Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 2863647, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2863647
Research Article

Mixing in the Minimal Flavor-Violating Two-Higgs-Doublet Models

Institute of Particle Physics and Key Laboratory of Quark and Lepton Physics (MOE), Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Fang Su; nc.ca.pti@gnafus

Received 14 May 2017; Accepted 10 July 2017; Published 29 August 2017

Academic Editor: Alexey A. Petrov

Copyright © 2017 Natthawin Cho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 30–61, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. S. Carena and H. E. Haber, “Higgs boson theory and phenomenology,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 63–152, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Trodden, “Electroweak baryogenesis: a brief review,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Rencontres de Moriond 98 Electrowek Interactions and Unified Theories: Les racs, vol. 71, pp. 1463–1500, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind, “Baryon asymmetry in the very early universe,” Physics Letters B, vol. 81, no. 3-4, pp. 416–418, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. M. Cline, “Baryogenesis,” in Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School - Session 86: Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime Les Houches, vol. 86, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. D. Lee, “A theory of spontaneous t violation,” Physical Review D, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID 1226, pp. 1226–1239, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Cabibbo, “Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 531–533, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, “CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 49, pp. 652–657, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, “Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 1285–1292, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, “Natural conservation laws for neutral currents,” Physical Review D, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1958–1965, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. A. J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jäger, and L. Silvestrini, “Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model,” Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, vol. 500, no. 1-2, pp. 161–167, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. J. Buras, M. V. Carlucci, S. Gori, and G. Isidori, “Higgs-mediated FCNcs: natural flavour conservation vs. minimal flavour violation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 10, article no. 009, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. D'Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia, “Minimal flavour violation: an effective field theory approach,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 645, no. 3, pp. 155–187, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Cerveró and J.-M. Gérard, “Minimal violation of flavour and custodial symmetries in a vectophobic two-higgs-doublet-model,” Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, vol. 712, no. 3, pp. 255–260, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. M. Hadeed and B. Holdom, “Remnant family symmetries: a case for D0-D0mixing,” Physics Letters B, vol. 159, no. 4-6, pp. 379–384, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Branco, W. Grimus, and L. Lavoura, “Relating the scalar flavour-changing neutral couplings to the CKM matrix,” Physics Letters B, vol. 380, no. 1-2, pp. 119–126, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. G. Cvetič, S. S. Hwang, and C. S. Kim, “Higgs-mediated flavor-changing neutral currents in the general framework with two Higgs doublets: An RGE analysis,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 1.16003E6–1.16004E7, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Bhattacharyya, D. Das, and A. Kundu, “Feasibility of light scalars in a class of two-Higgs-doublet models and their decay signatures,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 89, no. 9, Article ID 095029, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. D. Campos, D. Cogollo, M. Lindner, T. Melo, F. S. Queiroz, and W. Rodejohann, Neutrino Masses and Absence of Flavor Changing Interactions in the 2HDM from Gauge Principles.
  21. G. Branco, P. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models,” Physics Reports, vol. 516, no. 1-2, pp. 1–102, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, “The higgs hunters guide,” Frontier of Physics, vol. 80, pp. 1–404, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Davidson and H. E. Haber, “Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 9, Article ID 099902, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. V. Manohar and M. B. Wise, “Flavor changing neutral currents, an extended scalar sector, and the Higgs production rate at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 74, no. 3, Article ID 035009, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Degrassi and P. Slavich, “QCD corrections in two-Higgs-doublet extensions of the standard model with minimal flavor violation,” Physical Review D-Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 81, no. 7, Article ID 075001, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Pich and P. Tuzón, “Yukawa alignment in the two-Higgs-doublet model,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 80, no. 9, Article ID 091702, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Jung, A. Pich, and P. Tuzón, “Charged-Higgs phenomenology in the aligned two-Higgs-doublet model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 11, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. X.-Q. Li, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, “Exclusive radiative B -meson decays within minimal flavor-violating two-Higgs-doublet models,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 89, no. 5, Article ID 054024, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. I. Gresham and M. B. Wise, “Color octet scalar production at the CERN LHC,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 76, no. 7, Article ID 075003, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Idilbi, C. Kim, and T. Mehen, “Factorization and resummation for single color-octet scalar production at the LHC,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 79, no. 11, Article ID 114016, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, and A. Vicini, “Scalar particle contribution to Higgs production via gluon fusion at NLO,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 11, article 095, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. P. Burgess, M. Trott, and S. Zuberi, “Light octet scalars, a heavy Higgs and minimal flavour violation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 9, article 082, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Crivellin, C. Greub, and A. Kokulu, “Flavor-phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models with generic Yukawa structure,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 87, no. 9, Article ID 094031, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Q. Chang, P.-F. Li, and X.-Q. Li, “Bs0-Bs0 mixing within minimal flavor-violating two-Higgs-doublet models,” The European Physical Journal C:Particles and Fields, vol. 75, no. 12, p. 594, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. P. Ellis, “TikZ-feynman: feynman diagrams with TikZ,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 210, pp. 103–123, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. J. Urban, F. Krauss, and G. Soff, “Influence of external momenta in K0 anti-K0 and B0 anti-B0 mixing,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 23, pp. L25–L31, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  37. A. J. Buras, S. Jäger, and J. Ö. Urban, “Master formulae for ΔF=2 NLO-QCD factors in the Standard Model and beyond,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 605, no. 1-3, pp. 600–624, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. J. Buras, D. Guadagnoli, and G. Isidori, “On εK beyond lowest order in the operator product expansion,” Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, vol. 688, no. 4-5, pp. 309–313, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J.-M. Gérard, C. Smith, and S. Trine, “Radiative kaon decays and the penguin contribution to the ΔI =1/2 rule,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 730, no. 1-2, pp. 1–36, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Z. Ligeti and F. Sala, “A new look at the theory uncertainty of ϵ K,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2016, no. 9, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. FLAG Working Group, “Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics,” The European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields, vol. 77, no. 2, p. 112, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  42. T. Inami and C. S. Lim, “Effects of Superheavy Quarks and Leptons in Low-Energy Weak Processes k(L)→ mu anti-mu, K+ → pi+ Neutrino anti-neutrino and K0 anti-K0,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 297–314, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. A. J. Buras, M. Jamin, and P. H. Weisz, “Leading and next-to-leading QCD corrections to ε-parameter and B0B0 mixing in the presence of a heavy top quark,” Nuclear Physics, Section B, vol. 347, no. 3, pp. 491–536, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. Brod and M. Gorbahn, “k at next-to-next-to-leading order: The charm-top-quark contribution,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 82, no. 9, Article ID 094026, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Brod and M. Gorbahn, “Next-to-next-to-leading-order charm-quark contribution to the CP violation parameter μ k and Δm K,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 12, Article ID 121801, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Bobeth, A. J. Buras, A. Celis, and M. Jung, “Patterns of flavour violation in models with vector-like quarks,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, no. 4, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. Particle Data Group, “Review of particle physics,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 40, no. 10, p. 100001, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. B. J. Choi et al., “Kaon BSM B-parameters using improved staggered fermions from Nf = 2 + 1 unquenched QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 93, no. 1, Article ID 014511, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  49. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, “RunDec: a mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 43–65, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL Collaboration, and LEP Collaboration, “Search for charged Higgs bosons: combined results using LEP data,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, no. 2463, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. P. Gutierrez, “Review of charged higgs searches at the tevatron,” PoS CHARGED, vol. 10, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  52. ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for a charged higgs boson produced in the vector-boson fusion mode with decay H±→W±Z using pp collisions at s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS Experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, no. 23, Article ID 231801, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  53. CMS Collaboration, “Search for a charged Higgs boson in pp collisions at s = 8 TeV,” The Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1511, p. 018, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  54. A. Hayreter and G. Valencia, “LHC constraints on color octet scalars,” arXiv: 1703.04164.
  55. A. Arbey, F. Mahmoudi, O. Stal, and T. Stefaniak, “Status of the charged higgs boson in two higgs doublet models,” High Energy Physics-Phenomenology, 35 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet