Thermal Condensate Structure and Cosmological Energy Density of the Universe

Capolupo, Antonio; Lambiase, Gaetano; Vitiello, Giuseppe

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3127597

Advances in High Energy Physics

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 3127597 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3127597

Thermal Condensate Structure and Cosmological Energy Density of the Universe

Antonio Capolupo,¹Gaetano Lambiase,¹and Giuseppe Vitiello¹

Academic Editor: Rong-Gen Cai

Received13 Feb 2016

Revised25 Mar 2016

Accepted28 Mar 2016

Published18 Apr 2016

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study thermal vacuum condensate for scalar and fermion fields. We analyze the thermal states at the temperature of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and we show that the vacuum expectation value of the energy momentum tensor density of photon fields reproduces the energy density and pressure of the CMB. We perform the computations in the formal framework of the Thermo Field Dynamics. We also consider the case of neutrinos and thermal states at the temperature of the neutrino cosmic background. Consistency with the estimated lower bound of the sum of the active neutrino masses is verified. In the boson sector, nontrivial contribution to the energy of the universe is given by particles of masses of the order of 10⁻⁴ eV compatible with the ones of the axion-like particles. The fractal self-similar structure of the thermal radiation is also discussed and related to the coherent structure of the thermal vacuum.

1. Introduction

The task of this paper is the analysis of the thermal vacuum condensate for scalar and fermion fields, with specific reference to temperatures characteristic of cosmic microwave background (CMB). The interest in considering the vacuum condensate in relation with CMB resides in the fact that it is a thermal radiation filling almost uniformly the observable universe and one expects that it plays a relevant role in the universe thermal vacuum structure. CMB appears as a radiation left over from an early stage in the expansion of the universe [1] and has a thermal black body spectrum corresponding to the temperature of K [2]. The anisotropies contained in the spatial variation in the spectral density are attributed to small thermal variations, presumably generated by quantum fluctuations of matter [1, 3, 4].

In our analysis, we compute the expectation value of the energy momentum tensor density of photon fields on the thermal vacuum. As a result, we obtain the energy density and pressure of the CMB.

Together with the CMB, there is indirect evidence of the existence of the cosmic neutrino background (CNB) which represents the universe’s background particle radiation composed of neutrinos (relic neutrinos) [5–9]. The CNB estimated temperature is roughly 1.95 K [5]. It is therefore interesting to extend our study of thermal vacuum condensate also to the CNB case. Thus, we assume the hierarchical neutrino model and, by computing the energy density of the neutrino thermal vacuum, we check the lower bound of the sum of the active neutrino masses , which has been estimated from the neutrinos oscillations to be of the order of 0.06 eV [10].

We finally discuss the fractal self-similar structure of the thermal vacuum.

In Section 2, the Thermo Field Dynamics (TFD) formalism is introduced and the general expressions of its energy density and pressure are shown. Explicit computations for Maxwell, scalar, and fermion fields are presented in Section 3 and, in Section 4, the fractal structure of the thermal states is analyzed. Section 5 is devoted to the conclusions.

2. Thermal Vacuum and Particle Condensate

The thermal vacuum state , with , , and , the Boltzmann constant, is introduced in the TFD formalism [11, 12] in such a way that the thermal statistical average is given by , with , the number operator. The bosonic operators and have usual canonical commutation relations (CCR).

The explicit form of isand it is recognized to be a two-mode time dependent generalized coherent state [13, 14], condensate of pairs of and quanta. is the vacuum annihilated by and . The auxiliary boson operator commutes with and is introduced in order to produce the trace operation in computing thermal averages. The thermal vacuum is normalized to one, , , and in the infinite volume limit as , (for finite and positive).

One also has as , and , . Thus, provides a representation of the CCR defined at each and unitarily inequivalent to any other representation in the infinite volume limit.

Note that and do not annihilate the state . The annihilation operators, say and , for , , are obtained through the Bogoliubov transformationwhose generator is given by . The thermal vacuum expectation value of the number operator is given by

Minimization of the free energy (see below) then leads to the thermal statistical average of which is indeed the Bose-Einstein distribution function for .

Summing up, the “thermal background” at is described by the quantum coherent condensate vacuum , which is the thermal physical vacuum.

We now are ready to compute the contributions of the energy momentum tensor to the thermal vacuum for Maxwell, scalar, and fermion fields. We observe that the off-diagonal terms of on the vacuum state are zero for these fields; that is, , for . Therefore, the vacuum condensate is homogenous and isotropic and behaves as a perfect fluid (similar result holds for mixed particles [15–19] and for curved space [20]). Then, the energy density and pressure induced by the condensate (3), at a given time (we consider the red shift of the universe), can be defined by computing the expectation value of the and components of the energy momentum tensor of a field on :

Here, denotes the normal ordering with respect to and no summation on the index is intended.

3. Energy Density of Thermal Vacuum and CMB Temperature

In the photon fields case, the explicit expression of the energy momentum tensor density is [21, 22]. As usual, (, ; will be used throughout the paper). The thermal vacuum condensate energy density is thenwhere for photons. The result we obtain is

In a similar way, the contribution given to the pressure by the thermal vacuum condensate of photons field isThe equation of state is then , which is the equation of state of the radiation. Equations (7) and (8) reproduce of course the results obtained by solving the Boltzmann equation for the distribution function of photons in thermal equilibrium [5]. The advantage of the present computation is that the role of the boson condensate in obtaining such a result is underlined. Taking the present CMB temperature, K, and the present red shift of the universe, , one obtains the value of the thermal vacuum energy density, GeV⁴, which of course coincides with the energy density of the CMB [5].

Leaving apart the photon case, we consider now massive boson and fermion fields. The energy momentum tensor density is given by for free real scalar fields and for free Majorana spinor fields .

At any epoch, the thermal vacuum energy and thermal pressure are given by (5), which in the case of the field giveIn the case of the isotropy of the momenta , these can be written asExplicitly, they become

Notice that the vacuum energy density at thermal equilibrium , (12), coincides with the result obtained by solving the Boltzmann equation for the particle Bose distribution function [5]. The difference to the pressure between the contributions coming from the vacuum condensate and the ones coming solely from the Bose distribution function appears in (13). The second term on the RHS of (13) appears due to the condensate of the physical vacuum contributing with nonvanishing values of and . Should the vacuum be the trivial one , these contributions would be identically zero. To our knowledge, the presence of the time dependent term of RHS of (13) is a new result which has not been reported till now in the literature.

By considering the present epoch, , , and by solving numerically the integral in (12), one has the contribution to the vacuum energy given by GeV⁴ for masses less than or equal to the CMB temperature ; that is, eV (e.g., possible candidates are axion-like with eV). The maximum value of is obtained for eV. In this case, one has GeV⁴. Negligible values of are obtained for boson masses eV.

In the fermion case, the Fermi-Dirac distribution function is obtained: The thermal vacuum contribution to the energy density and to the pressure isrespectively. In (15), the relation is used. For Majorana fields, (15) and (16) give where , , is the annihilator of fermion field.

The explicit expressions of the energy density and pressure are respectively. These equations coincide with the energy density and pressure obtained by solving the Boltzmann equation for the fermion distribution function [5]. For and masses , we find at the maximum value of , that is, GeV⁴, which is of the same order of CMB energy. The state equation is . Condensates of heavier fermions give negligible contributions to the universe energy. Indeed, the number density of nonrelativistic particles () is exponentially suppressed by insufficient pair production due to low temperature. Only the condensates of fields with masses less than or equal to eV, for example, neutrinos, may give relevant contributions.

Taking into account such results, from (19) and (20), we compute the energy density and pressure for the thermal vacuum of the three neutrino fields at the cosmic neutrino background (CNB) temperature .¹

For and neutrino masses eV, the maximum value of the energy density turns out to be GeV⁴, with state equation . The thermal condensate of neutrinos with larger masses would give negligible contributions to . Adopting as customary and taking the mass eV (which leads to ) by the lighter neutrino mass, one can derive and from the hierarchical neutrino model and eV² and eV². The result is eV and eV, and thus eV, as it should be in agreement with its estimated lower bound.

We stress that in our discussion we consider the contribution of the condensate neutrino couples to the background energy. In this case, the condensate of neutrinos with larger masses gives negligible contributions to the energy density. Considering instead the particle contribution to the energy budget of the universe, a higher contribution should be obtained by nonrelativistic neutrinos (), with larger mass.

4. Fractal Structure of the Thermal States

Finally, we show that the thermal vacuum has a fractal self-similar structure. Let us consider the time dependent case . We will use the notation . The boson vacuum provides the quantum representation of the system of couples of damped/amplified oscillators [23]where “dot” denotes time derivative, , , and are positive real constants, and is the Lagrangian from which (21) and (22) are derived.

To see indeed how is obtained, one proceeds to the canonical quantization of the system described by (21)–(23) and assumes that the canonical commutation relations hold, , . The corresponding sets of annihilation and creation operators are with , . The canonical linear transformations , are introduced. It is found [23] that the time evolution of the system ground state (the vacuum) leads out of the Hilbert space of the states, and thus the proper quantization setting is the one of the quantum field theory (QFT). One has therefore to consider operators and and their hermitian conjugates, so as to perform, as customary in QFT, the continuum momentum limit (or the infinite volume limit) by use of the relation at the end of the computations. The Hamiltonian of the system is found to be [23] , withwhere has been used for each -mode. The group structure is the one of , , and the Casimir operator is given by . The initial condition of positiveness for the eigenvalues of is thus protected against transitions to negative energy states. One then finds that the time evolution of the vacuum for and is controlled by and given by which gives in fact (1).

One also finds that turns out to be a squeezed coherent state characterized by the -deformation of Lie-Hopf algebra and provides a representation of the CCR at finite temperature which is equivalent [23] to the Thermo Field Dynamics representation [11, 12]. In the limit of quasi-stationary case with slowly changing in time, minimization of the free energy gives again the Bose-Einstein distribution function equation (3).

Indeed, let us now introduce the functional for the -modes where is the free Hamiltonian relative to the -modes, , and is given by Inspection of (26) and (27) suggests that and can be considered as free energy and the entropy, respectively. Minimization of the functional , , [11, 12] (we consider ), then leads to (4) which is the Bose-Einstein distribution function for . The first principle of thermodynamics at constant temperature can be then expressed as where the change in time of the particle condensed in the vacuum turns out to heat dissipation : where denotes the time derivative of .

We now remark that the system of (21) and (22) possesses self-similarity properties. To see this, let us put with and , and , . Then, we see that (21) and (22) can be rewritten as [24]Solutions of (31) and (32) are in fact and and they describe the parametric time evolution of clockwise and the anticlockwise logarithmic spirals, and , with and [24].

Thus, (21) and (22) (or equivalently (31) and (32)), whose quantum representation is provided by , are found to describe the self-similar fractal structure of their logarithmic spiral solutions [25, 26]. This establishes the link between the coherent states and fractal-like self-similarity [24]. The relation of the photon energy momentum tensor with (21) and (22) can also be shown. For details, see [24]. Similar discussions can be done for the fermion vacuum.

5. Conclusions

We have studied the thermal vacuum structure at the temperature of the CMB. In the framework of TFD, the energy momentum tensor density of photon has expectation value on the vacuum which agrees with the energy density and pressure of the CMB. In the case of neutrinos and thermal states at the temperature of the CNB consistency has been verified with the estimated lower bound of the sum of the active neutrino masses. The fractal self-similar structure of the thermal vacuum has been also discussed.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Partial financial support from MIUR is acknowledged.

Endnotes

The relic neutrino temperature is related to the one of CMB by the relation [5]This implies that since, at the present epoch, , one obtains .

References

E. Gawiser and J. Silk, “The cosmic microwave background radiation,” Physics Report, vol. 333-334, no. 4–6, pp. 245–267, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Fixsen, “The temperature of the cosmic microwave background,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 707, no. 2, pp. 916–920, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Bennett, A. J. Banday, K. M. Górski et al., “Four-year COBE^∗ DMR cosmic microwave background observations: maps and basic results,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 464, no. 1, p. L1, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. de Bernardis, P. A. R. Ade, J. J. Bock et al., “A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave background radiation,” Nature, vol. 404, pp. 955–959, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Weinberg, Cosmology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2008.
S. Bashinsky and U. Seljak, “Signatures of relativistic neutrinos in CMB anisotropy and matter clustering,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 8, Article ID 083002, 35 pages, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor et al., “Relic neutrino decoupling including flavour oscillations,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 729, no. 1-2, pp. 221–234, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Komatsu, “Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP^∗) observations: cosmological interpretation,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 192, no. 2, p. 18, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kolb and M. Turner, The Early Universe, Frontiers in Physics, Westview Press, 1994.
M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. Salvado, and T. Schwetz, “Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical look at present precision,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 123, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, “Thermo field dynamics,” Collective Phenomena, vol. 2, pp. 55–80, 1975, Reprinted in: International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 10, pp. 1755–1805, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Umezawa, Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro, and Thermal Physics, AIP, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
A. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet
J. R. Klauder and B. Skagerstam, Coherent States, World Scientific, Singapore, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet
A. Capolupo, S. Capozziello, and G. Vitiello, “Neutrino mixing as a source of dark energy,” Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, vol. 363, no. 1-2, pp. 53–56, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Capolupo, S. Capozziello, and G. Vitiello, “Dark energy and particle mixing,” Physics Letters A, vol. 373, no. 6, pp. 601–610, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Capolupo, S. Capozziello, and G. Vitiello, “Dark energy, cosmological constant and neutrino mixing,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 23, no. 31, pp. 4979–4990, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Blasone, A. Capolupo, S. Capozziello, S. Carloni, and G. Vitiello, “Neutrino mixing contribution to the cosmological constant,” Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, vol. 323, no. 3-4, pp. 182–189, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Capolupo, M. Di Mauro, and A. Iorio, “Mixing-induced spontaneous supersymmetry breaking,” Physics Letters A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, vol. 375, no. 39, pp. 3415–3418, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. D. Albareti, J. A. R. Cembranos, and A. L. Maroto, “Vacuum energy as dark matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 12, Article ID 123509, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Schweber, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory, Harper and Row, New York, NY, USA, 1961.
View at: MathSciNet
J. Leite Lopez, Gauge Field Theories: An Introduction, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1981.
E. Celeghini, M. Rasetti, and G. Vitiello, “Quantum dissipation,” Annals of Physics, vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 156–170, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
G. Vitiello, “Fractals, coherent states and self-similarity induced noncommutative geometry,” Physics Letters. A, vol. 376, no. 37, pp. 2527–2532, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
H. O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens, and D. Saupe, Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1986.
A. A. Andronov, A. A. Vitt, and S. E. Khaikin, Theory of Oscillators, Dover, Mineola, NY, USA, 1966.

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Antonio Capolupo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP³.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

889

Downloads

846

Citations