Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 1350140, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1350140
Research Article

Analysis of Radial Excitations of Octet Baryons in QCD Sum Rules

Department of Physics, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to T. M. Aliev; rt.ude.utem@veilat

Received 5 November 2016; Accepted 30 November 2016; Published 3 January 2017

Academic Editor: Juan José Sanz-Cillero

Copyright © 2017 T. M. Aliev and S. Bilmis. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Abstract

Using the QCD sum rules method, we estimate the mass and residues of the first radial excitations of octet baryons. The contributions coming from the ground state baryons are eliminated by constructing the linear combinations of the sum rules corresponding to different Lorentz structures. Our predictions of the masses of the first radial excitations of octet baryons are in good agreement with the data.

1. Introduction

At present time, many radial excitations of the mesons and baryons which carry the same spin-parity quantum numbers as the ground states are observed in experiments [1]. The identification and investigation of the properties of the radial excitations on the background of the hadronic continuum are a quite difficult task in the experiments. These resonances are strongly coupled to the two, three hadrons, which leads to the large decay widths. Theoretical study of the radial excitations is also a challenging problem. One of the powerful theoretical methods for studying the properties of the hadrons is the sum rules method. The QCD sum rules method introduced in [2] was extremely useful for studying the properties of mesonic systems. This method was extended to ground state baryons in pioneering work [3]. It is well known that the choice of interpolating current which carries the same quantum numbers as appropriate baryon is not uniquely defined. The most general form of the interpolating currents for octet baryons is found in [4]. It is contemplated whether this method can be applied to the radial excitations of baryons. Note that the radial excitations of mesons within finite energy rules have been studied in [5, 6]. Recently, radial excitations of heavy-light mesons have been investigated in detail via the QCD sum rules in [7]. Recently, this method was applied for the determination of the masses of first radial excitation of mesons and nucleon by using the least square fitting method [8]. In this paper, we calculate the mass and residues of the first excited states of octet baryons within the QCD sum rules method. We modify the spectral representation from the hadronic part by taking into account two poles which correspond to the ground and first excited state baryons, respectively. Then, the method for eliminating the ground state contributions is employed for the determination of the mass and residues of the excited state baryons.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we derive the mass sum rules for octet baryons by including the first radial excitation baryons. Section 3 is devoted to the numerical analysis of obtained rules. Section 4 contains the summary of our results and conclusions.

2. Mass Sum Rules for Octet Baryons with Their Radial Excitation

For determination of the mass and residues of the mesons and baryons, usually two-point correlation function is used. Following the sum rules method strategy for extracting the mass and residues of radially excited octet baryons, we consider the following two-point correlation function:where is the interpolating currents of the octet baryons. The most general forms of the interpolating currents for the octet baryons are [4]where , , and in which is arbitrary parameter and , , and are color indices.

The phenomenological part of the correlation function can be obtained by inserting a full set of baryons carrying the same quantum numbers as the interpolating current. Isolating the ground state and its first radial excitation from phenomenological side for the correlation functions we have

Here and are the residue and mass of the ground (first radial excitation) state baryon and stands for the contributions of higher states and continuum. In derivation of (3), we used

In order to suppress the higher states and continuum contributions the Borel transformation is applied. After performing Borel transformation from (3) we have

The correlation function in terms of quark-gluon degrees of freedom (theoretical part) is calculated in the deep Euclidean domain () with the help of the operator product expansion (OPE), which contains the perturbative and nonperturbative (vacuum condensate) contributions. For structures and it can be written aswhere the invariant functions correspond to the coefficient of the structure .

The expressions of various terms entering to the right side of (6) are calculated in numerous works (see, e.g., [9, 10]). Performing Borel transformation over in theoretical part of the correlation function and equating the coefficients of the Lorentz structures and , one can obtain the sum rules for the mass.

The sum rules for the structures and can be written asIn (7), we consider the contributions of operators up to dimension . Obviously, for different members of the octet baryons are different. Note that, in the derivation of (7), we set the light quark masses to zero; .

The continuum subtraction is done using the quark-hadron duality ansatz. In (7) the function is described by the higher states contributions and continuum contributions and determined as , where is the effective continuum threshold. The coefficients in (7) are given as follows (see [9, 10]).

For

For

For

For Moreover, the coefficients for the members of the octet baryons are given as follows.

For

For

For

For where is the Euler constant, , and is the renormalization scale parameter whose value is taken as . Now using (5) and (7) one can determine the masses and residues of the octet baryons. We have four unknowns (two masses and two residues). Therefore we need four equations to find these unknowns.

The first two equations are obtained by equating the coefficients of the structures and in both representations of the correlation functions; that is,

The remaining two equations can be obtained by taking derivatives with respect to from both sides of (16). Then we have

From these equations we get

To obtain the mass and residues of the radial excitations from the sum rules, we take the mass of the ground state as an input parameter. Note that the zero width approximation is assumed.

3. Numerical Analysis

The input parameters used in the above coefficients include the strange quark mass and quark condensates. In our numerical calculations, we use the following values of these parameters (see [3, 11, 12]):In numerical calculations we take .

The sum rules for the mass and residues of the radially excited baryons contain three auxiliary parameters in addition to these input parameters: the Borel mass , arbitrary parameter (in expressions of the interpolating current), and continuum threshold . Usually the continuum threshold is related to the energy of the first excited state. In our calculations for we have used where varies between 0.3 and 0.8. These values of include only the mass of the first radial excitation, while the higher excitations are included in the continuum states. The working interval of is obtained by the following way. The lower bound of is determined by demanding the convergence of the operator product expansion, while the upper bound is obtained by requiring that the continuum contribution remains subleading. Our calculations lead to the following working region of :

Having determined the working regions for Borel mass parameter , we can calculate the mass and residues of the first radial excitation of octet baryons. As an example, in Figures 1 and 2, we present the dependence of the mass of the radial excitation of and baryons on at fixed values of and . From these figures, we obtained that the masses of the radial excitations of and exhibit good stability with respect to the variation of in the working region. We perform the same analysis for another fixed values of and find that the results change about . We also performed analysis for the other members of the octet baryons and obtained that the dependence of the mass of radial excitation of octet baryons on is rather weak.

Figure 1: Dependence of on the Borel mass parameter for the fixed value of the continuum threshold is depicted for the several fixed values of parameter .
Figure 2: Dependence of on the Borel mass parameter for the fixed value of the continuum threshold is depicted for the several fixed values of parameter .

In order to determine the optimal working interval of the parameter , we study the dependence of the mass and residues of octet baryons and their radial excitation on , where . Note that we use by the following reason. Exploring the whole region in () is equivalent to the very restricted domain .

In Figures 3 and 4, we present the dependence of and on for two fixed values of and at fixed value . From these figures, we observe that in the domain the mass of and baryons remains stable with respect to the variation of and we deduce the following values for their masses:

Figure 3: Dependence of on at the fixed value of the continuum threshold is shown for various values of the Borel mass parameter .
Figure 4: Dependence of on at the fixed value of the continuum threshold is shown for various values of the Borel mass parameter .

Performing similar analysis for the mass of the and baryons we obtained

Finally, we can determine the residues of the radial excitation baryons. For this aim, we used (18). Using the working region for and at given values of we studied the dependency of the residue square on and we obtained the following values:

Comparing our predictions on the mass of the radial excitation with the octet baryons we see that the results are in good agreement with the experimental data. Remember that experimentally the masses of the radial excitations of octet baryons are , , , and

We observed that our predictions on mass for the radial excitations are in good agreement with the experimental data. We also calculate the residues for the radial excitations octet baryons.

Our final remark to this section is as follows. We perform our analysis without taking into account the radiative corrections to the two-point correlation function. The one-loop radiative corrections to the two-point correlation function for nucleon for Ioffe current () is calculated in [13]. When we take into account these corrections, our results change by (5–8)%.

4. Conclusion

In the present work, we estimate the masses and residues of the first radial excited states of the octet baryons. The QCD sum rules are modified by including the contribution of the first radial excited states in addition to the ground state. Our predictions on the masses of the first radial excited states baryons are in good agreement with the experimental data. Hence, QCD sum rules work quite well not only for ground state baryons but also for the radial excitations. The obtained results for the residues can be checked by studying the electromagnetic or strong transitions of radial excitation to the ground state baryons.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. K. Olive, “Review of Particle Physics,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 38, no. 9, Article ID 090001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and resonance physics. Theoretical foundations,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 385–447, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. L. Ioffe, “Calculation of baryon masses in quantum chromodynamics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 317–341, 1981, Erratum to: Nuclear Physics B, vol. 191, pp. 591-592, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. Y. Chung, H. G. Dosch, M. Kremer, and D. Schall, “Baryon sum rules and chiral symmetry breaking,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 55–75, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. Krasnikov and A. Pivovarov, “The influence of the analytical continuation effects on the value of the QCD scale parameter Λ extracted from the data on charmonium and upsilon hadron decays,” Physics Letters B, vol. 116, no. 2-3, pp. 168–170, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. G. Gorishny, A. L. Kataev, and S. A. Larin, “Next-next-to-leading perturbative QCD corrections and light quark masses,” Physics Letters B, vol. 135, no. 5-6, pp. 457–462, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. Gelhausen, A. Khodjamirian, A. A. Pivovarov, and D. Rosenthal, “Radial excitations of heavy-light mesons from QCD sum rules,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article no. 2979, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J.-F. Jiang and S.-L. Zhu, “Radial excitations of mesons and nucleons from QCD sum rules,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, Article ID 074002, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. F. X. Lee and X. Liu, “Predictive ability of QCD sum rules for excited baryons,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 1, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. Aliev, A. Özpineci, and M. Savci, “Octet baryon magnetic moments in light cone QCD sum rules,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 1, Article ID 016002, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Narison, “Strange quark, tachyonic gluon masses and Vu s from hadronic tau decays,” Physics Letters B, vol. 626, no. 1–4, pp. 101–110, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Narison, “Power corrections to αsMT, Vu sand m-s,” Physics Letters B, vol. 673, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. E. G. Drukarev, M. G. Ryskin, and V. A. Sadovnikova, “On the loop approximation in nucleon QCD sum rules,” Physics of Atomic Nuclei, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 849–853, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar