Research Article  Open Access
Qin Chang, XiaoLin Wang, Jie Zhu, XiaoNan Li, "Study of Induced Decays", Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2020, Article ID 3079670, 12 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3079670
Study of Induced Decays
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the treedominated ( and ) decays in the Standard Model with the relevant form factors obtained in the lightfront quark model. These decays involve much more helicity states relative to the corresponding and decays, and moreover, the contribution of longitudinal polarization mode ( meson) is relatively small, , compared with the corresponding meson decays. We have also computed the branching fraction, lepton spin asymmetry, forwardbackward asymmetry, and ratio . Numerically, the branching fractions of decays are at the level of and are hopeful to be observed by LHC and BelleII experiments. The ratios have relatively small theoretical uncertainties and are close to each other, , which are a bit different from the predictions in some previous works. The future measurements are expected to make tests on these predictions.
1. Introduction
In the past years, a large amount of events have been accumulated by Babar, Belle, Tevatron and LHCb experiments, and most of meson decays having branching fractions have been measured [1]. Moreover, some deviations between the standard model (SM) predictions and the experimental data have been observed, for instance, the angular observable of decay with discrepancy [2–6], the differential branching fraction of decay with discrepancy [7, 8], and the wellknown “ CP puzzle” [9, 10]. Besides the flavorchangingneutralcurrent precesses mentioned above, the meson semileptonic decays induced by transition also play an important role in testing the SM and probing the hints of possible new physics (NP). For instance, the wellknown “ anomaly” reported by BaBar [11, 12], Belle [13–15], and LHCb [16, 17] collaborations exhibits a significant deviation between the SM prediction and experimental data [1, 18, 19]. Many studies have been done within the modelindependent frameworks [20–27], as well as in some specific NP models, for instance Refs. [28–48]. One can refer to Refs. [49, 50] for recent reviews.
The spintriplet vector meson with a quantum number of and [51–54] has the same flavor components as the spinsinglet pseudoscalar ( and ) meson and can also decay through the transition at quarklevel; therefore, its induced semileptonic decays can play a similar role as meson decays for testing the SM and probing possible hints of NP.
The meson is an unstable particle, it cannot decay via strong interaction due to that MeV [55]; meson decay is dominated by the radiative process [55], ; the weak decay modes via the bottomchanging transition (for instance, the induced semileptonic decays considered in this work) are generally very rare, and their branching fractions are expected to be very small within the SM. Until now, there is no experimental information and few theoretical works concentrating on the weak decays. Fortunately, thanks to the high luminosity and large production cross section at the running LHC and SuperKEKB/BelleII experiments, a huge amount of the meson data samples would be accumulated. At BelleII experiment, the and mesons are produced mainly via decays. With the target annual integrated luminosity, [56], and the cross section of production in collisions, [57], it is expected that about samples could be produced per year by BelleII. Further considering that meson mainly decays to final states with a pair of mesons and using the branching fractions of decays given by PDG [55], it can be estimated that about and samples can be accumulated by BelleII per year. Unfortunately, the meson and its decays are out of the scope of BelleII experiment. In addition, a lot of samples can also be produced via collision and be accumulated in the future by LHC with high collision energy, high luminosity and rather large production cross section [58–60], and some weak decays are hopeful to be observed, such as the leptonic decay with branching fraction [61].
Encouraged by the abundant data samples at future heavyflavor experiments, some interesting theoretical studies for the weak decays have been made within the SM, for instance, the pure leptonic and decays [61, 62], the impact of on decays [63], the studies of the semileptonic decays within the QCD sum rules [64–66], the semileptonic with decays within the BetheSalpeter (BS) method [67], and an approach under the assumption of heavy quark symmetry (HQS) [68], with [69] and the nonleptonic ( and ) [70, 71], [72], [73], [74], [75], and [76] decays. Moreover, the NP effects on the semileptonic with decays have been investigated in a modelindependent scheme [77] and the vector leptoquark model [78]. In this paper, we pay our attention to the CKMfavored and treedominated semileptonic weak decays, which are generally much more complicated than the corresponding decay modes because they involve much more allowed helicity states.
Our paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the helicity amplitudes and observables of decays are calculated. Section 3 is devoted to the numerical results and discussions, and the transition form factors obtained within the covariant lightfront quark model are used in the computation. Finally, we give our summary in Section 4.
2. Theoretical Framework and Results
2.1. Effective Lagrangian and Amplitude
In the SM, decays are induced by transition at quark level via Wexchange and can be described by the effective Lagrangian at low energy scale , where is the Fermi coupling constant and denotes the CKM matrix element. Using Eq. (1), the amplitude of decay can be written as the product of the hadronic matrix element and leptonic current. Then, in terms of leptonic () and hadronic tensors built from the respective products of the leptonic and hadronic currents, the square amplitude can be expressed as
Inserting the completeness relation of the polarization vector of virtual boson, the product of and can be rewritten as where and are Lorentz invariant and therefore can be evaluated in different reference frames. In our following evaluation, and will be calculated in the meson rest frame and the centerofmass frame, respectively.
2.2. Kinematics
In the rest frame of meson, assuming the final state meson moving along with positive direction, the momenta of , , and could be written as respectively, where and , with and being the momentum transfer squared, are the energy and momentum of virtual . The polarization vectors of the initial meson and daughter meson, and , can be written as respectively. For the four polarization vectors of virtual , , one can conveniently choose [79, 80] in which, has to be understood as and .
Turning to the centerofmass frame, the fourmomenta of lepton and antineutrino are given as where , , and is the angle between and threemomenta. In this frame, the polarization vectors have the form
2.3. Hadronic Helicity Amplitudes
For hadronic part, one has to calculate the hadronic helicity amplitudes of decay defined by which describes the decay of three helicity states of meson into the three helicity states of daughter meson and the four helicity states of virtual . For the transition, the matrix elements can be factorized in terms of ten form factors and as [81, 82] with the sign convention .
Then, by contracting these hadronic matrix elements with the polarization vector of virtual boson, we can finally obtain the nonvanishing hadronic helicity amplitudes, , given as
Obviously, only the amplitudes with survive due to the helicity conservation.
2.4. Helicity Amplitudes and Observables
For the leptonic part, the leptonic tensor could be expanded in terms of a complete set of Wigner's functions, which have been widely used in the study of hadron semileptonic [79, 83, 84]. As a result, can be reduced to a very compact form where and run over 1 and 0, , and run over their components. For the standard expression of function, we take their value from PDG [55]. The leptonic helicity amplitude in Eq. (15) defined as
Taking the exact forms of spinors and polarization vectors given in Eq. (11), we obtain which are the same as the results obtained in semileptonic and hyperon decays [83, 84].
Using the amplitudes obtained above, we can then further evaluate the observables of decays. The double differential decay rate is written as where the factor is caused by averaging over the spins of initial meson. The double differential decay rate with a given helicity state of lepton () is written as
Integrating over and summing over the lepton helicity, we can obtain the differential decay rate written as where the three nondiagonal interference terms in Eq. (20) vanish. In addition, paying attention to the polarization states of meson, one can obtain the longitudinal differential decay width by picking out , , , and terms in Eq. (21).
Using Eqs. (19) and (20) given above, we can also construct some useful observables as follows. The dependent ratios is defined as where denotes the light leptons and (in the following calculations, we take ). The lepton spin asymmetry and forwardbackward asymmetry are defined as and respectively. These observables are independent of the CKM matrix elements, and the hadronic uncertainties canceled to a large extent, therefore, they can be predicted with a rather high accuracy.
3. Numerical Results and Discussions
In our numerical calculation, for the wellknown Fermi coupling constant and the masses of mesons and , we take their central values given by PDG [55]. For the CKM element, we take given by CKMFitter Group [85]. In order to evaluate the branching fractions, the total decay widths (or lifetimes), , are also essential inputs. However, there is no available experimental or theoretical information until now. While, due to the fact that the electromagnetic processes dominates decays, we can take the approximation . In the lightfront quark model (LFQM), the decay width of decay is given by [86] where with , with being the invariant mass of boundstate, is the finestructure constant, is the kinematically allowed energy of the outgoing photon. The radial wavefunction (WF) of boundstate is responsible for describing the momentum distribution of the constituent quarks. In this paper, we shall use the Gaussiantype WF where is the relative momentum in direction and has the form . One can refer to Ref. [86] for more details. Using the constituent quark masses and the Gaussian parameter given in Table 1, we obtain the numerical results for as follows,
