Advances in Meteorology

Advances in Meteorology / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 238589 |

J. Z. Wang, S. L. Gong, X. Y. Zhang, Y. Q. Yang, Q. Hou, C. H. Zhou, Y. Q. Wang, "A Parameterized Method for Air-Quality Diagnosis and Its Applications", Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2012, Article ID 238589, 10 pages, 2012.

A Parameterized Method for Air-Quality Diagnosis and Its Applications

Academic Editor: Zhanqing Li
Received15 Jun 2012
Revised28 Sep 2012
Accepted03 Oct 2012
Published05 Nov 2012


A parameterized method is developed to diagnose the air quality in Beijing and other cities with an index termed (parameters linking air-quality to meteorological elements PLAM) derived from a correlation between PM10 and relevant weather elements based on the data between 2000 and 2007. Key weather factors for diagnosing the air pollution intensity are identified and included in PLAM that include atmospheric condensation of water vapour, wet potential equivalent temperature, and wind velocity. It is found that the poor air quality days with elevated PM10 are usually associated with higher PLAM values, featuring higher temperature, humidity, lower wind velocity, and higher stability compared to the averaged values in the same period. Both 24 h and 72 h forecasts provided useful services for the day of the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympic Games and subsequent sport events. A correlation coefficient of 0.82 was achieved between the forecasts and (air pollution index API) and 0.59 between the forecasts and observed PM10, all reaching the significant level of 0.001, for the summer period. A correction factor was also introduced to enable the PLAM to diagnose the observed PM10 concentrations all year round.

1. Introduction

Meteorological elements, including water vapor content, surface wind speed, visibility, and the diurnal temperature range are important parameters to effect air pollutant concentrations [1]. Studies using data from seven air quality stations during the period of 2000 to 2008 in Taiwan area showed that PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were significantly controlled by the weather elements, resulting in high concentrations in spring and winter and low concentrations in fall and summer [2]. Even in summer when relatively low pollutant concentrations were found, the weather elements still had a large impact on air quality as the high temperature and humidity tended to increase PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations, due to the formation of secondary pollution [3, 4]. Recently, substantial advances have been made in the studies of the impact of human activities on air quality caused by the increasing pollutant concentrations, especially ozone and particulate matters (PM) [59]. The concentration variations of different aerosols in various regions of China, as well as the impacts of aerosol concentration on sand/dust storms (SDS) and hazy weather in the Asia and North American were investigated [1, 1014]. It is found that the variation of aerosol and gaseous concentrations is closely related to the changing weather elements [3, 8, 1519]. The key weather elements influencing the air pollution include wind speed, wind direction, air pressure, temperature, humidity, precipitation, and atmosphere stability [20]. These factors control the dilution, transports, accumulation, and removal processes of air pollutants and hence dominate the air concentration of various pollutants under a given emission condition.

The relationship between the evolution of the general circulation and foggy/hazy weather systems was also examined to link the wind/cloud fields with low-visibility weather, indicating that atmospheric aerosols such as mist, fog, fume, smoke, smog, and haze can be formed from a condensation or nucleation process [2125]. Studies also show that in the case of heavy pollution due to the increase of NO2 and SO2, significant differences in condensability were observed before and after a hazy weather process. Before the haze onset, with the increase of SO2 and NO2 concentrations, condensability was increasing quickly. On the contrary, during a haze event, both SO2 and NO2 concentrations were decreased [19]. This was related to the consumption and washout of the nucleus in the haze formation. Atmospheric condensation is a key factor for diagnosing and forecasting the air pollution intensity in relation to weather conditions.

The above studies indicated that meteorological elements have a significant control over the accumulation and dilution of air pollutants. One of the most important scientific questions is how to quantify the meteorological impacts and use them to diagnose and forecast the air quality under the assumption that the time scale of emission changes is much longer than the meteorology changes.

Numerical prediction of air quality by 3D chemical transport models (CTM) has been implemented in a number of weather services around the globe with various degree successes [2628] to forecast air quality. Due to the emission inventories used for the forecasts usually lagging behind the current date, this method has the limitation for an accurate forecast if the emission inventory is not updated to the current time for a region with ever changing industries such as in China. Through an analysis of observed PM and meteorological parameters, a parameterized method was developed and defined as the PLAM index. PLAM links the air pollution variations to the meteorological conditions. During the period of 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, PLAM was used to forecast the air quality in Beijing and achieved reasonable results.

2. Data and Methods

2.1. Data

For the sake of data comparison, analysis, and operational run, both PM10 and weather observations were collected simultaneously at the National Climate Observatory in Beijing (NCOB). PM10 is measured by a TEOM (Series 1400a Ambient Particulate Monitor). The instrument measures the PM10 mass concentrations every 5 minutes automatically. The mass transducer minimum detection limit is 0.01 μg. The precision for 10-minute and 1-hour averaged data is 5.0 μg m−3 and 1.5 μg m−3, respectively [29]. The daily mean PM10 data and weather observations were obtained after careful QA/QC processes. NCOB is one of the national climate observatories providing data for international exchange under Word Meteorological Organization (WMO) through World Weather Watch (WWW). The NCOB (N 39.8, E116.5, 32 m) station is in the suburban/rural area of Beijing. Compared with meteorological variables, PM measurements are substantially influenced by the local environment.

2.2. Correlation Analysis

Previous study has indicated that a positive correlation of PM10 observations with maximum temperature () and relative humidity () was found for the period from July to September in 2000–2007 at NCOB [30]. It was suggested that for a better signal analysis and forecasts, the peak PM10 values could be identified on a daily basis in the same month.

In this study, for the forecasting purpose, the observed PM10 () with preceding 24 h weather elements (, , , , , etc.) was used with daily average meteorological data for period from 1 July to 31 September 2000–2007 (total 736 days) managed by the National Climate Centre of China. The elements of , , , , evaporability, water vapour, dew point, wind direction, wind speed, cloudiness, rainfall, and so forth were included in the dataset. Figure 1 presents the correlations of PM10 values measured at NCOB with the maximum temperature, relative humidity, water vapor observed 24 hours before and with the evaporability at the same time. The evaporability is to describe the evaporation capacity of the atmosphere with a unit of mm. The correlations of PM10 with , , air pressure, water vapor amount and evaporability are given in Table 1. Positive correlations of PM10 observations were found with the maximum temperature, relative humidity, and water vapor with preceding 24 hours, and negative correlations were found with evaporability from July to September in 2000–2007 at NCOB. The correlation coefficients are 0.6039, 0.6246, 0.5458, and −0.2557, respectively, reaching a significant level over 0.001 [31].The correlation of PM10 with air pressure is also noted (Table 1).

Element (Slop) Correlation coefficientSignificant levelPeriod

0.3813.410.6039 0.001pre 24 h736
rh1.6117.010.6246 0.001pre 24 h736
(water vapor)0.4136.130.5458 0.001pre 24 h736
− 0.001Synchronization736
Evaporability−0.89158.98−0.2557 0.001Synchronization736


Based on the analysis, a set of weather sensitive parameters signalling a forthcoming hazy event are identified, which can be observed several hours before the hazy weather occurs. Among these elements, high temperature, high humidity, moderate wind, and high stability will dominate the poor air-quality in the summer of Beijing. The effects of seasonal changes of meteorological elements on the PLAM will be discussed in next section. Therefore, the PLAM is established as a function of the following parameters: where , , , , , , and represent air pressure, air temperature, winds, relative humidity, evaporability, stability, and effect parameter associated with the contribution of air pollution , respectively.

2.3. Parameterization Method for Air-Quality Diagnosis

Some studies [3234] have showed that the microprocesses in cloud physics can be described in a parameterization scheme with large-scale observations. It was also found that the stabilized summer weather with high air temperature, high relative humidity, moderate winds, and stability might create a microenvironment for a high PM10 concentration in August over Beijing [30], corresponding to a static dynamic forcing (baroclinicity) and thermal forcing (equivalent potential temperature () gradient) in the atmospheric moist adiabatic processes [35]. It is shown that the lowest diffusion efficiencies occur more than 90% in moderate winds and stable conditions during the time for the summer period of July and August. Part of the temperature profile ranges between the adiabatic lapse rate (neutral stability) and the isothermal lapse rate [36]. The condensation is also a key factor for diagnosing pollution intensity under given weather conditions in the atmospheric moist adiabatic processes. Apparently, the final PLAM can be attributed to two separate factors: initial meteorological conditions α(m) associated with the atmospheric condensation processes and a dynamic effect parameter associated with the initial contribution of air pollution such as

In the following sections, these two terms are derived and discussed in details.

2.3.1. Initial Meteorological Conditions

According to Gao et al. [37], the meteorological dynamical identification for haze and humid weather in summer Beijing indicated that, in general, the obvious variation of wet-equivalent potential temperature () may be observed, which is associated with the releasing of latent heat by adiabatic condensation processes.

Initial meteorological contribution can be expressed as the variation of wet-equivalent potential temperature (): where the condensation function is described by [19, 38] Where is the heat capacity of air, is the latent heat for condensation or evaporation of water vapor, and is the specific humidity. is the dry condensation function as defined below: where is the gas constant. In order to analyze the statistical relationship between air quality and meteorological parameters for the special period during the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympic Games (July to August, 2008), the data for July to August 2007 were used in calculating the correlation of PM10 with and in (3). Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the correlations of the condensation function (4) and wet-equivalent potential temperature with the observed PM10 for July to August, 2007. It is seen that these two meteorological parameters are correlated with the PM10 and can be used for forecasting short term variations of PM due to changes in meteorology.

The and only account for the meteorological contributions to the PM. In reality, the PM concentrations are effected by emissions, meteorology, and atmospheric processes such as nucleation, condensation, and dry/wet depositions.

2.3.2. Relative Dynamic Affect Parameter

In order to quantify the relative impact of weather conditions on air pollution and eliminate the effect of total aerosol concentration change, a ratio of the initial weather conditions to the observed PM concentrations is introduced as the relative dynamic affect parameter : where denotes the meteorological contribution increment per unit PM concentrations. Initial contribution of air pollution () implicitly contains the information of all the processes on PM before a forecast, including the emission contributions.

There exists a sharp seasonal variation in meteorological parameters. For example, the average temperature in Beijing can range from 28°C in summer to −8°C in winter, and relative humidity also varies a lot from summer to winter. The degree of the variation for with seasons is larger than that for PM10 observations. In order to derive a parameter applicable for a wider range of conditions, an adaptive function , is introduced which completes the definition of (2) for the PLAM.

For (, ), there exist several cases, depending on the size of the relative dynamic parameter value in this spectrum:(1), : favourable meteorological conditions for pollutants either to be diffused or to be maintained;(2), : more adjustable weather conditions for pollutants to be accumulated;(3), : most favourable weather conditions for pollutants to be accumulated.

Figure 3 shows the correlations of and PLAM with PM10 observations for a year. The slope of the correlation and the magnitude of reflects the impact degree of meteorology on PM concentrations. In dry and cold season of Beijing and northern China area (NDJF), the observed concentration of PM10 can reach as high as μg m−3 and the initial meteorological influence parameter varies . Figure 3(a) also indicates that the air pollution situation in the winter time of Beijing is very heavy. However, the influences and contributions of meteorological conditions on the high PM10 were not high (shown in blue dot). In hot and humid season of Beijing and northern China area (JAS), the concentration of PM10 observations is less than 200 μg m−3. However, due to the hot and humid stabilizing weather conditions, is larger than that in the winter time, ranging from 40 to 70, which is the highest among all seasons (shown in green dot). In the transition season, that is, spring, (MAM), the concentration of PM10 observations can also reach as high as μg m−3 with a medium contribution and influence of initial meteorological (in red dot). The correlation coefficient () of PLAM for all season with PM10 observations reaches 0.46 (, Figure 3(b)), indicating that PLAM is a good indicator for air quality diagnosis.

Because the levels of air pollutants are usually controlled by a combination of meteorological variables within the stable air masses, the impacts of individual meteorological variables on air pollution may not be significant and/or may be cancelled each other, as they do not account for the interrelation between variables. PLAM, as an integrated index, considered the interactions among the meteorological variables such as the individual wind direction, temperature and hence reflected the better performance than any individual variable.

3. Annual Forecasts for 2008

To evaluate the performance of PLAM forecastability, an annual run was carried out to obtain the 24 hr forecasts of daily PLAM and compared with the observed PM10 at NCOB and the Air Pollution Index (API) defined by the Ministry of Environment of China taking into account of the air concentrations of NOx, NO2, SO2, TSP, and PM10. The API is calculated as follows: where is the API index for species is the observed daily averaged concentrations for species . , and , are the two standard daily averaged concentrations and API indices that are adjacent to the observed and are determined from the lookup table (Table 2). The largest index for species is regarded as the API index of the day. In China, SO2, TSP, and PM10 are usually the major air pollutants and correlated very well [23].


Pollutant concentrations (mg/m3)SO22.622.1001.600.800.150.05

Figure 4 shows the daily PLAM distribution in 24 h forecasts from 1 January to 31 December 2008. A good agreement was found between the forecasted and observed, including the daily variations, peaks and lows. There were a number of heavy pollution days between March and May as well as in September and December with PM10 greater than 200 μg m−3, among which there existed several extreme high pollution episodes around March 18, May 20–22, and May 27-28 with PM10 > 200–637, 280–604, and 200–450 μg m−3, respectively. These high episodes were all captured by the PLAM index. The features of comparison between the PLAM index forecast and PM10 observations at NCOB from 1 June to 31 August 2008 during the 2008 Olympic Games will be discussed in Section 4. The correlations between forecasted PLAM index and observed PM10 and API are shown in Figure 5. A correlation coefficient was achieved for 0.85 between the forecasts and API and 0.43 between the forecasts and observed PM10 for whole of the year 2008. All reached the significant level of 0.001. During the summer season from mid-June to late September, that is, 2008 Beijing Olympic Games period, the air quality was relatively high with low PLAM indices forecasted. Detailed forecasts will be given Figure 6 in Section 4.

Comparing Figures 5(a) and 5(b), API is calculated from the average PM10 measurements at different sites in the Beijing metropolitan area, indicating that the PLAM has the better capability to capture the regional pollution rather than a single site.

4. Applications of PLAM

4.1. Olympic Applications from June to September in 2008

Figure 6 shows the time series of the PLAM index and PM10 observations at NCOB from 1 June to 31 August 2008. During this period of time, the averaged PLAM index was small (<50) with a declining rate of 35%, which signaled an improving meteorology for the period. However, a much larger declining rate of 83% for PM10 was observed. Under normal conditions, the variations of PLAM and PM10 should be rather consistent. The significant discrepancy of the variation trend should be caused by some nonmeteorological factors. It is well known that very active emission control measures were taken during the 2008 Olympic Games [3]. It is likely that the effective emission controls have contributed to the large declining rate for the PM10 in Beijing. Excluding the meteorological influence, that is, PLAM, the emission control may have contributed to a 43% reduction in PM10 from June 1 to August 31, 2008.

To evaluate the performance of the PLAM method, the correlative analysis has been made on the 24 h PLAM forecasts and observations (Figure 7). A correlation coefficient was achieved for 0.8209 between the forecasts and API and 0.5924 between the forecasts and observed PM10. All reached the significant level of 0.001.

The good agreement of the forecasted PLAM index with the API and PM10 indicates the ability of PLAM as a criterion for diagnosing air quality problem. The high correlation illustrates that the meteorology has a dominant control over the variation of air quality in Beijing.

4.2. PLAM Applications in Shanghai and Guangzhou

In order to check the applicability of the PLAM in various regions of China, two other cities were chosen, that is, Shanghai and Guangzhou, to evaluate the performance of the PLAM. Shanghai (31.1_N, 121.4_E, 8.2 m) is the largest city in Yangtze River Delta in East China with climatic characteristics different from North China and is located in the East Asian monsoon region with humid and rainy climate on the East coast of the Asian continent. Guangzhou (23.1,1_N 13.3_E, 7.3 m) located in the coast of South China has a subtropical climate features. Figure 8(a) shows correlation analysis between the PLAM 24 h prediction and PM10 during January 1–December 31 in 2008 in Shanghai. Figure 8(b) shows correlation analysis between the PLAM 24 h prediction and of PM10 during January 1–May 31 in 2009 in Guangzhou. From Figure 8 it can be seen that the PLAM also applies to eastern and southern areas of China for different climatic characteristics regions in China.

5. Conclusions and Discussions

A parameterized method has been developed to predict the air quality in BISA and used successfully during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. The following was found. (1)Water vapor condensation (), wet potential equivalent temperature (), air pressure, air temperature, relative humidity, and evaporability are found to be the key meteorological factors for diagnosing air pollution intensity.(2)With the help of two independent data systems (PM10 values reported in API in Beijing and daily PM10 data collected by Beijing Nanjiao Observatory), the tests of PLAM performance showed that the forecasts have a cohesive correlation with them, reaching to a significant level. (3)It is found that the correction factor enables the ability for PLAM to diagnose the observed PM10 concentrations all year round. The  h forecasts by PLAM provided valuable services for the day of opening ceremony and subsequent events during the whole Beijing Olympic Games. PLAM also was applied to eastern and southern areas of China for different climatic characteristics regions in China.


This research is supported by the National “973" Program of China under Grant no. 2011CB403404, no. 2011CB403401, and the Project (2009Y002).


  1. I. Sabbah, “Impact of aerosol on air temperature in Kuwait,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 303–314, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. C. Fang and S. C. Chang, “Atmospheric particulate (PM10 and PM2.5) mass concentration and seasonal variation study in the Taiwan area during 2000–2008,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 98, no. 2-4, pp. 368–377, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. X. Y. Zhang, Y. Q. Wang, W. L. Lin et al., “Changes of atmospheric composition and optical properties over beijing 2008 olympic monitoring campaign,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 1633–1651, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y. Liu, W. Li, and X. Zhou, “Simulation of secondary aerosols over North China in summer,” Science in China D, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 185–195, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Z. Zhang, X. D. Xu, J. Z. Wang, and Y. Q. Yang, “A study of characteristics and evolution of urban heat island over Beijing and its surrouding area,” Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, vol. 13, p. 41, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  6. X. A. Xia, H. B. Chen, P. C. Wang, X. M. Zong, J. H. Qiu, and P. Gouloub, “Aerosol properties and their spatial and temporal variations over North China in spring 2001,” Tellus B, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 28–39, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Xue, J. Ma, P. Yan, and X. Pan, “Impacts of pollution and dust aerosols on the atmospheric optical properties over a polluted rural area near Beijing city,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 835–843, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Wang, Y. Yang, G. Zhang, and S. Yu, “Climatic trend of cloud amount related to the aerosol characteristics in Beijing during,” Acta Meteorologica Sinica, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 762–775, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. El-Metwally, S. C. Alfaro, M. M. Abdel Wahab, A. S. Zakey, and B. Chatenet, “Seasonal and inter-annual variability of the aerosol content in Cairo (Egypt) as deduced from the comparison of MODIS aerosol retrievals with direct AERONET measurements,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 97, no. 1-2, pp. 14–25, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. H. Zhou, S. L. Gong, X. Y. Zhang et al., “Development and evaluation of an operational SDS forecasting system for East Asia: CUACE/Dust,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 787–798, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  11. Y. Q. Wang, X. Y. Zhang, R. Arimoto, J. J. Cao, and Z. X. Shen, “Characteristics of carbonate content and carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of northern China soil and dust aerosol and its application to tracing dust sources,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 39, no. 14, pp. 2631–2642, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. L. Gong, L. A. Barrie, J. P. Blanchet et al., “Canadian aerosol module: a size-segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models 1. Module development,” Journal of Geophysical Research D, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  13. Y. Q. Yang, J. Z. Wang, Q. Hou, Y. Li, and C. H. Zhou, “Discriminant Genetic Algorithm Extended (DGAE) model for seasonal sand and dust storm prediction,” Science China Earth Sciences, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. Han, G. Zhuang, Y. Sun, and Z. Wang, “Local and non-local sources of airborne particulate pollution at Beijing—the ratio of Mg/Al as an element tracer for estimating the contributions of mineral aerosols from outside Beijing,” Science in China B, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 253–264, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. K. Sui, Z. F. Wang, J. Yang, F. B. Xie, and Y. Zhao, “Beijing persistent PM10 pollution and its relationship with general meteorological features,” Research of Environmental Sciences, vol. 20, p. 77, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  16. Y. Ji, H. J. Fan, Q. F. Wang, and L. H. Nie, “Air particle concentration and meteorological factors,” Journal of Environmental Health, vol. 25, p. 554, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  17. X. Xiao, L. Pengfei, G. Fuhai et al., “Comparison of black carbon aerosols in urban and suburban areas of Shanghai,” Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, vol. 22, p. 158, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  18. S. Y. Yu, Z. Zhang, C. Q. Peng et al., “Effects of meteorological factors on SO2 and other atmospheric pollutions in Shenzhen China,” Journal of Environment and Health, vol. 25, p. 483, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  19. G. Zhang, L. Bian, J. Wang, Y. Yang, W. Yao, and X. Xu, “The boundary layer characteristics in the heavy fog formation process over Beijing and its adjacent areas,” Science in China D, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 88–101, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X. Pang, Y. Mu, X. Lee, Y. Zhang, and Z. Xu, “Influences of characteristic meteorological conditions on atmospheric carbonyls in Beijing, China,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 913–919, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. X. Y. Tang, Y. H. Zhang, and M. Shao, Atmospheric Environment Chemistry, Higher Education Press, Beijing, Japan, 2006.
  22. Y. Q. Yang, Q. Hou, C. H. Zhou, H. L. Liu, Y. Q. Wang, and T. Niu, “Sand/dust storm processes in Northeast Asia and associated large-scale circulations,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  23. S. Wang and X. L. Zhang, “Meteorological features of PM10 pollution in Beijing,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 13, p. 177, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  24. C. D. O'Dowd, J. A. Lowe, and M. H. Smith, “The effect of clouds on aerosol growth in the rural atmosphere,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 201–221, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Wang, J. Guo, T. Wang et al., “Influence of regional pollution and sandstorms on the chemical composition of cloud/fog at the summit of Mt. Taishan in northern China,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 99, no. 3-4, pp. 434–442, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Honoré, L. Rouïl, R. Vautard et al., “Predictability of European air quality: assessment of 3 years of operational forecasts and analyses by the PREV'AIR system,” Journal of Geophysical Research D, vol. 113, no. 4, Article ID D04301, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. A. McKeen, S. H. Chung, J. Wilczak et al., “Evaluation of several PM2.5 forecast models using data collected during the ICARTT/NEAQS 2004 field study,” Journal of Geophysical Research D, vol. 112, no. 10, Article ID D10S20, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. D. Moran et al., “Particulate-Matter Forecasting with GEM-MACH15, A New Canadian Air-Quality Forecast Model,” in Proceedings of the 30th NATO/SPS ITM on Air Pollution Modelling and Its Application, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  29. H. Che, G. Shi, A. Uchiyama et al., “Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, China,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 3199–3214, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  30. Y. Q. Yang, J. Z. Wang, Q. Hou, and Y. Q. Wang, “A plam index for beijing stabilized weather forecast in summer over Beijing,” Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, vol. 20, p. 649, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  31. F. Y. Wei, Modern Diagnostic Techniques for Climatologically Statistics, China Meteorology Press, 1999.
  32. H. L. Kuo, “Convective weather in conditionally unstable atmosphere,” Tellus, vol. 13, p. 441, 1961. View at: Google Scholar
  33. H. L. Kuo, “On formation and intensification of tropical cyclone through latent heat release in cumulus convection,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 22, p. 40, 1965. View at: Google Scholar
  34. H. L. Kuo, “Further studies on the parameterization of the influence of cumulus convection in large-scale flows,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 31, p. 1232, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  35. S. Gao, X. Wang, and Y. Zhou, “Generation of generalized moist potential vorticity in a frictionless and moist adiabatic flow,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 31, no. 12, p. L12113, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. B. Johnson and D. G. Baker, “Climatology of diffusion potential classes for Minneapolis-St. Paul,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1620–1628, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. Gao, Y. Zhou, T. Lei, and J. Sun, “Analyses of hot and humid weather in Beijing city in summer and its dynamical identification,” Science in China, Series D: Earth Sciences, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 128–137, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. Z. Wang and Y. Q. Yang, Contemporary Weather Engineering, Meteorological Press, Beijing, Japan, 2000.

Copyright © 2012 J. Z. Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles