Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 5797514, 23 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5797514
Research Article

Superfield Approach to Nilpotency and Absolute Anticommutativity of Conserved Charges: 2D Non-Abelian 1-Form Gauge Theory

1Physics Department, Center of Advance Studies, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
2DST Centre for Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India

Correspondence should be addressed to R. P. Malik; moc.liamg@5991kilampr

Received 22 October 2017; Accepted 16 January 2018; Published 20 March 2018

Academic Editor: Elias C. Vagenas

Copyright © 2018 S. Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. J. Thierry-Mieg, “Geometrical reinterpretation of Faddeev-Popov ghost particles and BRS transformations,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 21, article 2834, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. M. Quirós, F. J. De Urries, J. Hoyos, M. L. Mazón, and E. Rodriguez, “Geometrical structure of Faddeev–Popov fields and invariance properties of gauge theories,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1767–1774, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. R. Delbourgo and P. D. Jarvis, “Extended BRS invariance and OSp (4/2) supersymmetry supersymmetry,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 611, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. L. Bonora and M. Tonin, “Superfield formulation of extended BRS symmetry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 98, no. 1-2, pp. 48–50, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Bonora, P. Pasti, and M. Tonin, “Extended BRS symmetry in non-Abelian gauge theories,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 307–331, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Bonora, P. Pasti, and M. Tonin, “Superspace approach to quantum gauge theories,” Annals of Physics, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 15–33, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. L. Baulieu and J. Thierry-Mieg, “The principle of BRS symmetry: an alternative approach to Yang-Mills theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 477–508, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Alvarez-Gaumé and L. Baulieu, “The two quantum symmetries associated with a classical symmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 255–267, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. R. P. Malik, “Abelian 2-form gauge theory: superfield formalism,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 457–470, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. R. P. Malik, “Superfield approach to nilpotent symmetries for QED from a single restriction: an alternative to the horizontality condition,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 39, no. 33, p. 10575, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. R. P. Malik, “An alternative to the horizontality condition in the superfield approach to BRST symmetries,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 51, pp. 169–177, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. P. Malik, “Superfield approach to symmetries for matter fields in Abelian gauge theories,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 37, no. 19, pp. 5261–5274, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. R. P. Malik, “New topological field theories in two dimensions,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 34, no. 19, pp. 4167–4181, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. N. Srinivas and R. P. Malik, “Nilpotent symmetries and Curci-Ferrari-type restrictions in 2D non-Abelian gauge theory: superfield approach,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 32, no. 33, Article ID 1750193, 21 pages, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. N. Srinivas and R. P. Malik, “Nilpotent symmetries and Curci-Ferrari type restrictions in 2D non-Abelian gauge theory: superfield approach,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 32, no. 33, pp. 1–21, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Kumar, B. K. Kureel, and R. P. Malik, “(Anti-)BRST and (anti-)co-BRST symmetries in 2D non-Abelian gauge theory: some novel observations,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09099.
  17. S. Gupta and R. P. Malik, “Rigid rotor as a toy model for Hodge theory,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 325–335, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Kumar, S. Krishna, A. Shukla, and R. P. Malik, “Abelian p-form (p = 1, 2, 3) gauge theories as the field theoretic models for the Hodge theory,” International Journal of Modern Physics, vol. 29, Article ID 1450135, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  19. E. Witten, “Topological quantum field theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 353–386, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. A. S. Schwarz, “The partition function of degenerate quadratic functional and Ray-Singer invariants,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 247–252, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. T. Eguchi, P. B. Gilkey, and A. J. Hanson, “Gravitation, gauge theories and differential geometry,” Physics Reports, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 213–393, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. S. Mukhi and N. Mukunda, Introduction to topology, differential geometry and group theory for physicists, Wiley Eastern Private Limited, New Delhi, 1990.
  23. K. Nishijima, “Observable states in the representations of BRS algebra,” Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 905–912, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. J. W. van Holten, “Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin cohomology of compact gauge algebras,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, no. 24, pp. 2863–2865, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. S. Gupta and R. P. Malik, “A field-theoretic model for Hodge theory,” The European Physical Journal Particles and Fields, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 517–529, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. S. Krishna, A. Shukla, and R. P. Malik, “Topologically massive non-Abelian theory: superfield approach,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 26, no. 25, pp. 4419–4450, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. D. Dudal, V. E. R. Lemes, M. S. Sarandy, S. P. Sorella, and M. Picariello, “On the SL() symmetry in Yang-Mills theories in the Landau, Curci-Ferrari and maximal Abelian gauge,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 212, no. 8, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. D. Dudal, H. Verschelde, V. E. Lemes et al., “The anomalous dimension of the gluon-ghost mass operator in Yang-Mills theory,” High Energy Physics, vol. 569, no. 1-2, pp. 57–66, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  29. R. P. Malik, “Hodge duality operation and its physical applications on supermanifolds,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 21, no. 16, pp. 3307–3336, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. N. Srinivas, T. Bhanja, and R. P. Malik, “(Anti)chiral superfield approach to nilpotent symmetries: self-dual chiral bosonic theory,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, Article ID 6138263, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Shukla, T. Bhanja, and R. P. Malik, “Supervariable approach to the nilpotent symmetries for a toy model of the Hodge theory,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2016, Article ID 2618150, 13 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. N. Srinivas, A. Shukla, and R. P. Malik, “Nilpotent symmetries of a 4D model of the hodge theory: augmented (anti-)chiral superfield formalism,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06770.