Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Medicine
Volume 2018, Article ID 1408450, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1408450
Research Article

Evaluating the Difference between Virtual and Paper-Based Clinical Cases in Family Medicine Undergraduate Education

1Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, Sl-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
2Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Poljanski nasip 58, Sl-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, Sl-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
4Faculty of Education, University of Maribor, Koroska cesta 160, Sl-2000 Maribor, Slovenia

Correspondence should be addressed to Zalika Klemenc-Ketis; is.mu@cnemelk.akilaz

Received 16 May 2017; Revised 25 August 2017; Accepted 3 October 2017; Published 15 January 2018

Academic Editor: Paul Van Royen

Copyright © 2018 Zalika Klemenc-Ketis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. E. Schifferdecker, N. B. Berman, L. H. Hall, and M. R. Fischer, “Adoption of computer-assisted learning in medical education: The educators' perspective,” Medical Education, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1063–1073, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Greenhalgh, “Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education,” British Medical Journal, vol. 322, no. 7277, pp. 40–44, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Jayakumar, O. Brunckhorst, P. Dasgupta, M. S. Khan, and K. Ahmed, “E-learning in surgical education: a systematic review,” Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 1145–1157, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. A. Cook, “The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based learning,” Academic Medicine, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 541–548, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Z. Klemenc Ketiš and I. Švab, “Using movies in family medicine teaching: a reference to the EURACT educational agenda,” Zdravstveno Varstvo, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 99–106, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Ally, “Foundations of educational theory for online learning,” in The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, T. Anderson, Ed., Athabasca University Press, Athabasca, Canada, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. A. Cook and M. M. Triola, “Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps,” Medical Education, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 303–311, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W. G. Harless, G. G. Drennon, J. J. Marxer, J. A. Root, and G. E. Miller, “Case: A computer-aided simulation of the clinical encounter,” Journal of Medical Education, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 443–448, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Ellaway, D. Topps, S. Lee, and H. Armson, “Virtual patient activity patterns for clinical learning,” The Clinical Teacher, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 267–271, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. MedU, 2017, https://www.med-u.org/.
  11. M. Sobocan and Z. Klemenc-Ketis, “Enhancing primary care clerkships with virtual patients,” Education for Primary Care, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 451–454, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Salminen, N. Zary, K. Björklund, E. Toth-Pall, and C. Leanderson, “Virtual patients in primary care: Developing a reusable model that fosters reflective practice and clinical reasoning,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 16, no. 1, article no. e3, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Sobocan and Z. Klemenc-Ketis, “Family medicine education with virtual patients: A qualitative study,” Acta Informatica Medica, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 202–205, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Allen, B. Gay, H. Crebolder, J. Heyrman, I. Svab, and P. Ram, The European Definition of General Practice/Family Medicine, Wonca Europe, 2011.
  15. J. Heyrman, EURACT Educational Agenda, Leuven: European Academy of Teachers in General Practice, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. C. Adams, C. J. Rodgers, R. Harrington, M. D. B. Young, and V. K. Sieber, “How we created virtual patient cases for primary care-based learning,” Medical Teacher, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 273–278, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Klemenc-Ketiš and J. Kersnik, “The role of the European Academy of Teachers in General Practice and Family Medicine in family medicine education in Europe--the experience of the University of Maribor,” Acta Medica Academica, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. B. Berman, L. H. Fall, A. W. Chessman et al., “A collaborative model for developing and maintaining virtual patients for medical education,” Medical Teacher, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 319–324, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Kersnik, Osnove Družinske Medicine, Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Medicinska fakulteta, 2007.
  20. P. R. Pintrich, D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. J. Mckeachie, “A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ),” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 801–813, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. P. R. Pintrich, W. H. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. J. Mckeachie, “Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ),” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 801–813, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. S. Čotar Konrad and M. Kukanja Gabrijelčič, “Motivacijska prepricanja, metakognitivne ucne strategije in ucni doseek tudentov pedagokih smeri,” Anthropus, vol. 3-4, no. 1, pp. 109–128, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  23. N. Posel, J. B. Mcgee, and D. M. Fleiszer, “Twelve tips to support the development of clinical reasoning skills using virtual patient cases,” Medical Teacher, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 813–818, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Berman, L. H. Fall, S. Smith et al., “Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships,” Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 942–949, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Norman, “Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends,” Medical Education, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 418–427, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. H. Vash, M. Yunesian, M. Shariati, A. Keshvari, and I. Harirchi, “Virtual patients in undergraduate surgery education: A randomized controlled study,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 77, no. 1-2, pp. 54–59, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Stevens, J. Hernandez, K. Johnsen et al., “The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 191, no. 6, pp. 806–811, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. O. Jabbur-Lopes, A. R. Mesquita, L. M. A. Silva, A. D. A. Neto, and D. P. Lyra Jr., “Virtual patients in pharmacy education,” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 76, no. 5, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. Wästlund, H. Reinikka, T. Norlander, and T. Archer, “Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 377–394, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Ülen, B. Čagran, M. Slavinec, and I. Gerlič, “Designing and evaluating the effectiveness of physlet-based learning materials in supporting conceptual learning in secondary school physics,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 658–667, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. M. Stegers-Jager, J. Cohen-Schotanus, and A. P. N. Themmen, “Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance,” Medical Education, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 678–688, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Weidman and K. Baker, “The cognitive science of learning: concepts and strategies for the educator and learner,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 1586–1599, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson Prentice Hall, London, UK, 2010.