Research Article
Nonintrusive Method Based on Neural Networks for Video Quality of Experience Assessment
Table 7
Papers with machine learning methods for assessing QoE.
| Paper | # video sequences | Resolution | Code c | SSIM | VQM | PSRN | MSE | BR | FR | PLR | value (decodificables frames rate) | QP |
Playout interruptions | Delay | Jitter | BW | MLBS | GOP |
Machine learning |
Assess MOS/DMOS? | Correlation performance | PCC | SROCC | RMSE | OR |
| He et al. [17], 2012 | 1 | QCIF | MPEG4 | | | X | | | | X | | | | X | X | | X | | Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) | Yes | 0.9286 | No | No | No | Kipli et al. [18], 2012 | N/D | No data | No data | X | | X | X | | | | | | | | | | | | BPNN | Yes | 0.891 | No | No | No | Singh et al. [19], 2012 | 4 | HD-720p | H.264 | | | | | | | X | | X | X | X | | | | | RNN | Yes | No | No | 0.37 | No | Lia et al. [20], 2011 | 4 | No data | No data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BPNN | No | No | No | No | No | Khan at al. [21], 2010 | 6 | QCIF | H.264 | | | | | X | X | | | | | | | | X | | ANFIS | Yes | 0.8717 | No | 0.2812 | No | Du et al. [22], 2009 | 1 | SD | No data | | | X | | | | X | | | | X | X | X | X | | BPNN | Yes | No | No | No | No | Piamrat et al. [23], 2009 | 1 | No data | H.264 | | | X | | | | X | | | | | | | X | | PSQA with RNN | Yes | No | No | No | No | Khan et al. [24], 2008 | 3 | CIF | MPEG4 | | | | | X | X | X | X | | | | | X | | | ANFIS | Yes | R = 0.8056 for MOS predicted versus MOS Measure and R = 0.9229 for predicted versus measure | No | RMSE = 0.1846 for MOS predicted versus MOS measure and RMSE = 0.06234 for predicted versus measure | No | Rubino et al. [25], 2004 | Only VoIP | No data | No data | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | X | | RNN | No | No | No | No | No |
|
|
BR: bitrate, FR: frame rate, PLR: Packet Loss Rate, QP: Quantization Parameter, BW: bandwidth, MLBS: Mean Loss Burst Size, GOP: Group of Pictures, PCC: Pearson correlation coefficient, SROCC: Spearman rank order correlation coefficient, RMSE: Root Mean Square Error, and OR: Outlier Ratio.
|