Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 6138263, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6138263
Research Article

(Anti)chiral Superfield Approach to Nilpotent Symmetries: Self-Dual Chiral Bosonic Theory

1Physics Department, Centre of Advanced Studies, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
2DST Centre for Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India

Correspondence should be addressed to T. Bhanja

Received 21 November 2016; Accepted 29 January 2017; Published 7 March 2017

Academic Editor: George Siopsis

Copyright © 2017 N. Srinivas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. N. Marcus and J. H. Schwarz, “Field theories that have no manifestly Lorentz-invariant formulation,” Physics Letters. B, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 111–114, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, E. Martinec, and R. Rohm, “Heterotic string,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 502–505, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. X. G. Wen, “Electrodynamical properties of gapless edge excitations in the fractional quantum Hall states,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, no. 18, pp. 2206–2209, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Stone, “Superfluid dynamics of the fractional quantum Hall state,” Physical Review B, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 212–217, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. V. José, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick, and D. R. Nelson, “Renormalization, vortices, and symmetry-breaking perturbations in the two-dimensional planar model,” Physical Review B, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1217–1241, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Weigman, “One-dimensional Fermi system and plane xy model,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 1583, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. Boyanovsky and R. Holman, “The Coulomb gas, vertex operators and the c-theorem,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 332, no. 3, pp. 641–665, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. R. Floreanini and R. Jackiw, “Self-dual fields as charge-density solitons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 59, no. 17, pp. 1873–1876, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. W. Siegel, “Manifest Lorentz invariance sometimes requires non-linearity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 238, no. 2, pp. 307–316, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. C. Imbimbo and A. Schwimmer, “The lagrangian formulation of chiral scalars,” Physics Letters B, vol. 193, no. 4, pp. 455–458, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Labastida and M. Pernici, “Heterotic-string Lagrangean in the bosonic formulation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 59, no. 22, pp. 2511–2514, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. P. P. Srivastava, “Quantization of self-dual field revisited,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 63, no. 26, pp. 2791–2792, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Upadhyay and B. P. Mandal, “The model for self-dual chiral bosons as a Hodge theory,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 71, no. 9, article 1759, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “The abelian Higgs Kibble model, unitarity of the S-operator,” Physics Letters B, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 344–346, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of the abelian Higgs-Kibble model,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 42, pp. 127–162, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of gauge theories,” Annals of Physics, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 287–321, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. I. V. Tyutin, “Gauge Invariance in field theory and statistical physics in operator formalism,” Report FIAN-39, Lebedev Institute, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Thierry-Mieg, “Geometrical reinterpretation of Faddeev-Popov ghost particles and BRS transformations,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2834–2838, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. M. Quirós, F. J. de Urries, J. Hoyos, M. L. Mazón, and E. Rodriguez, “Geometrical structure of Faddeev–Popov fields and invariance properties of gauge theories,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1767–1774, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. L. Bonora and M. Tonin, “Superfield formulation of extended BRS symmetry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 98, no. 1-2, pp. 48–50, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Bonora, P. Pasti, and M. Tonin, “Geometric description of extended BRS symmetry in superfield formulation,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 353–364, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. R. Delbourgo and P. D. Jarvis, “Extended BRS invariance and OSp (4/2) supersymmetry,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 611–625, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Delbourgo, P. D. Jarvis, and G. Thompson, “Local OSp(4/2) supersymmetry and extended BRS transformations for gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 109, no. 1-2, pp. 25–27, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. L. Alvarez-Gaumé and L. Baulieu, “The two quantum symmetries associated with a classical symmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 255–267, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. R. P. Malik and B. P. Mandal, “Augmented superfield approach to exact nilpotent symmetries for matter fields in non-Abelian theory,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 219–226, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. R. P. Malik, “Augmented superfield approach to unique nilpotent symmetries for complex scalar fields in QED,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 825–834, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. R. Malik, “An alternative to the horizontality condition in the superfield approach to BRST symmetries,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 169–177, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. P. Malik, “A generalization of the horizontality condition in the superfield approach to nilpotent symmetries for QED with complex scalar fields,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 40, no. 18, pp. 4877–4894, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. Krishna and R. P. Malik, “N=2 SUSY symmetries for a moving charged particle under influence of a magnetic field: supervariable approach,” Annals of Physics, vol. 355, pp. 204–216, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. S. Krishna, A. Shukla, and R. P. Malik, “General N=2 supersymmetric quantum mechanical model: supervariable approach to its off-shell nilpotent symmetries,” Annals of Physics, vol. 351, pp. 558–570, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. S. Krishna, A. Shukla, and R. P. Malik, “Supervariable approach to nilpotent symmetries of a couple of N=2 supersymmetric quantum mechanical models,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1623–1631, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Krishna and R. P. Malik, “A free N=2 supersymmetric system: novel symmetries,” EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 109, no. 3, Article ID 31001, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. N. Srinivas, A. Shukla, and R. P. Malik, “Nilpotent symmetries of the 4D Abelian 2-form gauge theory: augmented superfield formalism,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06770.
  34. T. Bhanja, N. Srinivas, and R. P. Malik, “(Anti-)BRST and (Anti-)co-BRST Symmetries of a System of Rigid Rotor: Augmented Supervariable Approach,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.04237.
  35. U. Kulshreshtha, D. S. Kulshreshthra, and H. J. W. Mueuller-Kirsten, “A gauge-invariant theory of chiral bosons: Wess-Zumino term, Hamiltonian and BRST formulations,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 427–431, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. N. Nakanishi and I. Ojima, Covariant Operator Formalism of Gauge Theory and Quantum Gravity, World Scientific, Singapore, 1990.
  37. D. Shukla, T. Bhanja, and R. P. Malik, “Self-dual chiral boson: augmented superfield approach,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 3025, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. G. Curci and R. Ferrari, “Slavnov transformations and supersummetry,” Physics Letters. B, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 91–94, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus