. The attractive interaction of the mesons with the hadronic medium might also lead to the possibility of formation of -nucleus bound state, which can be explored at the CBM experiment at FAIR in the future facility at GSI [70].

We now discuss how the results of the present investigation compare with the available literature on the medium effects for pseudoscalar mesons. As has already been mentioned, [4245] have treated the medium behavior of mesons, using the coupled channel framework. The broad perspective that emerges from all these analyses is that of an attractive interaction in the medium [44, 45] between mesons and baryon species like the nucleons or the hyperons [4245], which is consistent with what we have observed in this work. Additionally, one observes in these approaches an attractive medium interaction even with the charmed baryons [43]. Some of these interaction channels also feature resonances, which is reflected in the relevant scattering amplitudes picking up imaginary parts as well, for example, the state in the channel [42, 43]. Treating such resonances comes naturally to the coupled channel framework, since, by default, the strategy is aimed at considering the scattering of various hadron species off one another and assessing scattering amplitudes and cross sections, and so forth [10, 11]. In the present work, we have investigated the in-medium masses of the mesons arising due to their interactions with the baryons and scalar mesons in the nuclear (hyperonic) medium and have not studied the decays of these mesons. As has already been mentioned the mass modifications of the mesons can lead to opening up of the new channels for the charmonium states decaying to at certain densities as can be seen from Figure 7. In fact, even if one contemplates working along the lines of [46] for calculating these decay widths, the situation is a bit more complicated for these mesons, since the states , , and , which are highly relevant in this context (as one can see from Figure 7), are not classified as having clear, definite quantum numbers in the spectrum of excited charmonium states [47]. This makes the assessment of medium effects for these states more difficult in comparison, since the identification of the relevant charmonium states with definite quantum numbers in the charmonium spectrum, such as for , for , and for , was a crucial requirement for evaluating their mass shifts in the medium in the QCD second-order Stark effect study in [46]. For some of these unconventional states, for example, , this absence of definite identification with states in the spectrum has led to alternative possibilities being explored for these states. A prominent example is the possibility of a molecular structure for this state [65], borne out of contributions from the and components in the -wave.

Lastly, we point out that the medium effects described in this paper, and the possible experimental consequences entailed by these, are especially interesting in wake of the upcoming CBM [70] experiment at FAIR, GSI, where high baryonic densities are expected to be reached. Due to the strong density dependence of these medium effects, we expect that each of these mentioned experimental consequences would intensify at higher densities and should be palpable in the aforementioned future experiment.

5. Summary

To summarize, we have explored the properties of mesons in a hot and dense hadronic environment, within the framework of the chiral model, generalized to . The generalization of chiral model to is done in order to derive the interactions of the charmed mesons with the light hadrons, needed for the study of the in-medium properties of the mesons in the present work. However, realizing that the chiral symmetry is badly broken for the case due to the large mass of the charm quark, we use the interactions derived from for the meson but use the observed masses of these heavy pseudoscalar mesons as well as empirical/observed values of their decay constants [30]. The mesons have been considered in both (symmetric and asymmetric) nuclear and hyperonic matter, at finite densities that extend slightly beyond what can be achieved with the existing and known future facilities and at both zero and finite temperatures. Due to net attractive interactions in the medium, mesons are observed to undergo a drop in their effective mass. These mass drops are found to intensify with an increase in the baryonic density of the medium, while being largely insensitive to changes in temperature as well as the isospin asymmetry parameter. However, upon adding hyperonic degrees of freedom, the mass degeneracy of and is observed to be broken. The mass splitting between and is found to grow significantly with an increase in baryonic density as well as the strangeness content of the medium. Through a detailed analysis of the in-medium dispersion relations for the mesons, we have shown that the observed behavior follows precisely from the interplay of contributions from various interaction terms in the Lagrangian density. We have briefly discussed the possible experimental consequences of these medium effects, for example, in the ratio, dilepton spectra, possibility of formation of exotic -nucleus bound states, and modifications of the decays of charmonium states pair in the hadronic medium. The medium modifications of the mesons are expected to be considerably enhanced at large densities and hence the experimental consequences may be accessible in the upcoming CBM experiment, at the future facilities of FAIR, GSI [70].

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Divakar Pathak acknowledges financial support from University Grants Commission, India (Sr. no. 2121051124, Ref. no. 19-12/2010(i)EU-IV). Amruta Mishra would like to thank Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (Project no. SR/S2/HEP-031/2010), for financial support.

References

  1. W. Weise, “Quarks, hadrons and dense nuclear matter,” in Trends in Nuclear Physics, 100 Years Later 1996: Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School, Session LXVI, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  2. C. M. Ko, V. Koch, and G. Li, “Properties of hadrons in the nuclear medium,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 505–539, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. S. Hayano and T. Hatsuda, “Hadron properties in the nuclear medium,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 2949–2990, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Tsushima, D. H. Lu, A. W. Thomas, K. Saito, and R. H. Landau, “Charmed mesic nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 59, no. Article ID 2824, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. Sibirtsev, K. Tsushima, and A. W. Thomas, “On studying charm in nuclei through antiproton annihilation,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 351–359, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, “Recent progress in quantum hadrodynamics,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 515–631, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and resonance physics. Theoretical foundations,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 385–447, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and resonance physics. Applications,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 448–518, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Shifman, “Snapshots of Hadrons,” Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, no. 131, p. 1, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. A. Oller, E. Oset, and J. R. Peláez, “Nonperturbative approach to effective chiral lagrangians and meson interactions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 16, article 3452, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. Oset and A. Ramos, “Non-perturbative chiral approach to s-wave K-N interactions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 635, no. 1-2, pp. 99–120, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Bando, T. Kugo, and K. Yamawaki, “Nonlinear realization and hidden local symmetries,” Physics Reports, vol. 164, no. 4-5, pp. 217–314, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  13. U.-G. Meissner, “Low-energy hadron physics from effective chiral Lagrangians with vector mesons,” Physics Reports, vol. 161, no. 5-6, pp. 213–361, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Neubert, “Heavy-quark symmetry,” Physics Reports, vol. 245, no. 5-6, pp. 259–395, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Manohar and M. Wise, Heavy Quark Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
  16. E. Oset, A. Ramos, E. J. Garzon et al., “Interaction of vector mesons with baryons and nuclei,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 21, no. 11, Article ID 1230011, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Tolos, “Charming mesons with baryons and nuclei,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 22, no. 11, Article ID 1330027, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. García-Recio, V. K. Magas, T. Mizutani et al., “s-wave charmed baryon resonances from a coupled-channel approach with heavy quark symmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 5, Article ID 054004, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Gamermann, C. García-Recio, J. Nieves, L. L. Salcedo, and L. Tolos, “Exotic dynamically generated baryons with negative charm quantum number,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 9, Article ID 094016, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. García-Recio, J. Nieves, O. Romanets, L. L. Salcedo, and L. Tolos, “Hidden charm N and Δ resonances with heavy-quark symmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 7, Article ID 074034, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. H. Rischke, “The quark-gluon plasma in equilibrium,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 197–296, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Mishra, A. Kumar, S. Sanyal, and S. Schramm, “Kaon and antikaon optical potentials in isospin asymmetric hyperonic matter,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 205–213, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Mishra, A. Kumar, S. Sanyal, V. Dexheimer, and S. Schramm, “Kaon properties in (proto-)neutron star matter,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 169–177, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Mishra and S. Schramm, “Isospin dependent kaon and antikaon optical potentials in dense hadronic matter,” Physical Review C, vol. 74, no. 6, Article ID 064904, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Mishra, S. Schramm, and W. Greiner, “Kaons and antikaons in asymmetric nuclear matter,” Physical Review C, vol. 78, no. 2, Article ID 024901, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. Gamermann, E. Oset, D. Strottman, and M. J. V. Vacas, “Dynamically generated open and hidden charm meson systems,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 7, Article ID 074016, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Mishra, E. L. Bratkovskaya, J. Schaffner-Bielich, S. Schramm, and H. Stöcker, “Mass modification of D meson in hot hadronic matter,” Physical Review C, vol. 69, Article ID 015202, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Mishra and A. Mazumdar, “D mesons in asymmetric nuclear matter,” Physical Review C, vol. 79, no. 2, Article ID 024908, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Kumar and A. Mishra, “D mesons and charmonium states in asymmetric nuclear matter at finite temperatures,” Physical Review C, vol. 81, no. 6, Article ID 065204, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. Liu, C. M. Ko, and Z. W. Lin, “Cross section for charmonium absorption by nucleons,” Physical Review C, vol. 65, no. 1, Article ID 015203, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. He, R. J. Fries, and R. Rapp, “Ds meson as a quantitative probe of diffusion and hadronization in nuclear collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, no. 11, Article ID 112301, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, “New heavy mesons as hadronic molecules,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 127–132, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Liu, “The theoretical review of excited D/Ds mesons,” International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2, p. 147, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  34. F. Close, “Strange days,” Nature, vol. 424, no. 6947, pp. 376–377, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. A. Simonov and J. A. Tjon, “Coupled-channel analysis of the D and Ds mesons,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 11, Article ID 114013, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. P. Wang and X. G. Wang, “Study of 0+ states with open charm in the unitarized heavy meson chiral approach,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 014030, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, and H.-C. Chiang, “Dynamically generated 1+ heavy mesons,” Physics Letters B, vol. 647, no. 2-3, pp. 133–139, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. Molina, T. Branz, and E. Oset, “New interpretation for the D*s2(2573) and the prediction of novel exotic charmed mesons,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 1, Article ID 014010, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Molina, E. Oset, T. Branz, J. J. Wu, and B. S. Zou, “A molecular interpretation for the Ds2*(2573), the prediction of novel exotic charmed mesons and narrow N*,Λ* resonances around 4.3 GeV,” International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2, p. 153, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  40. E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, “Multichannel calculation of Ds* vector states and the DsJ+ (2632) resonance,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 20, Article ID 202001, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y.-Q. Chen and X.-Q. Li, “Comprehensive four-quark interpretation of Ds(2317), Ds(2457), and Ds(2632),” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 23, Article ID 232001, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. F. M. Lutz and C. L. Korpa, “Open-charm systems in cold nuclear matter,” Physics Letters B, vol. 633, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, “Coupled-channel study of crypto-exotic baryons with charm,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 763, no. 1–4, pp. 90–139, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C. E. Jiménez-Tejero, A. Ramos, and I. Vidaña, “Dynamically generated open-charm baryons beyond the zero-range approximation,” Physical Review C, vol. 80, no. 5, Article ID 055206, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. E. Jiménez-Tejero, A. Ramos, L. Tolós, and I. Vidaña, “Open-charm mesons in nuclear matter at finite temperature beyond the zero-range approximation,” Physical Review C, vol. 84, no. 1, Article ID 015208, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Kumar and A. Mishra, “D-mesons and charmonium states in hot isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 47, article 164, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. Particle Data Group, “Review of particle physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 010001, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  48. D. Röder, J. Ruppert, and D. H. Rischke, “Chiral symmetry restoration in linear sigma models with different numbers of quark flavors,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 1, Article ID 016003, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. D. Pathak and A. Mishra, “Open bottom mesons in a hot asymmetric hadronic medium,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, Article ID 045206, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  50. D. Pathak and A. Mishra, “Bottom-strange mesons in hyperonic matter,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 23, no. 11, Article ID 1450073, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. Papazoglou, D. Zschiesche, S. Schramm, J. Schaffner-Bielich, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, “Nuclei in a chiral SU(3) model,” Physical Review C, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 411–427, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. D. Zschiesche, P. Papazoglou, S. Schramm et al., “Chiral symmetries in nuclear physics,” in Symmetries in Intermediate and High Energy Physics, vol. 163 of Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, pp. 129–167, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. Weinberg, “Dynamical approach to current algebra,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 188–191, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S. Weinberg, “Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry,” Physical Review, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 1568–1577, 1968. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, “Structure of phenomenological lagrangians. I,” Physical Review, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 2239–2247, 1969. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. C. G. Callan, S. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, “Structure of phenomenological lagrangians. II,” Physical Review, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 2247–2250, 1969. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. W. A. Bardeen and B. W. Lee, “Some considerations on nonlinear realizations of chiral SU3×SU3,” Physical Review, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 2389–2397, 1969. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. Y. Aoki, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabó, “The order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics,” Nature, vol. 443, no. 7112, pp. 675–678, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. C. Bernard, T. Burch, C. DeTar et al., “QCD thermodynamics with three flavors of improved staggered quarks,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 034504, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, M. Cheng et al., “Chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 054503, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. Mishra, K. Balazs, D. Zschiesche, S. Schramm, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, “Effects of Dirac sea polarization on hadronic properties: a chiral SU(3) approach,” Physical Review C, vol. 69, Article ID 024903, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. D. Zschiesche, A. Mishra, S. Schramm, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, “In-medium vector meson masses in a chiral SU(3) model,” Physical Review C, vol. 70, no. 4, Article ID 045202, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. G. Q. Li, C. M. Ko, and G. E. Brown, “Effects of in-medium vector meson masses on low-mass dileptons from SPS heavy-ion collisions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 606, no. 3-4, pp. 568–606, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. P. Gerber and H. Leutwyler, “Hadrons below the chiral phase transition,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 321, no. 2, pp. 387–429, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. B. Voloshin, “Charmonium,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 455–511, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. Mishra and D. Pathak, “Bottomonium states in hot asymmetric strange hadronic matter,” Physical Review C, vol. 90, no. 2, Article ID 025201, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. B. Friman, S. H. Lee, and T. Song, “D mesons in matter and the in-medium properties of charmonium,” Physics Letters B, vol. 548, no. 3-4, pp. 153–160, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. R. Vogt, Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions, Elsevier, 2007.
  69. G. Q. Li and C. M. Ko, “Can dileptons reveal the in-medium properties of vector mesons?” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 582, no. 3-4, pp. 731–748, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. B. Friman, C. Höhne, J. Knoll et al., Eds., The CBM Physics Book, vol. 814 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010.

Copyright © 2015 Divakar Pathak and Amruta Mishra. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

553 Views | 269 Downloads | 5 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.