Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 7907858, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7907858
Research Article

Analysis of Various Projectile Interactions with Nuclear Emulsion Detector Nuclei at ~1 GeV per Nucleon Using Coulomb Modified Glauber Model

1Department of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
2Post Graduate and Research Department of Physics, The American College, Madurai 625002, India

Correspondence should be addressed to V. Singh; moc.oohay@zaknev and S. S. R. Inbanathan; moc.liamg@nahtanabninehpets

Received 29 June 2017; Accepted 25 September 2017; Published 31 October 2017

Academic Editor: Anna Cimmino

Copyright © 2017 N. Marimuthu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. M. S. M. Nour El-Din and M. E. Solite, “A study of the energy dependence for the multiplicity of shower particles produced in a 16O–emulsion interaction in the framework of the Coulomb-modified Glauber model,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 86, article 1209, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Y. Abul-Magd and M. T. Ali-Alhinai, “The Coulomb-modified Glauber description of reaction cross-sections of heavy ions with nuclei,” Il Nuovo Cimento A , vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1281–1288, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. K. Charagi and S. K. Gupta, “Coulomb-modified Glauber model description of heavy-ion reaction cross sections,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1610–1618, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Chauvin, D. Lebrun, A. Lounis, and M. Buenerd, “Low and intermediate energy nucleus-nucleus elastic scattering and the optical limit of Glauber theory,” Physical Review C, vol. 28, p. 1970, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Y. H. Farag, “Modified Glauber model for the total reaction cross-section of 12C + 12C collisions,” The European Physical Journal A - Hadrons and Nuclei, vol. 2, p. 405, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. K. Singh, A. K. Soma, R. Pathak, and V. Singh, “Two source emission behavior of projectile fragments alpha in 84Kr interactions at around 1 GeV per nucleon,” Indian Journal of Physics, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 1523–1533, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. Singh et al., “Multifragmentation Studies in 84Kr Interactions with Nuclear Emulsion at around 1 A GeV”.
  8. N. Marimuthu, V. Singh, and S. S. R. Inbanathan, “Characteristics study of projectile’s lightest fragment for 84Kr36–emulsion interaction at around 1 A GeV,” Indian Journal of Physics, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 431–438, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Singh, An Investigation of 84Kr-Emulsion interactions around 1Gev per nucleon - Thesis, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 1998.
  10. N. S. Chouhan, M. K. Singh, V. Singh, and R. Pathak, “Characteristics of compound multiplicity in 84Kr36 with various light and heavy targets at 1 GeV per nucleon,” Indian Journal of Physics, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 1263–1267, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. K. Singh, R. Pathak, and V. Singh, “Characteristics of alpha projectile fragments emission in interaction of nuclei with emulsion,” Indian Journal of Physics, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 1257–1273, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. K. Singh, A. K. Soma, R. Pathak, and V. Singh, “Multiplicity distributions of shower particles and target fragments in 84Kr36–emulsion interactions at 1 GeV per nucleon,” Indian Journal of Physics, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 323–327, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. V. Franco and G. K. Varma, “Collisions between composite particles at medium and high energies,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 349–370, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. H. De Vries, C. W. De Jager, and C. De Vries, “Nuclear charge-density-distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 495–536, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Friedrich and N. Voegler, “The salient features of charge density distributions of medium and heavy even-even nuclei determined from a systematic analysis of elastic electron scattering form factors,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 373, no. 2, pp. 192–224, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/27/006/27006912.pdf.
  17. C. J. Waddington and P. S. Freier, “Interactions of energetic gold nuclei in nuclear emulsions,” Physical Review C, vol. 31, p. 888, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. C. Xiangzhou et al., “In-medium nucleon-nucleon cross section and its effect on total nuclear reaction cross section,” Physical Review C, vol. 58, p. 572, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. J. Glauber, Lectures in Theoretical Physics, W. E. Brittin et al., Ed., vol. 1, Inter Science Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 1959.
  20. R. J. Glauber and G. Matthiae, “High-energy scattering of protons by nuclei,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 135–157, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  21. Y. J. Kim, “Coulomb-modified Glauber Model Analysis for 6Li + 58Ni and 6Li + 90Zr Elastic Scatterings at = 600 MeV,” New Physics: Sae Mulli, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 389–395, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. A. Jilany et al., “Interactions of relativistic 24Mg nuclei with emulsion nuclei at 4.5 GeV/c per nucleon,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 4, pp. 815–825, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. I. Adamovich, M. M. Aggarwa, Y. A. Alexandrov et al., “Complex analysis of gold interactions with photoemulsion nuclei at 10.7 GeV/nucleon within the framework of cascade and FRITIOF models,” Zeitschrift für Physik A: Hadrons and Nuclei, vol. 358, no. 3, pp. 337–351, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. I. Adamovich, M. M. Aggarwa, Y. A. Alexandrov et al., “Charged particle multiplicity and pseudorapidity density distributions in 16O, 28Si and 197Au-induced nuclear interactions at 14.6 and 11.6A GeV/c,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 593, no. 4, pp. 535–549, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. I. Adamovich, M. M. Aggarwa, Y. A. Alexandrov et al., “Charged particle density distributions in Au induced interactions with emulsion nuclei at 10.7 A GeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 352, no. 3-4, pp. 472–478, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. M. I. Adamovich, M. M. Aggarwa, Y. A. Alexandrov et al., “Local particle densities and global multiplicities in central heavy ion interactions at 3.7, 14.6, 60 and 200A GeV,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 509–520, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. M. I. Adamovich, M. M. Aggarwal, and N. P. Andreeva, “Rapidity densities and their fluctuations in central 200 A GeV 32S interactions with Au and Ag, Br nuclei EMU01 collaboration,” Physics Letters B, vol. 227, p. 285, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  28. P. Shukla, “Glauber model for heavy ion collisions from low energies to high energies,” 2001, https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0112039.
  29. P. J. Karol, “Nucleus-nucleus reaction cross sections at high energies: Soft-spheres model,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1203–1209, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. P. J. Karol, “Transparency in high-energy nuclear collisions,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1988–1995, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. M. S. M. Nour El-Din and M. E. Solite, “The mass-number dependence studies for the multiplicity of shower particles produced in interactions of different projectiles with emulsion nuclei at 3.7 GeV/n in the framework of the modified Glauber models I and II,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 87, no. 8, pp. 945–956, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  32. E. H. Esmael, M. S. M. Nour El -Din, and M. Y. M. Hassan, “Elastic scattering and breakup effect analysis of 11Be + 12C at 38.4 MeV/nucleon,” in Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Nuclear and Particle Physics, October 2003.
  33. W. H. Barkas, Nuclear Research Emulsion, vol. 1, Academic Press, New York and London, 1973.
  34. P. L. Jain, M. M. Aggarwal, M. S. El-Nagdy, and A. Z. Ismail, “Fission of Uranium Nuclei in Flight at Relativistic Energies,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 52, no. 20, pp. 1763–1766, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. B. Anderson, I. Otterlund, and E. Stenlund, “General properties of hadron-nucleus reaction multiplicities,” Physics Letters B, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 469–472, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  36. E. Firu, V. Bradnova, M. Haiduc et al., “Study of peripheral collisions of 56Fe at 1 a GeV/c in nuclear emulsion,” Romanian Reports in Physics, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 425–436, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  37. M. A. Jilany, “Electromagnetic dissociation of 3.7AGeV 24Mg and 28Si projectiles in nuclear emulsion,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 705, p. 477, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  38. V. Singh, B. Bhattacharjee, S. Sengupta, and A. Mukhopadhyay, “Estimation of Impact Parameter on event-by-event basis in Nuclear Emulsion Detector,” 2004, https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-ex/0412051.