Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 9291623, 24 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9291623
Review Article

Finite Temperature QCD Sum Rules: A Review

1Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 70-543, 04510 Mexico City, Mexico
2Centre for Theoretical and Mathematical Physics and Department of Physics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
3Instituto de Fisica, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile
4Centro Cientfico-Tecnologico de Valparaiso, Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile

Correspondence should be addressed to C. A. Dominguez; az.ca.tcu@zeugnimod.oerasec

Received 24 August 2016; Revised 16 November 2016; Accepted 14 December 2016; Published 5 February 2017

Academic Editor: Lokesh Kumar

Copyright © 2017 Alejandro Ayala et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and resonance physics. Theoretical foundations,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 385–447, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, “QCD sum rules, a modern perspective,” in At the Frontier of Particle Physics, M. Shifman, Ed., vol. 3, pp. 1495–1576, World Scientific, Singapore, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. I. Bochkarev and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “The spectrum of hot hadronic matter and finite-temperature QCD sum rules,” Nuclear Physics, Section B, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 220–252, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. A. Dominguez and M. Loewe, “Dimuon production in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions and QCD phase transitions,” Particles & Fields, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 423–430, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, J. C. Rojas, and Y. Zhang, “Charmonium in the vector channel at finite temperature from QCD sum rules,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 1, Article ID 014007, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. C. A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, J. C. Rojas, and Y. Zhang, “(Pseudo)scalar charmonium in finite temperature QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 3, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. C. A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, and Y. Zhang, “Bottonium in QCD at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 5, Article ID 054015, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Aarts, C. Allton, S. Kim et al., “S wave bottomonium states moving in a quark-gluon plasma from lattice NRQCD,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, article 84, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Aarts, C. Allton, S. Kim, M. Lombardo, S. Ryan, and J. Skullerud, “Melting of P wave bottomonium states in the quark-gluon plasma from lattice NRQCD,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 12, article 064, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  10. H. Pagels, “Departures from chiral symmetry,” Physics Reports, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 219–311, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. C. A. Dominguez, “Phenomenological analysis of a dimension-two operator in QCD and its impact on αs(MT),” Physics Letters B, vol. 345, no. 3, pp. 291–295, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. C. A. Dominguez and K. Schilcher, “Is there evidence for dimension-two corrections in QCD two-point functions?” Physical Review D, vol. 61, no. 11, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Bordes, C. A. Dominguez, P. Moodley, J. Peñarrocha, and K. Schilcher, “Chiral corrections to the SU(2) × SU(2) Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 5, article 064, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. A. Olive, K. Agashe, C. Amsler et al., “Review of particle physics,” Chinese Physics, vol. 38, no. 9, Article ID 090001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Erdelyi, Ed., Higher Transcendental Functions, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1955.
  16. E. de Rafael, “Centre de physique theorique, Marseille,” Report CPT-81/P.1344, 1981, Proceedings of the French-American Seminar: Theoretical Aspects of Quantum Chromodynamics, J. W. Dash, editor, CPT-81/P.1345, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  17. C. A. Dominguez, “Analytical determination of QCD quark masses,” in Fifty Years of Quarks, H. Fritzsch and M. Gell-Mann, Eds., pp. 287–313, World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Shankar, “Determination of the quark-gluon coupling constant,” Physical Review D, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 755–758, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Bramón, E. Etim, and M. Greco, “A vector meson dominance approach to scale invariance,” Physics Letters B, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 609–612, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Greco, “Deep-inelastic processes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 63, pp. 398–412, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. E. Etim and M. Greco, “Duality sum rules in e+e annihilation from canonical trace anomalies,” Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 91–95, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. A. Dominguez, L. A. Hernandez, K. Schilcher, and H. Spiesberger, “Quark–hadron duality: pinched kernel approach,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 31, no. 27, article 1630026, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. C. A. Dominguez, L. A. Hernandez, K. Schilcher, and H. Spiesberger, “Tests of quark–hadron duality in τ-decays,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 31, no. 31, Article ID 1630036, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Gonzalez Alonso, A. Pich, and A. Rodriguez-Sanchez, “Determination of the QCD coupling from ALEPH τ decay data,” Physical Review D, vol. 94, no. 3, Article ID 034027, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. C. A. Dominguez, “Determination of light quark masses in qcd,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 25, no. 29, pp. 5223–5234, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. C. A. Dominguez, “Quark masses in QCD: a progress report,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 691–710, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. C. A. Dominguez, “Quark mass determinations in QCD,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 29, no. 28, article 1430031, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. C. A. Dominguez, “Analytical determination of the QCD quark masses,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 29, no. 29, 24 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. Bodenstein, C. A. Dominguez, and K. Schilcher, “Hadronic contribution to the muon g-2 factor: a theoretical determination,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 1, Article ID 014029, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. S. Bodenstein, C. A. Dominguez, K. Schilcher, and H. Spiesberger, “Hadronic contribution to the muon g−2 factor,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 1, Article ID 014005, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. C. A. Dominguez, K. Schilcher, and H. Spiesberger, “Theoretical determination of the hadronic g − 2 of the muon,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 31, no. 32, Article ID 1630035, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. L. J. Reinders, H. Rubinstein, and S. Yazaki, “Hadron properties from QCD sum rules,” Physics Reports, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 1–97, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. A. Dominguez, L. A. Hernandez, and K. Schilcher, “Determination of the gluon condensate from data in the charm-quark region,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, article 110, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. C. A. Dominguez, L. A. Hernandez, K. Schilcher, and H. Spiesberger, “Chiral sum rules and vacuum condensates from tau-lepton decay data,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. P. Pascual and R. Tarrach, QCD: Renormalization for the Practitioner, vol. 194 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. C. A. Dominguez and M. Loewe, “Comment on ‘Current correlators in QCD at finite temperature’,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 5, p. 3143, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  37. R. J. Furnstahl, T. Hatsuda, and S. H. Lee, “Applications of QCD sum rules at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 42, no. 5, article 1744, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. Adami, T. Hatsuda, and I. Zahed, “QCD sum rules at low temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 43, no. 3, article 921, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Adami and I. Zahed, “Finite-temperature QCD sum rules for the nucleon,” Physical Review D, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 4312–4322, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. Hatsuda, Y. Koike, and S. H. Lee, “Pattern of chiral restoration at low temperature from QCD sum rules,” Physical Review D, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1225–1230, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. Hatsuda, Y. Koike, and S.-H. Lee, “Finite-temperature QCD sum rules reexamined: ρ, ω and A1 mesons,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 394, no. 1, pp. 221–264, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. Y. Koike, “Octet baryons at finite temperature: QCD sum rules versus chiral symmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 2313–2323, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. C. Song, “Masses of vector and axial-vector mesons at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1375–1389, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. C. Song, “Pions at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1556–1565, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. C. Dominguez and M. Loewe, “Deconfinement and chiral-symmetry restoration at finite temperature,” Physics Letters B, vol. 233, no. 1-2, pp. 201–204, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. J. P. Carlomagno and M. Loewe, “Comparison between the continuum threshold and the Polyakov loop as deconfinement order parameters,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05429.
  47. C. A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, and Y. Zhang, “Chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement in QCD at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 3, Article ID 034030, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, “Symmetry behavior at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 3320–3341, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, “Light quarks at low temperatures,” Physics Letters B, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 83–88, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Barducci, R. Casalbuoni, S. de Curtis, R. Gatto, and G. Pettini, “Pion decay constant at finite temperature,” Physics Letters B, vol. 240, no. 3-4, pp. 429–437, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. Barducci, R. Casalbuoni, S. De Curtis, R. Gatto, and G. Pettini, “Chiral-symmetry breaking in QCD at finite temperature and density,” Physics Letters B, vol. 231, no. 4, pp. 463–470, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Barducci, R. Casalbuoni, S. de Curtis, R. Gatto, and G. Pettini, “Chiral phase transitions in QCD for finite temperature and density,” Physical Review D, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1610–1619, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Barducci, R. Casalbuoni, S. De Curtis, R. Gatto, and G. Pettini, “Heuristic argument for coincidence or almost coincidence of deconfinement and chirality restoration in finite temperature QCD,” Physics Letters B, vol. 244, no. 2, pp. 311–315, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. Davier, A. Höcker, B. Malaescu, C. Z. Yuan, and Z. Zhang, “Update of the ALEPH non-strange spectral functions from hadronic τ decays,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2803, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. R. Barate et al., “Measurement of the axial-vector τ spectral functions and determination of αsMτ2 from hadronic τ decays,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 409–431, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. S. Schael, R. Barate, R. Brunelière et al., “Branching ratios and spectral functions of τ decays: final ALEPH measurements and physics implications,” Physics Reports, vol. 421, no. 5-6, pp. 191–284, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. C. A. Dominguez and K. Schilcher, “QCD vacuum condensates from tau-lepton decay data,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 1, article no. 93, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. S. Bodenstein, C. A. Dominguez, S. I. Eidelman, H. Spiesberger, and K. Schilcher, “Confronting electron-positron annihilation into hadrons with QCD: an operator product expansion analysis,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 39, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C. A. Dominguez, M. S. Fetea, and M. Loewe, “Pions at finite temperature from QCD sum rules,” Physics Letters B, vol. 387, no. 1, pp. 151–154, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. M. Cheng, N. H. Christ, S. Datta et al., “QCD equation of state with almost physical quark masses,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 1, Article ID 014511, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. S. Qin, L. Chang, H. Chen, Y. Liu, and C. D. Roberts, “Phase diagram and critical end point for strongly interacting quarks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 17, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, M. Cheng et al., “Equation of state and QCD transition at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 1, Article ID 014504, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. M. Cheng, S. Ejiri, P. Hegde et al., “Equation of state for physical quark masses,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 5, Article ID 054504, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. A. Ayala, C. A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, and Y. Zhang, “Rho-meson resonance broadening in QCD at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 11, Article ID 114036, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. C. A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, and J. C. Rojas, “Heavy-light quark pseudoscalar and vector mesons at finite temperature,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 8, article 040, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  66. R. Arnaldi et al., “First measurement of the rho spectral function in high-energy nuclear collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, Article ID 16302, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  67. R. Arnaldi, K. Banicz, J. Castor et al., “Evidence for radial flow of thermal dileptons in high-energy nuclear collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 2, Article ID 022302, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. R. Arnaldi, K. Banicz, K. Borer et al., “Evidence for the production of thermal muon pairs with masses above 1 GeV/c2 in 158 A GeV indium-indium collisions,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 607–623, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. S. Damjanovic, “Thermal dileptons at SPS energies,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 35, no. 10, Article ID 104036, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. S. Damjanovic, “NA60 results on thermal dimuons,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 711–720, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. G. Domokos and J. I. Goldman, “Diagnosing quark matter by measuring the total entropy and the photon or dilepton emission rates,” Physical Review D, vol. 32, no. 5, p. 1109, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. K. Kajantie, J. Kapusta, L. McLerran, and A. Mekjian, “Dilepton emission and the QCD phase transition in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions,” Physical Review D, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 2746–2754, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. Cleymans, J. Fingberg, and K. Redlich, “Transverse-momentum distribution of dileptons in different scenarios for the QCD phase transition,” Physical Review D, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 2153–2165, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. J. D. Bjorken, “Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: the central rapidity regionn,” Physical Review D, vol. 27, no. 1, article 140, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. V. Eletsky, B. Ioffe, and J. Kapusta, “In-medium modification of π-mesons produced in heavy ion collisions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 642, no. 1-2, pp. c155–c164, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. V. L. Eletsky, B. L. Ioffe, and J. I. Kapusta, “Mass shift and width broadening of ρ-mesons produced in heavy ion collisions,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 381–387, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. A. Ayala, C. A. Dominguez, L. A. Hernández, M. Loewe, and A. J. Mizher, “Dimuon production from in-medium rho decays from QCD sum rules,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 11, Article ID 114028, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. A. Ayala, A. Bashir, C. A. Dominguez, E. Gutiérrez, M. Loewe, and A. Raya, “QCD phase diagram from finite energy sum rules,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 5, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. P. M. Hohler and R. Rapp, “Dileptons and chiral symmetry restoration,” Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings, vol. 276-278, pp. 253–256, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. S. Weinberg, “Precise relations between the spectra of vector and axial-vector mesons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 18, no. 13, article 507, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. C. A. Dominguez and K. Schilcher, “Chiral sum rules and duality in QCD,” Physics Letters B, vol. 448, no. 1-2, pp. 93–98, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. K. Maltman, “Constraints on hadronic spectral functions from continuous families of finite energy sum rules,” Physics Letters B, vol. 440, no. 3-4, pp. 367–374, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. A. Ayala, C. Dominguez, M. Loewe, and Y. Zhang, “Weinberg sum rules at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 3, Article ID 034012, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. M. Dey, V. Eletsky, and B. Ioffe, “Mixing of vector and axial mesons at finite temperature: an indication towards chiral symmetry restoration,” Physics Letters B, vol. 252, no. 4, pp. 620–624, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. A. Pich and E. de Rafael, “K-K- mixing in the standard model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 158, no. 6, pp. 477–484, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. J. Prades, C. A. Dominguez, J. A. Peñarrocha, A. Pich, and E. Rafael, “The K0K0B-factor in the QCD-hadronic duality approach,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 287–295, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. S. Mallik and S. Sarkar, “Vector and axial-vector mesons at finite temperature,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 445–452, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. C. A. Dominguez and L. A. Hernandez, “Determination of the temperature dependence of the up- and down-quark masses in QCD,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 31, no. 36, Article ID 1630042, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. S. Aoki, Y. Aoki, C. Bernard et al., “Review of lattice results concerning low energy particle physics,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.8555.
  90. C. A. Dominguez, L. A. Hernandez, K. Schilcher, and H. Spiesberger, “Chiral sum rules and vacuum condensates from tau-lepton decay data,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 53, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling et al., “Is there still any Tc mystery in lattice QCD? Results with physical masses in the continuum limit III,” The Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, article 73, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. T. Bhuttacharya, M. I. Buchoff, N. H. Christ et al., “QCD phase transition with chiral quarks and physical quark masses,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 113, no. 8, Article ID 082001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and A. Schäfer, “QCD quark condensate in external magnetic fields,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 7, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. M. Heller and M. Mitter, “Pion and η-meson mass splitting at the two-flavor chiral crossover,” Physical Review D, vol. 94, no. 7, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. T. Matsui and H. Satz, “J/ψ suppression by quark-gluon plasma formation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 416–422, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. T. Altherr and D. Seibert, “Thermal quark production in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1684–1692, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. G. Boyd and D. E. Miller, “The temperature dependence of the SU(N) gluon condensate from lattice gauge theory,” https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9608482.
  98. D. E. Miller, “Gluon condensates at finite temperature,” https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0008031.
  99. V. L. Eletsky, “Four-quark condensates at T≠0,” Physics Letters B, vol. 299, no. 1-2, pp. 111–114, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. V. L. Eletsky, “Baryon masses from QCD current correlators at T  0,” Physics Letters B, vol. 352, no. 3-4, pp. 440–444, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. F. Klingl, S. Kim, S. H. Lee, P. Morath, and W. Weise, “Masses of J/ψ and ηc in the nuclear medium: QCD sum rule approach,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 17, p. 3396, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. K. Morita and S. H. Lee, “Mass shift and width broadening of J/ψ in hot gluonic plasma from QCD sum rules,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 2, Article ID 022301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. K. Morita and S. H. Lee, “Critical behavior of charmonia across the phase transition: a QCD sum rule approach,” Physical Review C, vol. 77, no. 6, Article ID 064904, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. C. A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, and J. S. Rozowsky, “Electromagnetic pion form factor at finite temperature,” Physics Letters B, vol. 335, no. 3-4, pp. 506–509, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. C. A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, and C. van Gend, “QCD sum rule determination of the axial-vector coupling of the nucleon at finite temperature,” Physics Letters B, vol. 460, no. 3-4, pp. 442–446, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. C. A. Dominguez and M. Loewe, “Nucleon propagator at finite temperature,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 273–277, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. H. Leutwyler and A. V. Smilga, “Nucleons at finite temperature,” Nuclear Physics, Section B, vol. 342, no. 2, pp. 302–316, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. C. A. Dominguez, M. S. Fetea, and M. Loewe, “Vector meson dominance and gϱππ at finite temperature from QCD sum rules,” Physics Letters B, vol. 406, no. 1-2, pp. 149–153, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. R. D. Pisarski, “Thermal rho's in the quark-gluon plasma,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 590, no. 1-2, pp. 553C–556C, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. R. D. Pisarski, “Where does the ρ go? Chirally symmetric vector mesons in the quark-gluon plasma,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. R3773–R3776, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. S. L. Adler, “Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,” Physical Review, vol. 177, no. 5, article 2426, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, “A PCAC puzzle: π0γγ in the σ-model,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. R. D. Pisarski, T. L. Trueman, and M. H. G. Tytgat, “How π0γγ changes with temperature,” Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 56, no. 11, article 7077, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. C. Dominguez and M. Loewe, “Axial anomaly, vector meson dominance and π0γγ at finite temperature,” Physics Letters B, vol. 481, no. 2-4, pp. 295–298, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar