Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016, Article ID 9496758, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9496758
Research Article

Octant Degeneracy and Quadrant of Leptonic CPV Phase at Long Baseline Experiments and Baryogenesis

1Department of Physics, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014, India
2Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Chhatnag Road, Jhunsi, Allahabad 211019, India

Received 30 May 2016; Revised 22 July 2016; Accepted 8 August 2016

Academic Editor: Abhijit Samanta

Copyright © 2016 Kalpana Bora et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. G. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo, and A. M. Rotunno, “Global analysis of neutrino masses, mixings, and phases: entering the era of leptonic CP violation searches,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 013012, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. F. P. An, J. Z. Bai, A. B. Balantekin et al., “Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 17, Article ID 171803, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. F. P. An, Q. An, J. Z. Bai et al., “Improved measurement of electron antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 37, no. 1, Article ID 011001, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. K. Ahn, S. Chebotaryov, J. H. Choi et al., “Observation of reactor electron antineutrinos disappearance in the RENO experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 19, Article ID 191802, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. Y. Abe, C. Aberle, T. Akiri et al., “Indication of reactor v-e disappearance in the double Chooz experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 13, Article ID 131801, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. D. Forero, M. Tórtola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Global status of neutrino oscillation parameters after Neutrino-2012,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 7, Article ID 073012, 8 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. Salvado, and T. Schwetz, “Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical look at present precision,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 123, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. Dutta and K. Bora, “Probing CP violation at LBNE with reactor experiments,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 30, no. 7, Article ID 1550017, 13 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Ghosh, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami, and S. K. Raut, “Evidence for leptonic CP phase from NOνA, T2K and ICAL: a chronological progression,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 884, no. 1, pp. 274–304, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. I. Girardi, S. T. Petcov, and A. V. Titov, “Predictions for the leptonic Dirac CP violation phase: a systematic phenomenological analysis,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, no. 7, article 345, pp. 1–24, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. K. Kang and M. Tanimoto, “Prediction of leptonic CP phase in A4 symmetric model,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 7, Article ID 073010, 8 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Aaij, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi et al., “Precision measurement of CP violation in BS0J/ΨK+K- decays,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, no. 4, Article ID 041801, 9 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Huber, M. Lindner, T. Schwetz, and W. Winter, “First hint for CP violation in neutrino oscillations from upcoming superbeamand reactor experiments,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 11, article 044, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. K. Bora, D. Dutta, and P. Ghoshal, “Determining the octant of θ23 at LBNE in conjunction with reactor experiments,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 30, no. 14, Article ID 1550066, 22 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, and A. Y. Smirnov, “Measuring the deviation of the 2-3 lepton mixing from maximal with atmospheric neutrinos,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, Article ID 093005, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Chatterjee, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami, and S. K. Raut, “Octant sensitivity for large θ13 in atmospheric and long-baseline neutrino experiments,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 6, article 010, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Choubey and A. Ghosh, “Determining the octant of θ23 with PINGU, T2K, NOνA and reactor data,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 11, article 166, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. D. Kaur, Md. Naimuddin, and S. Kumar, “The sensitivity of the ICAL detector at India-based Neutrino Observatory to neutrino oscillation parameters,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, no. 4, article 156, pp. 1–8, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Chatterjee, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami, and S. K. Raut, “Octant sensitivity for large θ13 in atmospheric and long-baseline neutrino experiments,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 6, article 10, pp. 1–35, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Ghosh, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami, N. Nath, and S. K. Raut, “New look at the degeneracies in the neutrino oscillation parameters, and their resolution by T2K, NO ν A and ICAL,” Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 93, no. 1, Article ID 013013, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Adams, D. Adams, T. Akiri et al., “The long-baseline neutrino experiment: exploring fundamental symmetries of the universe,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7335.
  22. T. Akiri, D. Allspach, M. Andrews et al., “The 2010 interim report of the long-baseline neutrino experiment collaboration physics working groups,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6249.
  23. P. Adamson, C. Ader, D. Ayres et al., “NOvA proposal to build a 30 kiloton off-axis detector to study neutrino oscillations in the fermilab numi beamline,” https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0503053.
  24. K. Abe, N. Abgrall, Y. Ajima et al., “Indication of electron neutrino appearance from an accelerator-produced off-axis muon neutrino beam,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 4, Article ID 041801, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. P. Adamson, D. J. Auty, D. S. Ayres et al., “Improved search for muon-neutrino to electron-neutrino oscillations in MINOS,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 18, Article ID 181802, 6 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. D. Autiero, J. Aysto, A. Badertscher et al., “Large underground, liquid based detectors for astro-particle physics in Europe: scientific case and prospects,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2007, no. 11, article 011, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  27. G. C. Branco, R. G. Felipe, and F. R. Joaquim, “Leptonic CP violation,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 515–565, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. B. Pontecorvo, “Mesonium and antimesonium,” Soviet Physics: Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 6, p. 429, 1957. View at Google Scholar
  29. B. Pontecorvo, “Neutrino experiments and the problem of conservation of leptonic charge,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 984–988, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  30. Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, “Remarks on the Unified Model of Elementary Particles,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 870–880, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. F. Capozzi, G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, and A. Palazzo, “Status of three-neutrino oscillation parameters, circa 2013,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, Article ID 093018, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo, and A. M. Rotunno, “Global analysis of neutrino masses, mixings, and phases: entering the era of leptonic CP violation searches,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 1, Article ID 013012, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. V. Forero, M. Tórtola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino oscillations refitted,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, “Updated fit to three neutrino mixing: status of leptonic CP violation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, article 52, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  35. V. Barger, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, “Off-axis beams and detector clusters: resolving neutrino parameter degeneracies,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 5, Article ID 053007, 13 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. H. Minakata and H. Nunokawa, “Exploring neutrino mixing with low energy superbeams,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2001, article 10, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. A. S. Joshipura and K. M. Patel, “Fermion masses in SO10 models,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 9, Article ID 095002, 17 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Cebola, D. E. Costa, and R. G. Felipe, “Neutrino observables from predictive flavour patterns,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, article 156, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. K. A. Olive, K. Agashe, C. Amsler et al., “Review of particle physics,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 38, no. 9, Article ID 090001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. D. V. Forero, M. Tórtol, and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino oscillations refitted,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 9, Article ID 093006, 10 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo, and A. M. Rotunno, “Global analysis of neutrino masses, mixings, and phases: entering the era of leptonic CP violation searches,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 1, Article ID 013012, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. Salvado, and T. Schwetz, “Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical look at present precision,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 123, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. Abe, J. Adam, H. Aihara et al., “Measurements of neutrino oscillation in appearance and disappearance channels by the T2K experiment with 6.6×1020 protons on target,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 7, Article ID 072010, 50 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. Bian, “First results of e appearance analysis and electron neutrino identification at NOvA,” in Proceedings of the Meeting of the APS Division of Particles and Fields (DPF '15), Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, August 2015.
  45. https://indico.cern.ch/event/361123/contributions/856187/attachments/1136004/1625868/SK_atmospheric_kachulis_dpf2015.pdf.
  46. W. Buchmüller, P. Di Bari, and M. Plümacher, “Cosmic microwave background, matter-antimatter asymmetry and neutrino masses,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 643, no. 1–3, pp. 367–390, 2002, Erratum in: Nuclear Physics B, vol. 793, no. 1-2, p. 362, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. R. N. Mohapatra and H.-B. Yu, “Connecting leptogenesis to CP violation in neutrino mixings in a tri-bimaximal mixing model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 644, no. 5-6, pp. 346–351, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. P. S. Bhupal Dev, “TeV-scale leptogenesis,” in XXI DAE-BRNS High Energy Physics Symposium, B. Bhuyan, Ed., vol. 174 of Springer Proceedings in Physics, pp. 245–253, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. P. S. B. Dev, C.-H. Lee, and R. N. Mohapatra, “TeV scale lepton number violation and baryogenesis,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 631, no. 1, Article ID 012007, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. G. Ghosh and K. Bora, “Resolving entanglement of CPV phase with octant of θ23, and leptogenesis,” in Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol. 174, pp. 287–291, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, “Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 870–880, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. N. Sahu and S. U. Sankar, “Bounds on neutrino masses from leptogenesis in type-II seesaw models,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 1, Article ID 013006, 5 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. W. Rodejohann, “Non-unitary lepton mixing matrix, leptogenesis and low-energy CP violation,” EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 88, no. 5, Article ID 51001, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. R. Kalita and D. Borah, “Constraining a type I seesaw model with A4 flavor symmetry from neutrino data and leptogenesis,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 5, Article ID 055012, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. R. Kalita and D. Borah, “Discriminating Majorana neutrino phases in the light of lepton flavor violation and leptogenesis in type I+II seesaw models,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 30, no. 22, Article ID 1550130, 24 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. E. I. Lashin, N. Chamoun, C. Hamzaoui, and S. Nasri, “Neutrino mixing and leptogenesis in μ-τ symmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 11, Article ID 113014, 25 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. W.-C. Huang, “The dark side of θ13, δCP, leptogenesis and inflation in type-I seesaw,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 11, article 083, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. M. Borah, D. Borah, and M. K. Das, “Discriminating Majorana neutrino textures in light of the baryon asymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 11, Article ID 113008, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. P. Di Bari and M. Re Fiorentin, “Supersymmetric SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis and a new N2-dominated scenario,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, no. 3, Article ID 039, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. C. S. Fong, D. Meloni, A. Meroni, and E. Nardi, “Leptogenesis in SO(10),” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 1, article 111, pp. 1–21, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. G. Altarelli and D. Meloni, “A non supersymmetric SO(10) grand unified model for all the physics below MGUT,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 8, article 21, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. P. Di Bari and L. Marzola, “SO(10)-inspired solution to the problem of the initial conditions in leptogenesis,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 877, no. 3, pp. 719–751, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. X.-D. Ji, Y.-C. Li, R. N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri, and Y. Zhang, “Leptogenesis in realistic SO(10) models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 651, no. 2-3, pp. 195–207, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. S. Blanchet, P. S. Bhupal Dev, and R. N. Mohapatra, “Leptogenesis with TeV-scale inverse seesaw model in SO(10),” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 11, Article ID 115025, 11 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. F. Buccella, D. Falcone, and F. Tramontano, “Baryogenesis via leptogenesis in SO(10) models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 524, no. 3-4, pp. 241–244, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. R. N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri, and H.-B. Yu, “Leptogenesis, μ-τ symmetry and θ13,” Physics Letters B, vol. 615, no. 3-4, pp. 231–239, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, “Oscillating neutrinos and μe,γ,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 618, no. 1-2, pp. 171–204, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. N. G. Deshpande and E. Keith, “Predictive fermion mass matrix Ansätze in nonsupersymmetric SO(10) grand unification,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 3513–3528, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. D.-G. Lee, R. N. Mohapatra, M. K. Parida, and M. Rani, “Predictions for the proton lifetime in minimal nonsupersymmetric SO(10) models: an update,” Physical Review D, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 229–235, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. F. Buccella, G. Miele, L. Rosa, P. Santorelli, and T. Tuzi, “An upper limit for the proton lifetime in SO(10),” Physics Letters B, vol. 233, no. 1-2, pp. 178–182, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. Samanta, “The quark-lepton unification: LHC data and neutrino masses,” Physics Letters B, vol. 728, pp. 11–14, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. S. Davidson and A. Ibarra, “A lower bound on the right-handed neutrino mass from leptogenesis,” Physics Letters B, vol. 535, no. 1–4, pp. 25–32, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. K. Bora and G. Ghosh, “Neutrino masses and mixings using updated values of running quark and lepton masses,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 481, Article ID 012016, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. K. Bora, D. Dutta, and P. Ghoshal, “Probing sterile neutrino parameters with Double Chooz, Daya Bay and RENO,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 12, article 25, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. K. Bora and G. Ghosh, “Charged lepton flavor violation μeγ in μτ symmetric SUSY SO(10) mSUGRA, NUHM, NUGM, and NUSM theories and LHC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, no. 9, article 428, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. G. t. Hooft, “Symmetry breaking through Bell-Jackiw anomalies,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 8–11, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. R. N. Mohapatra and X. Zhang, “Electroweak baryogenesis in left-right-symmetric models,” Physical Review D, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 5331–5336, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. F. R. Klinkhamer and N. S. Manton, “A saddle-point solution in the Weinberg-Salam theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2212–2220, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov, and M. E. Shaposhikov, “On anomalous electroweak baryon-number non-conservation in the early universe,” Physics Letters B, vol. 155, no. 1-2, pp. 36–42, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. S. Y. Khlebnikov and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “The statistical theory of anomalous fermion number non-conservation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 308, no. 4, pp. 885–912, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. B. D. Fields, P. Molarto, and S. Sarkar, “Big bang nucleosynthesis,” in Review of PDG-2014, Astrophysical Constants and Parameters, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  82. M. Malek, “Recent results from T2K,” in Proceedings of the 17th Lomonoscov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, August 2015.