Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016, Article ID 6391052, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6391052
Research Article

Nuclear Structure Calculations for Two-Neutrino Double-β Decay

1Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, IEM-CSIC, Serrano 123, 28006 Madrid, Spain
2Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Received 17 June 2016; Revised 26 August 2016; Accepted 19 September 2016

Academic Editor: Theocharis Kosmas

Copyright © 2016 P. Sarriguren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Weak-interaction and nuclear-structure aspects of nuclear double beta decay,” Physics Report, vol. 300, no. 3-4, pp. 123–214, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Faessler and F. Simkovic, “Double beta decay,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 24, no. 12, p. 2139, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, Seventy Years of Double Beta Decay, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. O. Cremonesi and M. Pavan, “Challenges in double beta decay,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, Article ID 951432, 40 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. Abgrall, E. Aguayo, F. T. Avignone III et al., “The Majorana Demonstrator neutrinoless double-beta decay experiment,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, Article ID 365432, 18 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Giuliani and A. Poves, “Neutrinoless double-beta decay,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, Article ID 857016, 38 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Maalampi and J. Suhonen, “Neutrinoless double β+/EC decays,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, Article ID 505874, 18 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Dell'Oro, S. Marcocci, M. Viel, and F. Vissani, “Neutrinoless double beta decay: 2015 review,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2016, Article ID 2162659, 37 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. S. Barabash, “Average and recommended half-life values for two-neutrino double beta decay,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 935, pp. 52–64, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. E. Caurier, G. Martínez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, and A. P. Zuker, “The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 427–488, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Menéndez, A. Poves, E. Caurier, and F. Nowacki, “Disassembling the nuclear matrix elements of the neutrinoless ββ decay,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 818, no. 3-4, pp. 139–151, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Caurier, F. Nowacki, and A. Poves, “Shell Model description of the ββ decay of 136Xe,” Physics Letters B, vol. 711, no. 1, pp. 62–64, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Vogel and M. R. Zirnbauer, “Suppression of the two-neutrino double-beta decay by nuclear-structure effects,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 57, no. 25, pp. 3148–3151, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Cha, “στ+ strength in nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2269–2281, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. T. Tomoda and A. Faessler, “Suppression of the neutrinoless ββ decay?” Physics Letters B, vol. 199, no. 4, pp. 475–481, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Muto, E. Bender, and H. V. Klapdor, “Effects of ground-state correlations on 2νββ decay rates and limitations of the QRPA approach,” Zeitschrift für Physik A Atomic Nuclei, vol. 334, no. 2, pp. 177–186, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. K. Cheoun, A. Bobyk, A. Faessler, F. Sĭmkovic, and G. Teneva, “Two-neutrino double-beta decay in coupled QRPA with neutron-proton pairing,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 564, no. 3, pp. 329–344, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. A. Raduta, A. Faessler, and D. S. Delion, “Unified description of the 2νββ decay in spherical and deformed nuclei,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 564, no. 2, pp. 185–203, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Double-beta-decay nuclear matrix elements in the QRPA framework,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 39, no. 8, Article ID 085105, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Faessler, V. Rodin, and F. Šimkovic, “Nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay and double-electron capture,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 39, no. 12, Article ID 124006, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. F. Šimkovic, L. Pacearescu, and A. Faessler, “Two-neutrino double beta decay of 76Ge within deformed QRPA,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 733, no. 3-4, pp. 321–350, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. R. Álvarez-Rodríguez, P. Sarriguren, E. M. de Guerra, L. Pacearescu, A. Faessler, and F. Šimkovic, “Deformed quasiparticle random phase approximation formalism for single- and two-neutrino double β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 70, no. 6, Article ID 064309, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. A. Raduta, A. Escuderos, A. Faessler, E. M. De Guerra, and P. Sarriguren, “Two neutrino double-β decay in deformed nuclei with an angular momentum projected basis,” Physical Review C, vol. 69, no. 6, Article ID 064321, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. S. Yousef, V. Rodin, A. Faessler, and F. Simkovic, “Two-neutrino double β decay of deformed nuclei within the quasiparticle random-phase approximation with a realistic interaction,” Physical Review C, vol. 79, no. 1, Article ID 014314, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. T. Mustonen and J. Engel, “Large-scale calculations of the double-β decay of 76Ge, 130Te, 136Xe, and 150Nd in the deformed self-consistent Skyrme quasiparticle random-phase approximation,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, no. 6, Article ID 064302, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. R. Chandra, J. Singh, P. K. Rath, P. K. Raina, and J. G. Hirsch, “Two-neutrino double- β decay of 94A110 nuclei for the 0+0+ transition,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 223–234, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Singh, R. Chandra, P. K. Rath, P. K. Raina, and J. G. Hirsch, “Nuclear deformation and the two-neutrino double-β decay in 124, 126Xe, 128, 130Te, 130, 132Ba and 150Nd isotopes,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 375–388, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. T. R. Rodríguez and G. Martínez-Pinedo, “Energy density functional study of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless ββ decay,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, no. 25, Article ID 252503, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. J. Barea and F. Iachello, “Neutrinoless double-β decay in the microscopic interacting boson model,” Physical Review C, vol. 79, no. 4, Article ID 044301, 16 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. J. Barea, J. Kotila, and F. Iachello, “Nuclear matrix elements for double-β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, no. 1, Article ID 014315, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. Yoshida, Y. Kanada-En'yo, and F. Kobayashi, “α-Cluster excited states in 32S,” Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, vol. 2016, Article ID 043D01, 22 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. Y. Fujita, B. Rubio, and W. Gelletly, “Spin-isospin excitations probed by strong, weak and electro-magnetic interactions,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 549–606, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. Frekers, P. Puppe, J. H. Thies, and H. Ejiri, “Gamow-Teller strength extraction from (3He, t) reactions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 916, pp. 219–240, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. Madey, B. S. Flanders, B. D. Anderson et al., “Low-lying structures in the Gamow-Teller strength functions for the double-beta-decaying nuclei 76Ge, 82Se, 128Te, and 130Te,” Physical Review C, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 540–552, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. R. L. Helmer, M. A. Punyasena, R. Abegg et al., “Gamow-Teller strength from the 76Sen,p76 As reaction: Implications for the double β decay of 76Ge,” Physical Review C, vol. 55, no. 6, p. 2802, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. S. Rakers, C. Bäumer, A. M. van den Berg et al., “Low-lying GT+ strength in In116 from a (d, He2) reaction experiment and its implications for Cd116 double β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 71, no. 5, Article ID 054313, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. E.-W. Grewe, C. Bäumer, H. Dohmann et al., “The d,2He reaction on 76Se and the double-β-decay matrix elements for A=76,” Physical Review C, vol. 78, no. 4, Article ID 044301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. C. J. Guess, T. Adachi, H. Akimune et al., “The Nd150(He3, t) and Sm150(t, He3) reactions with applications to ββ decay of Nd150,” Physical Review C, vol. 83, no. 6, Article ID 064318, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. J. H. Thies, D. Frekers, T. Adachi et al., “The (3He,t) reaction on 76Ge, and the double-β-decay matrix element,” Physical Review C, vol. 86, Article ID 014304, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  40. M. Sasano, H. Sakai, K. Yako et al., “Gamow-Teller transition strengths in the intermediate nucleus of the 116Cd double-β decay by the 116Cd(p,n)116In and 116Sn(n,p)116In reactions at 300 MeV,” Physical Review C, vol. 85, no. 6, Article ID 061301, 5 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. P. Puppe, A. Lennarz, T. Adachi et al., “High resolution (3He,t) experiment on the double-β decaying nuclei 128Te and 130Te,” Physical Review C, vol. 86, Article ID 044603, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. J. P. Schiffer, S. J. Freeman, J. A. Clark et al., “Nuclear structure relevant to neutrinoless double β decay: 76Ge and 76Se,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 11, Article ID 112501, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. B. P. Kay, J. P. Schiffer, S. J. Freeman et al., “Nuclear structure relevant to neutrinoless double β decay: the valence protons in 76Ge and 76Se,” Physical Review C, vol. 79, no. 2, Article ID 021301, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Effects of orbital occupancies on the neutrinoless ββ matrix element of 76Ge,” Physics Letters B, vol. 668, no. 4, pp. 277–281, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. F. Šimkovic, A. Faessler, and P. Vogel, “0νββ nuclear matrix elements and the occupancy of individual orbits,” Physical Review C, vol. 79, no. 1, Article ID 015502, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. J. Menéndez, A. Poves, E. Caurier, and F. Nowacki, “Occupancies of individual orbits, and the nuclear matrix element of the 76Ge neutrinoless ββ decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 80, no. 4, Article ID 048501, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. O. Moreno, E. Moya de Guerra, P. Sarriguren, and A. Faessler, “Theoretical mean-field and experimental occupation probabilities in the double-β decay system 76Ge to 76Se,” Physical Review C, vol. 81, no. 4, Article ID 041303, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Sarriguren, “Shape mixing and β-decay properties of neutron-deficient Kr and Sr isotopes,” Physical Review C, vol. 79, no. 4, Article ID 044315, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. P. Sarriguren, “Deformation effects on the Gamow-Teller strength distributions in the double-β decay partners 76Ge and 76Se,” Physical Review C, vol. 86, no. 3, Article ID 034335, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. P. Sarriguren, O. Moreno, and E. Moya de Guerra, “Gamow-teller strength distributions in the double-beta decay partners 128, 130Te and 128, 130Xe,” Romanian Journal of Physics, vol. 58, pp. 1242–1250, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  51. D. Navas-Nicolás and P. Sarriguren, “Gamow-Teller properties of the double-β-decay partners 116Cd(Sn) and 150Nd(Sm),” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 2, Article ID 024317, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. J. Abad, A. Morales, R. Nuñez-Lagos, and A. F. Pacheco, “An estimation for the half-lives of nuclear double beta emitters,” Anales de Fisica A, vol. 80, pp. 9–14, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  53. P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra, A. Escuderos, and A. C. Carrizo, “β Decay and shape isomerism in 74Kr,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 635, no. 1-2, pp. 55–85, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra, and A. Escuderos, “Shapes and β-decay in proton rich Ge, Se, Kr and Sr isotopes,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 658, no. 1, pp. 13–44, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  55. P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra, and A. Escuderos, “Spin–isospin excitations and half-lives of medium-mass deformed nuclei,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 691, no. 3-4, pp. 631–648, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. D. Vautherin, “Hartree-fock calculations with skyrme's interaction. II. Axially deformed nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 296–316, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Schaeffer, “A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities part II. Nuclei far from stabilities,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 635, no. 1-2, pp. 231–256, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra, L. Pacearescu, A. Faessler, F. Šimkovic, and A. A. Raduta, “Gamow-Teller strength distributions in 76Ge and 76Se from deformed quasiparticle random-phase approximation,” Physical Review C, vol. 67, no. 4, Article ID 044313, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. P. Möller and J. Randrup, “New developments in the calculation of β-strength functions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 514, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. K. Muto, E. Bender, and H. V. Klapdor, “Proton-neutron quasiparticle RPA and charge-changing transitions,” Zeitschrift für Physik A: Atomic Nuclei, vol. 333, no. 2, pp. 125–129, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. K. Muto, E. Bender, T. Oda, and H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, “Proton-neutron quasiparticle RPA with separable Gamow-Teller forces,” Zeitschrift füur Physik A: Hadrons and Nuclei, vol. 341, no. 4, pp. 407–415, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. H. Homma, E. Bender, M. Hirsch, K. Muto, H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, and T. Oda, “Systematic study of nuclear β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2972–2985, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. D. Fang, A. Faessler, V. Rodin, M. S. Yousef, and F. Šimkovic, “Running sums for 2νββ-decay matrix elements within the quasiparticle random-phase approximation with account for deformation,” Physical Review C, vol. 81, no. 3, Article ID 037303, 4 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, vol. 1, Benjamin, New York, NY, USA, 1969.
  65. A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, vol. 2, Benjamin, New York, NY, USA, 1975.
  66. F. Osterfeld, “Nuclear spin and isospin excitations,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 491–557, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. G. F. Bertsch and I. Hamamoto, “Gamow-Teller strength at high excitations,” Physical Review C, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1323–1326, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Single and double beta decays in the A=100, A=116 and A=128 triplets of isobars,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 924, pp. 1–23, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Probing the quenching of gA by single and double beta decays,” Physics Letters B, vol. 725, no. 1–3, pp. 153–157, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. P. Pirinen and J. Suhonen, “Systematic approach to β and 2νββ decays of mass A=100–136 nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 5, Article ID 054309, 17 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. A. Faessler, G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, V. Rodin, A. M. Rotunno, and F. Šimkovic, “Overconstrained estimates of neutrinoless double beta decay within the QRPA,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 35, no. 7, Article ID 075104, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. O. Moreno, R. Álvarez-Rodríguez, P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra, F. Šimkovic, and A. Faessler, “Single- and low-lying-states dominance in two-neutrino double-beta decay,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 36, no. 1, Article ID 015106, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. D. L. Fang, A. Faessler, V. Rodin, and F. Šimkovic, “Neutrinoless double-β decay of 150Nd accounting for deformation,” Physical Review C, vol. 82, Article ID 051301, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. J. Kotila and F. Iachello, “Phase-space factors for double-β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 85, Article ID 034316, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. A. Neacsu and M. Horoi, “An effective method to accurately calculate the phase space factors for β-β- decay,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2016, Article ID 7486712, 8 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. I. Hamamoto and H. Sagawa, “Charge-exchange spin monopole modes,” Physical Review C, vol. 62, no. 2, Article ID 024319, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. D. R. Bes, O. Civitarese, and J. Suhonen, “Schematic and realistic model calculations of the isovector spin monopole excitations in 116In,” Physical Review C, vol. 86, no. 2, Article ID 024314, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. O. Civitarese and J. Suhonen, “Strength of Jπ=1+ Gamow-Teller and isovector spin monopole transitions in double-β-decay triplets,” Physical Review C, vol. 89, no. 4, Article ID 044319, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. C. Wrede, S. K. L. Sjue, A. García et al., “Electron capture on 116In and implications for nuclear structure related to double-β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, no. 3, Article ID 031303, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. D. S. Delion and J. Suhonen, “Double-β decay within a consistent deformed approach,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 5, Article ID 054329, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. O. Civitarese and J. Suhonen, “Is the single-state dominance realized in double-β-decay transitions?” Physical Review C, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1535–1538, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. O. Civitarese and J. Suhonen, “Systematic study of the single-state dominance in 2vββ decay transitions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 653, no. 3, pp. 321–337, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. P. Domin, S. Kovalenko, F. Šimkovic, and S. V. Semenov, “Neutrino accompanied β±β±, β+/EC and EC/EC processes within single state dominance hypothesis,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 753, no. 3-4, pp. 337–363, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. F. Simkovic, P. Domin, and S. V. Semenov, “The single state dominance hypothesis and the two-neutrino double beta decay of 100Mo,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 27, no. 11, article 2233, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. J. C. Hardy and I. S. Towner, “Superallowed 0+0+ nuclear β decays: 2014 critical survey, with precise results for Vud and CKM unitarity,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 2, Article ID 025501, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. F. Šimkovic, V. Rodin, A. Faessler, and P. Vogel, “0νββ and 2νββ nuclear matrix elements, quasiparticle random-phase approximation, and isospin symmetry restoration,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, no. 4, Article ID 045501, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar