Advances in High Energy Physics

Advances in High Energy Physics / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 1861946 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1861946

A. I. Ahmadov, K. H. Abasova, M. Sh. Orucova, "Bound State Solution Schrödinger Equation for Extended Cornell Potential at Finite Temperature", Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2021, Article ID 1861946, 13 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1861946

Bound State Solution Schrödinger Equation for Extended Cornell Potential at Finite Temperature

Academic Editor: Ricardo G. Felipe
Received24 Aug 2020
Revised08 Feb 2021
Accepted20 Apr 2021
Published05 May 2021

Abstract

In this paper, we study the finite temperature-dependent Schrödinger equation by using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method. We consider the sum of the Cornell, inverse quadratic, and harmonic-type potentials as the potential part of the radial Schrödinger equation. Analytical expressions for the energy eigenvalues and the radial wave function are presented. Application of the results for the heavy quarkonia and meson masses are in good agreement with the current experimental data except for zero angular momentum quantum numbers. Numerical results for the temperature dependence indicates a different behaviour for different quantum numbers. Temperature-dependent results are in agreement with some QCD sum rule results from the ground states.

1. Introduction

It is a well-known fact that the potential models in quantum mechanics are very accurate in reproducing experimental data for meson spectroscopy [1] at zero temperature. However, one needs to consider spin-dependent potentials in the Schrödinger equation in order to describe the relativistic effects [2, 3]. There exist few potentials which are highly important because of their exact solubility within the Schrödinger equation for which all spectra of radial and orbital quantum states can be obtained analytically [25]. Except for the exact solvable potentials, others are solved by either approximation or numerical methods.

Several potentials such as the exponential-type including the Hulthén-, Manning–Rosen-, Woods–Saxon-, and Eckart-type potentials are also currently being investigated by several researchers. Among the particularly interesting potentials which play an important role in the quark-antiquark bound states include the so-called Cornell potential and a mixture of it with the harmonic oscillator potential and Morse potential as discussed in [610].

As an analytical method, the Nikiforov-Uvarov (NU) method is one of the widely applicable methods for solving the Schrödinger equation. The quarkonia system in a hot and dense matter media is studied in Ref. [11], where the authors studied the quarkonium dissociation in anisotropic plasma in hot and dense media by analytically solving the multidimensional Schrödinger equation via the NU method for the real part of the potential. The NU method was successfully applied for solving the radial Schrödinger equation in the presence of an external magnetic field and the Aharonov-Bohm flux fields in [12, 13]. The inverse square root potential, which is a long-range potential and a combination of the Coulomb, linear, and harmonic potentials, is often used to describe quarkonium states.

The study of the heavy quark resonances in a nonrelativistic regime and the thermal environment shows the importance of the color screening radius below which binding is impossible [14]. The theoretical investigation of this effect for the charmonium resonance is investigated in [15]. Considering the finite temperature for the Cornell potential within the D-dimensional Schrödinger equation by using the NU method is presented in [16]. However, the behaviour of bound states of heavy quarks in a strongly interacting medium close to the deconfinement temperature is largely uncertain such that various models predict the mass being constant, increasing and decreasing with temperature increments. One of the first applications of a nonrelativistic lattice QCD to the study of heavy quarkonia at finite temperature is presented in [17].

Temperature-dependent Schrödinger equations for different potentials by different methods are studied in [1821]. In Ref. [22] a modified radial Schrödinger equation for the sum of the Cornell and inverse quadratic potentials at finite temperature is solved. In Refs. [23, 24], the radial and hyperradial Schrödinger equations are analytically solved using the NU and SUSYQM methods, in which the heavy quarkonia potential is introduced at finite temperature with the baryon chemical potential. For numerical solutions, one may, for instance, have a look in [25].

The Cornell potential is extensively used to describe the mass spectrum of the heavy quark and antiquark systems at zero temperature [26, 27]. It is the sum of linear and Coulomb terms which are responsible for the confinement and quark-antiquark interaction at short distances, respectively.

The bound state solutions to the wave equations under the quark-antiquark interaction potential such as the ordinary, extended, and generalized Cornell potentials and combined potentials such as the Cornell with other potentials have attracted much research interest in atomic and high-energy physics within ordinary and supersymmetric quantum mechanics methods as in [2835].

Recently, Ikot et al. [36] reported the approximate solutions of the Schrödinger equation with the central generalized Hulthén and Yukawa potential within the framework of the functional method. The obtained wave function and the energy levels are used to study the Shannon entropy, the Renyi entropy, the Fisher information, the Shannon-Fisher complexity, the Shannon power, and the Fisher-Shannon product in both position and momentum spaces for the ground and first excited states.

The exact solution of the Schrödinger equation for the new anharmonic oscillator, double ring-shaped oscillator, and quantum system with a nonpolynomial oscillator potential related to the isotonic oscillator was also widely studied in Refs. [3739]. The relativistic Levinson theorem was also studied in detail in Ref. [40], and the authors obtained the modified relativistic Levinson theorem for noncritical cases.

It is still an open question if the appropriate potential which describes the interaction between a quark and an antiquark can be found more precisely. It would be interesting to test the following potential for the arbitrary orbital quantum number at finite temperature by using the NU method [41]: Here, , , , and are constant potential parameters, respectively.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The temperature-dependent radial Schrödinger equation for the sum of the Cornell, inverse quadratic, and harmonic oscillator-type potentials is introduced in Section 2 and solved using the NU method in Section 3. In Section 4, we apply the results to the mass spectrum of heavy mesons at zero and nonzero temperatures in Section 5, respectively. Finally, we end up with some concluding remarks in Section 6.

2. Temperature-Dependent Radial Schrödinger Equation

The Schrödinger equation in spherical coordinates is given as follows:

For the case of the separation of the wave function to the radial and angular parts, we can write the wave function as follows:

Consideration of the radial part of the wave function and the Cornell, inverse quadratic, and harmonic-type potentials for the potential part of the Schrödinger equation leads to the following:

This equation gets the following form if we do the replacement for the radial part of the wave function in (4): where is the reduced mass of the quark-antiquark system which is defined in this form: .Following the same philosophy for the Cornell potential in [17], one can do the nonzero temperature modification to the constant terms in equation (1) and make the potential term temperature dependent as follows: where Here, is the Debye screening mass, which vanishes at . It should be noted that, in this model, the temperature dependence of a potential is contained in a Debye screened mass. Next, using the approximation up to the second order, which gives a good accuracy when , we then obtain the following: Then, for , we obtain the following: As can be seen from the expressions in (8) at zero temperature, , , , and .

By using the expressions in (8), we may rewrite expression (6) in a more compact way as follows: where we used the following substitutions:

Considering all these in the radial Schrödinger equation (5), we get the following: Let us reduce the above equation to the generalized hypergeometric type [41]: In order to do that, we do the replacement in equation (12) which leads to the following:

For the solution in equation (14), we introduce the following approximation scheme on the terms , , and . Let us consider a characteristic radius of the quark and antiquark system; it is the minimum interval between two quarks at which they cannot collide with each other. This scheme is based on the expansion of , , and in a power series around or in the -space, up to the second order. One should note that the -, -, and -dependent terms save the original form of equation (14). This approach is similar to the Pekeris approximation [42], which causes a deformation of the centrifugal potential. Hence, after this modified potential, equation (14) can be solved by the NU method. This expansion is done for the new variable , where around as follows:

We get the following equation by substituting equations (15), (16), and (17) into equation (14):

In equation (18), we introduce new variables for making the differential equation more compact:

Finally, equation (18) gets the following more compact form:

3. NU Method Application

In this section, we will apply the NU method for defining the energy eigenvalues. A comparison of equation (21) and equation (13) leads us to the following redefinitions:

Consider the following factorization:

For the appropriate function , (21) takes the form of the well-known hypergeometric-type equation. The appropriate function has to satisfy the following condition: where function is the maximum degree of a polynomial with one variable and is defined as follows: Finally, we get the following hypergeometric-type equation: where and read The constant parameter can be defined by utilizing the condition that the expression under the square root has a double zero, i.e., its discriminant is equal to zero. Hence, we obtain the following: Now, substituting equation (28) into equation (25) leads us to the following expression for : According to the NU method, out of the two possible forms of the polynomial , we select the one for which the function has the negative derivative. Another form is not suitable for physical reasons. Therefore, the suitable functions for and have the following forms: and their derivatives are as follows: We can define the constant from equation (27) which reads as follows: Given a nonnegative integer , the hypergeometric-type equation has a unique polynomial solution of degree if with the condition for . Furthermore, it follows that We can solve equation (35) explicitly for and get the following: Substituting equation (36) into equation (19) we obtain the following: From this equation, we can get the energy spectrum as follows: We would like to note that the -dimensional radial Schrödinger equation for the same potential is solved in [32], which should be the same as our result for at zero temperature. Similar work with the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin approximation method has been studied at temperature in [43]. At , the zero temperature limit of equation (38) reads as follows: If we take in equation (39), we then obtain the following: If we take in equation (39), we get [22] If we take and in equation (39) we obtain the same result as follows [6]:

We can also find the radial eigenfunctions by applying the NU method. The relevant function must satisfy the following condition: It is not a complicated task to find the following result, after substituting and into equation (43) and solving a first-order differential equation: Furthermore, the other part of the wave function is the hypergeometric-type function whose polynomial solutions are given by the Rodrigues relation: where is a normalizing constant and is the weight function which is the solution of the Pearson differential equation. The Pearson differential equation and for our problem is given as follows: Therefore, we use equation ((46)) to find the second part of the wave function from the definition of weight function: Considering both parts of the wave function and within equation (23), we obtain the following: As the last step, we do the replacement , and using in equation (48) we get the following: The final form of the radial wave function reads:

4. Mass Spectrum of the Heavy Quarkonium

We calculate the mass spectra of the heavy quarkonium system, for example, charmonium and bottomonium mesons that are the bound state of quarks and antiquarks. For this we apply the following relation: where is the bare mass of a heavy quark. Using expression (39) for the energy spectrum in (51) we get the following equation for heavy quarkonia mass at finite temperature: Depending on the system which we want to study, we may consider that and are the bare masses of quarks and antiquarks correspondingly and is the energy of the system. By replacing , we obtain the meson mass at zero temperature: Numerical values for the charmonium mass spectra are presented in Table 1


StatesPresent paperExperimental results [44]StatesPresent paperExperimental results [44]


In this table, we considered the bare mass of the charm quark as , and the constant terms fitted with the experimental data via equation (53) as , , , , and . If we apply formula (53) to the bottomonium case with the bare mass , and the experiment fitted constants use equation (53) as , , , , and , we obtain the following results shown in Table 2.


StatesPresent paperExperimental results [44]StatesPresent paperExperimental results [44]


Considering the and limit in equation (52) we get the following expression which is obtained in [22]

The , , and limits of equation (52) lead to the following formula which fully coincides with the quarkonium mass formula at zero temperature in [6]

We may conclude that our current results as presented in Table 1 and Table 2 are in good agreement with current available experimental data for all states of charmonium and bottomonium resonances. The main reason why the results for the and states are not in good agreement with the experimental data comes from the nonrelativistic calculation which we use throughout our calculations. One needs to consider the spin-spin and spin-orbital interactions terms within the potential. Thus, the reason is not related to the correct choice of the parameters or making a better fit. It is impossible to consider the spin terms within the Schrödinger equation because of its nonrelativistic nature. These terms should be considered within the relativistic equations such as within the Klein-Fock-Gordon and Dirac equations. We are planning to study it in the future since it is out of the scope of the current paper.

In Table 3, we present the mass spectrum results for the mesons with masses and , and parameters , , , , and .


StatesPresent paperExperimental results [44]StatesPresent paper


Experimental Results [44].

In order to compare our results with the different theoretical works, we present Tables 4 and 5 for the mass spectra of charmonium and bottomonium accordingly.


Present paper [22] [6][45][46][7]Exp. [44]

3.0983.0973.0963.0683.0783.0963.097
3.6873.6873.6863.6973.5813.6863.686
4.0424.0414.0404.1444.0853.9844.039
4.2714.2714.2694.5894.1504.421
4.4284.4284.425
3.2563.2563.2553.5263.4153.4333.511
3.7803.7803.7793.9933.9173.9103.922
4.1004.100
4.3104.310
4.4564.456
3.5053.5053.5043.8293.7493.7673.774


Present paper [22] [6][45][46][7]Exp. [44]

9.4609.4599.4609.4479.5109.4609.460
10.02310.02210.02310.01210.03810.02310.023
10.35510.35410.35510.35310.56610.28010.355
10.56710.56610.56710.62911.09410.42010.579
10.71010.7106578
9.6199.6189.6199.9009.8629.8409.899
10.11410.11310.11410.26010.39010.16010.260
10.41110.411
10.60410.604
10.73610.736
9.86310.2579.86410.15510.21410.14010.164

5. Temperature Dependence of Quarkonia Mass

In this section, we present the numerical results for the temperature dependence for some heavy meson mass spectra.

In Section 4, we have seen that the present potential model for describing the heavy quarkonia and meson mass at zero temperature is quite a good candidate. For studying the temperature dependence, we will follow [15].

For calculating the mass spectra at finite temperature, we use the explicit form of the Debye screening mass according to [47]: where . In the numerical calculations for the running coupling constant , we will adopt the following form at finite temperature: Here, we take the critical temperature from lattice QCD [48] which leads to .In the numerical calculations, we will apply as with two light quarks of the same mass and and one heavier . Firstly, we present the graphs for the change of the meson masses within the temperature-dependent Cornell potential in Figures 13. Afterwards, we present the same calculation for the Cornell plus the inverse quadratic and harmonic potentials in Figures 46. In all these graphs, we see that there exists a substantial decrement in the meson masses around which corresponds to . When we increase the principal quantum number , the temperature leads an increment in masses of the charmonium and mesons up to some point and then there is a sharp decrement. However, this phenomena is a bit different for the case of bottomonium, such that these states firstly do not change and then start decreasing after some point.

Notice that although the number of the parameters for the Cornell potential is less than the current potential, the results are not so different. Thus, we may conclude that our observation for the temperature-dependent masses does not depend much on the number of parameters. Besides that, our results for the temperature-dependent masses are in agreement with QCD sum rule results for the ground states [49]. One needs to perform more analyses for other resonances in order to check the validity of this agreement between pure nonrelativistic effects and QFT.

These results may open new possibilities for determining the properties of the interactions in a hadronic system. As a conclusion of the results presented in these tables and figures which are based on analytical results, we may draw the following key points: Firstly, temperature-dependent masses either for the Cornell or the Cornell plus inverse quadratic and harmonic-type potentials are very sensitive to the choice of radial and orbital quantum numbers. Secondly, we may consider the temperature-dependent results valid because of the similar shapes between the Cornell and current potentials. These results are sufficiently accurate for practical purposes.

6. Conclusion

The temperature-dependent Schrödinger equation is investigated by applying the NU method. As a potential part of the Schrödinger equation, the Cornell plus inverse quadratic and harmonic oscillator-type potential is used. Analytical expression for the energy eigenvalues and the radial wave functions is presented. Results are used for describing nonzero and zero temperature mass spectra of heavy quarkonia and . Numerical results are compared with the experimentally well-established resonances, and some predictions are presented for the states which have not been confirmed yet. For instance, we have the predictions for bottomonium, namely, besides the , , , and resonances, we predict the and resonances to be and states, respectively. For the charmonium states, besides the and resonances, we predict , , and . We have seen that a zero temperature mass spectrum for is quite in agreement with current experimental data, while for , there is some disagreement with experimental data because of the missing spin-spin and spin-orbital momentum interaction terms within the potential. For the temperature-dependent case, we see the strong dependence of the quarkonia mass spectrum on the quantum numbers. Temperature-dependent results for ground states are in good agreement with the quantum field theoretical approach such as the QCD sum rule results. We have seen that the extension of the Cornell potential leads to slight changes on the masses for nonzero temperature as well as zero temperature.

It seems that this simple potential model, like other nonrelativistic models, is not enough to describe all the features of hadrons within a thermal effect such that having all the hadrons melted at the same temperature contradicts with the lattice data. The most convenient way to compare the prediction of potential models with a direct calculation of quarkonium spectral functions is to calculate the Euclidean meson correlator at finite temperature to compare the lattice data as it was done for the Cornell potential in [50, 51]. It has been shown that even though potential models with certain screened potentials can reproduce qualitative features of the lattice spectral function, such as the survival of the state and the melting of the state, the temperature dependence of the meson correlators is not reproduced. According to the lattice results [52, 53] the charmonium survives up to and the charmonium dissolves by and higher excited states disappear near the transition temperature. It is possible that the effects of the medium on quarkonia binding cannot be understood in a simple potential model. However, one can still do this comparison for other potential models such as the one we have used in this paper. One of the main steps for correlator calculation is about the exact solution of the radial Schrödinger equation which is already done in this paper.

The method used in this paper are the systematic ones, and in many cases, it is one of the most concrete works in this area. In particular, the extended Cornell potential can be one of the important potentials, and it deserves special concern in many branches of physics, especially in hadronic, nuclear, and atomic physics.

Consequently, studying for an analytical solution of the modified radial Schrödinger equation for the sum of the Cornell, inverse quadratic-, and harmonic-type potentials within the framework of ordinary quantum mechanics could provide valuable information on elementary particle physics and quantum chromodynamics and open new windows for further investigation.

We can conclude that the theoretical results of this study are expected to enable new possibilities for pure theoretical and experimental physicists, because of the exact and more general nature of the results.

Data Availability

The information given in our tables is available for readers in the original references listed in our work.

Disclosure

We would like to note that the current research did not receive any specific funding but was performed as part of the employment of the three authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Shahriyar Jafarzade for carefully reading the manuscript.

References

  1. T. Appelquist and H. D. Politzer, “Heavy quarks and annihilation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 43–45, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. Greiner, Quantum Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, 2001. View at: Publisher Site
  3. V. G. Bagrov and D. M. Gitman, Exact Solutions of Relativistic Wave Equations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990. View at: Publisher Site
  4. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, Non-Relativistic Theory, 1977.
  5. S.-H. Dong, Factorization Method in Quantum Mechanics, Springer, Dordrecht, 2007. View at: Publisher Site
  6. S. M. Kuchin and N. V. Maksimenko, “Theoretical estimations of the spin averaged mass spectra of heavy quarkonia and bc mesons,” Universal Journal of Physics and Application, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 295–298, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. F. Al-Jamel and H. Widyan, “Heavy quarkonium mass spectra in a Coulomb field plus quadratic potential using Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Applied Physics Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 94–99, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  8. N. V. Maksimenko and S. M. Kuchin, “Determination of the mass spectrum of quarkonia by the Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Russian Physics Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. Ghalenovi, A. A. Rajabi, S. Qin, and D. H. Rischke, “Ground-state masses and magnetic moments of heavy baryons,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 29, no. 20, article 1450106, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Vigo-Aguiar and T. E. Simos, “Review of multistep methods for the numerical solution of the radial Schrödinger equation,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 278–290, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Abu-Shady, H. M. Mansour, and A. I. Ahmadov, “Dissociation of quarkonium in hot and dense media in an anisotropic plasma in the nonrelativistic quark model,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2019, Article ID 4785615, 10 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Karayer, “Study of the radial Schrödinger equation with external magnetic and AB flux fields by the extended Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 135, no. 1, p. 70, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Karayer, D. Demirhan, and F. Büyükkılıç, “Solution of Schrödinger equation for two different potentials using extended Nikiforov-Uvarov method and polynomial solutions of biconfluent Heun equation,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 59, no. 5, article 053501, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Matsui and H. Satz, “J/ψ suppression by quark-gluon plasma formation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 416–422, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Karsch, M. T. Mehr, and H. Satz, “Color screening and deconfinement for bound states of heavy quarks,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 37, p. 617, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Abu-Shady, “N-Dimensional Schrodinger equation at finite temperature using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 86–89, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Fingberg, “Heavy quarkonia at high temperature,” Physics Letters B, vol. 424, no. 3-4, pp. 343–354, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. El-Naggar, L. Abou Salem, A. Shalaby, and M. Bourham, “The equation of state for non-ideal quark gluon plasma,” Physical Science International Journal, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 912–929, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. P. Malik, R. K. Jha, and V. S. Varma, “Finite-temperature Schrodinger equation: solution in coordinate space,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 503, no. 1, pp. 446–449, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X.-Y. Wu, B.-J. Zhang, X.-J. Liu, Y.-H. Wu, Q.-C. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Finite temperature Schrödinger equation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 2546–2551, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Maireche, “A theoretical investigation of nonrelativistic bound state solution at finite temperature using the sum of modified Cornell plus inverse quadratic potential,” Sri Lankan Journal of Physics, vol. 21, no. 25, pp. 11–36, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. I. Ahmadov, C. Aydin, and O. Uzun, “Bound state solution of the Schrödinger equation at finite temperature,” Journal of Physics Conference Series, vol. 1194, no. 1, article 012001, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Abu-Shady and A. N. Ikot, “Analytic solution of multi-dimensional Schrödinger equation in hot and dense QCD media using the SUSYQM method,” European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 134, no. 7, p. 321, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Abu-Shady and A. N. Ikot, “Dissociation of nucleon and heavy baryon in an anisotropic hot and dense QCD medium using Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 135, no. 5, p. 406, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. W. M. Alberico, A. Beraudo, A. De Pace, and A. Molinari, “Quarkonia in the deconfined phase: effective potentials and lattice correlators,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 7, article 074009, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, J. B. Kogut, K. Lane, and T.-M. Yan, “Spectrum of charmed quark-antiquark bound states,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 369–372, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. Lane, and T.-M. Yan, “Charmonium: the model,” Physical Review D, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3090–3117, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. Rani, S. B. Bhardwaj, and F. Chand, “Mass spectra of heavy and light mesons using asymptotic iteration method,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 70, no. 2, p. 179, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Abu-Shady, “Heavy quarkonia and Bc-mesons in the Cornell potential with harmonic oscillator potential in the -dimensional Schrödinger equation,” APS Physics, vol. 2, pp. 16–20, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  30. A. Vega and J. Flores, “Heavy quarkonium properties from Cornell potential using variational method and supersymmetric quantum mechanics,” Pramana, vol. 87, no. 5, p. 73, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. E. Khokha, M. Abu-Shady, and T. Abdel-Karim, “Quarkonium masses in the -dimensional space using the analytical exact iteration method,” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 86–92, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. Abu-Shady, T. A. Abdel-Karim, and S. Y. Ezz-Alarab, “Masses and thermodynamic properties of heavy mesons in the non-relativistic quark model using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 14, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Mansour and A. Gamal, “Bound state of heavy quarks using a general polynomial potential,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2018, Article ID 7269657, 7 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Abu-Shady, T. Abdel-Karim, and E. Khokha, “Exact solution of the -dimensional radial Schrödinger equation via Laplace transformation method with the generalized Cornell potential,” SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  35. S. Hassanabadi, A. A. Rajabi, and S. Zarrinkamar, “Cornell and Kratzer potentials within the semirelativistic treatment,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 27, no. 10, article 1250057, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. N. Ikot, G. J. Rampho, P. O. Amadi, U. S. Okorie, M. J. Sithole, and M. L. Lekala, “Quantum information-entropic measures for exponential-type potential,” Results in Physics, vol. 18, article 103150, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S.-H. Dong, G.-H. Sun, and M. Lozada-Cassou, “Exact solutions and ladder operators for a new anharmonic oscillator,” Physics Letters A, vol. 340, no. 1-4, pp. 94–103, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. X.-H. Wang, S.-H. Dong, C.-Y. Chen, and Y. You, “Exact solutions of the Schrödinger equation with double ring-shaped oscillator,” Physics Letters A, vol. 377, article 1521, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Q. Dong, H. I. G. Hernández, G.-H. Sun, M. Toutounji, and S.-H. Dong, “Exact solutions of the harmonic oscillator plus non-polynomial interaction,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 476, no. 2241, article 20200050, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. X.-W. Hou, S.-H. Dong, and Z.-Q. Ma, “Relativistic Levinson theorem in two dimensions,” Physical Review A, vol. 58, no. 3, article 2160, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. F. Nikiforov and V. B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1988. View at: Publisher Site
  42. C. Pekeris, “The rotation-vibration coupling in diatomic molecules,” Physics Review, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 98–103, 1934. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. E. Omugbe, O. E. Osafile, and M. C. Onyeaju, “Mass spectrum of mesons via the WKB approximation method,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2020, Article ID 5901464, 8 pages, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Particle Data Group, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, vol. 2020, article 083C01, 2020.
  45. R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, A. V. Tatarintsev, and A. S. Vshivtsev, “Spectral problem of the radial Schrödinger equation with confining power potentials,” Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 1530–1542, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. Kumar and F. Chand, “Series solutions to the -dimensional radial Schrödinger equation for the quark-antiquark interaction potential,” Physica Scripta, vol. 85, no. 5, article 055008, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. G. Boyd, J. Engels, F. Karsch et al., “Thermodynamics of SU(3) lattice gauge theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 469, no. 3, pp. 419–444, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. C. Bernard, T. Burch, E. Gregory et al., “QCD thermodynamics with three flavors of improved staggered quarks,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, article 034504, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. E. V. Veliev, H. Sundu, K. Azizi, and M. Bayar, “Scalar quarkonia at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 5, article 056012, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Á. Mócsy and P. Petreczky, “Heavy quarkonia survival in potential model,” European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields, vol. 43, no. 1-4, pp. 77–80, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Á. Mócsy and P. Petreczky, “Quarkonia correlators above deconfinement,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 7, article 074007, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. Umeda, K. Nomura, and H. Matsufuru, “Charmonium at finite temperature in quenched lattice QCD,” European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields, vol. 39, no. S1, pp. 9–26, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Asakawa and T. Hatsuda, “J/ψ and in the deconfined plasma from lattice QCD,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, no. 1, article 012001, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 A. I. Ahmadov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views689
Downloads512
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.