Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2015, Article ID 840780, 126 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/840780
Review Article

Exploring New Models in All Detail with SARAH

Theory Division, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

Received 13 March 2015; Accepted 7 July 2015

Academic Editor: Gordon Kane

Copyright © 2015 Florian Staub. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. P. Ramond, “Dual theory for free fermions,” Physical Review D, vol. 3, pp. 2415–2418, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Supergauge transformations in four dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. B70, pp. 39–50, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov, “Is the neutrino a goldstone particle?” Physics Letters B, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 109–110, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Weinberg, “Implications of dynamical symmetry breaking,” Physical Review D, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 974–996, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Weinberg, “Implications of dynamical symmetry breaking: an addendum,” Physical Review D, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1277–1280, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. H. Goldberg, “Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 1419–1422, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. Olive, and M. Srednicki, “Supersymmetric relics from the big bang,” Nuclear Physics, Section B, vol. 238, no. 2, pp. 453–476, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Drees and M. M. Nojiri, “Neutralino relic density in minimal N=1 supergravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 47, pp. 376–408, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and F. Wilczek, “Supersymmetry and the scale of unification,” Physical Review D, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1681–1683, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. E. Ibanez and G. G. Ross, “Low-energy predictions in supersymmetric grand unified theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 439–442, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. W. J. Marciano and G. Senjanović, “Predictions of supersymmetric grand unified theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 3092–3095, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Einhorn and D. Jones, “The weak mixing angle and unification mass in supersymmetric SU(5),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 475–488, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, and H. Furstenau, “Comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at LEP,” Physics Letters B, vol. 260, no. 3-4, pp. 447–455, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Langacker and M.-X. Luo, “Implications of precision electroweak experiments for mt, ρ0, sin2θw, and grand unification,” Physical Review D, vol. 44, pp. 817–822, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. R. Ellis, S. Kelley, and D. V. Nanopoulos, “Probing the desert using gauge coupling unification,” Physics Letters B, vol. 260, no. 1-2, pp. 131–137, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. P. Martin, “Two-loop effective potential for a general renormalizable theory and softly broken supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 11, Article ID 116003, 20 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. L. E. Ibanez and G. G. Ross, “SU(2)L×U(1) symmetry breaking as a radiative effect of supersymmetry breaking in GUTs,” Physics Letters B, vol. 110, pp. 215–220, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. E. Witten, “Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 513–554, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. E. Witten, “Constraints on supersymmetry breaking,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. B202, no. 2, pp. 253–316, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. L. Hall, J. Lykken, and S. Weinberg, “Supergravity as the messenger of supersymmetry breaking,” Physical Review D, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2359–2378, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. P. Nilles, “Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics,” Physics Reports, vol. 110, no. 1-2, pp. 1–162, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. L. Alvarez-Gaume, J. Polchinski, and M. B. Wise, “Minimal low-energy supergravity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 495–523, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. G. L. Kane, C. Kolda, L. Roszkowski, and J. D. Wells, “Study of constrained minimal supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, no. 11, article 6173, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Dine, A. E. Nelson, Y. Nir, and Y. Shirman, “New tools for low energy dynamical supersymmetry breaking,” Physical Review D, vol. 53, pp. 2658–2669, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. Dine, A. E. Nelson, and Y. Shirman, “Low-energy dynamical supersymmetry breaking simplified,” Physical Review D, vol. 51, pp. 1362–1370, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. G. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, “Theories with gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking,” Physics Reports, vol. 322, no. 6, pp. 419–499, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “Out of this world supersymmetry breaking,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 557, no. 1-2, pp. 79–118, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 30–61, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. G. Aad, T. Abajyanm, B. Abbott et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, “The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Physics Reports, vol. 496, no. 1-2, pp. 1–77, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, “The upper bound on the lightest Higgs mass in the NMSSM revisited,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 1581–1590, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. E. Ma, “Exceeding the MSSM Higgs mass bound in a special class of U(1) gauge models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 705, no. 4, pp. 320–323, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. Y. Zhang, H. An, X.-D. Ji, and R. N. Mohapatra, “Light Higgs mass bound in supersymmetric left-right models,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 011302, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. Hirsch, M. Malinsky, W. Porod, L. Reichert, and F. Staub, “Hefty MSSM-like light Higgs in extended gauge models,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 2, article 84, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. H. K. Dreiner, M. Kramer, and J. Tattersall, “How low can SUSY go? Matching, monojets and compressed spectra,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 99, aritlce 6, Article ID 61001, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. B. Bhattacherjee, J. L. Evans, M. Ibe, S. Matsumoto, and T. T. Yanagida, “Natural supersymmetry’s last hope: R-parity violation via UDD operators,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 11, Article ID 115002, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. S. Kim, K. Rolbiecki, K. Sakurai, and J. Tattersall, “‘Stop’ that ambulance! New physics at the LHC?” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 12, article 10, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. G. F. Giudice, T. Han, K. Wang, and L.-T. Wang, “Nearly degenerate gauginos and dark matter at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, Article ID 115011, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. S. Gori, S. Jung, and L.-T. Wang, “Cornering electroweakinos at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 10, article 191, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. C. Han, A. Kobakhidze, N. Liu, A. Saavedra, L. Wu, and J. M. Yang, “Probing light higgsinos in natural SUSY from monojet signals at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 2, article 49, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  41. P. Schwaller and J. Zurita, “Compressed electroweakino spectra at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 3, article 060, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. H. Baer, A. Mustafayev, and X. Tata, “Monojets and monophotons from light Higgsino pair production at LHC14,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 5, Article ID 055007, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. Z. Han, G. D. Kribs, A. Martin, and A. Menon, “Hunting quasidegenerate Higgsinos,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 7, Article ID 075007, 18 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. Bramante, A. Delgado, F. Elahi, A. Martin, and B. Ostdiek, “Catching sparks from well-forged neutralinos,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 9, Article ID 095008, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. C. Han, L. Wu, J. M. Yang, M. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “New approach for detecting a compressed bino/wino at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, Article ID 055030, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. H. Baer, A. Mustafayev, and X. Tata, “Monojet plus soft dilepton signal from light higgsino pair production at LHC14,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 11, Article ID 115007, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. S. Gori, S. Jung, L.-T. Wang, and J. D. Wells, “Prospects for electroweakino discovery at a 100 TeV hadron collider,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 12, article 108, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. J. Bramante, P. J. Fox, A. Martin et al., “Relic neutralino surface at a 100 TeV collider,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, Article ID 054015, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. C. Han, D. Kim, S. Munir, and M. Park, “Accessing the core of naturalness, nearly degenerate higgsinos, at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 4, article 132, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, “Updated fit to three neutrino mixing: status of leptonic CP violation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, article 52, p. 1411, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. J. Hisano, M. M. Nojiri, Y. Shimizu, and M. Tanaka, “Lepton-flavor violation in the left-handed slepton production at future lepton colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, Article ID 055008, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. A. Rossi, “Supersymmetric seesaw mechanism without singlet neutrinos: neutrino masses and lepton-flavor violation,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, Article ID 075003, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. M. R. Buckley and H. Murayama, “How can we test the neutrino mass seesaw mechanism experimentally?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, no. 23, Article ID 231801, 4 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. M. Hirsch, S. Kaneko, and W. Porod, “Supersymmetric type-II seesaw mechanism: CERN LHC and lepton flavor violating phenomenology,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 093004, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. M. Hirsch, J. W. F. Valle, W. Porod, J. C. Romao, and A. V. del Moral, “Probing minimal supergravity in the type-I seesaw mechanism with lepton flavor violation at the CERN LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 013006, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. F. Borzumati and T. Yamashita, “Minimal supersymmetric SU(5) model with nonrenormalizable operators seesaw mechanism and violation of flavour and CP,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 761–868, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. J. Esteves, J. Romao, A. Villanova del, M. Moral, J. Valle et al., “Flavour violation at the LHC: type-I versus type-II seesaw in minimal supergravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, article 3, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. J. Esteves, J. C. Romao, M. Hirsch, F. Staub, and W. Porod, “Supersymmetric type-III seesaw mechanism: Lepton flavor violating decays and dark matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 013003, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. M. Malinsky, J. Romao, and J. Valle, “Supersymmetric SO(10) seesaw mechanism with low B-L scale,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, Article ID 161801, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. A. Abada, D. Das, A. Vicente, and C. Weiland, “Enhancing lepton flavour violation in the supersymmetric inverse seesaw beyond the dipole contribution,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 9, article 15, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. P. S. B. Dev, S. Mondal, B. Mukhopadhyaya, and S. Roy, “Phenomenology of light sneutrino dark matter in cMSSM/mSUGRA with inverse seesaw,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 9, article 110, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. A. Abada, M. E. Krauss, W. Porod, F. Staub, A. Vicente, and C. Weiland, “Lepton flavor violation in low-scale seesaw models: SUSY and non-SUSY contributions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 11, article 48, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 38, no. 25, pp. 1440–1443, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. L. Covi, H.-B. Kim, J. E. Kim, and L. Roszkowski, “Axinos as dark matter,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2001, no. 5, article 033, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. H. B. Kim and J. E. Kim, “Late decaying axino as CDM and its lifetime bound,” Physics Letters B, vol. 527, no. 1-2, pp. 18–22, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. L. Covi and J. E. Kim, “Axinos as dark matter particles,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 11, Article ID 105003, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. K.-Y. Choi, L. Covi, J. E. Kim, and L. Roszkowski, “Axino cold dark matter revisited,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 4, article 106, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. K. J. Bae, E. J. Chun, and S. H. Im, “Cosmology of the DFSZ axino,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2012, no. 3, article 013, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. K. J. Bae, K. Choi, and S. H. Im, “Effective interactions of axion supermultiplet and thermal production of axino dark matter,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 8, article 65, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  70. A. Strumia, “Thermal production of axino dark matter,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 6, article 36, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, “A simple solution to the strong CP problem with a harmless axion,” Physics Letters B, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 199–202, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. A. Zhitnitsky, “On possible suppression of the axion hadron interactions,” Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 31, pp. 260–263, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  73. H. K. Dreiner, F. Staub, and L. Ubaldi, “From the unification scale to the weak scale: a self consistent supersymmetric Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky axion model,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, Article ID 055016, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. J. E. Kim and H. P. Nilles, “The μ-problem and the strong CP-problem,” Physics Letters B, vol. 138, no. 1–3, pp. 150–154, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. P. Athron, S. King, D. Miller, S. Moretti, and R. Nevzorov, “Predictions of the constrained exceptional supersymmetric standard model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 681, no. 5, pp. 448–456, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. P. Athron, S. King, D. Miller, S. Moretti, and R. Nevzorov, “Constrained exceptional supersymmetric standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 035009, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. C. Arbelaez, R. M. Fonseca, M. Hirsch, and J. C. Romao, “Supersymmetric SO(10)-inspired GUTs with sliding scales,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 7, Article ID 075010, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. C. Arbelez, M. Hirsch, M. Malinsk, and J. C. Romo, “LHC-scale left-right symmetry and unification,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 3, Article ID 035002, 19 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. P. Fayet, “Massive gluinos,” Physics Letters B, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 417–420, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. J. Polchinski and L. Susskind, “Breaking of supersymmetry at intermediate energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3661–3673, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. L. Hall and L. Randall, “U(1)R symmetric supersymmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 352, no. 2, pp. 289–308, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. P. J. Fox, A. E. Nelson, and N. Weiner, “Dirac gaugino masses and supersoft supersymmetry breaking,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, no. 8, article 035, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  83. A. E. Nelson, N. Rius, V. Sanz, and M. Unsal, “The minimal supersymmetric model without a μ term,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, no. 8, article 039, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. I. Antoniadis, A. Delgado, K. Benakli, M. Quirós, and M. Tuckmantel, “Splitting extended supersymmetry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 634, no. 2-3, pp. 302–306, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli, A. Delgado, and M. Quiros, “A new Gauge mediation theory,” Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics, vol. 2, pp. 645–672, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  86. S. D. L. Amigo, A. E. Blechman, P. J. Fox, and E. Poppitz, “R-symmetric gauge mediation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 1, article 018, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  87. T. Plehn and T. M. Tait, “Seeking sgluons,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 36, no. 7, Article ID 075001, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. K. Benakli and M. D. Goodsell, “Dirac gauginos in general gauge mediation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 816, no. 1-2, pp. 185–203, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  89. G. Belanger, K. Benakli, M. Goodsell, C. Moura, and A. Pukhov, “Dark matter with Dirac and Majorana gaugino masses,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2009, no. 8, article 027, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. K. Benakli and M. Goodsell, “Dirac gauginos and kinetic mixing,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 830, no. 1-2, pp. 315–329, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  91. S. Y. Choi, J. Kalinowski, J. M. Kim, and E. Popenda, “Scalar gluons and dirac gluinos at the LHC,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 2913–2922, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. K. Benakli and M. D. Goodsell, “Dirac gauginos, gauge mediation and unification,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 840, no. 1-2, pp. 1–28, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  93. S. Y. Choi, D. Choudhury, A. Freitas, J. Kalinowski, J. M. Kim, and P. M. Zerwas, “Dirac neutralinos and electroweak scalar bosons of N=1/N=2 hybrid supersymmetry at colliders,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 8, article 025, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. L. M. Carpenter, “Dirac gauginos, negative supertraces and gauge mediation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 9, article 102, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  95. G. D. Kribs, T. Okui, and T. S. Roy, “Viable gravity-mediated supersymmetry breaking,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 11, Article ID 115010, 11 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. S. Abel and M. Goodsell, “Easy Dirac gauginos,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 6, article 064, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. R. Davies, J. March-Russell, and M. McCullough, “A supersymmetric one Higgs doublet model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, article 108, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  98. K. Benakli, “Dirac gauginos: a user manual,” Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 59, no. 11-12, pp. 1079–1082, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. K. Benakli, M. D. Goodsell, and A.-K. Maier, “Generating μ and Bμ in models with Dirac gauginos,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 851, no. 3, pp. 445–461, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  100. J. Kalinowski, “Higgs bosons of R-symmetric supersymmetric theories,” Proceedings of Science. In press.
  101. C. Frugiuele and T. Gregoire, “Making the sneutrino a Higgs particle with a U(1)R lepton number,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 1, Article ID 015016, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. H. Itoyama and N. Maru, “D-term dynamical supersymmetry breaking generating split N=2 gaugino masses of mixed Majorana-Dirac type,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 27, no. 6, Article ID 1250159, 12 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. K. Rehermann and C. M. Wells, “Weak scale leptogenesis, R-symmetry, and a displaced Higgs,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0008.
  104. E. Bertuzzo and C. Frugiuele, “Fitting neutrino physics with a U(1)R lepton number,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 5, article 100, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. R. Davies, “Dirac gauginos and unification in F-theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 10, article 10, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. R. Argurio, M. Bertolini, L. Di Pietro, F. Porri, and D. Redigolo, “Holographic correlators for general gauge mediation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 8, article 86, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. R. Fok, G. D. Kribs, A. Martin, and Y. Tsai, “Electroweak baryogenesis in R-symmetric supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 5, Article ID 055018, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. R. Argurio, M. Bertolini, L. Di Pietro, F. Porri, and D. Redigolo, “Exploring holographic general gauge mediation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 10, article 179, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  109. C. Frugiuele, T. Grégoire, P. Kumar, and E. Ponton, “‘L=R-U(1)R as the origin of leptonic ‘RPV’,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 3, article 156, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. C. Frugiuele, T. Grégoire, P. Kumar, and E. Ponton, “‘L=R-U(1)R lepton number at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 5, article 12, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. K. Benakli, M. D. Goodsell, and F. Staub, “Dirac gauginos and the 125 GeV higgs,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 6, article 073, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  112. H. Itoyama and N. Maru, “D-term triggered dynamical supersymmetry breaking,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 2, Article ID 025012, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. S. Chakraborty and S. Roy, “Higgs boson mass, neutrino masses and mixing and keV dark matter in an U(1)R—lepton number model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 1, article 101, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. C. Csaki, J. Goodman, R. Pavesi, and Y. Shirman, “The mD-bM problem of Dirac gauginos and its solutions,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 5, Article ID 055005, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. H. Itoyama and N. Maru, “126 GeV Higgs boson associated with D-term triggered dynamical supersymmetry breaking,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4157.
  116. H. Beauchesne and T. Gregoire, “Electroweak precision measurements in supersymmetric models with a U(1)R lepton number,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 5, article 051, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  117. K. Benakli, “(Pseudo)goldstinos, SUSY fluids, Dirac gravitino and gauginos,” EPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 71, Article ID 00012, 18 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. E. Bertuzzo, C. Frugiuele, T. Grégoire, and E. Pontón, “Dirac gauginos, R symmetry and the 125 GeV Higgs,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 4, article 089, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. D. S. M. Alves, J. Galloway, M. McCullough, and N. Weiner, “Goldstone gauginos,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03819.
  120. M. Heikinheimo, M. Kellerstein, and V. Sanz, “How many supersymmetries?” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 4, article 43, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  121. G. D. Kribs and A. Martin, “Supersoft supersymmetry is super-safe,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 115014, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. D. S. M. Alves, J. Liu, and N. Weiner, “Hiding missing energy in missing energy,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 4, article 088, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  123. G. D. Kribs, E. Poppitz, and N. Weiner, “Flavor in supersymmetry with an extended R symmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 055010, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  124. R. Fok, “Expected limits on R-symmetric μe processes at project X,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.6558.
  125. E. Dudas, M. Goodsell, L. Heurtier, and P. Tziveloglou, “Flavour models with Dirac and fake gluinos,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 884, pp. 632–671, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  126. H. Baer, C.-H. Chen, R. B. Munroe, F. E. Paige, and X. Tata, “Multichannel search for minimal supergravity at pp- and e+e- colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 51, pp. 1046–1050, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  127. H. Baer, F. E. Paige, S. D. Protopopescu, and X. Tata, “ISAJET 7.69: a Monte Carlo event generator for pp, p-p, and e=e- reactions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0312045.
  128. H. Baer, C. Balazs, A. Belyaev, R. Dermisek, A. Mafi, and A. Mustafayev, “Study of viable models with non-universal gaugino mediation with CompHEP and ISAJET,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, vol. 502, no. 2-3, pp. 560–563, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  129. H. Baer, F. E. Paige, S. D. Protopopescu, and X. Tata, “ISAJET 7.48: a Monte Carlo event generator for pp, p-p, and e+e- interactions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0001086.
  130. F. E. Paige, S. D. Proto pescu, H. Baer, and X. Tata, “ISAJET 7.40: a Monte Carlo event generator for pp, p-p, and e+e- reactions,” http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9810440.
  131. F. E. Paige, S. D. Protopopescu, H. Baer, and X. Tata, “ISAJET 7.37: a Monte Carlo event generator for pp, p-p, and e+e- interactions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9804321.
  132. H. Baer, F. E. Paige, S. D. Protopopescu, and X. Tata, “Simulating supersymmetry with ISAJET 7.0/ ISASUSY 1,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9305342.
  133. A. Djouadi, J.-L. Kneur, and G. Moultaka, “SuSpect: a fortran code for the supersymmetric and higgs particle spectrum in the MSSM,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 176, no. 6, pp. 426–455, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. B. C. Allanach, “SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 305–331, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. B. Allanach and M. Bernhardt, “Including R-parity violation in the numerical computation of the spectrum of the minimal supersymmetric standard model: SOFTSUSY3.0,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 232–245, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. B. Allanach, A. Bednyakov, and R. Ruiz de Austri, “Higher order corrections and unification in the minimal supersymmetric standard model: SOFTSUSY3.5.0,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 189, pp. 192–206, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  137. W. Porod, “SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+e- colliders,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 275–315, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  138. W. Porod and F. Staub, “SPheno 3.1: extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 11, pp. 2458–2469, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, “FeynHiggs: a program for the calculation of the masses of the neutral C-even Higgs bosons in the MSSM,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 76–89, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  140. T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, and G. Weiglein, “FeynHiggs: a program for the calculation of MSSM Higgs-boson observables—version 2.6.5,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 180, no. 8, pp. 1426–1427, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. F. Staub, “Sarah,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0538.
  142. F. Staub, “From superpotential to model files for FeynArts and CalcHep/CompHep,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 181, no. 6, pp. 1077–1086, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  143. F. Staub, “Automatic calculation of supersymmetric renormalization group equations and loop corrections,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 808–833, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. F. Staub, “SARAH 3.2: dirac gauginos, UFO output, and more,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 7, pp. 1792–1809, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. F. Staub, “SARAH 4: a tool for (not only SUSY) model builders,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 185, no. 6, pp. 1773–1790, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. W. Porod, F. Staub, and A. Vicente, “A flavor kit for BSM models,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, no. 8, article 2992, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  147. M. D. Goodsell, K. Nickel, and F. Staub, “Two-Loop Higgs mass calculations in supersymmetric models beyond the MSSM with SARAH and SPheno,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, article 32, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  148. M. Goodsell, K. Nickel, and F. Staub, “Generic two-loop Higgs mass calculation from a diagrammatic approach,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, article 290, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  149. A. Pukhov, “CalcHEP 2.3: MSSM, structure functions, event generation, batchs, and generation of matrix elements for other packages,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0412191.
  150. E. E. Boos, M. N. Dubinin, V. A. Ilyin, A. E. Pukhov, and V. I. Savrin, “CompHEP—specialized package for automatic calculations of elementary particle decays and collisions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9503280.
  151. T. Hahn, “Generating feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 418–431, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  152. T. Hahn, “FormCalc 6,” Proceedings of Science, vol. 8, p. 121, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  153. W. Kilian, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, “WHIZARD: simulating multi-particle processes at LHC and ILC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 71, article 1742, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  154. M. Moretti, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, “O'Mega: an optimizing matrix element generator,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0102195.
  155. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter, “UFO—the universal FeynRules output,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 1201–1214, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, “MadGraph 5: going beyond,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 6, article 128, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  157. G. Cullen, N. Greiner, G. Heinrich et al., “Automated one-loop calculations with GoSam,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, article 1889, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  158. S. Gieseke, A. Ribon, M. H. Seymour, P. Stephens, and B. Webber, “Herwig++ 1.0: an event generator for e+e- annihilation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2, article 5, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  159. S. Gieseke, D. Grellscheid, K. Hamilton et al., “Herwig++ 2.0 release note,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0609306.
  160. J. Bellm, S. Gieseke, D. Grellscheid et al., “Herwig++ 2.7 release note,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.6877.
  161. T. Gleisberg, S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, A. Schalicke, S. Schumann, and J. C. Winter, “SHERPA 1.α, a proof-of-concept version,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 2, article 56, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  162. T. Gleisberg, S. Höche, F. Krauss et al., “Event generation with SHERPA 1.1,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 2, article 007, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  163. S. Höche, S. Kuttimalai, S. Schumann, and F. Siegert, “Beyond standard model calculations with Sherpa,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, article 135, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  164. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, “HiggsBounds: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 138–167, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  165. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, “HiggsBounds 2.0.0: confronting neutral and charged higgs sector predictions with exclusion bounds from LEP and the tevatron,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 182, no. 12, pp. 2605–2631, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  166. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stl, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, “HiggsSignals: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2711, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  167. P. Athron, J.-H. Park, D. Stöckinger, and A. Voigt, “FlexibleSUSY—a spectrum generator generator for supersymmetric models,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 190, pp. 139–172, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  168. J. Camargo-Molina, B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Vevacious: a tool for finding the global minima of one-loop effective potentials with many scalars,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, article 2588, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  169. O. Stål and G. Weiglein, “Light NMSSM Higgs bosons in SUSY cascade decays at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 1, article 071, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  170. K. Ender, T. Graf, M. Muhlleitner, and H. Rzehak, “Analysis of the NMSSM Higgs boson masses at one-loop level,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 075024, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  171. L. Aparicio, P. Camara, D. Cerdeno, L. Ibanez, and I. Valenzuela, “The NMSSM with F-theory unified boundary conditions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 2, article 084, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  172. T. Graf, R. Gröber, M. Mühlleitner, H. Rzehak, and K. Walz, “Higgs boson masses in the complex NMSSM at one-loop level,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 10, article 122, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  173. K. Schmidt-Hoberg and F. Staub, “Enhanced hγγ rate in MSSM singlet extensions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 10, article 195, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  174. K. Schmidt-Hoberg, F. Staub, and M. W. Winkler, “Enhanced diphoton rates at Fermi and the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 1, article 124, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  175. G. G. Ross, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and F. Staub, “The generalised NMSSM at one loop: fine tuning and phenomenology,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 8, article 074, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  176. A. Kaminska, G. G. Ross, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, “Non-universal gaugino masses and fine tuning implications for SUSY searches in the MSSM and the GNMSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, article 209, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  177. M. Y. Binjonaid and S. F. King, “Naturalness of scale-invariant NMSSMs with and without extra matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 5, Article ID 055020, 21 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  178. A. Kaminska, G. G. Ross, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and F. Staub, “A precision study of the fine tuning in the DiracNMSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 6, article 153, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  179. M. Muhlleitner, D. T. Nhung, H. Rzehak, and K. Walz, “Two-loop contributions of the order O(αtαS) to the masses of the Higgs bosons in the CP-violating NMSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, article 128, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  180. C. Arina, V. Martin-Lozano, and G. Nardini, “Dark matter versus hγγ and hγZ with supersymmetric triplets,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, article 15, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  181. P. Bandyopadhyay, K. Huitu, and A. S. Keceli, “Multi-lepton signatures of the triplet like charged Higgs at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 5, article 26, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  182. J. List and B. Vormwald, “Bilinear R parity violation at the ILC: neutrino physics at colliders,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2720, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  183. H. Dreiner, K. Nickel, F. Staub, and A. Vicente, “New bounds on trilinear R-parity violation from lepton flavor violating observables,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 015003, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  184. H. Dreiner, K. Nickel, and F. Staub, “Bs,d0μμ- and BXsγ in the R-parity violating MSSM,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 11, Article ID 115001, 14 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  185. S. Biswas, D. Chowdhury, S. Han, and S. J. Lee, “Explaining the lepton non-universality at the LHCb and CMS within a unified framework,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, article 142, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  186. B. Allanach, S. Biswas, S. Mondal, and M. Mitra, “Explaining a CMS eejj excess with R-parity violating supersymmetry and implications for neutrinoless double beta decay,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 1, Article ID 011702, 5 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  187. N. Chamoun, H. Dreiner, F. Staub, and T. Stefaniak, “Resurrecting light stops after the 125 GeV Higgs in the baryon number violating CMSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 8, article 142, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  188. H. K. Dreiner, K. Nickel, and F. Staub, “On the two-loop corrections to the Higgs mass in trilinear R-parity violation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 742, pp. 261–265, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  189. A. Abada, A. Figueiredo, J. Romao, and A. Teixeira, “Probing the supersymmetric type III seesaw: LFV at low-energies and at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 8, article 99, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  190. M. Hirsch, W. Porod, C. Weiss, and F. Staub, “Supersymmetric type-III seesaw mechanism: lepton flavor violation and LHC phenomenology,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, Article ID 013010, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  191. S. Banerjee, P. S. B. Dev, S. Mondal, B. Mukhopadhyaya, and S. Roy, “Invisible Higgs decay in a supersymmetric inverse seesaw model with light sneutrino dark matter,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 10, article 221, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  192. M. E. Krauss, W. Porod, F. Staub, A. Abada, A. Vicente, and C. Weiland, “Decoupling of heavy sneutrinos in low-scale seesaw models,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, Article ID 013008, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  193. V. De Romeri and M. Hirsch, “Sneutrino dark matter in low-scale seesaw scenarios,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 12, article 106, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  194. S. M. Boucenna, J. W. F. Valle, and A. Vicente, “Predicting charged lepton flavor violation from gauge symmetry,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.07546.
  195. J. Esteves, J. Romao, M. Hirsch, A. Vicente, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “LHC and lepton flavour violation phenomenology of a left-right extension of the MSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 12, article 77, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  196. J. Esteves, J. Romao, M. Hirsch, W. Porod, F. Staub, and A. Vicente, “Dark matter and LHC phenomenology in a left-right supersymmetric model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 1, article 95, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  197. V. De Romeri, M. Hirsch, and M. Malinsky, “Soft masses in supersymmetric SO(10) GUTs with low intermediate scales,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 053012, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  198. M. E. Krauss, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “SO(10) inspired gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 1, Article ID 015014, 18 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  199. B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Mass spectrum of the minimal SUSY B-L model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 5, article 42, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  200. M. Hirsch, W. Porod, L. Reichert, and F. Staub, “Phenomenology of a supersymmetric U(1)B−L × U(1)R extension of the standard model with inverse seesaw mechanism,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 9, Article ID 093018, 26 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  201. M. Frank and S. Mondal, “Light neutralino dark matter in U(1) models,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 7, Article ID 075013, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  202. G. Brooijmans, R. Contino, B. Fuks et al., “Les Houches 2013: physics at TeV colliders: new physics working group report,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1617.
  203. G. Corcella, “Phenomenology of supersymmetric Z′ decays at the Large Hadron Collider,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6831.
  204. D. Busbridge, “Constrained Dirac gluino mediation,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.4605.
  205. K. Benakli, M. Goodsell, F. Staub, and W. Porod, “Constrained minimal Dirac gaugino supersymmetric standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 4, Article ID 045017, 31 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  206. P. Diener, J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, and D. Stckinger, “Higgs boson mass and electroweak observables in the MRSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 12, article 124, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  207. Z. Lalak, M. Lewicki, and J. D. Wells, “Higgs boson mass and high-luminosity LHC probes of supersymmetry with vectorlike top quark,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, Article ID 095022, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  208. P. Athron, S. King, D. Miller, S. Moretti, and R. Nevzorov, “Constrained exceptional supersymmetric standard model with a Higgs signal near 125 GeV,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 095003, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  209. D. S. Alves, P. J. Fox, and N. Weiner, “Supersymmetry with a sister Higgs boson,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 5, Article ID 055003, 18 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  210. A. Bharucha, A. Goudelis, and M. McGarrie, “En-gauging naturalness,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2858, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  211. R. Ding, T. Li, F. Staub, C. Tian, and B. Zhu, “The supersymmetric standard models with a pseudo-dirac gluino from hybrid F− and D−term supersymmetry breakings,” In press.
  212. F. Brmmer, M. McGarrie, and A. Weiler, “Light third-generation squarks from flavour gauge messengers,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 4, article 78, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  213. R. Ding, T. Li, F. Staub, and B. Zhu, “Focus point supersymmetry in extended gauge mediation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 3, article 130, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  214. J. Louis, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and L. Zarate, “Dilaton domination in the MSSM and its singlet extensions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 735, pp. 1–6, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  215. R. Ding, L. Wang, and B. Zhu, “Neutralino dark matter in gauge mediation after run I of LHC and LUX,” Physics Letters B, vol. 733, pp. 373–379, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  216. B. Kyae and C. S. Shin, “Precise focus point scenario for a natural Higgs boson in the MSSM,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 3, Article ID 035023, 17 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  217. S. Abel and M. McGarrie, “Natural supersymmetry and dynamical flavour with meta-stable vacua,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, article 145, no. 07, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  218. C. S. Ün, H. Tanyldz, S. Kerman, and L. Solmaz, “Generalized soft breaking leverage for the MSSM,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, Article ID 105033, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  219. S. Fichet, B. Herrmann, and Y. Stoll, “Tasting the SU(5) nature of supersymmetry at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 5, article 91, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  220. J. Camargo-Molina, B. Garbrecht, B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Constraining the natural MSSM through tunneling to color-breaking vacua at zero and non-zero temperature,” Physics Letters B, vol. 737, pp. 156–161, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  221. U. Chattopadhyay and A. Dey, “Exploring MSSM for charge and color breaking and other constraints in the context of Higgs@125 GeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 11, article 161, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  222. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, “NMSPEC: a fortran code for the sparticle and Higgs masses in the NMSSM with GUT scale boundary conditions,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 399–407, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  223. B. C. Allanach, P. Athron, L. C. Tunstall, A. Voigt, and A. G. Williams, “Next-to-minimal SOFTSUSY,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 185, no. 9, pp. 2322–2339, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  224. J. Baglio, R. Gröber, M. Mühlleitner et al., “NMSSMCALC: a program package for the calculation of loop-corrected Higgs boson masses and decay widths in the (complex) NMSSM,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 185, no. 12, pp. 3372–3391, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  225. M. D. Goodsell, K. Nickel, and F. Staub, “On the two-loop corrections to the Higgs masses in the NMSSM,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 3, Article ID 035021, 13 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  226. F. Staub, W. Porod, and B. Herrmann, “The electroweak sector of the NMSSM at the one-loop level,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 10, article 40, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  227. L. E. Ibanez and G. G. Ross, “Discrete gauge symmetry anomalies,” Physics Letters B, vol. 260, no. 3-4, pp. 291–295, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  228. L. E. Ibáñez and G. G. Ross, “Discrete gauge symmetries and the origin of baryon and lepton number conservation in supersymmetric versions of the standard model,” Nuclear Physics. B, vol. 368, no. 1, pp. 3–37, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  229. T. Banks and M. Dine, “Note on discrete gauge anomalies,” Physical Review D, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1424–1427, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  230. H. K. Dreiner, C. Luhn, and M. Thormeier, “What is the discrete gauge symmetry of the MSSM?” Physical Review D, vol. 73, Article ID 075007, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  231. H. K. Dreiner, C. Luhn, H. Murayama, and M. Thormeier, “Baryon triality and neutrino masses from an anomalous flavor U (1),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 774, no. 1–3, pp. 127–167, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  232. R. M. Fonseca, “Calculating the renormalisation group equations of a SUSY model with Susyno,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 10, pp. 2298–2306, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  233. S. P. Martin, “A supersymmetry primer,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9709356.
  234. P. Fayet and J. Iliopoulos, “Spontaneously broken supergauge symmetries and goldstone spinors,” Physics Letters B, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 461–464, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  235. B. Holdom, “Two U(1)'s and ϵ charge shifts,” Physics Letters B, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 196–198, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  236. M. D. Goodsell, “Two-loop RGEs with Dirac gaugino masses,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 1, article 66, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  237. L. J. Hall, “Grand unification of effective gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 75–124, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  238. S. Weinberg, “Baryon- and lepton-nonconserving processes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 43, no. 21, pp. 1566–1570, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  239. S. Weinberg, “Varieties of baryon and lepton nonconservation,” Physical Review D, vol. 22, article 1694, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  240. S. L. Adler and W. A. Bardeen, “Absence of higher-order corrections in the anomalous axial-vector divergence equation,” Physical Review, vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 1517–1536, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  241. E. Witten, “An SU(2) anomaly,” Physics Letters B, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 324–328, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  242. S. P. Martin and M. T. Vaughn, “Two-loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry-breaking couplings,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, article 2282, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  243. Y. Yamada, “Two-loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry-breaking scalar interactions: supergraph method,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 3537–3545, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  244. I. Jack, D. R. Jones, and A. Pickering, “Renormalisation invariance and the soft β-functions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 426, no. 1-2, pp. 73–77, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  245. I. Jack and D. R. Jones, “Renormalisation of the fayet-iliopoulos D-term,” Physics Letters B, vol. 473, no. 1-2, pp. 102–108, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  246. I. Jack, D. Jones, and S. Parsons, “Fayet-Iliopoulos D term and its renormalization in softly broken supersymmetric theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, Article ID 125022, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  247. I. Jack and D. R. T. Jones, “The gaugino β-function,” Physics Letters B, vol. 415, no. 4, pp. 383–389, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  248. R. M. Fonseca, M. Malinsky, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Running soft parameters in SUSY models with multiple U(1) gauge factors,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 854, no. 1, pp. 28–53, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  249. M. Sperling, D. Stckinger, and A. Voigt, “Renormalization of vacuum expectation values in spontaneously broken gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 7, article 132, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  250. M. Sperling, D. Stckinger, and A. Voigt, “Renormalization of vacuum expectation values in spontaneously broken gauge theories: two-loop results,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 1, article 068, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  251. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, “Two-loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory: (I). Wave function renormalization,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 222, no. 1, pp. 83–103, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  252. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, “Two-loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory (II). Yukawa couplings,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 221–232, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  253. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, “Two-loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory: (III). Scalar quartic couplings,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 70–92, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  254. M.-X. Luo, H.-W. Wang, and Y. Xiao, “Two-loop renormalization group equations in general gauge field theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 6, Article ID 065019, 9 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  255. R. M. Fonseca, M. Malinsky, and F. Staub, “Renormalization group equations and matching in a general quantum field theory with kinetic mixing,” Physics Letters B, vol. 726, no. 4-5, pp. 882–886, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  256. D. M. Pierce, J. A. Bagger, K. T. Matchev, and R.-J. Zhang, “Precision corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 491, no. 1-2, pp. 3–67, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  257. S. P. Martin, “Complete two-loop effective potential approximation to the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 9, Article ID 095012, 5 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  258. S. P. Martin, “Two-loop scalar self-energies and pole masses in a general renormalizable theory with massless gauge bosons,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 116004, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  259. A. Brignole, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and F. Zwirner, “On the O(αt2) two-loop corrections to the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 631, no. 1-2, pp. 195–218, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  260. G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and F. Zwirner, “On the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM for arbitrary stop mixing,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 611, no. 1–3, pp. 403–422, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  261. A. Brignole, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and F. Zwirner, “On the two-loop sbottom corrections to the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 643, no. 1–3, pp. 79–92, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  262. A. Dedes and P. Slavich, “Two-loop corrections to radiative electroweak symmetry breaking in the MSSM,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 657, pp. 333–354, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  263. A. Dedes, G. Degrassi, and P. Slavich, “On the two-loop Yukawa corrections to the MSSM Higgs boson masses at large tanβ,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 672, no. 1-2, pp. 144–162, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  264. G. Degrassi and P. Slavich, “On the radiative corrections to the neutral Higgs boson masses in the NMSSM,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 825, no. 1-2, pp. 119–150, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  265. L. Avdeev and M. Y. Kalmykov, “Pole masses of quarks in-dimensional reduction,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 502, no. 1-2, pp. 419–435, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  266. A. Bednyakov, A. Onishchenko, and V. Velizhanin, “Two-loop script O sign(αs2) MSSM corrections to the pole masses of heavy quarks,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 87–101, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  267. M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P. Zerwas, “Higgs boson production at the LHC,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 453, no. 1-2, pp. 17–82, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  268. H. Dreiner, K. Nickel, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Full 1-loop calculation of BRBs,d0ll- in models beyond the MSSM with SARAH and SPheno,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 11, pp. 2604–2617, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  269. J. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D. V. Nanopoulos, and F. Zwirner, “Aspects of the super-unification of strong, electroweak and gravitational interactions,” Nuclear Physics, Section B, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 14–70, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  270. R. Barbieri and G. Giudice, “Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 306, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  271. D. Ghilencea and G. Ross, “The fine-tuning cost of the likelihood in SUSY models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 868, no. 1, pp. 65–74, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  272. S. Khalil and A. Masiero, “Radiative B−L symmetry breaking in supersymmetric models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 665, no. 5, pp. 374–377, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  273. V. Barger, P. Fileviez Perez, and S. Spinner, “Minimal gauged U(1)B-L model with spontaneous R parity violation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, Article ID 181802, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  274. P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, “Fate of R parity,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 035004, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  275. J. Camargo-Molina, B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Stability of R parity in supersymmetric models extended by U(1)B-L,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 1, Article ID 015033, 16 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  276. Z. Marshall, B. A. Ovrut, A. Purves, and S. Spinner, “Spontaneous R-parity breaking, stop LSP decays and the neutrino mass hierarchy,” Physics Letters B, vol. 732, pp. 325–329, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  277. A. Elsayed, S. Khalil, S. Moretti, and A. Moursy, “Right-handed sneutrino-antisneutrino oscillations in a TeV scale supersymmetric B−L model,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 5, Article ID 053010, 8 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  278. L. Basso, B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Higher order contributions to the effective action of N=2 super Yang-Mills,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 9, article 054, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  279. L. Basso and F. Staub, “Enhancing hγγ with staus in supersymmetric models with an extended gauge sector,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 1, Article ID 015011, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  280. P. Fileviez Perez, S. Spinner, and M. K. Trenkel, “Lightest supersymmetric particle stability and new Higgs signals at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 9, Article ID 095028, 19 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  281. S. Khalil and S. Moretti, “Heavy neutrinos, Z′ and Higgs bosons at the LHC: new particles from an old symmetry,” Journal of Modern Physics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  282. M. E. Krauss, B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Implications of gauge kinetic mixing on Z′ and slepton production at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 5, Article ID 055017, 17 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  283. P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, “Supersymmetry at the LHC and the theory of R-parity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 728, pp. 489–495, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  284. P. H. Chankowski, S. Pokorski, and J. Wagner, “Z′ and the Appelquist-Carrazzone decoupling,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 187–205, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  285. L. Basso, S. Moretti, and G. M. Pruna, “Renormalization group equation study of the scalar sector of the minimal B-L extension of the standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 5, Article ID 055018, 15 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  286. F. Staub, T. Ohl, W. Porod, and C. Speckner, “A tool box for implementing supersymmetric models,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 10, pp. 2165–2206, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  287. P. B. Dev and R. Mohapatra, “TeV scale inverse seesaw model in SO(10) and leptonic nonunitarity effects,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 1, Article ID 013001, 20 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  288. P. Bhupal Dev and R. Mohapatra, “Electroweak symmetry breaking and proton decay in SO(10) supersymmetric GUT with TeV WR,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, Article ID 035014, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  289. G. Brooijmans, B. Gripaios, F. Moortgat et al., “Les Houches 2011: physics at TeV colliders new physics working group report,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.1488.
  290. L. Basso, A. Belyaev, D. Chowdhury et al., “Proposal for generalised supersymmetry les Houches Accord for see-saw models and PDG numbering scheme,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 698–719, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  291. T. Ohl, “SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+e- colliders,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 153, pp. 275–315, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  292. P. Z. Skands, B. Allanach, H. Baer et al., “SUSY Les Houches accord: interfacing SUSY spectrum calculators, decay packages, and event generators,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 7, article 036, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  293. B. Allanach, C. Balazs, G. Belanger et al., “SUSY Les Houches Accord 2,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 8–25, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  294. J. Adam, X. Bai, A. M. Baldini et al., “New constraint on the existence of the μ+e+γ decay,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, Article ID 201801, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  295. B. Aubert, Y. Karyotakis, J. P. Lees et al., “Searches for Lepton flavor violation in the decays τ±e±γ and τ±μ±γ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 104, no. 2, Article ID 021802, 7 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  296. U. Bellgardt, G. Otter, R. Eichler et al., “Search for the decay μ+e+e+e-,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 299, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  297. K. Hayasaka, K. Inami, Y. Miyazaki et al., “Search for lepton-flavor-violating τ decays into three leptons with 719 million produced τ+τ pairs,” Physics Letters B, vol. 687, no. 2-3, pp. 139–143, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  298. C. Dohmen, K.-D. Groth, B. Heer et al., “Test of lepton-flavour conservation in μe conversion on titanium,” Physics Letters B, vol. 317, no. 4, pp. 631–636, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  299. W. H. Bertl, “A search for μ-e conversion in muonic gold,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 337–346, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  300. J. J. Liu, C. S. Li, L. L. Yang, and L. G. Jin, “tcV via SUSY FCNC couplings in the unconstrained MSSM,” Physics Letters B, vol. 599, no. 1-2, pp. 92–101, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  301. J. Aguilar-Saavedra and B. Nobre, “Rare top decays tcγ, tcg and CKM unitarity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 553, no. 3-4, pp. 251–260, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  302. F. Abe, H. Akimoto, A. Akopian et al., “Search for flavor-changing neutral current decays of the top quark in pp- collisions at s=1.8 TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, pp. 2525–2530, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  303. H. P. Nilles, M. Srednicki, and D. Wyler, “Weak interaction breakdown induced by supergravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 120, no. 4-6, pp. 346–348, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  304. J. Derendinger and C. A. Savoy, “Quantum effects and SU(2)×U(1) breaking in supergravity gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 237, no. 2, pp. 307–328, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  305. M. Claudson, L. J. Hall, and I. Hinchliffe, “Low-energy supergravity: false vacua and vacuous predictions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 228, no. 3, pp. 501–528, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  306. C. Kounnas, A. Lahanas, D. V. Nanopoulos, and M. Quiros, “Low-energy behaviour of realistic locally-supersymmetric grand unified theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 236, no. 2, pp. 438–466, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  307. M. Drees, M. Gluck, and K. Grassie, “A new class of false vacua in low energy N=1 supergravity theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 157, no. 2-3, pp. 164–168, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  308. J. Gunion, H. Haber, and M. Sher, “Charge/color breaking minima and A-parameter bounds in supersymmetric models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 306, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  309. H. Komatsu, “New constraints on parameters in the minimal supersymmetric model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 323–327, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  310. P. Langacker and N. Polonsky, “Implications of Yukawa unification for the Higgs sector in supersymmetric grand-unified models,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 2199–2217, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  311. J. Casas, A. Lleyda, and C. Munoz, “Strong constraints on the parameter space of the MSSM from charge and color breaking minima,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 471, no. 1-2, pp. 3–58, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  312. J. Casas and S. Dimopoulos, “Stability bounds on flavor-violating trilinear soft terms in the MSSM,” Physics Letters B, vol. 387, no. 1, pp. 107–112, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  313. J. E. Camargo-Molina, B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Vevacious: a tool for finding the global minima of one-loop effective potentials with many scalars,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 1–22, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  314. T. L. Lee, T. Y. Li, and C. H. Tsai, “HOM4PS-2.0: a software package for solving polynomial systems by the polyhedral homotopy continuation method,” Computing. Archives for Scientific Computing, vol. 83, no. 2-3, pp. 109–133, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  315. F. James and M. Roos, “Minuit—a system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 343–367, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  316. C. L. Wainwright, “CosmoTransitions: computing cosmological phase transition temperatures and bubble profiles with multiple fields,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 9, pp. 2006–2013, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  317. G. Bélanger, N. D. Christensen, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, “SLHAplus: a library for implementing extensions of the standard model,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 763–774, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  318. P. P. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan et al., “Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 571, article A16, 66 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  319. E. Conte, B. Fuks, and G. Serret, “MadAnalysis 5, a user-friendly framework for collider phenomenology,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 222–256, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  320. N. Craig, “The state of supersymmetry after run I of the LHC,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.0528.
  321. F. Braam and J. Reuter, “A simplified scheme for GUT-inspired theories with multiple Abelian factors,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, article 1885, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar