Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2019, Article ID 2031075, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2031075
Research Article

On Gravitational Casimir Effect and Stefan-Boltzmann Law at Finite Temperature

1International Center of Physics, Instituto de Física, Universidade de Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, DF, Brazil
2Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, 78060-900 Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
3Instituto de Física, Universidade de Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, DF, Brazil
4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to A. F. Santos; rb.tmfu.acisif@arierrefordnasela

Received 8 February 2019; Revised 28 March 2019; Accepted 1 April 2019; Published 8 April 2019

Academic Editor: Rong-Gen Cai

Copyright © 2019 S. C. Ulhoa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Abstract

Gravitons are described by the propagator in teleparallel gravity in nearly flat space-time. Finite temperature is introduced by using Thermofield Dynamics formalism. The gravitational Casimir effect and Stefan-Boltzmann law are calculated as a function of temperature. Then an equation of state for gravitons is determined.

1. Introduction

The teleparallel theory of gravity is similar to the general theory of gravity due to Einstein [14] except that it has a well-defined expression of energy-momentum tensor [5]. In addition the teleparallel gravity has a successful quantum approach using Weyl prescription [6]. Using a path integral approach a different propagator in teleparallel gravity is obtained [7]. Furthermore it is possible to introduce finite temperature effects in this formalism.

There are several approaches to introduce finite temperature formulation in a theory that can be quantized. Such a method involves doubling the physical space, Thermofield Dynamics (TFD) [816]. This thermal theory is obtained by using Bogoliubov transformation and it is a real-time formulation. The thermal state is obtained by doubling of Hilbert space, i.e., real space and a tilde space. The tilde space introduces temperature in the problem.

The objective of the paper is to use teleparallel theory of gravity and formulation of TFD to calculate the gravitational Casimir effect and Stefan-Boltzmann law. Originally the Casimir effect was observed by H. Casimir for parallel plates [17] which are attracted due to vacuum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. Subsequent experiments have established this effect to a high degree of accuracy [1820]. Experiments have observed both Casimir effect and Stefan-Boltzmann law experimentally for standard field theories. Gravitational field effects have been considered in gravitational field [2124], violation of Lorentz theory [2527], and in Kalb-Ramond field [28], among others.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, details of the teleparallel gravity are described. In Section 3, details of the TFD formalism are defined in detail. In Section 4, the Green function is defined using the graviton propagator for the teleparallel gravity. In Section 5, the Casimir effect and the Stefan-Boltzmann law are obtained using finite temperature procedure. Then the first law of thermodynamics for gravitons is obtained. Finally in Section 6, some concluding remarks are given.

2. Teleparallel Gravity

Teleparallel gravity has unique features such as a well-defined expression for the gravitational energy-momentum tensor. This alternative theory is constructed in the framework of Weitzenböck geometry that is described by torsion and a vanishing curvature. Thus a Weitzenböckian manifold is endowed with a Cartan connection [29], defined bywhere is the tetrad field. Such a variable assures two fundamental symmetries in teleparallel gravity, Lorentz symmetry denoted by latin indices and diffeomorphism represented by greek ones.

It is important to note that the Cartan connection is curvature free, but it has the torsion tensorOn the other hand, Weitzenböck geometry is intrinsically related to Riemann geometry by the following mathematical identitywhere are the Christoffel symbols and is the contortion tensor given bywith . Such an identity leads to the following relation:where is the determinant of the tetrad field and is the scalar mode of Christoffel symbols. Then a gravitational theory, dynamically equivalent to general relativity, is established by the following Lagrangian density:where , is the Lagrangian density of matter fields and is given bywith . It is worth pointing out that in the Weitzenböch geometry it is possible to obtain a large number of invariants compared to the Riemannian case.

If a derivative of the Lagrangian density with respect to the tetrad field is performed, it yieldswith andThis is the gravitational energy-momentum tensor [30, 31]. It should be noted that the quantity is skew-symmetric in the last two indices, i.e., which implies a conservation law that leads to the energy-momentum vectorthat is a well-defined expression for energy and momentum. It is a vector under Lorentz transformations.

3. Thermofield Dynamics (TFD)

This section includes brief details of Thermofield Dynamics (TFD) [816]. TFD is a real-time formalism of quantum field theory at finite temperature. The thermal average of an observable is given in an extended Hilbert space. There are two necessary ingredients of TFD: the doubling of the degrees of freedom in Hilbert space and the Bogoliubov transformations. The doubling is defined by the tilde conjugation. Each operator in the Hilbert space has a fictitious Hilbert space . The Bogoliubov transformation combines the two spaces.

The creation () and annihilation operators () in the standard Hilbert space and tilde operators, and , are combined in the extended space using Bogoliubov transformations. For bosons these areand the algebraic rules for the operators areand other commutation relations are null. The algebraic rules for these thermal operators are the same as obtained in the quantum field theory at zero temperature. The quantities and are related to the Bose distribution given asHere and with and is the Boltzmann constant and is the temperature. There is a similar Bogoliubov transformation for fermions.

A doublet notation is introduced bywhere is the Bogoliubov transformation given asThe parameter is assumed as the compactification parameter defined by . The effect of temperature is described by the choice and , where are the space-time dimensions. Any propagator in the TFD formalism may be written in terms of the -parameter. For the scalar field propagator, as an example, the Green function iswhere are the indices that define the double space andIn the thermal vacuum , the propagator becomeswherewithand . Here for bosons and for fermions. The nontilde variables describe the physical quantities. Thenwhere , the generalized Bogoliubov transformation [32], iswith being the number of compactified dimensions and for fermions (bosons), denotes the set of all combinations with elements, and is the 4-momentum.

4. Gravitational Casimir Effect and Stefan-Boltzmann Law

In this section the Stefan-Boltzmann law and the Casimir effect at zero and finite temperature are calculated in the teleparallel gravity framework. The free Lagrangian of the teleparallel gravity isand using the weak field approximation, i.e.,the graviton propagator is obtained asSome details are given in [7]. This leads to the Green functionwhich explicitly iswith . It is worth comparing the graviton propagator in TEGR and general relativity. There is remarkable difference between the graviton propagator in general relativity that has the formwhere is the Green function of a massless scalar field. Such a difference would be expected since the symmetry in the two theories are not the same.

Now it is necessary to calculate the mean value of (the gravitational energy-momentum tensor). In the weak field approximation, expanding expression (9) leads toThese quantities are second order in the tetrad field while the termsare of higher order in the field. These are dropped in the weak field approximation. Then the gravitational energy-momentum tensor isTo avoid a product of field operators at the same space-time point, the expectation value of energy-momentum tensor iswhere , with being the Green function.

In the TFD formalism, using the tilde conjugation rules, the vacuum average of the gravitational energy-momentum tensor isIt is impossible to get an analogues expression for general relativity since there is no energy-momentum tensor. However there is a propagator for the graviton. It is shared by other gravitational theories where the concept of gravitational energy is well established. Gravitoelectromagnetism (GEM) is certainly one theory where this is possible.

Following the Casimir prescription, the physical energy-momentum tensor is given byExplicitlywhereIn the Fourier representationsuch that its physical component iswhere is the generalized Bogoliubov transformation given in (23).

Now some applications are considered for different choices of the -parameter.

4.1. Gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann Law

A first application is the case , such that the Bogoliubov transformation is given asThen the physical component of the Green function iswhere . The vacuum expectation value of the gravitational energy-momentum tensor at finite temperature isAt this point a nearly flat space-time, which represents gravitons precisely, may be analyzed. With and using the Riemann Zeta function [33, 34]and the gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann law is given bywhere . The first law of Thermodynamics is formulated asthenwhere . As a consequence, which leads to the equation of stateThe equation of state for both gravitons and photons is the same.

4.2. Gravitational Casimir Effect at Zero Temperature

In the framework of TFD formalism the Casimir effect at zero temperature is determined when . Then the Bogoliubov transformation becomesand the Green function is given asThen the energy-momentum tensor iswhere . Then for the gravitational Casimir energy (at zero temperature) associated with the gravitons iswhere the Riemann Zeta function has been used and . Under such conditions and with the gravitational Casimir pressure is calculated as well; it readswhere . Here the Casimir force between the plates is negative; then, it is an attractive force, similar to the case of the electromagnetic field.

4.3. Gravitational Casimir Effect at Finite Temperature

The effect of temperature in the Casimir effect is introduced by taking . Thenare the Bogoliubov transformation and the Green function, respectively. The first term in (53) leads to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the second term to the Casimir effect at zero temperature, and the third term to the Casimir effect at finite temperature. Considering only the third term, the energy-momentum tensor becomesThe Casimir energy at finite temperature for gravitons isand the Casimir pressure at finite temperature isIt is to be noted that these results were obtained using a metric tensor of an approximate Minkowski space-time. In addition recovers the dependency of for ; similarly it tends to be proportional to when . The same behavior is observed for .

5. Conclusion

The graviton propagator is calculated using teleparallel gravity and this leads to a Green function. Details of TFD formalism are given to introduce temperature. Stefan-Boltzmann law and Casimir effect are calculated at finite temperature. This leads to finding pressure as a function of temperature. These results are obtained for a nearly flat space-time. These results play an important role in comparison with experimental results obtained for systems in outer space. An extension of this program for different space-time points will be carried out later. In addition the first law of thermodynamics is used to establish the dependency of the gravitational pressure on the temperature. The equation of state is found identical to that obtained for photons.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study. Our study is completely theoretical.

Disclosure

F. C. Khanna is Professor Emeritus, Physics Department, Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work by A. F. Santos is supported by CNPq projects 308611/2017-9 and 430194/2018-8.

References

  1. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, “New general relativity,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3524–3553, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, “Addendum to “new general relativity”,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3312–3314, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. F. W. Hehl, “Four lectures on poincaré gauge field theory,” in Cosmology and Gravitation: Spin, Torsion, Rotation and Supergravity, P. G. Bergmann and V. de Sabbata, Eds., vol. 58, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Blagojević and F. W. Hehl, Gauge Theories of Gravitation, Imperial College, London, UK, 2013.
  5. J. W. Maluf and J. F. da Rocha-Neto, “Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity in the teleparallel geometry,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 64, no. 8, Article ID 084014, 8 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. S. C. Ulhoa and R. G. G. Amorim, “On teleparallel quantum gravity in schwarzschild space-time,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, Article ID 812691, 6 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. S. C. Ulhoa, A. F. Santos, and F. C. Khanna, “Scattering of fermions by gravitons,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 49, no. 4, article no. 54, 11 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, “Thermo field dynamics,” Collective Phenomena, vol. 2, pp. 55–80, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, “Thermo field dynamics,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 10, pp. 1755–1805, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  10. Y. Takahashi, H. Umezawa, and H. Matsumoto, Thermofield Dynamics and Condensed States, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1982.
  11. F. C. Khanna, A. P. C. Malbouisson, J. M. C. Malboiusson, and A. E. Santana, Themal Quantum Field Theory: Algebraic Aspects and Applications, World Scientific, Singapore, 2009.
  12. H. Umezawa, Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro and Thermal Physics, AIP, New York, NY, USA, 1956. View at MathSciNet
  13. A. E. Santana and F. C. Khanna, “Lie groups and thermal field theory,” Physics Letters A, vol. 203, no. 2-3, pp. 68–72, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. A. E. Santana, F. C. Khanna, H. Chu, and Y. Chang, “Thermal lie groups, classical mechanics, and thermofield dynamics,” Annals of Physics, vol. 249, no. 2, pp. 481–498, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. A. E. Santana, A. Matos Neto, J. D. M. Vianna, and F. C. Khanna, “Symmetry groups, density-matrix equations and covariant Wigner functions,” Physica A, vol. 280, pp. 405–436, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  16. F. C. Khanna, A. P. Malbouisson, J. M. Malbouisson, and A. E. Santana, “Thermoalgebras and path integral,” Annals of Physics, vol. 324, no. 9, pp. 1931–1952, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. H. B. G. Casimir, “On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates,” Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen. Series B: Physical sciences, vol. 51, pp. 793–795, 1948. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. J. Sparnaay, “Measurements of attractive forces between flat plates,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 24, no. 6–10, pp. 751–764, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. K. Lamoreaux, “Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6μm Range,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, p. 5, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  20. U. Mohideen and A. Roy, “Precision measurement of the Casimir force from 0.1 to 0.9 μm,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, p. 21, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Q. Quach, “Gravitational casimir effect,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, Article ID 081104, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. A. F. Santos and F. C. Khanna, “Gravitational casimir effect at finite temperature,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 5356–5367, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and P. Wang, “Dark energy: vacuum fluctuations, the effective phantom phase, and holography,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 71, Article ID 103504, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. E. Elizalde, “Matching the observational value of the cosmological constant,” Physics Letters. B. Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 516, no. 1-2, pp. 143–150, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. A. F. Santos and F. C. Khanna, “Casimir effect at finite temperature for pure-photon sector of the minimal standard model extension,” Annals of Physics, vol. 375, pp. 36–48, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. A. F. Santos and F. C. Khanna, “Standard Model Extension and Casimir effect for fermions at finite temperature,” Physics Letters B, vol. 762, p. 283, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. A. F. Santos and F. C. Khanna, “Aether field in extra dimensions: Stefan-Boltzmann law and Casimir effect at finite temperature,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 95, no. 2, Article ID 025021, 10 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. H. Belich, L. M. Silva, J. A. Helayël-Neto, and A. E. Santana, “Casimir effect at finite temperature for the Kalb-Ramond field,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 84, no. 4, Article ID 045007, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. E. Cartan, “On a generalization of the notion of Reimann curvature and spaces with torsion,” in NATO ASIB Proc. 58: Cosmology and Gravitation: Spin, Torsion, Rotation, and Supergravity, P. G. Bergmann and V. de Sabbata, Eds., vol. 58, pp. 489–491, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. J. W. Maluf, “The gravitational energy-momentum tensor and the gravitational pressure,” Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), vol. 14, no. 11-12, pp. 723–732, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. V. C. de Andrade, L. C. Guillen, and J. G. Pereira, “Gravitational energy-momentum density in teleparallel gravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 20, pp. 4533–4536, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. F. C. Khanna, A. P. Malbouisson, J. M. Malbouisson, and A. E. Santana, “Quantum fields in toroidal topology,” Annals of Physics, vol. 326, no. 10, pp. 2634–2657, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. E. Elizalde, Ten Physical Applications of Spectral Zeta Functions, vol. 855 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. E. Elizalde, S. D. Odintsov, A. Romeo, A. A. Bytsenko, and S. Zerbini, Zeta Regularization Techniques with Applications, World Scientific, Singapore, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet