The Impact of Digital Transformation on Environmental Sustainability

Truong, Thanh Cong

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6324325

Advances in Multimedia

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 6324325 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6324325

The Impact of Digital Transformation on Environmental Sustainability

Thanh Cong Truong¹

Academic Editor: Rajesh Kaluri

Received25 Jan 2022

Accepted07 May 2022

Published17 May 2022

Abstract

Recently, digital transformation is supposed to affect all aspects of human life profoundly. Nevertheless, there is a lack of summaries map digital transformation in the environmental sustainability domain. To address this knowledge gap, this study examines the impacts of digital transformation on environmental sustainability, including both positive and negative effects. Furthermore, the results highlight the transformations that preserve the environment in three main areas: waste management and handling, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable resource management. Based on the literature summary, this study also discusses the opportunities and challenges in this field, which attempts to offer a vision for further research.

1. Introduction

Over the past decades, digital transformation has been a substantial focus for many researchers and practitioners. Digital transformation encompasses the profound changes that are happening in every aspect of society, organisations, and industries through the use of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, and other technologies [1].

Digital transformation—the leverage of technologies that influences all aspects of human life—lights up hopes of improving the environment [2, 3]. In the meantime, concerns have been raised about the risks of digitalisation on the environment [4, 5]. The relationship between digital transformation and environmental sustainability is complex, and whether digital transformation helps or hinders environmental sustainability has been the subject of debate within the scientific community.

Despite the complex association between digital transformation and environmental sustainability, a narrowed search for holistic review in this field gives few results. According to our investigations, only a few reviewing articles has been presented in the literature. In [6], the authors conducted a review on the assessments of the environmental impact of digital goods. In this study, they focused on indicators applied by companies to measure the environmental impacts of information and communication technology (ICT) hardware. Meanwhile, in [4], the author conducted a systemic literature review on the indirect environmental effects of ICTs. This study investigated the indirect environmental impact of the application of ICTs in other goods and services and the ecological impacts of these changes.

Another study [7] examined the current digitalisation trend for improving environmental sustainability. The researchers investigated nine cases in various countries using emerging technologies to address climate change adaptation. They asserted that digital transformations could help minimise the impacts of climate change in metropolitan centres. In a recent study [8], the authors introduced a framework that showed how and where such digital transformations occurred in environmental sustainability.

Generally, the studies mentioned above have not given a holistic view of how digital transformations impact the environment. The study [6] explored the direct effect on the environment; on the contrary, the indirect effect had not been mentioned. In contrast, the work in [4] focused on the indirect impact of the application of ICTs on the environment and did not address the direct effects. On the contrary, the authors in [7] concentrated on the impact of digitalisation on climate change adaptation and sustainable development. Meanwhile, in [8], the adverse effects of digitalisation were not mentioned explicitly in the publication.

Against this backdrop, this study aims to identify the impacts of digital transformations on environmental sustainability, both positive and negative aspects. Furthermore, emerging techniques that protect the ecological system in three principal areas, waste management and handling, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable resource management, are also examined.

This study systematically summarises the publications on digital transformation on environmental sustainability. The main contributions of this work are listed as follows:(i)The positive and negative effects of digitalisation on the environment(ii)The opportunities that emerging technologies such as AI, big data analytics, IoT, and blockchain could address environmental issues(iii)The current issues as well as the open research directions of digital transformation in the context of environmental sustainability

The remainder of this study proceeds as follows. Section 2 briefly provides the background information. The research method utilised for this study is presented in Section 3. Next, Section 4 presents the research’s main findings and discusses potential challenges as well as further research directions. Finally, conclusions are drawn in section 5.

2. Theoretical Background

This section contains the background information necessary to better understand the association between digital transformation and environmental sustainability.

2.1. Digital Transformation

There are many attempts to define the term “digital transformation”. For example, Westerman et al. stated: “the use of technology to radically improve performance or reach of enterprises” [9, 10], “use of new digital technologies, such as social media, mobile, analytics, or embedded devices, in order to enable major business improvements such as enhancing customer experience, streamlining operations, or creating new business models” as in [11], and “a process that aims to improve an entity by triggering significant changes to its properties through combinations of information, computing, communication, and connectivity technologies” as in [1]. Nevertheless, these definitions share a common ground: examining how to use digital technologies to enhance service delivery, change organisational processes and culture, and impact value creation [12].

Although digital transformation is primarily used in a business context, it also affects other sectors such as government organisations and those involved in addressing social challenges by leveraging these existing emerging technologies. In the context of a sustainable environment, digital transformation with emerging technologies such as AI, big data analytics, IoT, and blockchain technology is expected to address environmental issues.

2.2. Environmental Sustainability

The sustainability of the environment is an important topic and has attracted the attention of scientists since the 90s. The scientist first coined the term “environmentally sustainable development” at First Annual Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Development [13]. Later, environmental sustainability was conceptualised in the contribution [14]. According to the author, environmental sustainability “seeks to improve human welfare by protecting the sources of raw materials used for human needs and ensuring that the sinks for human wastes are not exceeded, in order to prevent harm to humans”.

Environmental sustainability requires research that deals with a wide range of environmental issues, including air and water pollution, waste management, greenhouse gases (GHG) mitigation, renewable energy and energy efficiency, climate change, maintenance of biodiversity, and protection of other natural resources.

3. Research Method

The research method described in this study followed the original guidelines as proposed in [15]. The main process consists of four distinct phases: designing, conducting, analysing, and documenting the review. The following protocol asserted the rationale for the study. The main process consists of four distinct phases: designing, conducting, analysing, and documenting the review. The following protocol asserted the rationale for the study: determining the research questions, forming the search strategy, choosing the databases, including and excluding criteria, data extraction, analysis, and reporting of findings.

3.1. Research Questions

The research questions addressed by this study are as follows:(i)Research question 1 (RQ1): what are the effects of digital transformation on environmental sustainability?(ii)Research question 2 (RQ2): how do digital technologies preserve the environment against pollution and the degradation of natural resources?(iii)Research question 3 (RQ3): what are the current issues and open research directions?

3.2. Sources of Information

The search has focused on selecting papers from the four primary electronic databases: ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and SpringerLink. Apart from the four sources above, we also search in Scopus databases due to its broad coverage of cross-disciplinary fields [16]. Table 1 depicts the primary databases utilised in this study.

3.3. Search Process and Filtering Criteria

A systematic search of the literature concerning the impact of digital transformation on environmental sustainability was performed. Table 2 shows several criteria defined to discover relevant articles to answer our research questions. The review conducted contains the literature review from 2011 to 2021 in the English language. This range was chosen because it allowed reflection of the study patterns over a substantial period.

In the first search, the author group gathered 570 articles, which were further reduced to 546 based on the articles’ titles. Next, the tutorials, short papers, technical reports, conference proceedings, and book chapters were excluded to ensure that all selected studies had undergone consistent revision. After this stage, 319 articles remained. Next, in the phase of skimming abstracts and conclusions, the papers that did not discuss environmental sustainability and were not related to digital technologies were excluded. After scanning the abstracts and conclusions, 160 articles were selected. These papers were examined thoroughly for a final filtering phase. Finally, a total of 106 papers were chosen for further analysing.

4. Results

This section presents the study’s findings consisting of the general characteristics of the studies and four main domains of investigation, including environmental effects of digital transformation, waste management and handling, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable resource management.

4.1. Typical Characteristics of the Studies

In this study, the author group imposed a year restriction that only publications since 2011 were selected. This period was chosen because it gave insight into the study patterns over a substantial period. This period was chosen because it gave insight into the study patterns over a substantial period. Figure 1 displays the number of total published articles after removing the duplication. According to Figure 1, from 2011 through 2015, the number of publications increased linearly. Nevertheless, the pace rose sharply from 2016, with a peak in 2019. This finding suggests that the impact of digital technologies that enable transformations on the environment is a growing area in sustainability research.

This paper focuses on the impact of digital transformation on environmental sustainability. In this manuscript, 106 articles were selected from 2011 to June 2021 for technical review, illustrated in Figure 2. According to Figure 2, the highest number of papers are chosen from the year 2019.

In this study, various digital solutions that could transform the environment have been reviewed. A diversity of digital technologies that enable transformations in different domains of environmental sustainability was examined, such as waste management and handling, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable resource management. Figure 3 represents the statistics of selected papers on different domains of environmental sustainability. According to Figure 3, the number of papers in the three fields is almost the same. Pollution prevention and control are the areas with a slightly higher number of research regarding digital disruptions, followed by waste management and handling and sustainable resource management.

Even though the chosen papers deal with different digital solutions, four main themes of digital technologies were examined in this study: AI, big data, IoT, and blockchain. The number of papers chosen for every type of technology is formulated in Figure 4. According to Figure 4, applications of AI were utilised in forty-four papers, followed by big data analytics with thirteen papers; IoT was leveraged in eleven papers, the same amount for blockchain. Finally, the combination of different technologies, such as AI and IoT or big data and IoT, showed up in five papers.

4.2. Environmental Effects of Digital Transformation

Many optimistic expectations and viewpoints show that digital transformation and innovation could contribute to environmental sustainability. Meanwhile, numerous studies discuss the opportunities and risks that may arise from digitisation and assess the effects of digital technologies on the environment, which can be either positive or negative. Within the scope of this study, the main effects of the direct and indirect environmental impacts of digital transformation were distinguished.

Direct environmental effects are impacts of resources and energy of digital products, i.e., production of ICT devices, energy consumption, and disposal of electronic waste [2, 17]. The mining and extraction of natural resources needed for hardware products are the main contributors to resource depletion and global warming. Furthermore, the raw material mining extraction processes cause other environmental effects, such as heavy metal emissions, acidification, and ground and water service contamination [18]. Other direct environmental impacts that need to be considered are improper collection, recycling, and electrical and electronic equipment disposal. In addition, the greenhouse gas emissions from power generation can also impact biodiversity.

Numerous studies showed that the production phase of ICT goods such as notebooks, smartphones, and tablets dominates the resource depletion impact [19–21]. Meanwhile, the authors [22–24] argued that the production of ICT machinery and devices is among the sources contributing to the increasing levels of CO₂ emissions. In other studies [25, 26], the researchers pointed out that waste of electrical and electronic equipment contains dangerous matters, posing significant environmental and health risks if not adequately handled during disposal.

The indirect effects on the environment result from the application of ICTs in other goods and services and the ecological impacts of these changes. Studies assessing the indirect effects on the environment often support the notion that they are desirable for environmental protection [4]. With respect to waste management and handling, digital solutions have been discussed as forecasting the waste generation [27, 28], unveiling resource [29–32] waste, or designing more efficient waste management models [33, 34]. With respect to pollution prevention and control, digitalisation and networking contribute to reducing greenhouse gases [35–37], designing models for predicting emission [38–42], and other applications for controlling environmental pollution. Concerning sustainable resource management, digital technologies open possibilities for energy efficiency [43–47] and exploitation and management of renewable resources [48–51].

Nevertheless, potential adverse effects need to be considered, such as greater energy use by digitalised systems than conventional systems. For example, the authors [52] discovered a unidirectional causal link between ICT and energy consumption. Furthermore, a contribution by the researchers in [53] pointed out that recycling might become more complex with high customisation products. Additionally, the systemic impacts of digital transformation on the environment involve production and consumption patterns, as well as changes in customer attitudes and behaviours. For example, research conducted by [54] reported that the increased usage of the Internet led to an increase in electricity consumption. Furthermore, digitalisation and networking can cause rebound effects because of the increased consumption or triggers growth effects [55].

4.3. Waste Management and Handling

The accumulation of waste is a major environmental problem due to rapid urbanisation and population growth. Hence, proper management and handling of waste are essential for any country to prevent pollution and reduce the risks to public health. Digital transformation, with the utilisation of modern technologies, can help develop new coping methods with waste on enormous scales. For example, the authors of [27, 28, 56–61] employed artificial neural networks (ANN) to forecast solid waste generation for efficient management of municipal waste and policy making.

Meanwhile, the researchers of [62] proposed using big data technologies to reduce cost, which led to reduced waste and improved efficiency in the automotive industry. Big data were also utilised to analyse the construction and demolition waste management performance [29–31], as well as identify illegal construction waste dumping [63].

In another study [64], IoT and big data were applied as solutions to manage the waste of electrical and electronic equipment. IoT was also used to treat food waste generated [32, 65, 66] or design a waste collection model in intelligent cities [33, 34, 67].

Other technologies were also transforming the waste management and handling domain. In [68, 69], the authors investigated AI algorithms for improving the efficiency of e-waste collection. Conversely, the researchers in [70] proposed an intelligent waste material classification system, which achieved an accuracy of 87%. On the contrary, in [71–74], the authors proposed to utilise blockchain technology in managing waste as it can offer integrity, resilience, and transparency and audit features in a trusted, decentralised, and secure manner [75].

Table 3 describes the main details of the selected studies focusing on applications of digital technology in waste management and handling regarding the techniques, the main ideas, and their effects.

4.4. Pollution Prevention and Control

Environmental pollution with its health impacts is a fundamental issue for ecological sustainability [77]. Therefore, more action is needed to be limiting environmental pollution. Pollution prevention lowers pollution, while pollution control strategies attempt to manage a pollutant after being released and decrease its impact on the environment. Innovative digital technologies find applications in a wide range of areas contributing to the prevention and control of environmental pollution.

In the context of emissions control and monitoring, the utilisation of AI in control systems can help leverage the best available technologies for even better performance. In [35], an application of DSS was introduced to minimise CO₂ emissions and energy consumption. Later, in [38], the author investigated and compared decision tree techniques in classifying and predicting emission levels, which showed a promising result.

In [78], the researchers combined an extreme learning machine model and harmony search algorithm to design a model for NO_X emission reduction, which yielded acceptable performance. Furthermore, to estimate NO_X emission, several AI algorithms were also utilised, such as deep bidirectional learning machine [39], deep belief network (DBN) [40], or long short-term memory (LSTM) [41, 42].

Apart from AI, big data also provided opportunities to monitor and control emissions, which assisted environmental sustainability. As in [79], big data were utilised to examine the relationship between carbon emission and economic growth, thereby providing background for governments to formulate emission reduction policies. Other studies applied big data for designing emissions—minimised paths in urban areas [36], investigated the benefits of bike-sharing to reduce CO₂ emissions [80], or assisted in selecting the optimal supplier and lot—sizing considering carbon emissions [37].

In the context of solving pollution problems, emerging technologies can help reduce pollution in the environment and achieve sustainability. For example, AI-based models were implemented to model, optimise, predict, and control pollutant issues related to pollutant removal processes [81–83] and analysis and forecast of air pollutants [84–87]. Other digital transformation technologies, such as big data and IoT, also contribute significantly to pollution control and prevention [88–90] (p. 5 in [91]). In [92], blockchain technology was utilised to develop an emission trading system, which was an economic incentive to control environmental pollution.

Last but not least, new technologies also contribute to minimising climate change impacts [93–96] and play a significant role in disaster management [97–99].

Table 4 describes the main details of the selected studies focusing on applications of digital technology in pollution prevention and control regarding the techniques, the main ideas, and its effects.

4.5. Sustainable Resource Management

Sustainable resources refer to energy and mineral resources that are either renewable (can replenish themselves) or nonrenewable (eventually depleted). Both renewable and nonrenewable resources need to be carefully managed to reduce resource consumption and pollution while reaching development goals. In terms of sustainable resource management, digital technologies open possibilities for reducing negative environmental impacts of the business through significant improvements in energy efficiency and exploitation and management of renewable resources.

Energy efficiency refers to the method or technique of decreasing energy consumption by using less energy to achieve the same function. Digital solutions can contribute to efficient energy management and reduce the burden on the environment. For example, new techniques were leveraged to forecast the energy consumption [43–45], analyse energy consumption [100, 101], design energy-efficient systems [102–104], or monitor and manage the resources [105–107]. In a recent work [108], the authors proposed an architecture that employ nature-inspired optimization algorithm to optimise the energy in cloud. These technologies transform the decision-making relating to operations, demand response strategies, planning, and energy systems’ management.

Regarding the exploitation and management of renewable resources, digital solutions can effectively enhance energy generation and consumption management. In [109, 110], DSS was utilised to select the most promising locations for installing renewable systems based on natural energy sources. Similarly, DSS was used to estimate forest biomass availability for energy production [111] or a hybrid renewable energy system’s effective and efficient energy management [48]. Meanwhile, other methods were utilised to predict variable renewable energy generation sources [49–51, 112], design renewable energy systems [113] and microgrid energy markets [114, 115], and develop an IoT-based solution to generate electrical energy from multiple sensors [116]. Controversy, swarm intelligence methodologies were utilised in [117, 118] for optimising the multimode resource-constrained project scheduling problem considering both renewable and nonrenewable resources.

Table 5 illustrates the main details of the chosen references that concentrate on applications of digital solutions in sustainable resource management regarding the techniques, the main ideas, and their effects.

5. Discussion

Based on our comprehensive literature review, the detailed answers to the three questions we raised before are discussed and answered.

First, as for RQ1, regarding the effects of digital transformation on environmental sustainability, the aspects have been explored in the available literature. This study distinguishes the main categories of direct and indirect environmental effects.(i)Direct effects: the production, consumption, and disposal of digital goods impact the environment in diverse ways and put pressure on the environment. The direct effects related to the digital transformation could cause resource depletion, water scarcity, greenhouse gas emissions, and pollution and cause substantial pressures on biodiversity.(ii)Indirect effects: numerous research studies assess the indirect effects of digitalisation and networking on the environment and support the notion that they could contribute to sustainable development. For example, digital technology such as AI, big data, IoT, and blockchain is revolutionising our approach to biodiversity conservation, clean energy development, and management of natural disasters. Nevertheless, prospective known adverse effects and uncertainties regarding the application of digital solutions need to be considered, for example, the energy-intensive demand for ICT-enable systems. Additionally, the rebound effects of digital transformation on the environment involve production and consumption patterns, as well as changes in consumer behaviour and attitudes that need further investigation.

Second, as for RQ2, regarding how digital technologies preserve the environment, this study points out that the advancement of digital technologies such as AI, big data, IoT, and blockchain could help alleviate the negative effects on the environment in a variety of ways.

Due to the advancement of AI technologies, AI-based models now impact every field of study. In environmental engineering, AI is implemented to solve the issues related to waste treatment modelling, pollution, sustainable resource management, and other areas. Due to their potential for data mining and feature extracting, AI-based models are extensively used to forecast waste generation and predict concentrations of pollutants and particulate matter, as well as monitor and prevent air pollution. Furthermore, AI was utilised to optimise waste collection routes, locate waste management facilities, and simulate waste conversion processes. Additionally, AI-based systems can also help when reducing the greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere. On the contrary, AI was also used for improving the forecasting accuracy of renewable energy.

The big data revolution has led to an information explosion for decades as humans and machines continue to generate large volumes of data at exponentially rates. Given the utility of big data, academia and practitioners have started to integrate these technologies to address sustainable environmental problems. Regarding pollution control and prevention, big data allow monitoring in real time to determine a method to track pollution violations and forecast future pollution. Furthermore, big data analytics enables tracking GHG emissions, reaching renewable energy goals, or designing energy-efficient systems.

Over the years, IoT innovation has transformed everyday objects into intelligent things, with interoperability between them and their environment. The usage of intelligent data-sensing devices opens the opportunity to digitise numerous operations and brings enormous benefits. It is also a facilitator of environmental sustainability research and application. The principal areas of IoT application for waste management involve monitoring, automation, and optimization. This increases the efficiency of waste management, thereby supporting environmental protection. Furthermore, the IoT has immense potential to improve the environment by increasing atmospheric quality, reducing pollution, and sustainably managing resources. This can be achieved by utilising advanced monitoring tools to collect data, and then, the outcome would be used by the decision-making systems.

Blockchain is considered one of the most disruptive inventions of the past decade, potentially impacting many areas of society such as energy industries, financial corporations, and pub sectors [119]. This ledge technology also has the potential to address environmental challenges. For example, it allows the development of efficient waste management systems or the design of energy-efficient systems. Furthermore, blockchain technology has facilitated applications of sharing economy in the energy area. In addition, blockchain-based methods can be deployed to reduce the number of pollutants being released into the environment by utilising a blockchain reward system.

Finally, as for RQ3, general issues that need to be tackled and the research areas that need further development are indicated as follows.

5.1. Current Issues

Even though the leverage of digital technologies for environmental sustainability goals has yielded favourable results, there exist general issues that need to be tackled in years to come.(i)The extraction of mineral resources for ICTs’ goods production causes a host of negative impacts on the environment, including resource degradation, land and water contamination, and biodiversity disturbance. Hence, it is crucial to improve the sustainability regulation and its enforcement.(ii)The volume of e-waste proliferates year by year and becomes an emerging threat to the environment. Hence, reducing e-waste streams and enhancing recycling technology are essential to lowering the environment’s burden.(iii)Digital transformation requires a large amount of physical hardware. All these physical products demand resources and energy throughout their life cycle. Hence, a comprehensive approach is needed to understand the impacts that digitalisation benefits the environmental aspect.

5.2. Open Research Direction

Our study has revealed many issues, while some research avenues that should be carried out in the upcoming future years also appeared, as presented below:(i)To date, few studies have investigated the systemic indirect environmental effect of ICT-enabled solutions. Hence, this is a critical issue for future research.(ii)In-depth studies are needed to investigate the association of technologies with their resource demands and ecological impact. For instance, the implications of emerging technologies such as blockchain and sensor technology in the environment context have yet to be thoroughly studied.(iii)Limited research has been conducted on the other digital transformation environmental impact categories except for GHG emissions and energy. Hence, the research community should expand the scope of the impact categories of ecological assessment studies, such as biodiversity disturbance, abiotic resource degradation, and the contamination of land and water.

6. Conclusion

The aim of the present research was to examine the impact of digital transformation on environmental sustainability. Specifically, this study focused on how digital technologies preserve the environment against pollution and improve the effectiveness of waste management and handling and sustainable resource management. This study has shown that the advancement of digital technologies such as AI, big data, IoT, and blockchain could help alleviate the negative effects on the environment in numerous ways.

In this study, the direct and indirect effects of digital transformation technologies on the environment were presented. In addition, a review of several techniques applied in different environmental domains aspect, including waste management and handling, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable resource management, were also presented, followed by the challenges and potential future research directions in this field. Overall, this study strengthens the idea that digital transformation has immense potential to achieve environmental sustainability goals. Nevertheless, it also engages a series of challenges, which need more in-depth investigation. To conclude, we believe our study lays the groundwork for future research into the field of environmental sustainability. Future research should be undertaken to explore how digital transformation impacts other related sustainability domains, such as the economy and the social fields.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declares no conflicts of interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118–144, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kunkel and M. Matthess, “Digital transformation and environmental sustainability in industry: putting expectations in Asian and African policies into perspective,” Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 112, pp. 318–329, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Santarius, J. Pohl, and S. Lange, “Digitalization and the decoupling debate: can ICT help to reduce environmental impacts while the economy keeps growing?” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 18, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. T. Bieser and L. M. Hilty, “Assessing indirect environmental effects of information and communication technology (ICT): a systematic literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 8, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Malmodin and D. Lundén, “The energy and carbon footprint of the global ICT and E& M sectors 2010–2015,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Krumay and R. Brandtweiner, “Measuring the environmental impact of ICT hardware,” International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1064–1076, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-L. Balogun, D. Marks, R. Sharma et al., “Assessing the potentials of digitalization as a tool for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in urban centres,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 53, Article ID 101888, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Feroz, H. Zo, and A. Chiravuri, “Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: a review and research agenda,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Westerman, C. Calméjane, D. Bonnet, P. Ferraris, and A. McAfee, “Digital Transformation: a roadmap for billion-dollar organizations,” MIT Cent. Digit. Bus. Capgemini Consult., vol. 1, pp. 1–68, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Westerman, D. Bonnet, and A. McAfee, “The nine elements of digital transformation,” MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1–6, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Fitzgerald, N. Kruschwitz, D. Bonnet, and M. Welch, “Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative,” MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 55, no. 2, p. 1, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Mergel, N. Edelmann, and N. Haug, “Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, Article ID 101385, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Serageldin, A. Steer, and A. Hetzner, “Valuing the environment: proceedings of the first annual international conference on environmentally sustainable development,” in Proceedings of the in Valuing the Environment: Proceedings of the First Annual International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Development, p. 192, Washington DC USA, March 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Goodland, “The concept of environmental sustainability,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 104, pp. 333–339, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-W. Harzing and S. Alakangas, “Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison,” Scientometrics, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 787–804, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Añón Higón, R. Gholami, and F. Shirazi, “ICT and environmental sustainability: a global perspective,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 85–95, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Manhart, R. Vogt, M. Priester et al., “The environmental criticality of primary raw materials – a new methodology to assess global environmental hazard potentials of minerals and metals from mining,” Miner. Econ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 91–107, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. G. Andrae and M. S. Vaija, “Precision of a streamlined life cycle assessment approach used in eco-rating of mobile phones,” Challenges, vol. 8, no. 2, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. André, M. Ljunggren Söderman, and A. Nordelöf, “Resource and environmental impacts of using second-hand laptop computers: a case study of commercial reuse,” Waste Management Series, vol. 88, pp. 268–279, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pradel, J. Garcia, and M. S. Vaija, “A framework for good practices to assess abiotic mineral resource depletion in Life Cycle Assessment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 279, Article ID 123296, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Z. B. W. Danish and Z. Latif, “Towards cross-regional sustainable development: the nexus between information and communication technology, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions,” Sustainable Development, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 990–1000, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Lee and T. Brahmasrene, “ICT, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence from a panel of ASEAN,” Global Economic Review, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 93–109, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Park, F. Meng, and M. A. Baloch, “The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis,” Environmental Science & Pollution Research, vol. 25, no. 30, Article ID 30719, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Biedenkopf, “Hazardous substances in electronics: the effects of European union risk regulation on China,” European Journal of Risk Regulation, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 477–487, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yang, M. Ma, J. R. Thompson, and R. J. Flower, “Waste management, informal recycling, environmental pollution and public health,” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 237–243, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Abbasi and A. E. Hanandeh, “Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence modelling approaches,” Waste Management Series, vol. 56, pp. 13–22, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Abbasi, M. N. Rastgoo, and B. Nakisa, “Monthly and seasonal modeling of municipal waste generation using radial basis function neural network,” Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, vol. 38, no. 3, Article ID e13033, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Lu, X. Chen, Y. Peng, and L. Shen, “Benchmarking construction waste management performance using big data,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 105, pp. 49–58, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Lu, X. Chen, D. C. W. Ho, and H. Wang, “Analysis of the construction waste management performance in Hong Kong: the public and private sectors compared using big data,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 112, pp. 521–531, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Lu, X. Chen, Y. Peng, and X. Liu, “The effects of green building on construction waste minimization: triangulating ‘big data’ with ‘thick data,” Waste Management Series, vol. 79, pp. 142–152, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Logan, M. Safi, P. Lens, and C. Visvanathan, “Investigating the performance of internet of things based anaerobic digestion of food waste,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 127, pp. 277–287, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cerchecci, F. Luti, A. Mecocci, S. Parrino, G. Peruzzi, and A. Pozzebon, “A low power IoT sensor node architecture for waste management within smart cities context,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 4, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Marques, D. Manfroi, E. Deitos et al., “An IoT-based smart cities infrastructure architecture applied to a waste management scenario,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 87, pp. 200–208, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. F. Porzio, B. Fornai, A. Amato et al., “Reducing the energy consumption and CO2 emissions of energy intensive industries through decision support systems – an example of application to the steel industry,” Applied Energy, vol. 112, pp. 818–833, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Ehmke, A. M. Campbell, and B. W. Thomas, “Data-driven approaches for emissions-minimized paths in urban areas,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 67, pp. 34–47, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Lamba, S. P. Singh, and N. Mishra, “Integrated decisions for supplier selection and lot-sizing considering different carbon emission regulations in Big Data environment,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 128, pp. 1052–1062, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Birant, “Comparison of decision tree algorithms for predicting potential air pollutant emissions with data mining models,” Journal of Environmental Informatics, vol. 17, no. 1, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
G.-Q. Li, X.-B. Qi, K. C. Chan, and B. Chen, “Deep bidirectional learning machine for predicting NO x emissions and boiler efficiency from a coal-fired boiler,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 31, no. 10, Article ID 11480, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Wang, S. Ma, H. Wang, Y. Li, and J. Zhang, “Prediction of NOX emission for coal-fired boilers based on deep belief network,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 80, pp. 26–35, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tan, B. He, C. Zhang et al., “Dynamic modeling of NOX emission in a 660 MW coal-fired boiler with long short-term memory,” Energy, vol. 176, pp. 429–436, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Yang, Y. Wang, and X. Li, “Prediction of the NOx emissions from thermal power plant using long-short term memory neural network,” Energy, vol. 192, Article ID 116597, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bedi and D. Toshniwal, “Empirical mode decomposition based deep learning for electricity demand forecasting,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, Article ID 49156, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cai, M. Pipattanasomporn, and S. Rahman, “Day-ahead building-level load forecasts using deep learning vs. traditional time-series techniques,” Applied Energy, vol. 236, pp. 1078–1088, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rahman, V. Srikumar, and A. D. Smith, “Predicting electricity consumption for commercial and residential buildings using deep recurrent neural networks,” Applied Energy, vol. 212, pp. 372–385, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Timur, K. Zor, Ö. Çelik, A. Teke, and T. İbrikçi, “Application of statistical and artificial intelligence techniques for medium-term electrical energy forecasting: a case study for a regional hospital,” Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 520–536, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
P. W. Tien, S. Wei, J. Calautit, J. Darkwa, and C. Wood, “Occupancy heat gain detection and prediction using deep learning approach for reducing building energy demand,” Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–31, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
K.-H. Chang, “A decision support system for planning and coordination of hybrid renewable energy systems,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 64, pp. 4–13, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Persson, P. Bacher, T. Shiga, and H. Madsen, “Multi-site solar power forecasting using gradient boosted regression trees,” Solar Energy, vol. 150, pp. 423–436, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zeng and W. Qiao, “Short-term solar power prediction using a support vector machine,” Renewable Energy, vol. 52, pp. 118–127, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, J. K. Ward, J. Tong, L. Collins, and G. Platt, “Machine learning for solar irradiance forecasting of photovoltaic system,” Renewable Energy, vol. 90, pp. 542–553, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Haseeb, E. Xia, S. Saud, A. Ahmad, and H. Khurshid, “Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis,” Environmental Science & Pollution Research, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 8594–8608, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Birkel, J. W. Veile, J. M. Müller, E. Hartmann, and K.-I. Voigt, “Development of a risk framework for industry 4.0 in the context of sustainability for established manufacturers,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 2, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Salahuddin and K. Alam, “Internet usage, electricity consumption and economic growth in Australia: a time series evidence,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 862–878, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Pothen and M. Schymura, “Bigger cakes with fewer ingredients? A comparison of material use of the world economy,” Ecological Economics, vol. 109, pp. 109–121, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. M. Adamović, D. Z. Antanasijević, M. Đ. Ristić, A. A. Perić-Grujić, and V. V. Pocajt, “Prediction of municipal solid waste generation using artificial neural network approach enhanced by structural break analysis,” Environmental Science & Pollution Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 299–311, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ali Abdoli, M. Falah Nezhad, R. Salehi Sede, and S. Behboudian, “Longterm forecasting of solid waste generation by the artificial neural networks,” Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 628–636, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Antanasijević, V. Pocajt, I. Popović, N. Redžić, and M. Ristić, “The forecasting of municipal waste generation using artificial neural networks and sustainability indicators,” Sustainability Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Azadi and A. Karimi-Jashni, “Verifying the performance of artificial neural network and multiple linear regression in predicting the mean seasonal municipal solid waste generation rate: a case study of Fars province, Iran,” Waste Management Series, vol. 48, pp. 14–23, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. D. Genuino, B. G. Bataller, S. C. Capareda, and M. D. G. de Luna, “Application of artificial neural network in the modeling and optimization of humic acid extraction from municipal solid waste biochar,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 4101–4107, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
D. S. Pandey, S. Das, I. Pan, J. J. Leahy, and W. Kwapinski, “Artificial neural network based modelling approach for municipal solid waste gasification in a fluidized bed reactor,” Waste Management Series, vol. 58, pp. 202–213, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ge and J. Jackson, “The big data application strategy for cost reduction in automotive industry,” SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 588–598, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Lu, “Big data analytics to identify illegal construction waste dumping: a Hong Kong study,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 141, pp. 264–272, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Gu, B. Ma, J. Guo, P. A. Summers, and P. Hall, “Internet of things and Big Data as potential solutions to the problems in waste electrical and electronic equipment management: an exploratory study,” Waste Management Series, vol. 68, pp. 434–448, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Hong, S. Park, B. Lee, J. Lee, D. Jeong, and S. Park, “IoT-based smart garbage system for efficient food waste management,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 646953, 13 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Wen, S. Hu, D. D. Clercq et al., “Design, implementation, and evaluation of an Internet of Things (IoT) network system for restaurant food waste management,” Waste Management Series, vol. 73, pp. 26–38, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Anagnostopoulos, K. Kolomvatsos, C. Anagnostopoulos, A. Zaslavsky, and S. Hadjiefthymiades, “Assessing dynamic models for high priority waste collection in smart cities,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 110, pp. 178–192, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Nowakowski, K. Szwarc, and U. Boryczka, “Vehicle route planning in e-waste mobile collection on demand supported by artificial intelligence algorithms,” Transportation Research Part Transp. Environ., vol. 63, pp. 1–22, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Nowakowski, K. Szwarc, and U. Boryczka, “Combining an artificial intelligence algorithm and a novel vehicle for sustainable e-waste collection,” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 730, Article ID 138726, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Adedeji and Z. Wang, “Intelligent waste classification system using deep learning convolutional neural network,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 35, pp. 607–612, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chen and O. A. Ogunseitan, “Zero E-waste: regulatory impediments and blockchain imperatives,” Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, vol. 15, no. 6, 114 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. L. França, J. Amato Neto, R. F. Gonçalves, and C. M. V. B. Almeida, “Proposing the use of blockchain to improve the solid waste management in small municipalities,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 244, Article ID 118529, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Gopalakrishnan, J. Hall, and S. Behdad, “Cost analysis and optimization of Blockchain-based solid waste management traceability system,” Waste Management Series, vol. 120, pp. 594–607, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zhang, R. Y. Zhong, M. Farooque, K. Kang, and V. G. Venkatesh, “Blockchain-based life cycle assessment: an implementation framework and system architecture,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 152, Article ID 104512, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Viriyasitavat and D. Hoonsopon, “Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 13, pp. 32–39, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Abbatecola, M. P. Fanti, A. M. Mangini, and W. Ukovich, “A decision support approach for postal delivery and waste collection services,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1458–1470, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Elleuch, F. Bouhamed, M. Elloussaief, and M. Jaghbir, “Environmental sustainability and pollution prevention,” Environmental Science & Pollution Research, vol. 25, no. 19, Article ID 18225, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tan, J. Xia, C. Zhang, Q. Fang, and G. Chen, “Modeling and reduction of NOX emissions for a 700 MW coal-fired boiler with the advanced machine learning method,” Energy, vol. 94, pp. 672–679, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhou, M. Zhang, M. Zhou, and M. Zhou, “A comparative study on decoupling relationship and influence factors between China’s regional economic development and industrial energy–related carbon emissions,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 142, pp. 783–800, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang and Z. Mi, “Environmental benefits of bike sharing: a big data-based analysis,” Applied Energy, vol. 220, pp. 296–301, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Antwi, J. Li, J. Meng et al., “Feedforward neural network model estimating pollutant removal process within mesophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket bioreactor treating industrial starch processing wastewater,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 257, pp. 102–112, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dolatabadi, M. Mehrabpour, M. Esfandyari, H. Alidadi, and M. Davoudi, “Modeling of simultaneous adsorption of dye and metal ion by sawdust from aqueous solution using of ANN and ANFIS,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 181, pp. 72–78, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nag, A. Mondal, D. N. Roy, N. Bar, and S. K. Das, “Sustainable bioremediation of Cd(II) from aqueous solution using natural waste materials: kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics, toxicity studies and GA-ANN hybrid modelling,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 11, pp. 83–104, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Bashir Shaban, A. Kadri, and E. Rezk, “Urban air pollution monitoring system with forecasting models,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2598–2606, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Chen, S. Li, L. D. Knibbs et al., “A machine learning method to estimate PM2.5 concentrations across China with remote sensing, meteorological and land use information,” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 636, pp. 52–60, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Park, M. Kim, M. Kima et al., “Predicting PM10 concentration in Seoul metropolitan subway stations using artificial neural network (ANN),” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 341, pp. 75–82, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhou, F.-J. Chang, L.-C. Chang, I.-F. Kao, Y.-S. Wang, and C.-C. Kang, “Multi-output support vector machine for regional multi-step-ahead PM2.5 forecasting,” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 651, pp. 230–240, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Apte, K. P. Messier, S. Gani, and M. Brauer, “High-resolution air pollution mapping with google street view cars: exploiting big data,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 6999–7008, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Chen, S. Shao, Z. Tian, Z. Xie, and P. Yin, “Impacts of air pollution and its spatial spillover effect on public health based on China’s big data sample,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 142, pp. 915–925, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kanabkaew, P. Mekbungwan, S. Raksakietisak, and K. Kanchanasut, “Detection of PM2.5 plume movement from IoT ground level monitoring data,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 252, pp. 543–552, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Mihăiţă, L. Dupont, O. Chery, M. Camargo, and C. Cai, “Evaluating air quality by combining stationary, smart mobile pollution monitoring and data-driven modelling,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 221, pp. 398–418, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Yuan, X. Xiong, L. Lei, and K. Zheng, “Design and implementation on hyperledger-based emission trading system,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 6109–6116, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Howson, “Tackling climate change with blockchain,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 644-645, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Howson, S. Oakes, Z. Baynham-Herd, and J. Swords, “Cryptocarbon: The Promises and Pitfalls of forest protection on a Blockchain,” Mar, vol. 100, pp. 1–9, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kashiwao, K. Nakayama, S. Ando, K. Ikeda, M. Lee, and A. Bahadori, “A neural network-based local rainfall prediction system using meteorological data on the Internet: a case study using data from the Japan Meteorological Agency,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 56, pp. 317–330, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kim, S. Pan, and H. Mase, “Artificial neural network-based storm surge forecast model: practical application to Sakai Minato, Japan,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 91, Article ID 101871, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Al-Turjman, “Cognitive routing protocol for disaster-inspired Internet of Things,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 92, pp. 1103–1115, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. T. Bui, P. Tsangaratos, P.-T. T. Ngo, T. D. Pham, and B. T. Pham, “Flash flood susceptibility modeling using an optimized fuzzy rule based feature selection technique and tree based ensemble methods,” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 668, pp. 1038–1054, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sinha, P. Kumar, N. P. Rana, R. Islam, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Impact of internet of things (IoT) in disaster management: a task-technology fit perspective,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 283, no. 1, pp. 759–794, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, S. Ma, H. Yang, J. Lv, and Y. Liu, “A big data driven analytical framework for energy-intensive manufacturing industries,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 197, pp. 57–72, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Zhou and S. Yang, “Understanding household energy consumption behavior: the contribution of energy big data analytics,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 56, pp. 810–819, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-S. Chou and D.-K. Bui, “Modeling heating and cooling loads by artificial intelligence for energy-efficient building design,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 82, pp. 437–446, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. T. Le, H. Nguyen, J. Dou, and J. Zhou, “A comparative study of PSO-ANN, GA-ANN, ICA-ANN, and ABC-ANN in estimating the heating load of buildings’ energy efficiency for smart city planning,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 13, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Liu, K. K. Chai, X. Zhang, E. T. Lau, and Y. Chen, “Adaptive blockchain-based electric vehicle participation scheme in smart grid platform,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, Article ID 25665, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Shrouf and G. Miragliotta, “Energy management based on Internet of Things: practices and framework for adoption in production management,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 100, pp. 235–246, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Vikhorev, R. Greenough, and N. Brown, “An advanced energy management framework to promote energy awareness,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 43, pp. 103–112, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang, H. Yang, Y. Zhang, and J. Xu, “IoT-enabled real-time energy efficiency optimisation method for energy-intensive manufacturing enterprises,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 31, no. 4–5, pp. 362–379, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. M. Swarna, B. Sweta, M. R. K. Praveen et al., “Load balancing of energy cloud using wind driven and firefly algorithms in internet of everything,” Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 142, pp. 16–26, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dagdougui, A. Ouammi, and R. Sacile, “A regional decision support system for onsite renewable hydrogen production from solar and wind energy sources,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, no. 22, Article ID 14334, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Noorollahi, H. Yousefi, and M. Mohammadi, “Multi-criteria decision support system for wind farm site selection using GIS,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 13, pp. 38–50, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zambelli, C. Lora, R. Spinelli et al., “A GIS decision support system for regional forest management to assess biomass availability for renewable energy production,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 38, pp. 203–213, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Haupt and B. Kosović, “Variable generation power forecasting as a big data problem,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 725–732, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, W. Yang, P. He, C. Chen, and X. Wang, “Design and management of a distributed hybrid energy system through smart contract and blockchain,” Applied Energy, vol. 248, pp. 390–405, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Kyriakarakos and G. Papadakis, “Microgrids for productive uses of energy in the developing world and blockchain: a promising future,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Mengelkamp, J. Gärttner, K. Rock, S. Kessler, L. Orsini, and C. Weinhardt, “Designing microgrid energy markets: a case study: the Brooklyn Microgrid,” Applied Energy, vol. 210, pp. 870–880, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Puri, S. Jha, R. Kumar et al., “A hybrid artificial intelligence and internet of things model for generation of renewable resource of energy,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, Article ID 111191, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Li and H. Zhang, “Ant colony optimization-based multi-mode scheduling under renewable and nonrenewable resource constraints,” Automation in Construction, vol. 35, pp. 431–438, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Sebt, M. R. Afshar, and Y. Alipouri, “Hybridization of genetic algorithm and fully informed particle swarm for solving the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 513–530, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sujatha, C. Navaneethan, R. Kaluri, and S. Prasanna, “Optimized digital transformation in government services with blockchain,” Blockchain Technology and Applications, Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Thanh Cong Truong. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

15143

Downloads

2381

Citations