Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016, Article ID 5687463, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5687463
Research Article

MSSM Dark Matter in Light of Higgs and LUX Results

1Center for Fundamental Physics, Zewail City of Science and Technology, 6th of October City, Giza 12588, Egypt
2Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt

Received 26 September 2015; Accepted 6 December 2015

Academic Editor: Enrico Lunghi

Copyright © 2016 W. Abdallah and S. Khalil. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan et al., “Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 571, article A16, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, “Supersymmetric dark matter,” Physics Report, vol. 267, no. 5-6, pp. 195–373, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, “Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints,” Physics Reports, vol. 405, no. 5-6, pp. 279–390, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. H. P. Nilles, “Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics,” Physics Reports, vol. 110, no. 1-2, pp. 1–162, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. D. Lykken, “Introduction to supersymmetry,” In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9612114.
  6. J. Wess and J. Bagger, Supersymmetry and Supergravity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 1991. View at MathSciNet
  7. H. E. Haber and G. Kane, “The search for supersymmetry: probing physics beyond the standard model,” Physics Reports, vol. 117, no. 2–4, pp. 75–263, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. S. P. Martin, “A Supersymmetry Primer,” Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics, vol. 21, pp. 1–153, 2010, Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics, vol. 18, pp. 1–98, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. D. J. H. Chung, L. L. Everett, G. L. Kane, S. F. King, J. D. Lykken, and L. T. Wang, “The soft supersymmetry-breaking Lagrangian: theory and applications,” Physics Reports, vol. 407, no. 1–3, pp. 1–203, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Drees, P. Roy, and R. M. Godbole, Theory and Phenomenology of Sparticles, World Scientific, Singapore, 2005.
  11. H. Baer and X. Tata, Weak Scale Supersymmetry: From Superfields to Scattering Events, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. H. Goldberg, “Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 1419–1422, 1983, Erratum-ibid: Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, Article ID 099905, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. G. Aad, T. Abajyan, B. Abbott et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 30–61, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Summary of the ATLAS experiment's sensitivity to supersymmetry after LHC Run 1—interpreted in the phenomenological MSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, article 134, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Gaz, “SUSY searches at CMS,” In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1886.
  17. I. Melzer-Pellmann and P. Pralavorio, “Lessons for SUSY from the LHC after the first run,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2801, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. N. Craig, “The state of supersymmetry after Run I of the LHC,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.0528.
  19. D. S. Akerib, H. M. Araújo, X. Bai et al., “First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 112, Article ID 091303, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. E. Aprile, “The Xenon1T dark matter search experiment,” in Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe, vol. 148 of Springer Proceedings in Physics, pp. 93–96, Springer, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. E. Aprile, M. Alfonsi, K. Arisaka et al., “Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 18, Article ID 181301, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. H. Baer, V. Barger, and A. Mustafayev, “Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for the LHC supersymmetry and neutralino dark matter searches,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 075010, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Ellis and K. A. Olive, “Revisiting the higgs mass and dark matter in the CMSSM,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, article 2005, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. O. Buchmueller, R. Cavanaugh, M. Citron et al., “The CMSSM and NUHM1 in light of 7 TeV LHC, Bsμ+μ- and XENON100 data,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, no. 11, article 2243, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. O. Buchmueller, R. Cavanaugh, A. De Roeck et al. et al., “The CMSSM and NUHM1 after LHC run 1,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2922, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. R. Aaij, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi et al., “Measurement of the Bs0μ+μ branching fraction and search for B0μ+μ decays at the LHCb experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 111, no. 10, Article ID 101805, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Chatrchyan, B. Betev, L. Caminada et al., “Measurement of the Bs0μ+μ branching fraction and search for B0μ+μ with the CMS experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 111, no. 10, Article ID 101804, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. CMS and LHCb Collaborations, “Combination of results on the rare decays B(s)0μ+μ- from the CMS and LHCb experiments,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-BPH-13-007, CERN, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  29. D. Feldman, Z. Liu, and P. Nath, “Low mass neutralino dark matter in the minimal supersymmetric standard model with constraints from Bsμ+μ- and Higgs boson search limits,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 11, Article ID 117701, 4 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. S. Akula, D. Feldman, P. Nath, and G. Peim, “Excess observed in CDF Bs0μ+μ- and supersymmetry at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 11, Article ID 115011, 10 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. Y. Amhis, Sw. Banerjee, R. Bernhard et al., “Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and tau-lepton properties as of early 2012,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1158.
  32. B. Bhattacherjee, M. Chakraborti, A. Chakraborty, U. Chattopadhyay, D. Das, and D. K. Ghosh, “Implications of the 98 GeV and 125 GeV higgs scenarios in nondecoupling supersymmetry with updated ATLAS, CMS, and PLANCK data,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 3, Article ID 035011, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. U. Haisch and F. Mahmoudi, “MSSM: cornered and correlated,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 1, article 61, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. N. Chen, D. Feldman, Z. Liu, and P. Nath, “SUSY and higgs signatures implied by cancellations in bsγ,” Physics Letters B, vol. 685, no. 2-3, pp. 174–181, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. M. E. Gómez, T. Ibrahim, P. Nath, and S. Skadhauge, “An improved analysis of bsγ in supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 1, Article ID 015015, 19 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, “bτ unification, gμ2, the bs+γ constraint, and nonuniversalities,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 7, Article ID 075009, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. A. Djouadi, U. Ellwanger, and A. M. Teixeira, “Constrained next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 10, Article ID 101802, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. A. Djouadi, U. Ellwanger, and A. M. Teixeira, “Phenomenology of the constrained NMSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 4, article 31, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. S. Khalil and A. Masiero, “Radiative B–L symmetry breaking in supersymmetric models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 665, no. 5, pp. 374–377, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. P. Fileviez Pérez and S. Spinner, “Fate of R parity,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 3, Article ID 035004, 7 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. A. Elsayed, S. Khalil, and S. Moretti, “Higgs mass corrections in the SUSY B − L model with inverse seesaw,” Physics Letters B, vol. 715, no. 1–3, pp. 208–213, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. D. Cerdeno, C. Hugonie, D. Lopez-Fogliani, C. Munoz, and A. Teixeira, “Theoretical predictions for the direct detection of neutralino dark matter in the NMSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 12, article 048, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. A. Menon, D. E. Morrissey, and C. E. M. Wagner, “Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter in a minimal extension of the MSSM,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, Article ID 035005, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. S. Khalil, H. Okada, and T. Toma, “Right-handed sneutrino dark matter in supersymmetric B-L model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, article 26, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. S. Khalil and H. Okada, “Dark matter in B-L extended MSSM models,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 8, Article ID 083510, 9 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. F. Staub, “SARAH 3.2: dirac gauginos, UFO output, and more,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 7, pp. 1792–1809, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. W. Porod, “SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+e- colliders,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 275–315, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. W. Porod and F. Staub, “SPheno 3.1: extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 11, pp. 2458–2469, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi, and F. Zwirner, “Radiative corrections to the masses of supersymmetric Higgs bosons,” Physics Letters B, vol. 257, no. 1-2, pp. 83–91, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi, and F. Zwirner, “On radiative corrections to supersymmetric Higgs boson masses and their implications for LEP searches,” Physics Letters B, vol. 262, no. 4, pp. 477–484, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. H. E. Haber and R. Hemping, “Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the minimal supersymmetric model be larger than mZ?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 66, no. 14, pp. 1815–1818, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yanagida, “Renormalization-group analysis on the Higgs mass in the softly-broken supersymmetric standard model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, “The mass of the lightest MSSM Higgs boson: a compact analytical expression at the two-loop level,” Physics Letters B, vol. 455, no. 1–4, pp. 179–191, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. M. Carena, H. E. Haber, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, C. E. M. Wagner, and G. Weiglein, “Reconciling the two-loop diagrammatic and effective field theory computations of the mass of the lightest CP-even Higgs boson in the MSSM,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 580, no. 1-2, pp. 29–57, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. J. R. Espinosa and R. J. Zhang, “Complete two-loop dominant corrections to the mass of the lightest CP-even Higgs boson in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 586, no. 1-2, pp. 3–38, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Search for squarks and gluinos in events with isolated leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum at s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 4, article 116, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  57. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for gluino mediated bottom- and top-squark production in multijet final states in pp collisions at 8 TeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 725, no. 4-5, pp. 243–270, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, “The search for supersymmetry: probing physics beyond the standard model,” Physics Reports, vol. 117, no. 2–4, pp. 75–263, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber, “Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 272, no. 1, pp. 1–76, 1986, Erratum: Nuclear Physics B, vol. 402, pp. 567–569, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. M. M. El Kheishen, A. A. Shafik, and A. A. Aboshousha, “Analytic formulas for the neutralino masses and the neutralino mixing matrix,” Physical Review D, vol. 45, article 4345, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. Guchait, “Exact solution of the neutralino mass matrix,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 157–163, 1993, Erratum in: Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 61, p. 178, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe, vol. 70 of Frontier in Physics, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, Calif, USA, 1988.
  63. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, “micrOMEGAs_3: a program for calculating dark matter observables,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 960–985, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. M. Chakraborti, U. Chattopadhyay, S. Rao, and D. P. Roy, “Higgsino dark matter in nonuniversal gaugino mass models,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 3, Article ID 035022, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, and E. M. Sessolo, “Two ultimate tests of constrained supersymmetry,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, article 78, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. G. F. Giudice, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, “Largest temperature of the radiation era and its cosmological implications,” Physical Review D, vol. 64, no. 2, Article ID 023508, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. T. Moroi and L. Randall, “Wino cold dark matter from anomaly mediated SUSY breaking,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 570, no. 1-2, pp. 455–472, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar