The Biological Metallic versus Metallic Solution in Treating Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Outcome Assessment

Table 1

Description of population.

	PS	PSS
Number of patients	8	7
Average of age in years	77.8	75.3
Range of patients age in years	70–89	67–81
Gender ratio (m : f)	0.6 (3 : 5)	0.75 (3 : 4)
Fractures type according to Vancouver and Rorabeck classification	Vancouver B2: 2; Vancouver C: 3; Rorabeck 2: 2; Rorabeck 3: 1	Vancouver B2: 2; Vancouver C: 3; Rorabeck 2: 1; Rorabeck 3: 1
ASA physical status classification system	ASA I: 0; ASA II: 2; ASA III: 6; ASA IV: 0	ASA I: 0; ASA II: 3; ASA III: 4; ASA IV: 0
Number of patients that needed a place in intensive care	5 (62.5%)	5 (71.42%)
Patients treated for osteoporosis	4 (50%)	6 (85.71%)
Average years of follow-up after periprosthetic fracture	2.3	2.3
Range of years of follow-up after periprosthetic fracture	1–4	1–5