Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 8417598, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8417598
Research Article

Magnetic Hexadecapole Transitions and Neutrino-Nuclear Responses in Medium-Heavy Nuclei

1Department of Physics, University of Jyvaskyla, P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
2Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University, Osaka 567-0047, Japan

Received 17 March 2016; Accepted 14 April 2016

Academic Editor: Enrico Lunghi

Copyright © 2016 Lotta Jokiniemi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. H. Ejiri, “Nuclear spin isospin responses for low-energy neutrinos,” Physics Reports, vol. 338, no. 3, pp. 265–351, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. D. Vergados, H. Ejiri, and F. Šimkovic, “Theory of neutrinoless double-beta decay,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 75, no. 10, Article ID 106301, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. F. T. Avignone, S. R. Elliott, and J. Engel, “Double beta decay, Majorana neutrinos, and neutrino mass,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 481–516, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Weak-interaction and nuclear-structure aspects of nuclear double beta decay,” Physics Report, vol. 300, no. 3-4, pp. 123–214, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Hyvärinen and J. Suhonen, “Nuclear matrix elements for 0νββ decays with light or heavy Majorana-neutrino exchange,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 2, Article ID 024613, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Faessler, G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, V. Rodin, A. M. Rotunno, and F. Šimkovic, “Overconstrained estimates of neutrinoless double beta decay within the QRPA,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 35, no. 7, Article ID 075104, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Probing the quenching of gA by single and double beta decays,” Physics Letters B, vol. 725, no. 1–3, pp. 153–157, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. H. Ejiri, N. Soukouti, and J. Suhonen, “Spin-dipole nuclear matrix elements for double beta decays and astro-neutrinos,” Physics Letters B, vol. 729, pp. 27–32, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Single and double beta decays in the A = 100, A = 116 and A = 128 triplets of isobars,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 924, pp. 1–23, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. H. Ejiri and J. Suhonen, “GT neutrino-nuclear responses for double beta decays and astro neutrinos,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 42, no. 5, Article ID 055201, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. H. Ejiri and J. I. Fujita, “Effective coupling constants for beta and gamma transitions in medium and heavy nuclei,” Physics Reports, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 85–131, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Barea, J. Kotila, and F. Iachello, “Nuclear matrix elements for double-β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, no. 1, Article ID 014315, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Barea, J. Kotila, and F. Iachello, “0νββ and 2νββ nuclear matrix elements in the interacting boson model with isospin restoration,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 3, Article ID 034304, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. D. Holt and J. Engel, “Effective double-β-decay operator for 76Ge and 82Se,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, no. 6, Article ID 064315, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Volpe, N. Auerbach, G. Colò, and N. Van Giai, “Charged-current neutrino-208Pb reactions,” Physical Review C, vol. 65, no. 4, Article ID 044603, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. W. Almosly, E. Ydrefors, and J. Suhonen, “Neutral- and charged-current supernova-neutrino scattering off 116Cd,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 40, no. 9, Article ID 095201, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. W. Almosly, E. Ydrefors, and J. Suhonen, “Neutrino scattering off the stable cadmium isotopes: II. Charged-current processes,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 42, no. 9, Article ID 095106, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Lazauskas and C. Volpe, “Neutrino beams as a probe of the nuclear isospin and spin-isospin excitations,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 792, no. 3-4, pp. 219–228, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Haaranen, P. C. Srivastava, and J. Suhonen, “Forbidden nonunique β decays and effective values of weak coupling constants,” Physical Review C, vol. 93, no. 3, Article ID 034308, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure Volume I, II, Benjamin, New York, NY, USA, 1969, 1975.
  21. J. Suhonen, From Nucleons to Nucleus: Concepts of Microscopic Nuclear Theory, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. J. Toivanen and J. Suhonen, “Microscopic quasiparticle-phonon description of odd-mass Xe127133 isotopes and their β decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1237–1245, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. K. Holinde, “Two-nucleon forces and nuclear matter,” Physics Reports, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 121–188, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Suhonen, A. Faessler, T. Taigel, and T. Tomoda, “Suppression of the β+-decays of 148Dy, 150Er and 152Yb,” Physics Letters B, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 174–178, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Suhonen, T. Taigel, and A. Faessler, “pnQRPA calculation of the β+/EC quenching for several neutron-deficient nuclei in mass regions A=94–110 and A=146–156,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 486, no. 1, pp. 91–117, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, M. Wang et al., “The Nubase2012 evaluation of nuclear properties,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 36, no. 12, p. 1157, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, “Double-beta-decay nuclear matrix elements in the QRPA framework,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 39, no. 8, Article ID 085105, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. M. Bhattacharya, A. García, M. M. Hindi et al., “Electron capture decay of 116In and nuclear structure of double β decays,” Physical Review C, vol. 58, no. 2, p. 1247, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. O. Civitarese and J. Suhonen, “Systematic study of the single-state dominance in 2νββ decay transitions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 653, no. 3, pp. 321–337, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Pirinen and J. Suhonen, “Systematic approach to β and 2νββ decays of mass A=100-136 nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 5, Article ID 054309, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. H. Ejiri, “Experimental nuclear matrix elements for two neutrino double beta decays and single beta decays,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 78, no. 7, Article ID 074201, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. E. Woosley, D. H. Hartman, R. D. Hoffman, and W. C. Haxton, “The neutrino-process,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 356, pp. 272–301, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  33. K. Langanke and G. Martínez-Pinedo, “Nuclear weak-interaction processes in stars,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 819–862, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M.-K. Cheoun, E. Ha, T. Hayakawa et al., “Neutrino induced reactions for ν-process nucleosynthesis of 92Nb and 98Tc,” Physical Review C, vol. 85, no. 6, Article ID 065807, 12 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. E. K. Warburton, “Core polarization effects on spin-dipole and first-forbidden β-decay operators in the lead region,” Physical Review C, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2479–2486, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. E. K. Warburton, “First-forbidden β decay in the lead region and mesonic enhancement of the weak axial current,” Physical Review C, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 233–260, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. T. Suzuki, T. Yoshida, T. Kajino, and T. Otsuka, “β decays of isotones with neutron magic number of N=126 and r-process nucleosynthesis,” Physical Review C, vol. 85, no. 1, Article ID 015802, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. Q. Zhi, E. Caurier, J. J. Cuenca-García, K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and K. Sieja, “Shell-model half-lives including first-forbidden contributions for r-process waiting-point nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, no. 2, Article ID 025803, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. T. Wakasa, H. Sakai, H. Okamura et al., “Gamow-Teller strength of 90Nb in the continuum studied via multipole decomposition analysis of the 90Zr(p,n) reaction at 295 MeV,” Physical Review C, vol. 55, no. 6, p. 2909, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. F. Cappuzzello, M. Cavallaro, C. Agodi et al., “Heavy-ion double charge exchange reactions: a tool toward 0νββ nuclear matrix elements,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 51, article 145, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar